Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


A Lott of outrage

posted at 10:30 am on June 27, 2007 by Michelle
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Feel the love, Sen. Lott:

Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, R-Miss., has been inundated with so many phone calls in his Washington office over his support for the immigration bill that he has taken to picking up the phone himself.

“Some people were pretty startled,” said Lott spokesman Lee Youngblood.

Lott’s position on the immigration bill has angered some radio talk show hosts who have publicized the office numbers of his Washington and Jackson offices, leading to jammed lines that often ring “busy” and e-mail servers that fill up.

“The problem has been that when lines are tied up, people with concerns about Social Security or veterans’ benefits can’t get through,” said Youngblood. “That’s what has posed the greatest challenge.”

Lott on Tuesday was one of 24 Senate Republicans who helped break a stalemate and move the bill forward. Its final passage remains uncertain.

Lott has expressed concern that some people who call use profanity and inappropriate language…

…As to the volume of calls, which number in the thousands, Youngblood said, “It’s safe to say that it’s the most phone traffic we’ve had in a number of years.”

Keep it coming:

DC Office:
487 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-2403
Phone: 202-224-6253
Fax: 202-224-2262
Email: senatorlott @ lott.senate.gov

District Office – Gulfport:
2012 Fifteenth Street, Suite 451
Gulfport, MS 39501
Phone: 228-863-1988
Fax: 228-863-9960

District Office – Jackson:
245 East Capitol Street, Suite 226
Jackson, MS 39201
Phone: 601-965-4644
Fax: 601-965-4007

District Office – Oxford:
911 Jackson Avenue, Suite 127
Oxford, MS 38655
Phone: 662-234-3774
Fax: 662-234-1744

District Office – Pascagoula:
3100 South Pascagoula Street
Pascagoula, MS 39567
Phone: 228-762-5400
Fax: 228-762-0137


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Since so many Senators allowed their mailboxes to fill up, here’s a
number
that you can use to reach the Seante switchboard, from which you can be
switched to any Senator’s office and possibly avoid the full mailbox
trap:
202-224-3121.
enjoy

palefaced on June 27, 2007 at 10:35 AM

“The problem has been that when lines are tied up, people with concerns about Social Security or veterans’ benefits can’t get through,” said Youngblood. “That’s what has posed the greatest challenge.”

What a crock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!We are horrible horrible people aren’t we? Denying Vets and the elderly access to their Senator!……grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 10:35 AM

“The problem has been that when lines are tied up, people with concerns about Social Security or veterans’ benefits can’t get through,” said Youngblood. “That’s what has posed the greatest challenge.”

Note that the immigration shamnesty bill isn’t the problem, it’s all those pesky plebes tying up the phone lines!

Insomniac on June 27, 2007 at 10:36 AM

Peter Boyles on KHOW in Denver brings up an interesting point.

He says that in the case of Date Rape we are all taught that no means no. So whey is it that the Senate does not understand that when the people say no it means no. Especially since this is an obvious case of “STATE RAPE

400lb Gorilla on June 27, 2007 at 10:37 AM

“The problem has been that when lines are tied up, people with concerns about Social Security or veterans’ benefits can’t get through,” said Youngblood. “That’s what has posed the greatest challenge.”

This should show them that right now, immigration is what matters most to people, and that people are not happy w/ Lott and all the others who voted for this terrible bill.

StephC on June 27, 2007 at 10:38 AM

“The problem has been that when lines are tied up, people with concerns about Social Security or veterans’ benefits can’t get through,” said Youngblood. “That’s what has posed the greatest challenge.”

Newsflash:
Trent Lott enrages his constituency by support of amnesty! Widows, orphans and veterans most affected!

Nichevo on June 27, 2007 at 10:40 AM

He needs to know, he is a Senator in a representative democracy not an oligarchy.
He is just another case for term limits.

TheSitRep on June 27, 2007 at 10:40 AM

I love how it’s talk radio’s fault. When’s somebody going to shut those guys up?!

I also think it’s hilarious that Lott is “concerned” about all the people trying to get through to talk to his office about Social Security and veterans’ benefits. Uh-huh. People concerned about those things have been ignored and put off for years. A few more days isn’t going to matter. I think it’s appropriate that those concerned about the immigration bill be ignored and put off first, don’t you? ;-)

aero on June 27, 2007 at 10:40 AM

He doesn’t mind people expressing their views, he just doesn’t care what those views are.

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 10:43 AM

Lott has proven without a doubt that he is incompetent double talking weasel. He looks like a starving sharecropper knocking on the backdoor of the big house looking for a hand out. Kennedy wouldn’t spit on him if he was on fire. Lott sucked up to him on the floor of the Senate. Kennedy was probably amused at the adoration from a subject.

volsense on June 27, 2007 at 10:45 AM

Just exactly who is he representing?

Anyone ask that yet?

With only 20% in favor, who’s bidding is he doing?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Press 2 for English.

drjohn on June 27, 2007 at 10:45 AM

History lesson children.

Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

LakeRuins on June 27, 2007 at 10:45 AM

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 10:43 AM

Sadly this is obviously the case…

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 10:47 AM

Lott has expressed concern that some people who call use profanity and inappropriate language…

That’s like a spouse having their mate killed because the church doesn’t condone divorce…

jeffNWV on June 27, 2007 at 10:48 AM

IMO Lott is just biding his time in the Senate for the big payoff as a lobbyist.

roux on June 27, 2007 at 10:48 AM

“The problem has been that when lines are tied up, people with concerns about Social Security or veterans’ benefits can’t get through,” said Youngblood. “That’s what has posed the greatest challenge.”

That’s your own fault Senator.
The American people have spoken and you ignored what they had to say, you bet their calling.

The question is, can you hear us now?

Speakup on June 27, 2007 at 10:50 AM

Lott has expressed concern that some people who call use profanity and inappropriate language…

Well F-ing excuse us. We’re pissed!

soulsirkus on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

I love that picture. It makes me chuckle every time.

Matticus Finch on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Senator Lott and other politicians are individuals who have though own views. I’m a conservative Republican but I can’t stand how conservative bloggers and radio talk show hosts our treating Republicans on this bill. When you vote for someone to Elected office you vote for them because you agree with them more often then not, not because you agree with them on every single issue.

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

This whole thing stinks more then my bait bucket…..what the hell kind of back-door deal was made here? Was it simply a case of we-know-we-loose in 08 anyway and everyone decided to deal away for their own benefit? Something really isn’t right about this whole thing. I’m no black-helicopter nut but something is causing these snakes to turn on us.

The ‘we need the Hispanic vote’ thing is nothing but a smoke screen. That will not happen for decades, if at all.
Since when are the up and comers not going to opt for the party that offers the biggest safety net? The Hispanic vote is a mirage for what is really going on here.

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Lott has expressed concern that some people who call use profanity and inappropriate language.

I swear it wasn’t me.

sonnyspats1 on June 27, 2007 at 10:55 AM

It’s time for a lot more action than phone calls and emails. We have flooded Congress with phone calls and emails and it has accomplished nothing.

People keep saying this bill is being forced so strongly because big business has boughour Senate. I’m not sure if it’s that or the fact that it creates 12-20 million new voting democrats. But if big business does have a huge hand in this, we need to know specifically which businesses are involved so we can make it known that they are going to lose all of OUR business because of it. And then we need to back it up with a nationwide boycott of ALL the businesses involved.

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 10:56 AM

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Limerick,
All you need to do is watch any business show. They get the talking heads from Wall St on there and there may be one lone voice saying this is bad legislation but by a wide margin all of the business community thinks this is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
When they use the argument about the cheap labor force in the construction market I am left wondering why do houses cost so much then?
The poiticians pander to those who but money in their pockets and fund their campaigns.

LakeRuins on June 27, 2007 at 10:56 AM

It seems the Senate has a bunker mentality about this. Both the left and the right aren’t thrilled with this bill, but Lott is in the foxhole with Teddy Kennedy.

Trust me Trent, you don’t want to be in a foxhole with Ted Kennedy…or in a 1969 Oldsmobile.

Matticus Finch on June 27, 2007 at 10:57 AM

When you vote for someone to Elected office you vote for them because you agree with them more often then not, not because you agree with them on every single issue.

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

At the very least we expect our representatives to debate the bill rather than ram it through with parlaimentary procedure and to not endorse curbs on free speach.

Nosferightu on June 27, 2007 at 10:58 AM

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

I’m a conservative Republican

No dipsh%t you are not and your not fooling anyone, if you were a conservative republican then like every other conservative republican in the country you would be screaming your bloody head off. No your just a worthless Moby pretending to be something that you obviously cant even begin to understand, and that something would be a conservative republican.

So just STFU and STFD…….

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM

Is the foxhole filled with water?

Nosferightu on June 27, 2007 at 10:59 AM

And then we need to back it up with a nationwide boycott of ALL the businesses involved.

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 10:56 AM

It would probably be easier to make a list of all the businesses that DON’T hire illegals. Pretty short list, I’d imagine. ARE there any?

aero on June 27, 2007 at 11:02 AM

Trent Lott and Lee Youngblood prove once again that they are both a couple of friggin liars.

If they had any interest in or concern with Social Security issues they wouldn’t be trying to foist a bill on Americans that grants Social Security to illegal aliens.

And the biggest issue Veterans have right now is traitorous a-holes like Lott who are willing to sell out the Country for their own personal enrichment.

there it is on June 27, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Watching C-Span right now. Sen. Fienstein is talking about “biometric documents”… Keep your ear to the ground on this one.
Teddy inturrupts, “tamper proof cards”.
That is you and me folks. Are you ready to stand in line to prove that you are a United States citizen? That is what the Dems want. Everyone get in line and PROVE TO THE GOVERNMENT who you are and what your right is to walk unchallenged in our nation…
This is all a direct result of the got’s direct failure to secure our borders and stop illegal hiring.
You will pay through lack of freedom and your being forced to stand before a gov’t funtionary. This is the solution our gov’t has in mind for us…
Even if the Fed. gov’t COULD pull off a Stalinesque move like this (which they at the present moment are absolutely unable to do) is this what you wish for your country?
I say screw the 12-20 million that have invaded our country; close the borders down, fix the immigration system so documents aren’t put through shredders, beef up ICE and let the American people (the same people that you want to stand in line for “biometric security”) KNOW that our existing gov’t functionaries are actually doing their jobs, then, let’s talk about people here now…

Babs on June 27, 2007 at 11:03 AM

If he thinks his phone lines are tied up now prevent those with benefit concerns, etc., from getting through, just wait until the 20 million illegals I mean “legals” bring in all their family members and they all start calling wondering where their benefits are. He ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Qzsusy on June 27, 2007 at 11:06 AM

This in and of itself should send them the message that this “Bill” of theirs is wrong.

Viper1 on June 27, 2007 at 11:07 AM

I think there should be a ‘I choose no candidate’ or a ‘No Confidence’ choice when voting, and they should have to be published. I think that would be pretty damning of idiots like Lott and the rest of the rodents scurrying about Capitol Hill.

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:07 AM

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Sorry pal but I don’t listen to talk radio. Ooops…sorry….maybe once every two weeks I hear Glen Beck when I am driving into town. That is it. I don’t have a ‘Rush-Baby’ sticker on my bumper. I just know a flim-flam when I see one and this bill is a flim-flam.

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 11:08 AM

I am so glad Trent thinks my education is tird world. I no hobola english. Maybee that was his thought supporting this p.o.s. bill. If we do not know , we can not tell.
Sorry Trent, the internet has polorized a lot of people and they are informed of what is going on and only you and Dianne tree hugger can stop us…………Fairness Doctrine????

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:10 AM

Revolution is the only thing that can fix this country. In other words, we’re screwed.

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:12 AM

These politicos are not interested in you, or me, or this country. Their only interests are their petty careers and votes. The theat of losing their place at the public feeding trough is the only thing that will motivate them to act in the people’s best interest. Sad but true.

rplat on June 27, 2007 at 11:13 AM

Senator Lott and other politicians are individuals who have though own views. I’m a conservative Republican but I can’t stand how conservative bloggers and radio talk show hosts our treating Republicans on this bill. When you vote for someone to Elected office you vote for them because you agree with them more often then not, not because you agree with them on every single issue.

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

They are there to represent their constituents, Chip. If the constituents, by large numbers, express dissent, they should be listening. This is not a case of simply disagreeing with them on A random issue. This ONE issue is the life or death of this country as we know it. So, excuse us if we’re not able to bite our tongues. I for one, am not interested in letting a bunch of elitist Globalist destroy the Country my ancestor suffered to create, and other ancestors died to protect, simply because these a$$holes care more about money.

Don’t preach to us. You should note..in a country that seems to care more about Paris Hilton’s latest idiocy than the impinging by Government on our lives, some ridiculously high number of folks are paying attention for the first time. This is not a simple disagreement. This is the beginnings of a revolution. Accept it and deal with it.
Help us out, or get out of the way.

tickleddragon on June 27, 2007 at 11:14 AM

They deal only in money and power. If you can’t affect either of those, they honestly do not care about you.

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:15 AM

This has been posted many times on the Web and deserves many more posts for thought on where in the progression is the the USA today.

At about the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution, in the year 1787, Alexander Tyler (a Scottish history professor at The University of Edinborough) had this to say about “The Fall of The Athenian Republic” some 2,000 years prior.

“A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship.”

“The average age of the worlds greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From Bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.”

Wade on June 27, 2007 at 11:16 AM

Senator Lott and other politicians are individuals who have though own viewsbeen paid a fortune not to think. I’m a conservative Republican Moby but I can’t stand how conservative bloggers and radio talk show hosts our treating Republicans RINO sellouts on this bill. When you vote for someone to Elected office you vote for them because you agree with them more often then not have to choose between a KleptoCon and a Socialist, not because you agree with them on every single issue are stuck choosing between being screwed and being screwed badly by people who hate this nation.

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

FTFY.

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:16 AM

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Dude, I’m a Democrat, don’t listen to talk radio regularly and agree about 50% of the time with fellow HotAir comments, but even I can see what an absolute travesty this bill is.
Senator Lott’s views are supposed to represent his constituents views.

SouthernDem on June 27, 2007 at 11:17 AM

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:07 AM

What we need is a new amendment to the constitution that allows any senator or congressman to be recalled. We also need an amendment that forces the government to initiate criminal investigations of corrupting of senators congressmen and any federal or state elected official at the request of the people themselves. Sadly I doubt even the most courageous of congress critters like Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo have to balls to author legislation like this.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:17 AM

The people have been betrayed. It dosen’t matter what you stance is. We have been sold out to globalism.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:18 AM

From Bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.”
Wade on June 27, 2007 at 11:16 AM

We’re at the apathy stage now. How scarey is that?!

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:19 AM

Hey, I’ve been here a while and all of a sudden started seeing the word “Moby”. Can someone please tell me what that means, literally? I think I’ve got the gist, but not sure of the context.

Is it referring to Moby the dj/artist, or Moby Dick? ;)

tickleddragon on June 27, 2007 at 11:20 AM

I’d say we’re not quite at apathy yet. We’re between apathy and complacency.

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM

If every single illegal restaurant worker were driven out of our country, every single one, would our entire way of life come crashing down?

I don’t think so. On the contrary, I think people like my college age children would have a real incentive to get a part time job.

The idea that our “restaurant industry” would collapse might actually be a good thing…

I also think that the typical American household would prepare more meals at home and, healthier meals. When I was raising children and had to turn the meals out daily I served all kinds of raw foods. Why? Because I didn’t have to put a whole lot of work into it. So, fruit, veggie, hard boiled eggs and cheese plates along with basic bread and butter were foods that we ate on a regular basis. Is the restaurant industry really doing any of us a favor?

To hear Diane Fienstein talk, we will all sink into the mire if the restaurant workers are regulated…

Babs on June 27, 2007 at 11:22 AM

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Chip we elected them to be our voice in Washingotn. I am glad they have an opinion, but when the folks back home have a different they must put aside their personal opinion in favor of the folks they represent. Or at least that was how the founding fathers viewed it. Our congress critters are now all of the opinion that they know better then us. They put on bliders and insert ear plugs and go about their business, while hoping not to get their clothes soiled by screaming masses. Masses that just might be arming themselves with torches, pitchforks, tar and feathers.
Ahhh for the good ‘ol days.

LakeRuins on June 27, 2007 at 11:23 AM

Are yo kidding me chip? Of course you did not see the bus hit you straight on. But not to see it back up over your ass is just ingorant.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:25 AM

There are a group of people who think that anything that’s not deporting 12 million Illegal Aliens in a short period of time is amnesty. This bill strengthens border security, and creates a temporary worker program. The immigration debate is more then just whining that anything that’s not lock step with idea is amnesty.

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM

Is that you Chertoff????

Funny, WE’RE the crazy ones for wanting the laws we already have in place to actually mean something. WE’RE the crazy ones for thinking we should have a country, a country with borders.

If Bush and Co. actually want to secure the borders, then why the heck don’t they? Who is stopping them?

Esthier on June 27, 2007 at 11:25 AM

Chip, you do realize that amnesty is gonna give the Democrats a permanent majority, and anything other conservative thing you believe in is never gonna happen if that happens, right? So why the hell would you support this nightmare?

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:25 AM

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM

STFU and STFD you are a utter and complete imbecile and an embarrassment to every single person on the face of the planet capable of logical or rational thought.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:26 AM

Gah, anything should be any…

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:26 AM

Are yo kidding me chip? Of course you did not see the bus hit you straight on. But not to see it back up over your ass is just ingorant.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:25 AM

Thanks for lightening my mood.

Esthier on June 27, 2007 at 11:27 AM

chip91
We ain’t nowhere near the deporting stage yet. We want to stop the bleeding. Take a First Aid course and the first things they teach you is to stop the bleeding, restore the breathing, protect the wound. You don’t do it all at once. Step one is to stop the damn bleeding. When we have fewer or none coming in then that 12 million can’t grow to 15 million which leads to the next argument of you can’t deport 15 million. Were people arguing back in 1985 that you couldn’t deport X number of millions when the first amnesty got rammed through? Would we be in this situation if we had actually deported them back them?

LakeRuins on June 27, 2007 at 11:28 AM

Dragon, Moby is a reference to the crappy singer, who said liberals should pose as conservatives on message boards and try and lie, trick and demoralize people during 04, I think.

Oh, and I just realized chip is a kid, so go easy on him.

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:29 AM

Lott: (pick’s up ringing phone) Hello. Senator Lott.

Vet: Senator Lott, I’m a veteran and I…

Lott: Oh, good, finally. Sorry the lines have been tied up by all the bigots.

Vet: … I’m a veteran and am calling to tell you I didn’t lose my f**king leg to hand over the country to an inferior country, asshole.

Lott: (Gasp, gasp).

Editor on June 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM

I have two words for this fat, toupe-wearing ass clown:

Term Limits

Jaibones on June 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM

I think referring to the election year. Coulda been 00.

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:30 AM

chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 11:21 AM

New laws are not needed. The previous laws would do just fine except they do not work and that is why? Because we do not enforce. What makes you think a new series of laws will be enforced?

Congress, the Administration and the Justice Dept have demonstrated nothing to me they will do a thing to make any laws, current or new, work.

I say shit can the entire shamnesty bill, enforce current laws and then come back in a year or so to see what we really need to fix.

Wade on June 27, 2007 at 11:32 AM

Also, who the f said its 12 mill. If it’s our government then, more like 20 + chain and anchor and scammers and ???????????????

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Where can I find a list of the votes for this bill?

StephC on June 27, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:29 AM

15 year old twerp or not that aint gonna happen, to quote chip, if the little imbecile can dish it out then he damn well be able to take it.

I think Michelle Malkin’s an idiot, if you don’t like that characterization because it’s not soft-spoken, so be it. She’s definitely far from being the dumbest person on the blogesphere, but she’s the dumbest conservative.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Garbage workers in my town, $5.50 an hour. Bricklayer, piece-rate. Glass worker $8.00 an hour. There is the bill in a nut shell.

Oh yeah, Senator….$165,000 + freezer money.

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 11:34 AM

StephC,

here

SouthernDem on June 27, 2007 at 11:35 AM

I think FORMER Senator Lott is appropriate.

countywolf on June 27, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Didn’t even notice that, dorian, I just checked the profile, didn’t bother to read the text. Nice attitude, kid. You do realize you’re on her site, right?

Bad Candy on June 27, 2007 at 11:36 AM

What we need is a new amendment to the constitution that allows any senator or congressman to be recalled.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:17 AM

“Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [i.e., securing inherent and inalienable rights, with powers derived from the consent of the governed], it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” –Thomas Jefferson: Declaration of Independence, 1776. ME 1:29, Papers 1:315

“[It is] the people, to whom all authority belongs.” –Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1821. ME 15:328

“The ultimate arbiter is the people of the Union.” –Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823. ME 15:451

“Every nation has a right to govern itself internally under what forms it pleases, and to change these forms at its own will; and externally to transact business with other nations through whatever organ it chooses, whether that be a King, Convention, Assembly, Committee, President, or whatever it be. The only thing essential is, the will of the nation.” –Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Pinckney, 1792. ME 9:7

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:40 AM

Thank you, Southern Dem. I got a hold of Lott, now I need to call my senators, too. Ugh.

StephC on June 27, 2007 at 11:40 AM

Poll.. Does anybody think what is put in our face as candidates,now will truly represent us???

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:41 AM

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:41 AM

Free market baby….free market….we demand it, it will be there. We yawn and don’t pay attention, we get what we pay for.

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 11:43 AM

Sorry Privatestock but our boss thinks the constit. is nothing but a G.D piece of paper.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:44 AM

Sorry Privatestock but our boss thinks the constit. is nothing but a G.D piece of paper.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:44 AM

Those weren’t from the Constitution. They are quotes from the most well-known Framer telling us to take back our government. It belongs to us, not the Senate.

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:49 AM

My bad, but still the same concept of not adhearing to the foundations that were set forth.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 11:51 AM

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:40 AM

O.K. so show me that article or statute under which a can petition the government for recalling a senator, or by which I can have an obviously corrupt senator investigated for bribery.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:52 AM

Here’s my fingers, Lott, in order of index, middle, ring, pinky:

.|..

thirteen28 on June 27, 2007 at 11:53 AM

Why waste any time on the Lotts, the Durbins, McCains,..They will never turn around, their hopeless souls. Better to email, fax and call in support to the Sessions, Cornyns, the Alexanders if you are fortunate enough to have one of these Senators or any of the rest they need their constituents support. I have emailed them all, telling them “I write for the one’s who cannot”. I only received one email return from the 15 I wrote too.Our Empress has spoken now lets not let Her down..

Legions on June 27, 2007 at 11:54 AM

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:40 AM

Opp’s, that should read…

which a I can petition…

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:54 AM

O.K. so show me that article or statute under which I can petition the government for recalling a senator, or by which I can have an obviously corrupt senator investigated for bribery.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 11:52 AM

I’m gonna work on that. (can’t guarantee anything though…)

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:59 AM

I believe it’s a state right.

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 12:01 PM

They are using profanity out of frustration for not being able to reach though the GD phone and strangle the SOB!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on June 27, 2007 at 12:04 PM

Tomorrow’s vote is certainly going to be interesting.

awake on June 27, 2007 at 12:05 PM

Lott wants to speak up for himself and personally tell the public that the spray of urine they feel is rain, rain, sweet sweet rain.

Now isnt’ that special?

G. Charles on June 27, 2007 at 12:05 PM

Privatestock on June 27, 2007 at 11:59 AM

Well see thats the problem, while the constitution has the theoretical allowance for both of these in it, it also lacks the actual mechanism by which they might be done.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 12:07 PM

Senator Lott and other politicians are individuals who have though own views. I’m a conservative Republican but I can’t stand how conservative bloggers and radio talk show hosts our treating Republicans on this bill. When you vote for someone to Elected office you vote for them because you agree with them more often then not, not because you agree with them on every single issue.
chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

That is understandable, but do you think that this is the issue to be silent on? We did not send our representitives to Washington to pass legislation that benefits big business. Regardless of the issues we elected them on, we expect them to react to our demands. And along that line of thought, I don’t know of ANY conservatives that ran on an amnesty platform, so if they really want to represent us, they need to listen and obey our commands. This isn’t like an issue that only affects a few Americans. This is going to affect all of us, and more importantly our children.

csdeven on June 27, 2007 at 12:08 PM

Tony Snow is claiming that the Administration is really listening. No way. Do Americans prefer a bill that says, “you are legal one day after we pledge money for a fence,” or “you are legal one day after the fence is built”?? I cannot allow Snow, Lott, or anyone else to claim they are listening when they are pushing for legal status after merely a pledge (bribe) of money.

G. Charles on June 27, 2007 at 12:10 PM

Legions on June 27, 2007 at 11:54 AM

Cornyn got an ear full, believe me. This is one Texan who keeps his faith in God, his eye on the preacher, and his hand on his wallet. I don’t trust any of them right now.
Keep the pressure on everyone cause if they think you are napping you’ll find yourself down the river.

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 12:10 PM

of them = politicos……….ooops

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 12:11 PM

Limerick on June 27, 2007 at 12:11 PM

ROTFLMAO………..Oh believe me…we all knew exactly who the “of them” were…

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 12:14 PM

Senator Lott and other politicians are individuals who have though own views. I’m a conservative Republican but I can’t stand how conservative bloggers and radio talk show hosts our treating Republicans on this bill. When you vote for someone to Elected office you vote for them because you agree with them more often then not, not because you agree with them on every single issue.
chip91 on June 27, 2007 at 10:52 AM

I will put you to the front of the line Chip to get your chip. Is the Whitehouse paying you as a news source to promote the nau agenda?

Mr.Cynical on June 27, 2007 at 12:14 PM

Here’s my fingers, Lott, in order of index, middle, ring, pinky:

.|..

thirteen28 on June 27, 2007 at 11:53 AM

I think that sums it up.

ophelia on June 27, 2007 at 12:14 PM

G. Charles on June 27, 2007 at 12:10 PM

Tony Snow is correct, the administration is listening. The problem is that they think we are a bunch of ignorant misguided children who cant be trusted to make the right decision.

doriangrey on June 27, 2007 at 12:17 PM

Vote them out

What we need is more people to come together and vote these dead beats out of office.

Send faxes and call, call and call them to tell them that they will be history when election time comes around.

Mark levin for president :)

investwize999 on June 27, 2007 at 12:19 PM

How condescending!

SouthernGent on June 27, 2007 at 12:20 PM

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hmmm… just how DO you petition the Government for a redress of grievances? Whats the mechanism?

You can’t sue the Fed government for NOT doing their job… which is the problem with immigration…

Romeo13 on June 27, 2007 at 12:20 PM

Chip91,

Chip no offense here but at 15 years of age do you really know what your talking about?

unseen on June 27, 2007 at 12:21 PM

The whole problem here is that the answer is so simple. We the people can not understand why our “leaders” are too stupid to see it.

Secure the border.

Get rid of the employee hiring magnet

those two are a given. After that it gets tricky.

Question

Is there anyone on this site that would be opposed to a path way to citizenship if the border was proven secured for say a period of 3 years?

unseen on June 27, 2007 at 12:30 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.