manwithblackhat on June 26, 2007 at 4:25 PM

My God! I hope not!

The False Dervish on June 26, 2007 at 3:47 PM

Does this mean we’re gonna start talking about Paris again?

Fine with me.

But it is for Michelle to tell me (or anyone of her staff), not for you. But, point and proof well taken.

No more CAPS LOCK KEY from me.

You have better things to do than to “wonder” about me.

I certainly will not argue with that. But what I have a “right” to do or not do here, is spelled out in no uncertain terms by the hostess of this site. If I violated her rules, she has my sincere regrets.

I’m not as concerned in this forum with anyone else’s rules.

It is not your place to tell me not to use the CAPS LOCK KEY, nor do I think you have the right to quote Michelle’s request from another posting (as I believe it to be based upon the time indication) to tell me. I have not seen her request, and I think she can tell me directly without any assistance.

Those who follow the career of our hostess nearly as much as they pretend to in this setting

I cannot, AND WILL NOT speak for anyone else here, but I do not pretend to follow Michelle’s career nor am I a Michelle Malkin expert, but I am aware of the situation as you have written it. And nicely written, too!

It’s the rest of us who make me wonder

You have better things to do than to “wonder” about me.

bmac on June 26, 2007 at 12:19 PM

I can’t argue with reasoning like this. But I’ll bet CC’s collie will. Which would mean this subject has… gone to the dogs.

She’ll be ten times better than anyone else and the whole Liberal media world will be gunnin’ for her. I’m eager to see her hosting something really big…, but I’m even MORE eager to have her around a while longer. ;)

So do the math: when something bad happens to her, EVERYONE wants to watch.

logis on June 25, 2007 at 10:35 PM

Up next:
Celebrity Death Match: Humping Robot vs. Paris Hilton

My collie says:

How could anyone NOT watch?

MM needs her own show. I’d like to see MM take Katie Couric’s chair. No.. I take that back.. Les Loonves doesn’t deserve her.

And when Michelle WHIPS THEIR ASSES ON THE AIR (she whipped Geraldo’s and bites O’Reilly every now and then), she will PROBABLY be banned from THOSE stations.

IT IS TIME FOR THE MALKIN FACTOR. HEY, ROGER AILES, WAKE UP! YOU HAVE A POTENTIAL STAR WHO IS (HOPEFULLY) AVAILABLE FOR HER OWN PROGRAM!

The False Dervish on June 26, 2007 at 9:30 AM

Please turn off the caps lock key. We hear you fine without it.

Michelle on June 26, 2007 at 12:49 AM

I’m sure all this adulation could go to a girl’s head. Then again, a woman, wife, and mother would know that it comes at a price.

Those who follow the career of our hostess nearly as much as they pretend to in this setting, probably know that she has already had to pull her children out of school and relocate to another part of the Maryland suburbs. Moving is hard enough for adults, let alone for children who must leave friends behind. It is for their own safety, as her family has been threatened by the advocates of “peacemaking” among the intellectual elite.

I’ve never had the pleasure of meeting Mrs M, and as much as I admire her work, I’ve learned to live with it. But I’d bet dollars to donuts that she is attempting to strike a balance, between maintaining a stable environment for home and hearth, and working tirelessly to expose the unbalance in the news brought on by the more celebrated journalists. To have her own show on a major cable news outlet would require more public exposure, which comes at the expense of her privacy, and that of her family. It would require less time with that family. It may also result in yet another relocation.

In the meantime, there is a certain caché to having just enough exposure to appear as the underdog, standing up to the Goliaths of the newsmaking machinery, against the odds, armed with only a webcam, a few well-designed props, and a cadre of loyal associates. From a garage outside the Beltway, a revolution is fermenting, one that is yet to “sell out” to the society pages of the Washington Post. Nothing wrong with that.

I suspect our hostess is well aware of all this. It’s the rest of us who make me wonder.

And, I think it is true…what other station would be less hostile to Michelle? Look at all the filthy, racist names she has been called (check out UNHINGED).

Remember the journalistic ambush that Chris Matthews (host of NO-BALL) pulled on Michelle two years ago. Make no mistake, Michelle WILL fearlessly go where journalists fear to tread, but given the style of the various hosts, I suspect that they will make it a broadcasting free-for-all where it will probably be four against one and the women hosts will probably suffer from MICHELLE MALKIN ENVY (like Chris Matthews does) and become angry because Michelle does not share their views on most stuff.

And when Michelle WHIPS THEIR ASSES ON THE AIR (she whipped Geraldo’s and bites O’Reilly every now and then), she will PROBABLY be banned from THOSE stations.

IT IS TIME FOR THE MALKIN FACTOR. HEY, ROGER AILES, WAKE UP! YOU HAVE A POTENTIAL STAR WHO IS (HOPEFULLY) AVAILABLE FOR HER OWN PROGRAM!

Paris has none of the above.

GOD Bless you Michelle for giving it to Bill last night for even his coverage of this non-news event.

I didn’t like arrows – sorry

Michelle is the broadcasting triple threat;
Looks (not that it is important)
Brains

Of course, Michelle Malkin could refuse to have anything to do with Bill O’Reily altogether, but I’m not sure that writing off Fox News would be a brilliant move — unless of course you can name a network that would be LESS abusive toward her?

logis on June 26, 2007 at 1:15 AM

Excellent point…! Wish *I* had made it. :)

I’m attracted to Fred Thompson.

Connie on June 26, 2007 at 2:12 AM

I knew it.

You are my ex-wife.

Joshua P. Allem on June 26, 2007 at 12:56 AM

I’m attracted to Fred Thompson.

Paris this, Paris that. What a great way for the MSM not to cover the amnesty travesty, and what an equally spectacular way for (many of) the American people to remain blissfully unaware of what’s going down in the Senate.

John on June 25, 2007 at 10:36 PM

You figgered that out, too.

Oh, come one. If MM was “above this” she could of simply refused to come the show to talk about Paris….

This is part of O’Reily’s “Monday’s with Kirsten and Michelle” segment. The ugliest of the trio is the only one who has any input into the topics. As I said his choices, and the way he often talks over her, are more than merely obtuse. At time it seems to border on the abusive.

Of course, Michelle Malkin could refuse to have anything to do with Bill O’Reily altogether, but I’m not sure that writing off Fox News would be a brilliant move — unless of course you can name a network that would be LESS abusive toward her?