Must read: Michael Yon meets an Iraqi stringer for the AP
posted at 3:17 pm on July 9, 2007 by Allahpundit
There’s a lot going on in his latest but you’re looking for the section on “Stringers.” He’s appropriately complimentary of the guy’s bravery and work ethic but anyone who followed first the Fauxtography scandal last summer and then Jamilgate last winter won’t be surprised by this exchange:
To see what the AP might have by way of reliable, mainstream, news resources, on the morning of 07 July, I asked Talal, an Associated Press stringer in Baqubah, if he had heard about the Al Hamari murders [i.e., the jihadist massacre Yon reported on here -- ed.], and our conversation went something like this:
“Yes,” answered Talal.
“How many had been killed?” I asked.
“35,” answered Talal. Not “about 35”, but precisely 35.
“How do you know?” I asked.
“A medic at the Baqubah hospital told me,” Talal said.
“What was the medic’s name?” I asked.
“I don’t know,” answered Talal.
“You didn’t ask?”
“No,” he said. Talal said a doctor told him the same thing, but that he did not know the doctor’s name. He had not asked. Besides which, Talal said, the doctor and the medic were afraid to give their names.
“How were the people killed?” I asked.
“They were shot,” answered Talal as he motioned shooting with a pistol.
“Did you tell someone at AP headquarters in Baghdad?” I asked.
“Yes,” answered Talal.
“Who did you tell?” I asked.
“I don’t know,” answered Talal.
According to a Diyala councilman named Abdul Jabar, the Al Hamari massacre might have involved hundreds of victims, not 35. You’ll find Yon’s interview with him on video at the link. Yon also met a full-time AP reporter named Robert Reid in Baquba and tipped him off to what happened at Al Hamari. Reid seemed interested, but if he wrote it up then it’s still in the pipe: as Bob Owens notes, his story today mentions it not at all.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
And these are the people the AP and other big media souces rely on for news? God, no wonder nobody knows what the hell is going on over there.
Bad Candy on July 9, 2007 at 3:37 PM
I’m starting to understand the, “I read it in the news so it must be true,” phenomonon of mis-information.
Sure, a person will neglect a few factual items from time to time, but if this is the level of “reporting” we are getting from the war zone, then we are all screwed.
natesnake on July 9, 2007 at 3:37 PM
The whole dispatch is a must read!
bnelson44 on July 9, 2007 at 3:39 PM
AP, could you photoshop an image showing a Micky Mouse stuffed toy laying on a bloody hospital gurney?
That would really set the tone for this post.
natesnake on July 9, 2007 at 3:41 PM
This is more proof in the pudding… The AP, Reuters, whomever you want to name, they’re all the same. They’re all locked together in goose-step as they peddle and disseminate their propogandist slight-of-hand accounts of reality.
My greatest curiosity is, Why? Why does the AP, Reuters, and all the other major newswires refuse to dispense with the propoganda and just report the news as accurately and unbiased as they can? What do they have to gain by being the 24/7/365 propoganda machine churning out their lies and anti-reality? Who are they working for? Who are they working against?
I just don’t get it, and I just don’t trust any damn thing any news service has to say regarding the most pressing issues of our time. That frustrates me, because I like to be informed and stay informed… of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!
The little news weasels at the AP and Reuters and most all the other wires truly disgust me.
SilverStar830 on July 9, 2007 at 3:43 PM
Can our hero, Michelle M., get Fox News’ attention on this matter?
jediwebdude on July 9, 2007 at 3:46 PM
More impressive work from Mr. Yon.
Spirit of 1776 on July 9, 2007 at 4:01 PM
all the so-called reporters in america these days, all the journalism schools, and yet, by my count at least, two of the only three great reporters in the world (Yon and Totten, with Burns being the third) are bloggers!
AdrianG on July 9, 2007 at 4:26 PM
As with the Democrats, the MSM is more interested in the Republicans suffering defeat than with American victory in a war. Loathsome. The lot of them.
MCPO Airdale on July 9, 2007 at 4:36 PM
I am beginning to not trust these so called Muslims.
Is it me? I’m just connecting the dots here.
TheSitRep on July 9, 2007 at 4:45 PM
Ya Know…
This “Stringer” is just selling what his customers are buying. A little capitalism at work in Iraq.
My point is the problem is not with this stringer, but the Dupes at AP who buy his
c**pjunk.Lawrence on July 9, 2007 at 4:56 PM
Gotta read this article written by Michael Yon and on the front page of foxnews.com.
It’s about General Petraeus, although then he was Col. Petraeus.
It’s almost an unbelievable story in today’s day and age.
Christoph on July 9, 2007 at 5:09 PM
Who are they working for? Themselves, of course. Why be a mere messenger of news facts, when you can be the official propagandist for a socialist regime? The major media’s agenda is clear: they are actively promoting a socialist takeover of the west, partly because of their ideology, but also to elevate their status.
Don’t forget how vital propaganda is to the socialist state, whether Nazi, Stalinist, Maoist, etc.
stonemeister on July 9, 2007 at 5:10 PM
Our soldiers do, but they only get coverage if they rape someone or get screwed by the V.A.
infidel4life on July 9, 2007 at 5:13 PM
I started doubting the media when I discovered that Walter Cronkite lied about the Tet offensive. Successive discoveries of slanted stories, wishful fiction being portrayed as factual, and the outright open liberal bias of the media have convinced me (and ought to have convinced everybody else) that the media lies and cannot — EVER — be trusted to tell the truth.
The best reporting on Iraq comes NOT from the hotel bar in the Green Zone in Baghdad, but from the imbeds with the troops. Until their editors either spike the stories or rewrite them to fit the media’s agenda, that is.
georgej on July 9, 2007 at 5:34 PM
Dang. That explains Webster’s latest dictionary.
Associated (with terrorists) Press is spelled “cluster fvck”.
locomotivebreath1901 on July 9, 2007 at 5:48 PM
What I dont get, is who needs the second chance? Is Yon asking for a second chance? Is he asking for a second chance for Wallach?
Has Lt Johnson passed on a second chance to Yon?
Did Lt Johnson give a second chance to the Iraqi officials?
Was Abdul Jabar given a second chance, as if he was involved in the killings or did he not stop them? Is he AQI?
Yon is saying something, but I just cant put a grasp on it.
WoosterOh on July 9, 2007 at 6:28 PM
The way I hear it these international news divisions have two type of ‘clients’. The west and Arab press. The later will only pay for a certain slant of news – news which show Islam and Muslims in a ‘good’ light and the west and infidels in a ‘bad’ light. The ‘west’ consumer doesn’t really care about ‘content’ just ‘newsworthyness’ (if it bleeds it leads).
If AP and Reuters and the like can cut a few corners by selling only one ‘version’ of news to both… well they will get a better profit margin. And arab news won’t buy certain stories.
That is why you will never see AP or Reuters associate terrorism with Islam and why they will remain focused – to the exclusion of all else – on some one night incident where some malcontents placed panties on a few prisoners heads (bad image of the west) and then totally ignore news about AQ slaughtering innocents in a village, beheading children and boobytrapping their dead bodies (bad image of Islam and the holy islamic warriors) – which the arab press would never buy and might even protest / kill people over).
CrazyFool on July 9, 2007 at 6:34 PM
Reuters, AP and other so-called “journalists” must keep the fate of Danny Pearl embedded in their minds. This might help to explain just why they are so loath to put any terrorist in a bad light. They have become “good dhimmis”.
auzerais on July 9, 2007 at 7:14 PM
Farfour was martyred in Iraq?
andycanuck on July 9, 2007 at 7:17 PM
I can remember hearing a quote attributed to Will Rogers. He was before my time. But still rings true “Don’t believe everything you read in the papers.”
But how many people only get their news from any of the MSM news outlets, and sadly assume it has to be true, or else they wouldn’t print it?
PowWow on July 9, 2007 at 9:16 PM
Who’s coat tail has to be tugged to get the Al Hamari murders noticed? This really is ridiculous.
oakpack on July 9, 2007 at 10:29 PM
So the AP would not publish a Michael Yon story without a second source? Do they really believe that the AP label add credibility?
If these two headlines were back to back, which one you most likely believe?
Chicken crosses the road reported by Michael Yon.
Chicken does not cross the road reported by the AP.
TunaTalon on July 10, 2007 at 10:27 AM