CIA releases “family jewels”
posted at 2:25 pm on June 22, 2007 by Bryan
What was classified is now declassified:
The US Central Intelligence Agency is to declassify hundreds of documents detailing some of the agency’s worst illegal abuses from the 1950s to 1970s.
The papers, to be released next week, will detail assassination plots, domestic spying and wiretapping, kidnapping and human experiments.
Many of the incidents are already known, but the documents are expected to give more comprehensive accounts.
It is “unflattering” but part of agency history, CIA chief Michael Hayden said.
“This is about telling the American people what we have done in their name,” Gen Hayden told a conference of foreign policy historians.
The documents, dubbed the “Family Jewels”, offer a “glimpse of a very different time and a very different agency”.
A good question to ask, given some of the international contents, would be “Why release this stuff?”
Hayden also announced the declassification of some 11,000 pages of the so-called CAESAR, POLO and ESAU papers–hard-target analyses of Soviet and Chinese leadership internal politics and Sino-Soviet relations from 1953-1973, a collection of intelligence on Warsaw Pact military programs, and hundreds of pages on the A-12 spy plane.
We’ll tell the world what we knew, which will give them clues to how we knew it, which might help them guage what we know now–at a time when Russia is reverting to Stalinism.
President Vladimir Putin said no one should try to make Russia feel guilty about one of the most notorious episodes of the Stalinist era -the so-called Great Purge of 1937 – saying that “in other countries even worse things happened.”
Speaking at a televised meeting on Thursday with social studies teachers, Putin noted that 2007 is the 70th anniversary of a year that many Russians regard as a synonym for state-sponsored terror. It is an anniversary that has, however, gotten relatively little attention in Russian media.
“Yes, we had terrible pages” in Russia’s history, Putin said in remarks broadcast on state television. “Let us recall the events since 1937, let us not forget that. But in other countries, it has been said, it was more terrible.”
What could be worse than the systematic murder of millions of people by their own government? American actions during World War II, of course:
Speaking with the teachers, Putin suggested the United States’ use of atomic weapons against Japan at the end of World War II was worse than the abuses of Stalin. He also cited the massive US bombing campaigns during the war in Vietnam, as well as the use there of the defoliant Agent Orange.
“We have not used nuclear weapons against a civilian population,” he said. “We have not sprayed thousands of kilometres (miles) with chemicals, (or) dropped on a small country seven times more bombs than in all the Great Patriotic (war),” as WWII is known in Russia.
“We had no other black pages, such as Nazism, for instance,” he said.
The Soviets didn’t need “black pages” like Nazism. They had themselves.
So yeah, let’s just declassify everything and hope for the best. What can go wrong?
(h/t Chris R.)









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Dumb.
omnipotent on June 22, 2007 at 2:28 PM
Imagine what Hilary’s CIA will declassify…
Theworldisnotenough on June 22, 2007 at 2:38 PM
MSM microscopic analysis of Eisenhower, Nixon (& Cheney), and Ford in 3…2…1…
It’s funny how bad things und a Democratic president are never sooo bad.
natesnake on June 22, 2007 at 2:38 PM
Nothing like a kick in the
ballsfamily jewelsKini on June 22, 2007 at 2:41 PM
If he’s going to dredge up WW2, maybe he should direct some attention towards the USSR actions during the same period. When it came to attrocities against civilians in eastern Europe, the Wehrmact didn’t have much on the vengeful Red Army.
Blacklake on June 22, 2007 at 2:43 PM
This is, given the current state of world affairs, a Horrendous time to be releasing this information. I hope it’s not the administration’s effort to cast itself in a light brighter than that of prior admins…for it will do naught but create a longer shadow on our country’s reputation.
Whatever happened to the mentality this country used to have? ‘Loose Lips Sink Ships’ applies today like it did during WWII to our representatives, our administration, and the MSM. Unfortunately, actually abiding by it is a different story apparently. Sad.
Biffstir on June 22, 2007 at 2:43 PM
Reps haven’t been schooled on how to stuff documents down their trousers.
Editor on June 22, 2007 at 2:43 PM
With the exception of human experiments and domestic spying, I don’t see that things are all that different today. The CIA’s still blowing up terrorists and kidnapping them–maybe not as much as I’d like, but probably more than we hear about.
see-dubya on June 22, 2007 at 2:51 PM
I see absolutely no purpose and no reason in this at all.
The press will have a field day and won’t even bother to discuss the atrocities of the USSR and the threat of nuclear war.
What is wrong with these people?
INC on June 22, 2007 at 2:52 PM
Biffstir on June 22, 2007 at 2:43 PM
I’m thinking this is being used as a tactic of the Left. This could divide this nation even further. There are elements of our society that have been saying for many years that the CIA introduced drugs into the population mainly ghettos. I skimmed the preliminary report and there is mention of abuse of power within the US which is forbidden. Couple that with all the assasinations (attempts) and the whole world could potentially get their panties in a twist over this information, especially the thirld world. It could be potent fuel for the fire.
sonnyspats1 on June 22, 2007 at 2:53 PM
On the contrary, with current approval ratings in the toilet, they must figure it can’t get any worse. Might as well air out all the laundry.
On second thought, they’re probably not bright enough to think on that level.
natesnake on June 22, 2007 at 2:54 PM
Maybe we’ll finally find out who killed JFK!
Yakko77 on June 22, 2007 at 2:54 PM
Yes.
INC on June 22, 2007 at 2:55 PM
Duh – it was a gun. Ask James Brady.
Editor on June 22, 2007 at 2:58 PM
It was Colonel Mustard in the conservatory with a potato cannon.
natesnake on June 22, 2007 at 2:59 PM
So what?
I don’t think decalssifying events from over 34 years ago will have any effect. It is a very different world now than back then. We also have very different procedures now.
I garantee that the old hippie liberal media will jump all over these and find some way to spin it against the republicans or even Bush himself.
Mazztek on June 22, 2007 at 3:07 PM
oh, nevermind. Someone is already trying to spin it against bush.
Mazztek on June 22, 2007 at 3:08 PM
Sonnyspats:
“elements of our society”–like Congresswoman Maxine Waters.
see-dubya on June 22, 2007 at 3:16 PM
I would like to remind Putin of Chernobyl.
CIA declassifying information is just another bad idea, in a long list of others we’ve come to expect from this administration lately.
moonsbreath on June 22, 2007 at 3:23 PM
It’s probably just a grand distraction while they ram ShAmnesty down our throats.
Buzzy on June 22, 2007 at 3:24 PM
I sent this to Hot Air yesterday… Hmph!
Why not point out that the media are leaving out the fact that it was Robert F. Kennedy that knew about the wiretapping of journalists in 1963 and was personally involved in planning the assassination of Fidel Castro?
Is everyone afraid of the Kennedys or something?
Seixon on June 22, 2007 at 3:47 PM
Putin gets away with saying this sh1t unanswered because the present rulers in liberal democracies are too puss-puss to give smart replies. American elected officials and political operators seem to follow a rule, “Reply within the news cycle,” when they’re replying to their domestic critics. They’re somehow indifferent to putting down their nation’s international critics with similar timeliness and vigor.
Kralizec on June 22, 2007 at 3:56 PM
There will be inevitable calls to get rid of the awful CIA and establish something like a “Department of International Cooperation,” which will make all this spying and other nasty stuff unnecessary.
And many of the Dems will have to pretend they take the idea seriously. And a few *cough*Kucinich*cough* will.
eeyore on June 22, 2007 at 4:00 PM
That would be perfect, and provide some nice puns for the headline writers. I won’t list the couple I just thought up.
Reading through that list of “offenses”, I don’t see what the big deal is. To me it’s worse that people try and pretend that there weren’t (and aren’t) Americans who are actively conspiring against us, or in bed with the Commies and the rest of our enemies.
It’s as bad as the people who think Russia is our friend. The USSR is still there, they just went bankrupt and reorganized under a new name.
reaganaut on June 22, 2007 at 4:07 PM
see-dubya:….. On the bright side the CIA could be exonerated of Congresswoman Waters claims. One the other hand Sen. Kennedy could be impicated for further for conspiring with the Russian government as suspected.
sonnyspats1 on June 22, 2007 at 4:15 PM
Just another attempt by the agency to do what it does best……..nothing well.
Limerick on June 22, 2007 at 4:16 PM
Seriously, if the tech and procedures of our intel gathering haven’t changed significantly since 1973, then people deserve to know how we do what we do. It’s obsolete tech and should be easily guessed by any expert in the field today.
Also, it’s far more important to the preservation of a free society that the citizens of that society know what their government is up to (or was up to). Especially with regards to things like assassinations and human experimentation.
corbettw on June 22, 2007 at 4:39 PM
Do you really want to know how many men have hit on your wife and what methods she uses to make them go away? Or does it just matter that they went away?
Limerick on June 22, 2007 at 4:58 PM
Group hug everyone! How ’bout a round of Kumbaya to begin the healing process.
America is turning into a bunch of pantywaistes.
robblefarian on June 22, 2007 at 5:00 PM
Everything they are releasing has been known and written about for decades. There are no bombshells or surprises. It may come as a surprise to some Americans but critics of the CIA have had all of this information and published it long ago.
Does the fact that confirming the info by releasing it make a difference? I don’t know. But the CIA has done far worse than what they are releasing here. The story of our assistance to El Salvadoran death squads for instance might make for interesting reading in Latin America if the whole truth ever comes out.
rick moran on June 22, 2007 at 5:34 PM
Ya know, I just had a thought about a possible consequence of shrillery becoming POTUS. I think it might be plausible to believe that she might form alliances with mother russia. Alliances that would take America in the direction Russia is going now.
Talk about evil squared! Yikes.
The CIA info is definitely going to be used to dispirit and demean any remaining Patriots; tenderize and prepare them for their soon to come socialist overlords. All for the good of the many, of course.
We are being historically stupid right now, and our ‘leaders’ and msm are working toward national suicide. But I’m still convinced that the bulk of this country won’t tolerate a shift that far left. We’ll soon see.
Enemies foriegn and domestic and all that.
/spit
techno_barbarian on June 22, 2007 at 5:35 PM
Here is a summary of these illegal activities per a contemporary Justice Department memo obtained by The National Security Archive:
1. Confinement of a Russian defector that “might be regarded as a violation of the kidnapping laws.” (A reference to James Angleton’s holding of defector Yuri Nosenko).
2. Wiretapping of two syndicated columnists, Robert Allen and Paul Scott.
3. Physical surveillance of muckraker Jack Anderson and his associates, including current Fox News anchor Britt Hume.
4. Physical surveillance of then Washington Post reporter Michael Getler.
5. Break-in at the home of a former CIA employee.
6. Break-in at the office of a former defector.
7. Warrantless entry into the apartment of a former CIA employee.
8. Mail opening from 1953 to 1973 of letters to and from the Soviet Union.
9. Mail opening from 1969 to 1972 of letters to and from China.
10. Behavior modification experiments on “unwitting” U.S. citizens. (LSD and other drug trials)
11. Assassination plots against Castro, Lumumba, and Trujillo (on the latter, “no active part” but a “faint connection” to the killers).
12. Surveillance of dissident groups between 1967 and 1971.
13. Surveillance of a particular Latin American female and U.S. citizens in Detroit.
14. Surveillance of a CIA critic and former officer, Victor Marchetti.
15. Amassing of files on 9,900-plus Americans related to the antiwar movement.
16. Polygraph experiments with the San Mateo, California, sheriff.
17. Fake CIA identification documents that might violate state laws.
18. Testing of electronic equipment on US telephone circuits.
This is CIA wrongdoing from the 50′s to the 70′s only. And there is nothing in the CIA charter that prevents it from overthrowing country’s leaders because they didn’t like United Fruit Company having a monopoly on their banana production or ditto AT & T with their nation’s telephones.
For all the good and brave and decent things the CIA has done, there have been some horrors as well. It is a cold, brutal world out there and the CIA has had to act in ways that do not reflect well on our stated values. But usually, they did what was necessary to ensure our survival.
That is it’s own moral justification right there.
rick moran on June 22, 2007 at 5:44 PM
50s and 60s? So how much of this bad stuff was ordered by JFK and LBJ?
Tim Burton on June 22, 2007 at 6:16 PM
How do we know these ducments are real, or tell the truth?
They could be anti-CIA disinformation b.s. added to the files by the likes of CIA traitor Wilson and FBI traitor Hanson, or their undiscovered ilk.
The whole enterprise of showing even part of your hand -in the middle of a terror war against the most dangerous enemies in human history- strikes me as colossally stupid and catastrophically naive.
If the documents are real, they should have been destroyed long ago. Or, if held on to for some reason, kept tight to the intelligence vest for a century, or more.
It’s not as if the paranoid-tending world needs more reasons to villify the last best hope of human freedom.
Morons.
profitsbeard on June 22, 2007 at 6:30 PM
Very bad idea indeed. What in the hell are they thinking.
Catie96706 on June 22, 2007 at 6:57 PM
Boosh has lost it to allow this. Is it Jan 2009 yet?
Wade on June 22, 2007 at 8:59 PM
There are way too many Clintonians inside the USAF. Hayden is from that lot. Liberal politicking now in charge of the CIA. Welcome to the New World Order. No where to go now. This is the last bastion of freedom and it is falling fast.
We are guilt tripping ourselves into laying down so we can be raped and murdered more easily after we have been looted and robbed.
Egfrow on June 22, 2007 at 10:00 PM
Couldn’t leave that one be, forgive me see-dubya.
Bryan is right, the main reason for keeping such information under wraps isn’t in the least about embarassment, it’s about analysts of enemy nations reverse-engineering facts to determine methods. That’s a huge part of the intel game, and handing this stuff over will put American lives at risk, or the lives of foreigners who have helped us.
There’s a reason the name “family jewels” came to be. They should not be exhibited in public, and putting them out there is just begging for them to be stomped on. It’ll hurt.
Freelancer on June 22, 2007 at 10:45 PM