Coming soon: Evil imperialist American occupiers, the animated film
posted at 11:38 am on June 21, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
‘Bout time. The left has been waiting for another Teachable Moment like this for 30 years; what better way to teach it than with a little light, Pixar-ish family fare? It started as a short in 2003, the year of the Iraq invasion, and now it’s gone feature length. Says the director:
I watched these [old] alien films and found it extremely simplistic that these aliens are just out to get us. In many cases they’re allegories for the Red Threat and so on, but I always thought you could add a layer or two to that and then I thought how interesting it would be if you could give the aliens as much of a character and as much sympathy and complexity as we do for the humans. And then I thought I’d want to do an alien invasion film, but completely turn it on its head. I found that a lot of the aliens in these other films exhibit behavior which humans exhibit in history, particularly humanity’s tendency to dominate and occupy. In light of recent events too and tendencies in several First World nations, not just the United States, it feels as though we are the ones who are following the patterns of the ‘invading aliens.’ So I figured lets turn it around and make the point of view through the aliens and make the invaders us.
That was the plot of virtually every “alien invasion” episode of the Twilight Zone, from “The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street,” where aliens conquer earth by stirring up people’s prejudices until they’re at each other’s throats, to “The Invaders,” which is a direct analog to this flick. (“To Serve Man” is a notable exception.) So famous was Rod Serling for “we’re the real enemy” sci fi that the producers of what would become the ultimate example of the genre sought him out to write the screenplay for it. He’d be doing a celebrity nudge-wink voice cameo in this movie if he was alive today.
Anyway, I do like the title pun, which alludes of course to Bush’s oft-mocked pronunciation of “terror.” Doubtless one of the characters will cleverly exclaim at some point, “They’ve declared a war on Terra!” (which would actually have a third meaning to lefties in the know) just to make sure everyone’s on the same page. Exit question: Just how idyllic will the depiction of the pastoral utopian salamander paradise be? Somewhat restrained, or the full nine kite-flying yards?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
God, I hate salamanders. I’m going to go kill a salamander right now.
Alex K on June 21, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Will they have that Clutch Cargo/SPace Angel lip thing going on?
Oh, I love the earnestness…it’s so deep and full.
benrand on June 21, 2007 at 11:48 AM
Sounds like another “duuuuhhh” celebrity “brilliant idea”, as when they tell a knock-knock joke and repeatedly blather, “get it? get it?”. These are the people who brought us a live-action version of The Thunderbirds. Yeah, they get it all right.
Next, they’ll have an all-human version of Lancelot Link!
stonemeister on June 21, 2007 at 11:56 AM
Star Trek
Twilight Zone
Planet of the Apes
I’m sensing a theme today Allah. A cool theme. Thanks.
Oh, by the way Hillary Clinton’s new theme song is here – http://www.hillaryclinton.com/feature/song/
By Celine Dion!!!!
Canadian Infidel on June 21, 2007 at 11:56 AM
I have it on good authority that the invaders are there to build a
oil pipelinespace elevator and steal the salamanders’ riches.Niko on June 21, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Speaking as an “artsy-farsty” person (professional writer), I really, really, really, really hate artsty-fartsy people. Especially the Hollywood types.
They’re so bloody stupid and self-absorbed.
Mindcrime on June 21, 2007 at 12:01 PM
This takes me back to my days at NYU.
Every film student would talk his/her friends’ ears off about their brilliant new script with a story/concept that has “never been done before!!!!”
Without fail, there was always someone there that could name a movie/tv show/play that was exactly like their idea.
This “humans as alien invaders” concept is child’s play in the ‘name that plot’ game.
The only thing that would make it better is if those war-mongering humans discover that they had been the original inhabitants of the salamander planet and they start demonstrating in the streets and shouting “We didn’t cross the interplanetary border…the interplanetary border crossed us!”
JadeNYU on June 21, 2007 at 12:02 PM
benrand, where/when did you see Clutch Cargo? Was it on a double bill with Diver Dan and trigger fish?
Anymore,pretty much everything in the “entertainment” fields is grossly tainted with the disease of the progressive movement, really difficult for me to watch 90% of it.
bbz123 on June 21, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Oh, sheesh.
I don’t even know what else to say.
Sheesh.
Okay, I do know what to say: the next time, somewhere in the world, a REAL invading, imperialist nations rolls its tanks into one of its neighbors’ countries …. can you just please, PLEASE not call us?
I’ll be more than happy to pick up a rifle again and defend our country.
But I’m not defending anybody else. Not anymore. Not Kuwait. Not France. Nobody.
Screw you guys, I’m taking my gun, my courage, my freedom, and going home. We’re the bad guys? Fine. You deal with the world then.
The Atlantic and the Pacific are going to protect us from the fanatical Islamic hordes for a long time. Meanwhile, the Muslim Borg has already started assimilating YOUR countries.
But call somebody else, mmm-kay? I don’t care anymore. Screw you people.
Maybe you can make a cartoon about it later, if it’s permitted under sharia law, you ungrateful dickweeds.
Professor Blather on June 21, 2007 at 12:07 PM
benrand……………………………………..Will they have that Clutch Cargo/SPace Angel lip thing going on?I watched those episodes every day after school. The lack of animation was obvious even then. I think that tecnique has been resurected with South Park and Conan O’brian used to do remote ‘guest’ spots. They were mostly hillarious. Are you from the Northeast?
sonnyspats1 on June 21, 2007 at 12:07 PM
A metaphor for US imperialism, hmm? Well, you have to be a brainless lefty to understand a metaphor for a non-fact. Maybe Nonfactor can manage it.
I guess Hugo stopped answering Danny Glover’s calls, so he had to find some voice work.
The nearest thing to an example of US imperialism is Puerto Rico, and they seem to have gotten the better end of the deal.
Freelancer on June 21, 2007 at 12:09 PM
There’s also Guam, but I don’t think anyone Guam complains half as much as people in Puerto Rico.
Mindcrime on June 21, 2007 at 12:11 PM
So it’ll be like The Day The Earth Stood Still?
Maybe they’ll have robot named Gore…
Heh, my names all shiny and blue cuz I put mah blahg in…sweeeet.
Bad Candy on June 21, 2007 at 12:11 PM
in new Fantastic Four movie, the military are bad guys and ‘torture’, a military commander actually says “Mission Accomplished” at a point when the mission is obviously not over….propaganda is everywhere in hollywood.
jp on June 21, 2007 at 12:14 PM
I knew it – George Bush hates salamanders.
infidel4life on June 21, 2007 at 12:14 PM
God I’m pissed. Imperialism, huh?
The Newsbusters blog mentions the flick “Independence Day,” and there’s a scene in that movie that always both makes me laugh and pisses me off.
Near the end. They’ve devised the plan to take out the alien ships, upload the virus, etc. Our forces tell other countries around the world, using the old Morse code.
They cut to a scene, presumably somewhere in Europe. One soldier with an accent says to another: “The Americans have a plan!”
And his comrade replies something to the effect of: “About bloody time!”
It makes me laugh and pisses me off, because if we ever do face a real threat like that – whether its from aliens, or a reconstituted Russia, or China, or the Muslim Mob of Madness, you just freaking KNOW that the response is going to be exactly like that.
The Americans are coming to rescue us? About bloody time!
When the day comes – and it will – all this crap about us being evil imperialists is going to be conveniently forgotten. And like we always do, we’ll send our sons and daughters to save their ungrateful, spoiled asses. Again.
I’m just so sick of it.
If you don’t like us …. THEN SOLVE YOUR OWN PROBLEMS.
/rant off
Sorry. I’m annoyed.
Professor Blather on June 21, 2007 at 12:15 PM
I think one of the reasons “Independence Day” was such a hit was that the aliens were bad guys (even to the extent of blowing up all the peaceniks who chose to party directly beneath their spaceships).
To paraphrase The Simpsons, some aliens are just jerks.
Deep. I haven’t seen a director tackle that perspective for well over two months now.
saint kansas on June 21, 2007 at 12:15 PM
Hmmm, I wonder how well the film would be received if the human invaders spoke Arabic, wore diapers on their heads and were spreading Islam by the sword galactically? They had acheived their goal of turning the entire Earth into an Islamic oppressive hell hole and by Allah (peace be upon him) they needed more because for some reason the 12th Imam never actually appeared on that holy day of distruction. Naaah, that would be too unrealistic. Obviously people like that would never become technologically advanced enough to build a spaceship.
Zetterson on June 21, 2007 at 12:15 PM
The people in Puerto Rico complain, but, let’s see how fast their tune changes if we say “You guys win! We’re sorry. We’ll take all our naval training bases, financial aid, etc and give you back your island.”
JadeNYU on June 21, 2007 at 12:16 PM
Ob-”The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street”:
It’s the kid! It’s Allah! He’s the lefty!
calbear on June 21, 2007 at 12:17 PM
The Twilight Zone wasn’t trying to make a “statement” though, was it? (I know nothing about Rod Serling, except that I love his voice.) Weren’t they just trying to have cool twist endings?
The one with the teeny, tiny spaceship in the giant house is another example, but you could say the same thing (surprise! we’re the enemy!) about Eye of the Beholder.
Tanya on June 21, 2007 at 12:18 PM
did you guys know that Sen. Santourum is working on a movie that involves terrorist? I hope it gets made and widely distributed and marketed.
jp on June 21, 2007 at 12:19 PM
The tiny spaceship in the house was “The Invaders” wasn’t it?
Alex K on June 21, 2007 at 12:19 PM
The author gives his theory on who the hero of the story will be, but I have to disagree with him. I believe, the eventual hero of the story will be a human. She (the author gets this one right) will be a human civilian scientist or other non-military intellectual who will figure out that the salamanders are intelligent and should be spared from destruction. She will then form a fifth column (just like Martin did in V) to work with the salamanders and try to subvert the human military from within. The character’s name will be Cindy or Nancy of Barbara or something like that.
BohicaTwentyTwo on June 21, 2007 at 12:20 PM
If you think this is bad, wait until James Cameron’s “Avatar” hits. I read the original script treatment a few years ago when it was leaked on-line, and it managed to swing almost every conceivable radicalized Green, anti-American, anti-corporate, and anti-civilizational trope with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer. (The only thing not preached about explicitly was global warming, though I’m sure that’ll make it into the final draft.)
When it finally hits the screen, expect at least a cameo by Al Gore, if not a full-on role.
Blacklake on June 21, 2007 at 12:20 PM
That’s it. I kept trying to make it something more complicated than that.
Tanya on June 21, 2007 at 12:21 PM
This movie will be picked up by a distributor. It will be released in theaters and on DVD next year. It will make money from domestic TV distribution rights (which means tons of revenue via advertising sales on cable and local channels) and overseas distribution to warrant more work from the filmmakers that made it…
…and this information should not be a shock to any of you.
The counterproductive bitching about how e-e-e-evil liberal Hollyweird doesn’t make any entertainment for you should be replaced with stories about how you don’t watch TV or go to movies anymore because you’ve found alternative entertainment from more politically-neutral (if not outright conservative) artists online. I’ll start:
http://www.baratsandbereta.com/videos.html
http://www.homestarrunner.com/main12.html
http://www.smosh.com
I cannot emphasize enough the importantance of encouraging any of your children that show a proclivity to the arts to make it their career.
ScottMcC on June 21, 2007 at 12:26 PM
It does sound more anti-human than anti-US to me.
I mean, we have very recent history of what could be considered occupation, but we’re hardly the country that’s best known for wiping out entire indigenous populations with smallpox-laden blankets, are we?
Tanya on June 21, 2007 at 12:34 PM
Amen.
And what frustrates me most about the lack of conservative Hollywood films is that there is a VAST untapped market out there waiting to be plundered.
There are literally a hundred million people who would line up to see more films with a pro-American, conservative perspective. Heck, you can even be religious if you want: did “Passion of the Christ” not teach anybody anything?
There are billions to be made. Some conservative George Lucas type is out there, I hope. And he’s going to be very very rich someday.
Just hope he shows up soon. Not taking advantage of this obvious market demand is so … unconservative. Sheesh.
Professor Blather on June 21, 2007 at 12:36 PM
I’d like to see your entire post be read as an official US statement at the UN, Blather. Bolton might have been up to it, but now….
I see someone already beat me to the, “What, this isn’t a James Cameron film?” comment.
Anton on June 21, 2007 at 12:52 PM
As Ted Nugent and the boys put it so succinctly back in 89/90:
… Crazy dictator down south of us, lost all control. He didn’t have time to see me, didn’t have time to thank me. Suck on the barrel of my hot shotgun, smile when you say Damn Yankee!
juanito on June 21, 2007 at 12:54 PM
“I found that a lot of the aliens in these other films exhibit behavior which humans exhibit in history, particularly humanity’s tendency to dominate and occupy.”
As much as that side talks about evolution, they don’t seem to have a clue how it works.
Clue: That isn’t just a human trait, it is what successful species do.
B Moe on June 21, 2007 at 1:00 PM
http://www.godawa.com and check out his book, ‘hollywood worldviews’
michael medved of course
http://www.libertyfilmfestival.com/libertas/
it seems to me there is a profitable market for conservative themed movies, if they would just get the big budget and good actors to go with them.
jp on June 21, 2007 at 1:21 PM
Just as President Bush is the most incompetent evil genius the world has ever seen (too stupid to properly pronounce “nuclear”, but brilliant enough to fool even the elite into marching off to war on the basis of a “lie”, too stupid to realize how transparent his attempts to enrichen his oil buddies are, but an abosulute genius at planning and executing the controlled implosion of the WTC and WTC 7).
So too is the United States the most incompetent imperialistic super-power in the history of the world! So incredibly devious as to manuever the entire world into a situation where all challengers to U.S. power have been laid low, but led by such bumbling fools as to be unable to quash an insurgency consisting of a few rag-tag freedom fighters in one of it’s future client states.
Is the entire LLL movement madeup up of nothing more than extremely bipolar individuals who believe that both absolute ruthless genius AND total bumbling incompetence not only can, but actually DO exist in their perceived “enemies” (Bushitler and the U.S.)?
Does anyone believe that, if the U.S. was really as evil as portrayed in the rest of the world, we would have any trouble ending the “troubles” in Iraq? If we really didn’t care about people, didn’t care about torture, etc – would we actually purposely limit our actions in order to avoid civilian casualties? And do soto an extent never before seen in any nation, let alone an imperialistic one?
Sheesh!
Fatal on June 21, 2007 at 1:22 PM
check out this short film, and future movie called “Cruel Logic”, this will drive libs nuts if they actually ‘get it’
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4qd1LPRJLnI
jp on June 21, 2007 at 1:23 PM
The problem is that, for anything but a big summer blockbuster, Hollywood can make their money back in the NY & LA markets alone.
Then, they export their liberal agenda/anti-American crap to the rest of the world and make a tidy little profit.
While their may be a huge, untapped market of Conservative dollars for conservative films, there is little chance that Hollywood (in its current incarnation) is ever going to feel the need to tap into those dollars.
JadeNYU on June 21, 2007 at 1:35 PM
Once again…NOT at all surprised.
Can’t even muster annoyance…because of the lack of surprise.
THIS is precisely why I am not working in this Industry in which I’m trained. I decided once I got that degree in Film that I DO NOT want to work with these uncreative, self back-patting, bleedingheart, anti-American Liberal morons. (Read: “Hollywood”). One can WRITE anywhere, so I’m happy I’m here, on the RIGHT coast.
And Allah, I’m having trouble with your use of “Pixar-ish” in your description. Pixar would NEVER do this sort of twaddle. Dreamworks, definitely…but not Pixar.
tickleddragon on June 21, 2007 at 1:38 PM
Klaatu barada nikto
Nonfactor on June 21, 2007 at 1:41 PM
the arts are a reflection of philosophy, the problem is in the 1800’s and early 19th hundreds lib/godless/marxist philosophy dominated, it lead us to where we are now. Artist are just portraying the logical conclusions to these philosophies in ‘art’ today, this is how it works, Philosophy then into Art/Music, then pop/general culture and finally it starts making its way into Theology(liberal theology), see the Episcopal church muslim priest blog….conservative philosophy, anti-humanism needs to rise up intellectually and eventually the art problem will be solved.
jp on June 21, 2007 at 1:43 PM
Someone needs to make this asshole read STARSHIP TROOPERS.
fusionaddict on June 21, 2007 at 2:14 PM
Yeah, we all know how well Heinlein’s words are translated to the silver screen when put through the Hollywood meat grinder…
Put your kids in private school and make ‘em learn reading, writing, maths, and cinematography.
ScottMcC on June 21, 2007 at 2:34 PM
“Yes, I said the words…basically.”
James on June 21, 2007 at 2:41 PM
As the writer of the Newsbusters piece linked in your post, I thank you for the link and I updated the story to welcome HotAir readers.
Thanks guys.
Warner Todd Huston on June 21, 2007 at 2:50 PM
I don’t know if anyone has said it above, but humans-as-invaders was also done by Bradbury in The Martian Chronicles.
Chris L. on June 21, 2007 at 2:56 PM
…which also sucked.
I wonder if it is uniquely American for modern fiction writers to cast their fellow citizens as the careless, wanton, amoral antagonists in stories?
ScottMcC on June 21, 2007 at 4:31 PM
Please knock-off all the dire doom and gloom stuff about getting invaded by some insideous race of alien beings from outer space. Besides, everybody knows that the Earth is already slated for destruction in order to make room for an intergalactic freeway. I suspect that the groundbreaking dedication ceremony consists of nothing more than a giant ball of rock and ice that falls out of the sky — obliterating all life on the planet. Yeah…that’s right…the end of human history and civilization will be about as meaningful and significant as a child’s game of marbles. Apropos, donchathink?
My dolphin says:
CyberCipher on June 21, 2007 at 8:59 PM
The people in Puerto Rico complain, but, let’s see how fast their tune changes if we say “You guys win! We’re sorry. We’ll take all our naval training bases, financial aid, etc and give you back your island.”
I live in a heavily populated Puerto Rican/Brazilian neighborhood. When I use that argument? I get anywhere between “Good,we don’t NEED you’re help” to “F**k You white boy,we don’t need nobody telling us what to do” to slack jawed (admittedly older) folks just blinking and saying “we are here legally”….There IS no Americanism in them,and I count that as a blessing…
Because MOST of them GO HOME in the winter…Trafic around here is a lot lighter
Blitz on June 21, 2007 at 10:09 PM
To tickleddragon, JadeNYU, and jp:
I’d be willing to kick some money/time in to produce and distribute entertainment online for a conservative audience.
Click on my name and contact me through the website.
Let’s talk.
ScottMcC on June 22, 2007 at 1:43 PM
I never saw it that way. It seemed to me that the Brits were just anxious to get into the fight, showing their usual swagger in the face of world annihilation. Like during the Big War, eh?
Hey, they get to pretend to be their own country in the Olympics. What more do they want from us???
manwithblackhat on June 22, 2007 at 2:23 PM
By the way, does this movie have a trailer anywhere?
manwithblackhat on June 22, 2007 at 2:23 PM
Comment pages: