Taliban “graduation” video shows suicide bombers trained for U.S. attacks
posted at 6:49 pm on June 18, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Drudge is wetting himself over this. Justified? On the one hand, the only detail that makes it the slightest bit credible is the fact that one of the men spoke English. On the other hand, that’s no minor detail. Revisit this post from December describing a tip British intel had gotten about 18 suicide bombers operating inside the country which just so happened to coincide with a Newsweek story about “the English brothers,” an alleged team of 12 western jihadist recruits in Pakistan who’d been cultivated by AQ for a special mission. Mullah Dadullah, a.k.a. the Taliban Zarqawi, also claimed in his final video that he was planning attacks on the United States and Britain.
On the other other hand, my understanding is that the Taliban and AQ, while ideological allies, operate at very different levels of sophistication. If a plot against the west is being planned, it seems odd that the Taliban commander (Dadullah’s brother) would be officiating instead of some AQ capo. There’s also the matter of a minor detail that ABC mentions in the photo series that accompanies the story but conveniently omits in the body of the story itself: “After all of the speeches, there was a reception line, during which many of the recruits’ faces are shown, including this of a boy who appears to be as young as 10 or 12 years-old.”
Sounds like amateur hour to me. I think it’s a load of shinola.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
How dare you…
Nonfactor on June 18, 2007 at 6:57 PM
It’s always been my feeling that the “English brothers” that got close to Dadullah was the reason he was ultimately killed.
Recruiting English speakers cuts both ways, you jihadi !@#$s.
Citizen Duck on June 18, 2007 at 6:58 PM
I read that on Drudge also about several of the “grads” were as young as 12. How would someone that age could get into the country or Europe? And this is ABC’s Blotter, which, IMHO, tends to sensationalize things. Do they have beards at that age? Let alone get their hands on explosives, unless they have someone already in the country they are planning to blow themselves up in.
Is this the bumper sticker bomber? Or a picture on the milk carton bomber?
Kini on June 18, 2007 at 6:59 PM
But, but, but….ABC News said!
Big bucket full of shinola. Imagine the coordination needed to transport, paper, house, feed, and train these ‘boys’.
But then again…..ABC News said!
Limerick on June 18, 2007 at 7:08 PM
Impossible, there is no war on terror…it is just a bumper sticker.
If we just talk to them we will find out it was a misunderstanding.
Kind of like someone yelling out: there is a good buy today, and the neighbor yells back, ok goodbye.
That is all it is, just a simple misunderstanding.
right2bright on June 18, 2007 at 7:09 PM
They all look thrilled to be waving those little flags. /sarasm.
amerpundit on June 18, 2007 at 7:20 PM
This story may turn out to be explosive.
JayHaw Phrenzie on June 18, 2007 at 7:29 PM
Whew, I was worried but since I see them waving a surrender flag, I feel all better now.
abinitioadinfinitum on June 18, 2007 at 7:37 PM
Yes… but it’s what they consider ‘right’ and what we consider ‘wrong’. Those that would excuse them aren’t explaining this clearly documented intent.
They may be clueless… but they will keep coming.
DANEgerus on June 18, 2007 at 7:45 PM
When is America going to wake up!
I’ll tell you when….
When America finally gets nuked. That is the only way these stupid liberals will understand what we are fighting.
msipes on June 18, 2007 at 8:07 PM
hmmm… Why were the soldiers with guns facing INWARD? Why didn’t any of the “bombers” have guns of their own?
With England’s facial recognition software and systems, why would they show their faces? If they travel to the west, we’ll know who they are.
Sinola, indeed.
Why didn’t they have a dress rehersal?
Mazztek on June 18, 2007 at 8:28 PM
Pigskin-lined coffins for them all.
Every size available.
profitsbeard on June 18, 2007 at 9:14 PM
Those who can, bomb. Those who can’t, make videos.
Tantor on June 18, 2007 at 9:49 PM
No, they won’t. They will sat that we need to look at ourselves to see what drove these people to such desperate acts.
jman on June 18, 2007 at 10:08 PM
10 and 12 year-olds do grow up you know.
billy on June 18, 2007 at 10:44 PM
As per the Dummiecrap Party…”War on terror? What war on terror?” The war planned out by Mullah Dadullah and his brother, Yertle the Turtle. Stupid liberals.
lynnv on June 19, 2007 at 8:17 AM
The ‘unintelligible’ word is Ummah maybe the folks at ABC should look it up. While they are at it, they should also look up Dhimmi.
keving on June 19, 2007 at 9:17 AM
Comment pages: