The amnesty cloture vote — in order
posted at 2:52 pm on June 28, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The official roll breaks down the vote alphabetically, by state, and of course by vote. What it doesn’t do is tell you the order they voted in, which is critical to understanding (or at least inferring) motive. They’re supposed to vote in alphabetical order, but if they’re not present when the roll is called — or if they are present but would rather keep mum to see how things are shaking out — they get skipped, and can then approach the podium afterwards, when they see fit, to cast their ballot.
So here’s how it went, based on a once-through of the videotape. Boldface indicates Republicans, underline means they switched from yes on the cloture vote on Tuesday to no today. Forty members voted during the alphabetical roll. Note that fully six of them switched — and only five switches total were needed to kill the bill. The other fencesitters must have noticed, sensed the momentum, and recalibrated their own votes accordingly. The other notable is the Burr-Harkin-Pryor-Nelson run. They all voted no, all in succession, and were all switchers, which makes we wonder if they had an informal agreement among themselves.
The dotted line marks the 40th no vote, which doomed the bill. Everyone after that knew it was dead (assuming they’d been keeping count), which makes the late switchers like Coleman, McConnell, and especially Voinovich switchers of convenience, not conviction. Why vote yes on a bill that you know is going to lose?
First round
Aye (19):
Bennett Brownback Casey Clinton Conrad Craig Durbin Graham Kyl Lott Martinez Murray Obama Reid Salazar Schumer Specter Whitehouse Kennedy
No (21):
Alexander Baucus Bayh Bond Bunning Cornyn DeMint Dole Domenici Dorgan Ensign Hatch Isakson Murkowski Sessions Smith Stabenow Stevens Sununu Vitter Webb
Afterwards
Leahy – aye (20)
Dodd – aye (21)
Crapo – no (22)
Corker – no (23)
Feingold – aye (22)
Biden – aye (23)
Gregg – aye (24)
McCain – aye (25)
Coburn – no (24)
Chambliss – no (25)
Bingaman – no (26)
Enzi – no (27)
Landrieu – no (28)
Allard – no (29)
Roberts – no (30)
Rockefeller – no (31)
Lugar – aye (26)
Reed – aye (27)
Sanders – no (32)
Feinstein – aye (28)
Grassley – no (33)
Wyden – aye (29)
Mikulski – aye (30)
Hutchison – no (34)
Burr – no (35)
Harkin – no (36)
Pryor – no (37)
Nelson (Ben) – no (38)
Lincoln – aye (31)
Cardin – aye (32)
McCaskill – no (39)
Shelby – no (40)
———————————-
Tester – no (41)
Nelson (Bill) – aye (33)
Inouye – aye (34)
Barrasso – no (42)
Collins – no (43)
Byrd – no (44)
Snowe – aye (35)
Thune – no (45)
Brownback – no (46)
Akaka – aye (36)
Coleman – no (47)
Cochran – no (48)
Cantwell – aye (37)
Hagel – aye (38)
McConnell – no (49)
Brown – no (50)
Lieberman – aye (39)
Klobuchar – aye (40)
Carper – aye (41)
Warner – no (51)
Inhofe – no (52)
Menendez – aye (42)
Lautenberg – aye (43)
Kerry – aye (44)
Boxer – aye (45)
Kohl – aye (46)
Levin – aye (47)
Voinovich – no (53)
Say, how come there are 47 yes votes when the roll says there were only 46? Ah, my friends, that’s because Sam Brownback turned out to be the weaseliest “no” vote of all. He voted yes right at the very beginning, during the alphabetical vote, probably thinking that cloture was going to pass. Then, when it died, he switched to a no. I almost wish he was pulling more than 1% in the presidential polls so we could hammer him into oblivion with that. As it is, I’ve captured his moment of shame for posterity on video. I think that’s him in the red circle; you’ll see him gesture to the clerk just before she announces his deep, principled opposition to amnesty.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
From breitbart.com:
Senator Edward Kennedy, a key figure in the reform drive, vowed to overcome the defeat.
“We will be back. This issue is not going away, and we will ultimately be successful. This
is really a part of a whole march for progress for our nation and the country.”
Who made Kennedy a spokesman for Mexico… because he sure isn’t speaking for America…
- Mark
ricer1 on June 28, 2007 at 2:54 PM
Brownback = untrustworthy = enemy
Zetterson on June 28, 2007 at 2:59 PM
Nice work AP.
Valiant on June 28, 2007 at 3:00 PM
This amnesty bill is starting to remind me of riverboat gambling in Missouri.
The first time the people voted on it, it was soundly defeated.
After a lot of casino money was poured in and it got voted on a second time, it was still defeated (but not so soundly).
A third round of money (and a lot of fatigue) and, when they brought it up for vote the third time it passed. Many people I knew voted for it because, “they’re [the casino supporters] are just going to keep bringing to vote again until we pass it and I’m tired of hearing about it.”
The senators (and President Bush) keep vowing to bring this thing back again and again. How long until they wear everyone down and opposition dies because people are tired of hearing about it?
JadeNYU on June 28, 2007 at 3:01 PM
If you go back to the first round vote video, you can clearly hear Brownback’s “aye.”
Valiant on June 28, 2007 at 3:01 PM
He votes yes before voting no…right out of the playbook from an ex Vietnam Vet.
right2bright on June 28, 2007 at 3:02 PM
curious why inhofe waited so late to vote no.
lorien1973 on June 28, 2007 at 3:02 PM
The fight of good versus evil goes on.
Speakup on June 28, 2007 at 3:04 PM
What the heck is Kennedy saying here?
jdawg on June 28, 2007 at 3:04 PM
- Mark
Ted just needs to sit back, relax, grab a Corona and a taco and chill. By the way, he is not longer Ted “The Swimmer” Kennedy. He’s officially changed his name to “El Nadador” which of course, means the swimmer in Spanish.
sdd on June 28, 2007 at 3:06 PM
JadeNYU, I think this is different than casino boats in MO, in terms of the scope and its implications. I think people we can’t let it die this time. The last time, we were led to think it was deader than dead, which threw people off and it took them a while to get back in the game.
And I always think of Porky’s when I hear about riverboat gambling.
Bad Candy on June 28, 2007 at 3:08 PM
nice catch
tshell on June 28, 2007 at 3:09 PM
That’s the end of C-span… Congress can’t have this kind of evidence getting out.
db on June 28, 2007 at 3:10 PM
The biggest message from all this–and it’s an encouraging one–is that Americans are smarter than the Congress that supposedly represents it. I was watching C-SPAN during the vote and noticed the weasel Brownback switch his vote. How arrogant that he thinks that little of his constituents. I hope that he is soundly whipped next election cycle. I still need to call and thank Burr and Dole for their votes.
windbag on June 28, 2007 at 3:11 PM
“This is our home. We have the right to say who comes in.”
Fred Thompson 2007
TheSitRep on June 28, 2007 at 3:11 PM
Free iPhone given to number 1,000 post on the top pick list.
right2bright on June 28, 2007 at 3:11 PM
Great job, AP!
Thanks for doing this for those of us that couldn’t watch this morning.
This is why I get almost all my news from the internet.
jaime on June 28, 2007 at 3:13 PM
If he runs, he gets my vote! Wait, he is losing – nevermind!
On-my-soap-box on June 28, 2007 at 3:13 PM
Allah, We definitely don’t agree on Tancredo, but real good job with your coverage on this one. Really.
You can bet that even the likes of O’Reilly will be looking to blogs such as Hotair for inspiration (and late-breaking facts)
Regards
bucktowndusty on June 28, 2007 at 3:13 PM
Wow. Great work Allah. Seldom are we witnesses to an actual act of cowardly convenience caught on tape.
Matticus Finch on June 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM
Was Byrd a weasely one too? Usually he is a die hard on rules and all sorts of procedural old and new crap.
However, as bleeding liberal as he is and as Mr. Pork in the Senate, he voted NO in the last, and insignificant round.
Shelby is the knive which gored this monster. Should be hailed in the history annals as such.
Entelechy on June 28, 2007 at 3:14 PM
Arrgh! He’s my Senator. I got a freaking letter from him yesterday all about how he supports border enforcement, etc. What a spineless toad! Oblivion is too good for him. Brownback is devoid of all principles. At least Graham is honest about his support for shamnesty. Brownback will lie to his own constituents.
Brownback is the Diamond Joe Quimby of the mid-west.
Thomas the Wraith on June 28, 2007 at 3:15 PM
Good catch, indeed!!
Brownback is definitely a weasel.
StephC on June 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM
Byrd and Rockefeller have voted against this piece of crap every chance they got. They have been solidly anti-amnesty since day 1.
jaime on June 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM
Of course s/b “Shelby is the knife”
Entelechy on June 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM
Congress has got to be lovin’ all the attention they’ve garnered recently! I think several of them are suffering from stage fright knowing how many Americans are intently watching their every move.
Maybe they’ll give ol’ Hugo a call and see if he can offer them any pointers?
kjspeedial on June 28, 2007 at 3:19 PM
right2bright on June 28, 2007 at 3:11 PM
No damn fair, Allah will spam until he gets that dang iPhone…..
doriangrey on June 28, 2007 at 3:21 PM
Thanks jaime – good to know they were steady throughout.
Entelechy on June 28, 2007 at 3:23 PM
Here’s a list of the Senators up for reelection in 2008 that voted for cloture.
What’s up with Larry Craig? Last I heard he was rock-ribbed conservative.
Dems-
Joe Biden (D)
Richard J. Durbin (D)
John Kerry (D)
Carl Levin (D)
Frank R. Lautenberg (D)
Jack Reed (D)
Repubs-
Larry Craig (R)
Lindsey Graham (R)
Chuck Hagel (R)
Dev on June 28, 2007 at 3:26 PM
Senators Gone Wild! Flip-Flopping Weasels Caught on Tape
Hey you… get that steel drum out of the, er, mayor’s office.
saint kansas on June 28, 2007 at 3:26 PM
What a weasel Sam Switch-back is.
Good job on the catch.
Think I will give his office a call.
Dersu on June 28, 2007 at 3:26 PM
Inhofe was leading the charge against cloture and this bill. Unlike Brownback (who obviously switched for political expediency), I don’t think we can question Inhofe’s motives. He might have been shoring up “Nay” votes, looking into additional parliamentary delaying procedures, thanking like-minded senators, etc.
Having said that, I’m still baffled out how impervious to public opinion these guys are. They were willing to defy more than three-quarters of the American public for this! And sadly, I’ll bet more than 90% of them are reelected come the next election.
cmay on June 28, 2007 at 3:27 PM
You can’t make too much of the order (with the exception of crybaby casting the very last vote) given the usual confusion up there. Thune has been a patriot on this and he voted no after the monster was dead.
Brownback owes the public an explanation. Call his office and ask for one. (202) 224-6521
Valiant on June 28, 2007 at 3:27 PM
that brownback nonsense is somethin else, nice catch
ernesto on June 28, 2007 at 3:28 PM
My pleasure, Entelechy. Usually the sight if either of them turns my stomach. But, any port in a storm…
jaime on June 28, 2007 at 3:28 PM
I dont see Kennidy Singing! !…president bush said today that he was disappointed that the congress was not able to come together on this bill…MR PRESIDENT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAME TOGETTHER ON THIS BILL! I thank those senators that heard
on another subject what is it with elizabeth edwards attacking Ann Coulter,is this part of a move to SHUTDOWN FREE SPEACH.
what a dirty set up job,that Chris Matthews pulled on her.
tilthen on June 28, 2007 at 3:32 PM
Yeah, seriously: exactly who is going to be waiting outside the Capitol with a lead pipe looking for the senators who voted against this thing? Someone was offering them a huge payoff to take a dive on this thing.
saint kansas on June 28, 2007 at 3:35 PM
In retrospect, the anticipation I had watching the voting on C-Span doesn’t even come close to my excitement for Byrd’s subsequently doddering speech about being old…
Yeah. Right.
mboprey on June 28, 2007 at 3:42 PM
Brownback Mountain. The Raging RINOs need to be taken out one by one. Start with Lindsay Grahamnesty and continue with George Voinovich and Sen. Switchback if necessary. I’d like to vote again El Presidente Jorge Bush, but he isn’t on the ballot any more. The only thing that makes me not regret voting for him twice was the alternative … President Algore and President John F-ing Kerry.
pdigaudio on June 28, 2007 at 3:46 PM
No, it wasn’t 3/4 of the American public. It was just us here calling over and over and over….
Well, that’s what Specter says.
BacaDog on June 28, 2007 at 3:46 PM
Did you watch Kennedy’s speech on C-Span after the vote? Three times he said a “minority” in the senate defeated the immigration bill. At the same time, C-Span’s crawl showed the actual tally.
What’s up with that? Reid couldn’t get his own Dhimmicrats to vote on this crapola. Who’s the minority that voted it down?
JiangxiDad on June 28, 2007 at 3:46 PM
Called Switch-backs office.
They have a prepared statement to read on his 2 votes
First yay and then nay
Said that during the vote he became convinced that this bill was not going to be the vechicle to solve the problem.
And that he is now looking for other solutions.
I gagged, but was polite to the young lady.
Dersu on June 28, 2007 at 3:46 PM
Medved is saying the Republican party is now doomed, since Hispanics (allegedly) now hate Republicans. I agree with him on everything else, but really disagreed with him on immigration. I think it’s more important to try to save the country than cater to a certain voter group. Are conservatives doomed electorally now??
gmoonster on June 28, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Ted Kennedy to sing Via Condios
HarryStar on June 28, 2007 at 3:52 PM
– President Bush, 43
Sir, one little change – s/b “when it comes to not enforcing our immigration laws”.
Easy to write, to say and harder to do – but not impossible, especially when willing to protect our country.
Entelechy on June 28, 2007 at 3:52 PM
JiangxiDad on June 28, 2007 at 3:52 PM
Now courtesy of Neal Boortz here is “Keeping it in Perpective”
LakeRuins on June 28, 2007 at 3:52 PM
JiangxiDad on June 28, 2007 at 3:53 PM
Right at the end of the video clip, someone walks down to the front, stands next to Brownback, and gestures to the clerk. It looks like John Kerry to me. Was he trying to change his vote?
drunyan8315 on June 28, 2007 at 3:55 PM
Thanks, Allah, I was keeping numerical score, and couldn’t figure out why my numbers were off by one — now I know.
Brownback is a jerk.
Coleman, McConnell, Warner and Voinovich are equally hypocritical. Now they can pat themselves on the back: “Hey, look at me! I killed the amnesty bill (when it was already dead).”
Nichevo on June 28, 2007 at 3:56 PM
HEY KENNEDY…BRING IT !!!!!
DoctorDentons on June 28, 2007 at 3:57 PM
One of the dumbest pieces of legislation which would have been signed by one of our dumbest presidents gets shot down in flames. Mission 2: Target any Republican who voted for it.
MaiDee on June 28, 2007 at 3:57 PM
Damn that sunshine legislation.
sonnyspats1 on June 28, 2007 at 3:57 PM
If he ever thought that Republicans would be able to crack into the Hispanic vote in the first place, he’s an idiot. This bill would have decimated the Republican party.
NeoConNews on June 28, 2007 at 3:58 PM
Thanks Big A
Sammy316 on June 28, 2007 at 3:58 PM
Is there a difference between “our nation” and “the country”? Perhaps Teddy is starting to think of Mexico as part of the country.
jimwesty on June 28, 2007 at 4:00 PM
Roger that.
How about comprehensive ENFORCEMENT instead of comprehensive amnesty.
Mojave Mark on June 28, 2007 at 4:00 PM
Nice eye AP, just like 911 we won’t forget. Brownback is a true pc of #^&*. Even Webb came out in 1st call.
Legions on June 28, 2007 at 4:01 PM
This is a good victory for the common folks but it is an empty one. What can we do now to force the government to actually enforce the existeng laws ?
SIJ6141 on June 28, 2007 at 4:03 PM
Obama and Clinton were no shows? Imagine that…
Theworldisnotenough on June 28, 2007 at 4:13 PM
What’s all this talk about a free iPhone?
I’m sick of the talk about the 12+ million illegals and the impossibility of rounding up that many people and shipping them back to wherever they came from. It’s impossible for Wal-Mart to to stop every single shoplifter, and they probably have 12+ millions of them too, but they aren’t going to stop trying to catch them!
pb5000 on June 28, 2007 at 4:13 PM
What can we do now to force the government to actually enforce the existeng laws ?
Any time the Republicans asks me for any more money, I now write back “Finish the fence, then the $ will follow” (sans any $)
gmoonster on June 28, 2007 at 4:14 PM
I think they voted aye in the first round.
Zetterson on June 28, 2007 at 4:30 PM
¡Muchas gracias AP!
This is exactly for what I was looking on M.M.’s “Kill the Bill: Shamnesty showdown” thread. It’s good to see Senator Webb stuck to his guns BEFORE it became “popular” to vote “NO”. I see Mr. Warner was not so brave (as expected).
And, of course, Voinovich, brave soul that he is, was dead last to commit.
SomeSay on June 28, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Now ‘Switchback’ join Kerry in the ‘I Voted for It Before I Voted Against It Club for Moronic Politicians’…
random_rodder on June 28, 2007 at 4:33 PM
A no show would have been good for our side, because 60 aye votes are required.
And it is correct, they both voted aye on first go around.
It will be interesting to see how Hill twists this vote as she travels to our southern states.
Maybe Trent will pick her up at the airport and give her a quick lesson on our drawl.
Dersu on June 28, 2007 at 4:41 PM
BROWNBACK a la Kerry:
“I was for the Shamnesty before I was against it.“
BirdEye on June 28, 2007 at 5:20 PM
Living in Kansas, I’ve always been embarrassed of Fred Phelps. Now I get to add Brownback to the list, sigh.
dingoatemebaby on June 28, 2007 at 5:45 PM
Interesting. Nebraska’s Dem Senator (Nelson) voted Nay but our “Republican’ Senator (Hagel) voted Yea. Not too surprising as Nelson is generallu about as conservative as they come for a Dem and Hagel has worked very hard to earn his “RINO” title on a few too many issues lately.
Yakko77 on June 28, 2007 at 5:47 PM
By the way, Specter is also from Kansas
dingoatemebaby on June 28, 2007 at 5:56 PM
It’s obvious Mexico is plying Kennedy with tequila. Mr. Graham is the worm in the bottom of the bottle.
SouthernGent on June 28, 2007 at 6:58 PM
Coleman is a disappointment, can’t be counted on to do the right thing. I’m sick of career politicians. We need term limits.
Newman on June 28, 2007 at 7:03 PM
Brownback = weak as piss
I’d respect him a lot more if he voted yes even though I would disagree with his position. Have the courage of your convictions!
JamesP on June 28, 2007 at 7:10 PM
Strong work AP! So glad you’re here to keep us informed!
hollygolightly on June 28, 2007 at 7:47 PM
Not sure who linked the summary on Breitbart earlier, but an image perfect opener like this one is rare and beautiful thing:
“The Senate drove a stake Thursday through President Bush’s plan to legalize millions of unlawful immigrants…..”
What I love most though, is what the vote tally does to media CW:
Yeas 46 (28.6% Republican) to 53 (28.3% Democrats).
Parse that, pundits! No party line, “polarized” vote to work with here. The Republican “extremists” voted with the Dem’s, and when Kyl said 40 Senators were thwarting the will of the majority, he was off by six. What’s left in the toolbox but A Stunning Setback for the Prez or the ever popular Conservative Fright Night?
JM Hanes on June 28, 2007 at 7:59 PM
Brownback + liar cheat corrupt bought sellout bribe loser
13times on June 28, 2007 at 9:45 PM
Not to quibble, but it would be off by 13. The no votes were 53.
Freelancer on June 28, 2007 at 11:22 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »