Video: Hey, how about an enforcement-only bill now, Chertoff?
posted at 7:38 pm on July 1, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
A fine question from Chris Wallace. Now that the amnesty bill’s dead, why not have the White House drop a bomb in Harry Reid’s lap by splitting off the $4.4 billion border-enforcement package and submitting it as a new bill? The left is serious about the border, right? They must be — they tell us so all the time, when they’re not telling us how tough they are on terrorism. So how about bundling some employer verification, some fencing, and some new border patrol agents and floating that one down Pennsylvania Avenue? Even if it fails, watching Harry, Teddy, and smilin’ Nancy Pelosi squirm while they try to explain why they must, regrettably, oppose the bill would make for dynamite politics. We have a tiny bit of momentum right now; why not press it?
No thanks, says Chertoff.
Exit question: Anyone else not feeling terribly depressed while reading this?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I’m playing my tiniest violin already.
lorien1973 on July 1, 2007 at 7:43 PM
I just saw this on FNC earlier.
What a farking bastage.
PBoilermaker on July 1, 2007 at 7:43 PM
I rest my case: The government never intended to spend any of that 4.4 billion that they were not going to collect from those illegals.
SIJ6141 on July 1, 2007 at 7:44 PM
Homeland Security my ass.
SoulGlo on July 1, 2007 at 7:46 PM
Not depressed, but still a bit angry.
When I saw this earlier today all I do was respond ‘liar’.
But I also emailed Chris and asked him to stop allowing people to make the fallacious point that people opposed to “comprehensive” immigration law are racist.
Just because the majority of people violating a law are of one particular race, does not mean enforcing that law is racist.
Geesh!
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 7:47 PM
Is it 2009 yet?
“We tried enforcement only, that didn’t pass.”
Did I miss something? Anyone know what he’s talking about?
Pablo on July 1, 2007 at 7:47 PM
He (Bush) shot himself in the foot by turning his back and insulting his base. I hope Republicans live and learn.
ulyses on July 1, 2007 at 7:47 PM
Point WELL made!
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 7:49 PM
As long as all the king’s horses and all the kings men can’t put the amnesty bill back together again, let him spin.
Spirit of 1776 on July 1, 2007 at 7:49 PM
Bob, it’s a good thing you didn’t see the panel discussion with Mara and Juan later (or did you?).
They are still spouting the racist accusations.
PBoilermaker on July 1, 2007 at 7:49 PM
I did, that is what pushed me to write in and complain.
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 7:50 PM
Here’s a novel idea:
Enforce the existing laws
Let me repeat that – I know your kind of slow on the uptake sometimes:
ENFORCE
THE
EXISTING
LAWS
In other words:
Do the farking job you are supposed to do!
CrazyFool on July 1, 2007 at 7:51 PM
So the money appropriated for the border fence and enforcement went where?!?
sonnyspats1 on July 1, 2007 at 7:51 PM
You’re assuming the Bush Whitehouse was actually intending on enforcing the borders. It’s obvious they (and the other RINOS and democrats) were not serious. We need senators DeMint/Sessions/Vitter/Dole to bring forth an amendment that’s enforcement only.
SouthernGent on July 1, 2007 at 7:52 PM
Probably La Raza got it to do a study on the fence.
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 7:52 PM
“secure the border …using the tools that we have.”
With no effort to answer the questions and not one iota of
effort to relieve the ongoing concerns of the MAJORITY
VOICE who want the border finally and rightfully secured.
A serious case of “I’m taking my ball and I’m going home. hmph!”
I’m not feeling terribly depressed about Bush securing lame
duck status for himself. Disappointment? Oh yes, I voted
for the incompetant twice. Depressed? No.
SilverStar830 on July 1, 2007 at 7:52 PM
It amazes me that I dont hear anyone calling for the Senate to enforce the current law, that was signed in 1986. We won a victory on the SHAMNESTY legislation, and it seems we are too busy slapping each other on the back to keep the pressure on our elected officials to administer the law
DRLIMO on July 1, 2007 at 7:52 PM
Actually I do feel a little depressed. I didn’t make it to the gun show this weekend.
Oh, you mean about the president?
We really don’t need a lame duck in the White House. The thing is, the president can still lead if he wants to because of the weakness, venality, and pettiness of so-called “leaders” like Land Office Harry and Queen Burkha.
Now that we’ve shown him our power, perhaps it’s time to send, fax, and call him with our support for the other things we do agree with him on. Better to salve his wounds and get him back into the fight than say no mas to such cretins like the surrendercrats and rinos who aren’t looking out for anyone but themselves.
A year and a half is more than enough time for one or maybe two SC justices to disappear from the court. We don’t need a president who has no ability to get anyone past a hostile Senate onto the bench. That’s one good reason to fight for the president now instead of against him.
We tell him not to go wobbly, we need to do the same to ourselves.
ScottG on July 1, 2007 at 7:53 PM
How offensive it is for us to be called racist! I have heard and read more reasoned logical comments by people opposed to this bill than on many other subjects in the past year, and racism isn’t even in the picture.
Mara, Juan and the like were just trying to scare, shame, whatever, people into at least keeping quiet if they wouldn’t support the bill.
Qzsusy on July 1, 2007 at 7:53 PM
Mr Chertoff: The blind’s sight has been restored, we do see what you are doing.
boomer on July 1, 2007 at 7:53 PM
Ditto. I must have slept through that one.
Jaibones on July 1, 2007 at 7:54 PM
Maybe this is the evil plan of Karl Rove to energize the base.
Laughing.
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 7:55 PM
Don’t you feel really safe with this guy as the head of Homeland Security?
TheBigOldDog on July 1, 2007 at 7:56 PM
Our “national conversation” on illegal immigration is at a stalemate. I guess serious border security will have to wait until an AQ cell drives a truck-bomb across from Mexico and levels a convention center or hotel in Houston or Phoenix.
Sad to say. This is a prime example of how our political system has failed, and continues to fail everyday.
Thomas the Wraith on July 1, 2007 at 7:56 PM
Skeletor’s non-answer proves that the Bush administration never intended to enforce border security beyond the occasional small token crackdown. The shamnesty bill was just that – a sham.
Not in the least. You expect to have battles with your opponents. Being betrayed by your own team captain is far worse.
infidel4life on July 1, 2007 at 7:57 PM
Dissembling, weaselly, lying pr!ck.
Insomniac on July 1, 2007 at 7:57 PM
US illegal immigration enforcement has been a national embarrassment and international joke for so long (20+ years) that it is portrayed on “normal” domestic television as a simple matter of fact. That the G won’t enforce its own laws has become an OBVIOUS fact to anyone with eyes. What fool would believe that any new laws would be taken any more seriously than the old laws?
A better way? How ’bout taking the laws you wrote seriously? How ’bout going up against the cities and municipalities that are spending taxpayers dollars making things more comfortable and easier for illegals? How ’bout going after financial institutions that are giving loans and other financial assistance to illegals? How ’bout you and yours faithfully executing your Constitutional obligation by protecting our borders and the nations citizens, not its criminals and a one-world paradigm?
P. James Moriarty on July 1, 2007 at 7:58 PM
You missed the fact that he’s lieing.
- The Cat
P.S. Children cry when you haul off their crack sellin daddies too.
MirCat on July 1, 2007 at 7:58 PM
Jerkoff/Bush is a liar and a juvenile. “Well we tried to do it, but won’t let us…so let’s see what they can do!”
Exit Answer: Yes I am, and clearly the $4.4 billion was just another bluff against conservatives, using our (Monopoly!) money.
I still say that the perfect metaphor for the GOP Senate during the Bush years is an amnesty bill with lots of support, and paid for with $4.4 billion in new tax money.
Jaibones on July 1, 2007 at 7:58 PM
Shit, maybe Pelosi is right, I’m a hate monger and I really despise that liybg bastard, Jerkoff or Mr. Burns, or whoever he is!
The only enforcement these holes have done was enforce the Mexican Consulate’s displeasur eof our border patrol agents doing their job. Now there are in jail for doing the job charged in the job description. Can we at least put Bush in jail for failing to do his?
warpmine on July 1, 2007 at 7:59 PM
“Blinking Liar” what was the blink rate on that clip?
rrroark on July 1, 2007 at 8:00 PM
Chertoff deserves to be impeached for failing to do his job. He’s nothing more than a shamnesty mouthpiece and a bootlicker for El Presidente Jorge. Does anybody feel safer with this tool running the DHS?
ReubenJCogburn on July 1, 2007 at 8:02 PM
Chertoff, This is the same moron that said; “A fence is a 19th century solution to a 21st century problem” What a tool! If you wanna hear some bureaucratic gobbledy gook he is your go to guy. He is a man of speak , we need a man of action.
TheSitRep on July 1, 2007 at 8:02 PM
It’s Official: we have a Lame Duck Presidency. And the soldiers and people of Iraq are going to pay the price for Bush’s stupidity and Reid’s lies and deceit.
Jaibones on July 1, 2007 at 8:02 PM
ScottG: I am afraid that is not going to help. That guy has the touch of a Midas, only problem is everything he touches turns into poop.
SIJ6141 on July 1, 2007 at 8:03 PM
Insomniac on July 1, 2007 at 8:03 PM
If the Dems win back the white house in ‘08, I would not be surprised if they kept him onboard. He’s the perfect do-nothing bureaucrat.
infidel4life on July 1, 2007 at 8:04 PM
Sorry, that’s from MM’s site. Twitchy comment submission finger…
Insomniac on July 1, 2007 at 8:04 PM
ReubenJCogburn on July 1, 2007 at 8:02 PM
Enforce the law. That’s all I’m asking.
Spirit of 1776 on July 1, 2007 at 8:06 PM
Had to be the worst trial lawyer in the history of the American Bar. Does anyone believe aword that comes out of his pie hole?
warpmine on July 1, 2007 at 8:07 PM
Chertoff spent his Sunday dutifully deflecting anger aimed at his boss while not puncturing the bosses policy of Y’all come, now!
Answer, no! But unfortunately even a double amputee duck President has a lot of power and again I predict he will refuse to enforce our immigration laws anymore than he is just forced too and he will, readily go so far as to use executive orders to facilitate, reward and even legitimize, poor, besotted, illegal migrants, who he believes deserve more than we do to live here.
Speakup on July 1, 2007 at 8:13 PM
Chertoff = deer, headlights, splat!
You know he wanted to say that the border security issue will for sure fix the problem, but they need to hold it up as a bargaining chip to get their amnesty provisions agreed to.
Chertoff is officially a tool.
csdeven on July 1, 2007 at 8:13 PM
This guy is downright spooky. He simply does not want to secure the border and stop the invasion by illegal foreign nationals. We need no further discussions with this puppet.
rplat on July 1, 2007 at 8:14 PM
I surely hope the secret service doesn’t prevent illegals from cutting through the Ranch in Crawford,TX.
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 8:15 PM
Did anyone see Chertoff’s attempt at an enforcement guilt trip the other day, basically saying (in a way that would make Gerry proud) we would see an awful lot of families broken up?
PBoilermaker on July 1, 2007 at 8:17 PM
Chertoff is so lame that I can’t think of anything to say to him other than to attack his honor and integrity, which I’ll keep to myself.
I think that if he gets his way, they will start cracking down on illegal immigration in the most repugnant way they can possibly imagine, making sure there are hundreds of cameras around in an effort to demonstrate to the world how cruel the American people are.
They’ll be blasting tear gas into homes, busting in the doors, pepper spraying entire families including children, yanking babies away from their mothers breast and slamming her down to the ground to administer handcuffs and shackles. There will be videos of shackled and crying children balling their heads off while their parents are loaded into meat-trucks, followed by images of children being dragged kicking and screaming into prison bussed on their way to the most dilapidated and overflowing orphanages they can find.
All to make their sick demented point.
FloatingRock on July 1, 2007 at 8:19 PM
message to terrorists: Bring your families with you.
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 8:19 PM
Can a Republican bring up a bill for enforcement only at this point? Would the President veto it if it passed?
ctmom on July 1, 2007 at 8:26 PM
I’m with you 100% on that. But we’re only going to get two things out of Chertoff as far as enforcement, and the first one’s Jack.
ReubenJCogburn on July 1, 2007 at 8:26 PM
He’s lying so fast his moustache burned off.
(”Chert” must mean “Jerk” is some language.)
profitsbeard on July 1, 2007 at 8:27 PM
If those are the caliber of “Republicans” breaking ranks to oppose Bush’s Iraq policy, I’m not entirely convinced there’s anything new to worry about. I suppose a Quisling’s a Quisling, and if enough of them with either R’s or D’s next to their names get together in congress they could cause problems. But after Shamnesty, if there’s anybody in the country with less popular support than Bush, it’s pro-amnesty congressional weasels like the above.
Blacklake on July 1, 2007 at 8:27 PM
No. Why should I? He brought this all upon himself.
We conservatives defended him the first million times he screwed up, and we grit our teeth and rationalize it all away under the old “us vs. them” mentality, that even though he was making a mess of things, he was still at least “our guy”.
But Bush has proven that he’s most definitely NOT “our” guy. He tried his best to sell out the entire country, and then turned around and labeled those of us who opposed his efforts – the base who are the ONLY ones who’ve supported him the last couple years – as “racists”. Screw that. Let him enjoy the full-on impotency of lame-duck status. Let’s just hope that he doesn’t screw up so badly in what time he has left that he poisons the well completely and ruins our chances or winning the White House in 08.
Vyce on July 1, 2007 at 8:30 PM
So true. Irritates me that Dept. Homeland Security is the one pushing for amnesty. I realize it’s all one administrative umbrella but come on! Send Health and Human Services out there so I can pretend DHS cares about security.
Spirit of 1776 on July 1, 2007 at 8:30 PM
Comprehensive, that ‘THOSE PEOPLES’ buzz word for amnesty. It is a lame excuse for not doing the peoples will.
Is there anyone here who feels safer knowing Chertoff is in charge? What a doofus.
Wade on July 1, 2007 at 8:32 PM
Chertoff = Smarmy Weasel.
TinMan13 on July 1, 2007 at 8:33 PM
Here’s a letter I just sent to Bush:
Can’t we get something going here Hot Air?
aqvik on July 1, 2007 at 8:33 PM
Seriously, I think you are right. They will engage in absurd, well documented theatrics to show how “inhumane” it is to enforce the laws, prepping a renewed fight to grant amnesty.
That’s what Chertoff made it sound like we would be seeing shortly.
PBoilermaker on July 1, 2007 at 8:34 PM
G** D*** that MFing SOB straight to hell. WTF do these people think they are? We are authoring our own death certificates. Does anyone else here hear any muslims laughing their a**’s off while they listen to that idiot and all the others like him? What are we doing?? AP, this is way beyond depressing…
JWS on July 1, 2007 at 8:34 PM
Too bad we don’t have 100 lame duck senators.
If they all weren’t obsessed with getting re-elected, we might get a fence built, or a war won.
[sigh]
fogw on July 1, 2007 at 8:43 PM
Sorry about the lang****, but I am so PO’d I can barely take it…
JWS on July 1, 2007 at 8:47 PM
LOL, JWS
I am trying as hard as I can not to make some comment about certain upper body parts of Chertoff being stuffed up some lower body part of Bush.
Whoops.
BobH on July 1, 2007 at 8:50 PM
If this bumbling, lying moron is all that stands between us and another deadly terror attack, God helps us all!
msplitt on July 1, 2007 at 8:53 PM
Can’t we get something going here Hot Air?
aqvik on July 1, 2007 at 8:33 PM
We need to.
sonnyspats1 on July 1, 2007 at 8:54 PM
What makes you think Bush cares about any of us? The only reason we killed the bill was because enough Senators worried about losing their jobs.
What’s really depressing is that Bush was the best choice (?) in 2000.
WisCon on July 1, 2007 at 8:56 PM
The funny/sad thing about this whole situation is that if George Bush had just been smart enough to do the right things in the right order at the right time he might very well have been able to have people ready to talk about some sort of normalization process by now. To do that, he would have needed to start showing some interest in border enforcement early in his first term or, barring that, shortly after 9/11. The Republican party controlled both houses of Congress right up till last winter. He could have started by showing some interest in actually implementing the border enforcement provisions that have been on the books since ‘86. After construction on a border fence was well under way and starting to show results the time would have been right to start introducing congressional bills (multiple bills, not one big all-or-nothing bill) to make it possible for some of the people who were already in the country illegally to stay legally. Since he wasn’t smart enough to do things that way he ended up with nothing to show for his efforts except a lot of hard feelings among people whose support he’ll still need in the coming months. Maybe our next President will be smarter.
bdfaith on July 1, 2007 at 9:01 PM
Just pray a better choice is there for 08′. I really like Newt as he has solutions for all to see. The left gave him a bad rap as they do to all conservatives that they fear.
Fred T is a good guy buy I haven’t really heard his take on where we need to go. Giuliani can forget it, like Billery, just to many skeletons.
warpmine on July 1, 2007 at 9:01 PM
PBoilermaker, we’ve both noticed the same thing so perhaps Chertoff accidentally tipped his hand and allowed us to see his cards.
I think they’ll either do nothing or will make an extreme propaganda effort in an attempt to force the American people to beg them to stop, hoping we’ll give up and agree to their amnesty.
If they try it, I hope it backfires on them and we get some turnover in our government, starting with the head of Homeland Security.
FloatingRock on July 1, 2007 at 9:02 PM
Sessions, DeMint….help us.
Please.Help.Us.
A voice of reason on July 1, 2007 at 9:04 PM
Maybe he’ll die in a yerrorist attack! lol
warpmine on July 1, 2007 at 9:04 PM
That’s terrorist
warpmine on July 1, 2007 at 9:04 PM
What an idiot. All of the intelligent, clear thinking and patriots unfortunately chose the business world and we are left with these dolts to run our country. That somehow needs to change.
Bereans on July 1, 2007 at 9:09 PM
If I was the Pres. I would assume that this country is under attack. I would declare war on Mexico, suspend Posse Comitatus, put 100,000 active troops on the border Armed with rounds chambered , hammers back and safety off. Have a double wall fence built in 6 months. Require that the Mexican consulate pay by bank transfer for all medical services rendered to Mexican or any other country invaders. Ban all non citizens from all schools.
I would set up a bus service and charge them for a bus ride back. The bastages walked here so the bastages can walk back
Foreigners that want to work here and don’t want to wait for the system they could have a work permit. The company that sponsors them would be responsible for their medical care and criminal liability. They nor any off spring will ever be eligible for citizenship.
That goes for Brits, Germans, Canadians, Mexicans etal.
Then I’d tell the U.N. they have 24 hours to pack there trash and get the hell out of America.. Stragglers will be thrown in the Hudson river.
I’d get all that done before noon chow.
TheSitRep on July 1, 2007 at 9:14 PM
Glad to see the Bush administration finally worried about fiscal discipline.
They can’t get the money anywhere else than fines from illegals seeking amnesty?
What a tool.
Valiant on July 1, 2007 at 9:15 PM
Newt’s a brilliant man but he has skeletons too, and he’s as polarizing as Hillary.
I like Newt better as a policy/idea man than as a candidate for President. He’s better at hashing out and explaining the details of policy…
eanax on July 1, 2007 at 9:25 PM
The whole racsist/bigot arguement is specious from the get go. Nobody has one word of criticism for legal immigrants regardless of race. Our criticism is for illegal immigrants regardless of race. Chertoff needs to buy a vowel.
Mojave Mark on July 1, 2007 at 9:27 PM
“Smarmy weasel” is to good for this guy. What a putz…I have been so disallusioned by all this BS — I voted and defended GW and now feel cheated and stupid for having done so.
jimwesty on July 1, 2007 at 9:32 PM
Chertoff reminds me of Elmer Fudd, “Da…da..da…that’s all folks.”
Say goodbye to the USA and hello North American Union. Who knows in a few years we might even being saying…
Viva El Presidente!
Irenaeus on July 1, 2007 at 9:33 PM
“Anyone else not feeling terribly depressed while reading this?”
Not me! But then I’m hit’tn four gongs for jeebus!
Or is that 4 bongs?
Or is that waring fore thoungs?
Well anyway all-ah knows what I mean!
spike on July 1, 2007 at 9:42 PM
Chertoff is the perfect example of how incompetent people thrive in Govt.
Shame on you G.W. Bush for letting him sit in that chair.. Shame on you. Yet another reason, after years of supporting you, that I cannot stand to even here you speak now.
Why don’t you take that walking cadaver out for a round of golf, mkay?
Montana on July 1, 2007 at 9:46 PM
So am I. He is a major dickhead.
auspatriotman on July 1, 2007 at 9:49 PM
Chertoff needs to fired, NOW! IF Bush is unwilling to fire Chertoff, then Bush needs to be impeached for intentionally refusing to defend US sovereignty.
progressoverpeace on July 1, 2007 at 9:56 PM
My suggestion for BOOSH:
Keep Pace, Fire Chertoff.
BKennedy on July 1, 2007 at 10:03 PM
Exactly.
Jaibones on July 1, 2007 at 10:04 PM
He not only sides with comprehensive but his word choice says he thinks it’s not dead yet.
Stephen M on July 1, 2007 at 10:04 PM
No, no … you’re a busy President, George. Why don’t you just let Dick take him out to hunt some grouse…
Jaibones on July 1, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Chertoff = “THE SKULL”
DfDeportation on July 1, 2007 at 10:14 PM
Who cares what the manager of Home Depot thinks. What’s that… He’s WHAT? Oh crap.
BDavis on July 1, 2007 at 10:21 PM
ordinarily, when someone blinks 1.4 times PER SECOND (yes, i counted) it’s an indication that they do not believe the words that are coming out of their mouth. In poker, it means they have a handful of weak cards. And that pretty much sums up
the Crypt KeeperMr Chertoff.stevezilla on July 1, 2007 at 10:36 PM
According to latest polls, his job performance is 10 points higher than Congress’s numbers. And no, I’m not sorry to see him becoming a lame duck. My only concern right now is that he doesn’t have the rug pulled out from under our troops in harm’s way. He burned all his remaining (not much) political capital on this shamnesty that almost none of his base wanted. Why in the world didn’t he exert even half of that on reforming social security? That was one of the main reasons I voted for him… it took b@lls to push for reform (even that modest) but he barely put up a fight on that issue. I am truly disappointed in his performance, but I’m still glad Gore or Kerry didn’t win. As miserable as Bush has been on amnesty, etc., I can’t imagine how bad they would have been.
Abu Daboo Doo on July 1, 2007 at 10:37 PM
As has been said above enforce the laws already passed. That roundtable discussion on this show was pathetic. Yet I watched, as I was called a racist. What about the fence Hunter had funded that still hasn’t been built? Still disappointed he never picked up any momentum in this race.
PowWow on July 1, 2007 at 10:53 PM
The entire White House staff is pushing Pres. Bush’s agenda. Personally, I don’t think, they all agree with the President. If Pres. Bush wants his legacy, he should build the security fence !!!
aniladesai on July 1, 2007 at 10:59 PM
Jerkoff – I mean Chertoff is too busy worrying about the price of produce to concern himself with enforcing laws, protecting legal U.S. citizens, and preventing terrorist attacks.
jeffNWV on July 1, 2007 at 11:55 PM
Who’s the bald ‘homeless’ looking jerk talking to the right of Chris Wallace?
countywolf on July 1, 2007 at 11:59 PM
Chertoff just isn’t believable in this sense. A man who is charged with homeland security essentially just said that he’ll wait for Congress to sort it out… seems he’s really concerned about HOMELAND SECURITY. What a weakling.
D2Boston on July 2, 2007 at 12:07 AM
LOL! Great comment; short, sweet and to the point.
FloatingRock on July 2, 2007 at 12:30 AM
Individuals and the appropriate government departments at all levels must be sued for not enforcing existing laws.
A fund must be started, and lawyers must be hired.
digitalintrigue on July 2, 2007 at 1:08 AM
Hate to say it, but until this guy leaves as the head of DHS, not much is going to change. I wonder if Chris Wallace feels like he’s talking to a brick wall. I’ve written letters to some of these congressmen, and I sure feel like I’ve been writing to a few of them.
Found this screwing around on the net. Wish it came in black to match the car, but it should get the point across. Right alongside the Glenn Beck “Eco-friendly Hydrocarbon Powered Vehicle” sticker I’m getting next week.
Now that’s something I’d like to see on a 4XL shirt. Say something along the lines of “Do you really want a ‘Jerkoff’ in charge of Homeland Security?” I’m sure someone will come up with something better. Better yet instead of a t-shirt, put it on the side of one of those beer bottle cooler sleeves. I’ll use it when I’m drinking Coronas.
Suihei Deloi on July 2, 2007 at 1:42 AM
I didn’t see this on FOX, but I saw Juan what’s-his-name and Mara what’s-her-name on Brit Hume this afternoon saying the only reason this legislation didn’t pass is because the racists opposed it. Now this loser Chertoff. I didn’t notice anyone challenging them.
I would be very happy to see FNC ratings plunge for a month or so. Just to let them know that if they’re going to allow guests on their broadcasts that spew hate, they shouldn’t let it pass unchallenged.
jaime on July 2, 2007 at 2:34 AM
Congress has passed no bill in the pass two years that dealt with enforcement only well that is a fucking lie because they did pass a law that the Senate shot down.
American8298 on July 2, 2007 at 2:44 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »