Hillary booed at Take Back America Update: Link to video added
posted at 10:35 am on June 20, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view
The nutroots must be appeased.
Ellen Malcolm introduced Hillary Clinton, talking about health care, and Clinton opened her speech with a promise to lift a ban on stem cell research…
Our Constitution is being shredded, Clinton said, citing spying, detentions, US attorney firings, silencing of scientists, retribution against whistleblowers, Katrina, and the occupation of Iraq [some people shouted angry comments at this point. Clinton, of course, voted for the war and many times to fund the occupation]… Clinton moved into talking about health care. She never got to any sort of solution to the long list of problems.
James Hansen is the most famous “silenced” scientist in American history. The Clintons fired all 93 US attorneys in March 1993. Hillarycare was a disaster. She didn’t even read the 2002 NIE. Etc etc.
Then she jumped to ending the occupation and bringing the troops home. She called is a sectarian civil war. Several people shouted things during this part of Clinton’s speech, like “Get us out!” Then she said “The American military has succeeded. It is the Iraqi government that has failed.” Loud booing.
Bonus: After Bill Richardson’s Take Back America speech, TNR catches him flip-flopping and scrubbing his website of all the evidence.
Update: Bill Scher has video of Hillary Clinton’s speech embedded in this post. The booing is at 23:38. He explains the booing.
Why get booed for that?
Because a lot of people are sick and tired of what’s become a stand-by cop-out bipartisan talking point: that the Iraqis are solely to blame for the chaos and de-stablization.
As if the Iraqis invaded and occupied themselves.
The debacle cannot be turned around until blame is properly placed. Not on all the Iraqi people. Not on the propped-up Iraqi “government.” Not on America. Not on Americans. Not on the troops.
But on the individuals in Washington who planned the occupation, voted for the occupation, fund the occupation, and continue the occupation.
The Washington media are likely to miss the true nature of the boos, because this grassroots frustration at the constant blame-shifting has rarely been given the media megaphone. That it’s the Iraqis fault has become accepted fact.
I highly doubt Sen. Clinton thought repeating conventional wisdom would have resulted in such a visceral reaction. But that’s what happens when mainstream media only reflects Beltway groupthink and ignores what’s simmering on the ground across America.
What is the actual news?
That the progressive grassroots, being serious about foreign policy and national security, wanting a fundamental change in our foreign policy away from blundering occupation and towards steely multilateral diplomacy, viscerally reacted to a blatant mischaracterization of what’s happening abroad.
&c. I find it fascinating that in all that high-minded dissection, the Iranians and Syrians never make an appearance. Surely they’re to blame for at least some of the violence in Iraq, right Bill? Oh, he throws a one-liner at unnamed “foreign fighters who commit unspeakable violence,” but spends the bulk of his time blaming America and Americans first and praising the nutroots’ childish reaction today. Typical liberal.
(h/t Michelle)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I like this observation via MM:
Feed the sharks.
Spirit of 1776 on June 20, 2007 at 10:38 AM
Hillary is trying to be the Nadia Comenici of politics as she performs on the balance beam between the nutroots and mainstream America. She is trying to be something for everyone without falling on her ass. So, won’t everyone find something to dislike about her? I am hoping that will be her fatal weakness and keep her out of the White House.
(P.S. Sorry for the visual of Hillary performing on a balance beam)
Mallard T. Drake on June 20, 2007 at 10:43 AM
What about Hillary would make women want to vote for her. She seems so drab and has zero personality.
tomas on June 20, 2007 at 10:47 AM
Must be how she won her medals.
James on June 20, 2007 at 10:48 AM
I’m so sick of Mrs. Bill Clinton. She’s been infecting our national media for something like 17 years now. I’m sick of her face. I’m sick of her faux accents. I’m sick of her inability to grasp even the simplest democratic principles.
If it would guarentee her a swift exit from politics, I’d even vote for a non-Clinton Democrat candidate. That’s how sick of her I am.
Mindcrime on June 20, 2007 at 10:48 AM
Hmmm. Does this mean that the left doesn’t support the military?
Looks like it does…survey says…yes.
benrand on June 20, 2007 at 10:49 AM
Too late. Now I have to do mathematical equations in my head to get that vision outta there. :(
SuperManGreenLantern on June 20, 2007 at 10:51 AM
Pair of losers
Hillary on balance beam and Rosie on swing upside down.
Wade on June 20, 2007 at 10:56 AM
Cut it out. I threw up the first time I saw it. I don’t want to go into remission.
SuperManGreenLantern on June 20, 2007 at 11:00 AM
Who will be next to join our olympic team?
Wade on June 20, 2007 at 11:02 AM
Hillary’s out a-courtin’ the Deaniacs.
Nothing good can come from it.
Nethicus on June 20, 2007 at 11:03 AM
lan astaslem on June 20, 2007 at 11:16 AM
oops…. PIMF sorry
lan astaslem on June 20, 2007 at 11:17 AM
John Kerry came in well behind Hillary in the balance beam competition to take the bronze, but then he threw the medal over the White House fence.
saint kansas on June 20, 2007 at 11:22 AM
Can I be the first to say “snuke?”
JunkCoast on June 20, 2007 at 11:29 AM
What’s a “snuke”?
Andy in Agoura Hills on June 20, 2007 at 11:37 AM
Her Thighness is looking old and tired, methinks.
RushBaby on June 20, 2007 at 11:37 AM
Only if you whisper loudly for dramatic effect.
sunny on June 20, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Wow, that’d be about 5.7 on the Richter Scale, wouldn’t it?
N. O'Brain on June 20, 2007 at 11:45 AM
South Park has all your answers.
James on June 20, 2007 at 12:06 PM
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
profitsbeard on June 20, 2007 at 12:22 PM
Which is like telling the judge, “Your honor, I didn’t hit my wife nearly has hard this time!
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on June 20, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Every time she speaks, she proposes another way to take money from hard working Americans and let the government decide how to spend it.
She rolls out a laundry list of problems, and those are true enough, for the most part, but she never offers any solution. Then she start telling you how YOU will benefit from her in the
Oral OrificeOval Office, and how MY dollars will pay for it. Marx*sm on parade.Henry Reardon said it best. Productive people want to MAKE money, unproductive people want to GET money.
Freelancer on June 20, 2007 at 3:29 PM
On the subject of Mrs. Clinton, I noticed the Sopranos spoof thread was taken down, but the headline up there is that her campaign site is getting lots of traffic.
This morning the radio came on and the station announces that Hillary has a funny spoof out on the Sopranos and that listeners could go to the station’s website to see it.
Well, well, so that’s why it was packaged like that. Call it a spoof of a TV show and voila! Free radio time for a campaign ad, tons of internet freebie plugs. What a great deal. Makes it easier on the old campaign budget – the national media market is very happy to oblige. Too bad the GOP won’t ever be able allowed to pull that stunt.
naliaka on June 20, 2007 at 6:40 PM
Nothing will silence the “nutroots” except a massive loss in Nov ‘08.
And maybe not even then. Though a massive loss will cost them all their credibility and denigrate their effect in the Democratic Party.
These people are insane. We are fighting AL QAEDA in Iraq now. The nutroots and the truthers don’t want that. They will not be molified. And they will not support any war against Al Qaeda, even if AQ strikes America again.
We will have to deal with these traitors sooner or later, folks.
georgej on June 21, 2007 at 6:09 AM
Comment pages: