<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In which I fisk Dan Riehl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 01:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReubenJCogburn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-539539</link>
		<dc:creator>ReubenJCogburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-539539</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Theodore Dalrymple in the LA Times on this very topic at the top of HT links today:

Now, despite friendly and long-lasting relations with many Muslims, my first reaction on seeing Muslims in the street is mistrust; my prejudice, far from having been inherited or inculcated early in life, developed late in response to events.

The spread of “rational prejudice” in Britain. 

Thomas the Wraith on July 8, 2007 at 11:35 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, good--now Dan Riehl can get his frilly panties in a wad over Dalrymple too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Theodore Dalrymple in the LA Times on this very topic at the top of HT links today:</p>
<p>Now, despite friendly and long-lasting relations with many Muslims, my first reaction on seeing Muslims in the street is mistrust; my prejudice, far from having been inherited or inculcated early in life, developed late in response to events.</p>
<p>The spread of “rational prejudice” in Britain. </p>
<p>Thomas the Wraith on July 8, 2007 at 11:35 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, good&#8211;now Dan Riehl can get his frilly panties in a wad over Dalrymple too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas the Wraith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-539412</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas the Wraith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-539412</guid>
		<description>Theodore Dalrymple in the LA Times on this very topic at the top of HT links today: &lt;blockquote&gt;Now, despite friendly and long-lasting relations with many Muslims, my first reaction on seeing Muslims in the street is mistrust; &lt;strong&gt;my prejudice, far from having been inherited or inculcated early in life, developed late in response to events&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The spread of &quot;rational prejudice&quot; in Britain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theodore Dalrymple in the LA Times on this very topic at the top of HT links today:<br />
<blockquote>Now, despite friendly and long-lasting relations with many Muslims, my first reaction on seeing Muslims in the street is mistrust; <strong>my prejudice, far from having been inherited or inculcated early in life, developed late in response to events</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The spread of &#8220;rational prejudice&#8221; in Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowandslow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538869</link>
		<dc:creator>lowandslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 05:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538869</guid>
		<description>So,

.
.
.
how about this weather, hot enough for ya?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So,</p>
<p>.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
how about this weather, hot enough for ya?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netherman79</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538500</link>
		<dc:creator>netherman79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538500</guid>
		<description>Bryan,
Lord knows I&#039;ve had my differences with your opinions before, but you are exactly right about this one. I sent the following titled &quot;Kneeling Before the Queen&quot; to both the White House and the State Department:

Dear Poor, misguided, knuckle-dragging boobs,
I just saw a picture of top Bush administration officials recently withe the caption:
 
&quot;Senior White House staff members attend the rededication ceremony of The Islamic Center in Washington June 27, 2007. From L-R are: Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Frances Townsend, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, and Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Karen Hughes.&quot;
 
Such powerful women!  Such proud members of American society sporting such important titles.  If only they looked as important as their titles instead of like pathetic, clownish infidels trying to ....to do what?  Exactly?  Make us all vomit? 
 
OK, do a fellow Republican a favor.  For the remaining time in office, cut the politically correct crap, stop bending over backwards to look more stupid than you already do, embarrassing the whole country.  You are officials of the government of the United States of America and you do NOT bend your knee to the Queen of England and you DO NOT wear veils, headscarves, hijab, or burqas when conducting official government business.  Your little field trip down to the Islamic Center was official government business, however ridiculous that business was. 
 
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,<br />
Lord knows I&#8217;ve had my differences with your opinions before, but you are exactly right about this one. I sent the following titled &#8220;Kneeling Before the Queen&#8221; to both the White House and the State Department:</p>
<p>Dear Poor, misguided, knuckle-dragging boobs,<br />
I just saw a picture of top Bush administration officials recently withe the caption:</p>
<p>&#8220;Senior White House staff members attend the rededication ceremony of The Islamic Center in Washington June 27, 2007. From L-R are: Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Frances Townsend, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, and Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Karen Hughes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Such powerful women!  Such proud members of American society sporting such important titles.  If only they looked as important as their titles instead of like pathetic, clownish infidels trying to &#8230;.to do what?  Exactly?  Make us all vomit? </p>
<p>OK, do a fellow Republican a favor.  For the remaining time in office, cut the politically correct crap, stop bending over backwards to look more stupid than you already do, embarrassing the whole country.  You are officials of the government of the United States of America and you do NOT bend your knee to the Queen of England and you DO NOT wear veils, headscarves, hijab, or burqas when conducting official government business.  Your little field trip down to the Islamic Center was official government business, however ridiculous that business was. </p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBinSTL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538457</link>
		<dc:creator>TBinSTL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 23:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538457</guid>
		<description>I had never formed a strong opinion of Dan, though I recall reading some decent posts of his in the past. I think that, sadly, it&#039;s really just a promotional tactic. This site is at or near the top and I would bet that the spike in traffic created for any site you link to is significant. I have seen many second and third tier bloggers pick fights with better know and more widely read sites purley to get noticed. Since I haven&#039;t been to Dan&#039;s site in some time, perhaps others have moved him off their &quot;daily read&quot; list too. This might be an attempt to inflate a flagging readership......
I&#039;m just sayin&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never formed a strong opinion of Dan, though I recall reading some decent posts of his in the past. I think that, sadly, it&#8217;s really just a promotional tactic. This site is at or near the top and I would bet that the spike in traffic created for any site you link to is significant. I have seen many second and third tier bloggers pick fights with better know and more widely read sites purley to get noticed. Since I haven&#8217;t been to Dan&#8217;s site in some time, perhaps others have moved him off their &#8220;daily read&#8221; list too. This might be an attempt to inflate a flagging readership&#8230;&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverStar830</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538390</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverStar830</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538390</guid>
		<description>Dan, who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jihadwatcher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538305</link>
		<dc:creator>jihadwatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538305</guid>
		<description>The word bigot, used as a pejorative, implies that there is something morally wrong with having a negative view of a certain race or religion. When one reflexively feels the need to deny the charge of &quot;bigot&quot; one is allowing the accuser to frame the issue in his PC realm. That is the realm where all races and religions are equal. 

They are not. History and common sense, say otherwise. For one to have a negative view of islam is to have a positive, humanistic view of everything else as islam is the scourge of humanity and all that is decent. The charge of bigot in this case, should be worn like a badge of honor and not denied as if being such was wrong. Being a bigot in this case is the only rational and humane view to have. 

Seeing those Bush women wearing a headscarf in honor of a religion founded by a pedophile, murderer, rapist, robber with a book of hate as its bible, is to see those people bow to evil itself. 

What this supposedly conservative blogger does is partake of the one disingenuous intellectualism that is undermining not only our culture and our world, but civilization&#039;s battle with terror, more than any other force ... moral relativism.

Moral relativism will be the end of us all if we don&#039;t start making value judgements about what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil. And today, to do so, garners not accolades, but the term &quot;bigot&quot;.

No doubt, this &quot;conservative&quot; is no ally. This is a Bushite, a rino, a man that does not understand the basic principles of conservatism, much less the basic tenets of islam. Have no compunction, Bryan, about distancing yourself from conservatives like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word bigot, used as a pejorative, implies that there is something morally wrong with having a negative view of a certain race or religion. When one reflexively feels the need to deny the charge of &#8220;bigot&#8221; one is allowing the accuser to frame the issue in his PC realm. That is the realm where all races and religions are equal. </p>
<p>They are not. History and common sense, say otherwise. For one to have a negative view of islam is to have a positive, humanistic view of everything else as islam is the scourge of humanity and all that is decent. The charge of bigot in this case, should be worn like a badge of honor and not denied as if being such was wrong. Being a bigot in this case is the only rational and humane view to have. </p>
<p>Seeing those Bush women wearing a headscarf in honor of a religion founded by a pedophile, murderer, rapist, robber with a book of hate as its bible, is to see those people bow to evil itself. </p>
<p>What this supposedly conservative blogger does is partake of the one disingenuous intellectualism that is undermining not only our culture and our world, but civilization&#8217;s battle with terror, more than any other force &#8230; moral relativism.</p>
<p>Moral relativism will be the end of us all if we don&#8217;t start making value judgements about what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil. And today, to do so, garners not accolades, but the term &#8220;bigot&#8221;.</p>
<p>No doubt, this &#8220;conservative&#8221; is no ally. This is a Bushite, a rino, a man that does not understand the basic principles of conservatism, much less the basic tenets of islam. Have no compunction, Bryan, about distancing yourself from conservatives like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIJ6141</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538303</link>
		<dc:creator>SIJ6141</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538303</guid>
		<description>&lt;strike&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1.Active jihadist, head chopping group
or
2. Sleeper cell Group 

TheSitRep on July 7, 2007 at 8:26 AM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/strike&gt;
I am right ther with you on these points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strike><strong>1.Active jihadist, head chopping group<br />
or<br />
2. Sleeper cell Group </p>
<p>TheSitRep on July 7, 2007 at 8:26 AM</strong></strike><br />
I am right ther with you on these points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIJ6141</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538294</link>
		<dc:creator>SIJ6141</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538294</guid>
		<description>This is a bit late but a few months ago Amy Kellog would wear a hijab all the time when reporting for FOX from Iran I think. I sent a email to either Cavuto or Gibson at the time asking why. I told them I could understand it if she does it when interviewing the other side but it reaaly puts me off when she does it when reporting back to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit late but a few months ago Amy Kellog would wear a hijab all the time when reporting for FOX from Iran I think. I sent a email to either Cavuto or Gibson at the time asking why. I told them I could understand it if she does it when interviewing the other side but it reaaly puts me off when she does it when reporting back to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JWS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538244</link>
		<dc:creator>JWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538244</guid>
		<description>bigoted &#124;ˈbigətid&#124; adjective obstinately convinced of the superiority or correctness of one&#039;s own opinions and prejudiced against those who hold different opinions : a bigoted group of reactionaries. • expressing or characterized by prejudice and intolerance : a thoughtless and bigoted article.

I know I am correct regarding a &quot;religion&quot; and a people that treat women like sh*t and openly seek to rule over all real religions. I can handle the bigot label...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bigoted |ˈbigətid| adjective obstinately convinced of the superiority or correctness of one&#8217;s own opinions and prejudiced against those who hold different opinions : a bigoted group of reactionaries. • expressing or characterized by prejudice and intolerance : a thoughtless and bigoted article.</p>
<p>I know I am correct regarding a &#8220;religion&#8221; and a people that treat women like sh*t and openly seek to rule over all real religions. I can handle the bigot label&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538223</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538223</guid>
		<description>naliaka ... well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naliaka &#8230; well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowWow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538205</link>
		<dc:creator>PowWow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538205</guid>
		<description>Like other comments I&#039;ve read, the only other times I&#039;ve been to his site, were to follow links as well. In my opinion this guy is trying to build up traffic. If you can, block it out and have fun on vacation. When you come back, if he&#039;s still at it, do what ya have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like other comments I&#8217;ve read, the only other times I&#8217;ve been to his site, were to follow links as well. In my opinion this guy is trying to build up traffic. If you can, block it out and have fun on vacation. When you come back, if he&#8217;s still at it, do what ya have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538175</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538175</guid>
		<description>This proves a number of things.  One, Christians and Conservatives and Republicans are not the same thing and it&#039;s incorrect to lump the appellations together as if they were.  A Christian is a religious identification.    Republican is a political identification.  These two categories are narrower than Conservative.  Conservative is often described as preserving traditional patterns.  What the patterns are depends on the culture.  A conservative communist would be inclined to make decisions to maintain the Communist structure, but here, a Conservative American would be inclined to preserve the democratic structure as found in the Constitution and reject alterations to it.  
This is more proof that the Left continues to deliberately play with words to muddy these distinctions in order to confuse to sway arguments to their &quot;Liberal&quot; goals which no longer means what it did forty years ago, but &quot;Progressive&quot; or &quot;Socialist.&quot;
So the problem of &quot;bigot&quot; and &quot;racist.&quot;  Both terms are being used incorrectly against people, with the intent to cast aspersions on the points made by observers of human activities.
The correct word for Bryan is &quot;DISCERNING.&quot;

The smart person discerns the nature of an enemy and determines a set of tests to determine whether a particular person is a threat or not.  A bigot does not discern, just lumps.  Isn&#039;t it bigotry to lump all religious people into one amorphous group?  Isn&#039;t it bigotry to assume that a sharp observation is unfounded based on factors that have nothing to do with the topic at hand?  Isn&#039;t it bigotry to assume all members of a particular population all do one thing, all behave the same?  Isn&#039;t it bigotry to ignore strong cultural practices that produce easily identifiable trends?
If all people around you are of the same race and culture, then you must then look for other characteristics to determine whether an individual is a trustworthy type or a crook. It is not bigotry to make that determination.  It&#039;s plain common sense survival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This proves a number of things.  One, Christians and Conservatives and Republicans are not the same thing and it&#8217;s incorrect to lump the appellations together as if they were.  A Christian is a religious identification.    Republican is a political identification.  These two categories are narrower than Conservative.  Conservative is often described as preserving traditional patterns.  What the patterns are depends on the culture.  A conservative communist would be inclined to make decisions to maintain the Communist structure, but here, a Conservative American would be inclined to preserve the democratic structure as found in the Constitution and reject alterations to it.<br />
This is more proof that the Left continues to deliberately play with words to muddy these distinctions in order to confuse to sway arguments to their &#8220;Liberal&#8221; goals which no longer means what it did forty years ago, but &#8220;Progressive&#8221; or &#8220;Socialist.&#8221;<br />
So the problem of &#8220;bigot&#8221; and &#8220;racist.&#8221;  Both terms are being used incorrectly against people, with the intent to cast aspersions on the points made by observers of human activities.<br />
The correct word for Bryan is &#8220;DISCERNING.&#8221;</p>
<p>The smart person discerns the nature of an enemy and determines a set of tests to determine whether a particular person is a threat or not.  A bigot does not discern, just lumps.  Isn&#8217;t it bigotry to lump all religious people into one amorphous group?  Isn&#8217;t it bigotry to assume that a sharp observation is unfounded based on factors that have nothing to do with the topic at hand?  Isn&#8217;t it bigotry to assume all members of a particular population all do one thing, all behave the same?  Isn&#8217;t it bigotry to ignore strong cultural practices that produce easily identifiable trends?<br />
If all people around you are of the same race and culture, then you must then look for other characteristics to determine whether an individual is a trustworthy type or a crook. It is not bigotry to make that determination.  It&#8217;s plain common sense survival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windchaser73</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538130</link>
		<dc:creator>windchaser73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538130</guid>
		<description>It seems that the disease of &lt;em&gt;Cultural Relativism&lt;/em&gt; is spreading to the Conservatives.. Is there a cure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the disease of <em>Cultural Relativism</em> is spreading to the Conservatives.. Is there a cure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538093</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538093</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If there existed a race of blue people who were genetically predisposed to frequent outburst of violence, it would be coherent to assign meaning to blue skin color. Indeed, we should, despite the blue skin color being unchosen.

thuja on July 7, 2007 at 11:55 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You Vulcan bigot!  (Star Trek reference.)

I stopped reading Reihl after he posted about a young man who had received a 10 year or so prison sentence because he received oral sex from a girl two years younger than him who was a minor.  I, and a few others thought the sentence overly harsh.  Reasonable people might disagree about this but Reihl said he deserved what he got and anyone who disagreed with Reihl was soft on crime.

From that I took that Reihl does not handle disagreement very well and there are better blogs out there. 

As someone who has inadvertantly offended people on this blog it doesn&#039;t take much to realize you are wrong when you do reflect on what you have said and them apologizing is very easy.  I think he owes you this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If there existed a race of blue people who were genetically predisposed to frequent outburst of violence, it would be coherent to assign meaning to blue skin color. Indeed, we should, despite the blue skin color being unchosen.</p>
<p>thuja on July 7, 2007 at 11:55 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You Vulcan bigot!  (Star Trek reference.)</p>
<p>I stopped reading Reihl after he posted about a young man who had received a 10 year or so prison sentence because he received oral sex from a girl two years younger than him who was a minor.  I, and a few others thought the sentence overly harsh.  Reasonable people might disagree about this but Reihl said he deserved what he got and anyone who disagreed with Reihl was soft on crime.</p>
<p>From that I took that Reihl does not handle disagreement very well and there are better blogs out there. </p>
<p>As someone who has inadvertantly offended people on this blog it doesn&#8217;t take much to realize you are wrong when you do reflect on what you have said and them apologizing is very easy.  I think he owes you this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538058</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538058</guid>
		<description>This was hardly bigotry. Dan&#039;s looking for a fight for some reason, maybe his blogs getting some lefty traffic and it&#039;s time to go &quot;moderate&quot;? Nothing brings in the Ad clicks like &quot;moderation&quot;. (which explains my poor performance!)

I once wrote something semi critical of a stance MM made, and got two days of heavy lefty traffic and compliments. Maybe Dan&#039;s feeling lonely and wanting some hot feminazi action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was hardly bigotry. Dan&#8217;s looking for a fight for some reason, maybe his blogs getting some lefty traffic and it&#8217;s time to go &#8220;moderate&#8221;? Nothing brings in the Ad clicks like &#8220;moderation&#8221;. (which explains my poor performance!)</p>
<p>I once wrote something semi critical of a stance MM made, and got two days of heavy lefty traffic and compliments. Maybe Dan&#8217;s feeling lonely and wanting some hot feminazi action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas the Wraith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538039</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas the Wraith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538039</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Erudition on parade.

TheSitRep on July 7, 2007 at 12:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Guilty as charge. This is one of my hot button issues and I&#039;ve spend some time thinking about it.

There&#039;s one other point I wanted to make regarding the &lt;em&gt;hijab&lt;/em&gt;. Turkey, a nation all but entirely composed of Muslims, does not allow, by law, its civil servants to wear the &lt;em&gt;hijab&lt;/em&gt;. The &lt;em&gt;hijab &lt;/em&gt;is seen as a symbol of Islamist political power. Indeed this view is state policy. There was a scandal earlier this year at the mere possibility of the president&#039;s wife wearing one. Are the Turks anti-Muslim? Of course not. But they are anti-Islamist bigots, as they should be. The Islamists have a political agenda that is hostile to Turkish secularism and freedoms. Are they supposed to sit by a watch the symbolic expansion of Islamist power because to oppose it would be bigotry? What a silly idea.

Two cheers for bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Erudition on parade.</p>
<p>TheSitRep on July 7, 2007 at 12:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Guilty as charge. This is one of my hot button issues and I&#8217;ve spend some time thinking about it.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s one other point I wanted to make regarding the <em>hijab</em>. Turkey, a nation all but entirely composed of Muslims, does not allow, by law, its civil servants to wear the <em>hijab</em>. The <em>hijab </em>is seen as a symbol of Islamist political power. Indeed this view is state policy. There was a scandal earlier this year at the mere possibility of the president&#8217;s wife wearing one. Are the Turks anti-Muslim? Of course not. But they are anti-Islamist bigots, as they should be. The Islamists have a political agenda that is hostile to Turkish secularism and freedoms. Are they supposed to sit by a watch the symbolic expansion of Islamist power because to oppose it would be bigotry? What a silly idea.</p>
<p>Two cheers for bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leepro</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-538009</link>
		<dc:creator>leepro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-538009</guid>
		<description>Removed Dan from my Wizz RSS list awhile back. I&#039;d had just about enough of his nitpickin&#039; every issue to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removed Dan from my Wizz RSS list awhile back. I&#8217;d had just about enough of his nitpickin&#8217; every issue to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537999</link>
		<dc:creator>darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537999</guid>
		<description>Calling people bigots ... or racists ... or whatever has become soooooooo tiresome, especially when it&#039;s directed at Christians or white folks.  The world is chock full of bigots and racists who are anything other than Christian or white.  No one likes their country overrun by a people looking to reinvent their homeland in theirs ... no one likes people who expect you to respect their beliefs but are disrespectful of yours.  It human nature to dislike that which threatens not only your way of life, but your life as well.  

If calling people bigots makes someone feel good because they thinks it&#039;s makes them morally superior ... then they&#039;re either denying how they truly feel or they&#039;re blind to what&#039;s going on around them.  People who cry bigot are by rule, usually the biggest bigots out there.

I couldn&#039;t care less if people who are no more than fools call me a bigot.  I hate muslims who come to this country and isolate themselves, then expect us to change our ways and our laws to accomodate them and their &quot;religion&quot;.  Carry your ass wherever it came from.  For those muslims that were born here and feel that way ... carry your ass as well.  For those Mexicans and other immigrants who feel they &quot;deserve&quot; to become citizens while they wave the Mexican flag and demand everything be in Spanish ... carry your ass back across the border.  You&#039;re neither needed or wanted.  I&#039;m sick to death of bending over backwards for every group playing psedo-victim.  If you want to be here then become American, don&#039;t expect us to become Mexican or muslim.  To expect Americans to cater to you is ... well, being a bigot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling people bigots &#8230; or racists &#8230; or whatever has become soooooooo tiresome, especially when it&#8217;s directed at Christians or white folks.  The world is chock full of bigots and racists who are anything other than Christian or white.  No one likes their country overrun by a people looking to reinvent their homeland in theirs &#8230; no one likes people who expect you to respect their beliefs but are disrespectful of yours.  It human nature to dislike that which threatens not only your way of life, but your life as well.  </p>
<p>If calling people bigots makes someone feel good because they thinks it&#8217;s makes them morally superior &#8230; then they&#8217;re either denying how they truly feel or they&#8217;re blind to what&#8217;s going on around them.  People who cry bigot are by rule, usually the biggest bigots out there.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t care less if people who are no more than fools call me a bigot.  I hate muslims who come to this country and isolate themselves, then expect us to change our ways and our laws to accomodate them and their &#8220;religion&#8221;.  Carry your ass wherever it came from.  For those muslims that were born here and feel that way &#8230; carry your ass as well.  For those Mexicans and other immigrants who feel they &#8220;deserve&#8221; to become citizens while they wave the Mexican flag and demand everything be in Spanish &#8230; carry your ass back across the border.  You&#8217;re neither needed or wanted.  I&#8217;m sick to death of bending over backwards for every group playing psedo-victim.  If you want to be here then become American, don&#8217;t expect us to become Mexican or muslim.  To expect Americans to cater to you is &#8230; well, being a bigot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amerpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537962</link>
		<dc:creator>amerpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537962</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;rho on July 7, 2007 at 9:52 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m looking forward to the day when Ron Paul supporters stop spamming my damn polls! A new day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>rho on July 7, 2007 at 9:52 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the day when Ron Paul supporters stop spamming my damn polls! A new day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537942</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537942</guid>
		<description>If insisting that members of our government don&#039;t abase themselves and acknowledge tacitly the Islamist belief that women are inferior to men by covering their heads (for goodness sake), makes you a bigot.

Then I&#039;m a bigot too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If insisting that members of our government don&#8217;t abase themselves and acknowledge tacitly the Islamist belief that women are inferior to men by covering their heads (for goodness sake), makes you a bigot.</p>
<p>Then I&#8217;m a bigot too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viewtifulgare</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537869</link>
		<dc:creator>Viewtifulgare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537869</guid>
		<description>This is probably coming at the worst possible time too; after that whole immigration fiasco, we need to get united as much as possible if we don&#039;t want to listen to a Clinton inauguration speech.

Sorry about all this happening to you, Bryan. I appreciate you trying to keep it classy as you go to cleaners to get the mud off your jacket</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably coming at the worst possible time too; after that whole immigration fiasco, we need to get united as much as possible if we don&#8217;t want to listen to a Clinton inauguration speech.</p>
<p>Sorry about all this happening to you, Bryan. I appreciate you trying to keep it classy as you go to cleaners to get the mud off your jacket</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537867</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537867</guid>
		<description>Bigotry and prejudice are not one in the same. Bigotry is intolerance toward anything that is different then oneself. So, a Christian bigot would be intolerant toward Jews, Buddhists, Muslims, atheists, etc...

That said, Thomas&#039; Nazi analogy holds. There&#039;s nothing wrong with intolerance toward those who believe in doing harmful things to you and others. Unless you&#039;re a moral equivocating idiot, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigotry and prejudice are not one in the same. Bigotry is intolerance toward anything that is different then oneself. So, a Christian bigot would be intolerant toward Jews, Buddhists, Muslims, atheists, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>That said, Thomas&#8217; Nazi analogy holds. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with intolerance toward those who believe in doing harmful things to you and others. Unless you&#8217;re a moral equivocating idiot, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claimsratt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537835</link>
		<dc:creator>Claimsratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537835</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Which Muslim countries? 

Guardian on July 7, 2007 at 1:57 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq (possibly Quatar).  That is 4 of the 5 Muslim countries I have &quot;visited&quot;.  The fifth, Saudi Arabia, is very strict. 

I remember seeing the first short skirt (short, black and very tight) in over 7 months in Bahrain.  Kuwait is very Westernized and I do not see the people ever going back to living in tents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Which Muslim countries? </p>
<p>Guardian on July 7, 2007 at 1:57 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq (possibly Quatar).  That is 4 of the 5 Muslim countries I have &#8220;visited&#8221;.  The fifth, Saudi Arabia, is very strict. </p>
<p>I remember seeing the first short skirt (short, black and very tight) in over 7 months in Bahrain.  Kuwait is very Westernized and I do not see the people ever going back to living in tents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSitRep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/comment-page-1/#comment-537824</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSitRep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/07/07/in-which-i-fisk-dan-riehl/#comment-537824</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thomas the Wraith on July 7, 2007 at 10:28 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Erudition on parade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thomas the Wraith on July 7, 2007 at 10:28 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Erudition on parade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
