Dictionary.com defines a conspiracy as; “an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons.”

There is a conspiracy but it is no longer a theory.

If the NAU/SPP does not exist why does the Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007, S.1348, have a provision on page 211, for fast tracking the North American Union inserted in the bill?

“It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico, which will lead to reduced migration,” the draft legislation states on page 211 on the version time-stamped May 18, 2007 11:58 p.m.”

John Hawklns, Michael Medved, and Allah are in denial when the facts are on the Internet for anyone to read. What is stupid is that these guys refuse to believe what is happening right in front of them and then attack anyone that has done their homework and understands that GWB is trying to do an end run around the Constitution to implement the NAU or SPP.

Dr. Jerome Corsi and Judicial Watch have used the FOIA to obtain the proof that the North American Union is being created in secret, behind closed doors and have posted the documents on the Internet for everyone to read.

There is no “conspiracy theory” here, whether about black helicopters or anything else. The evidence that supports the idea of a strategy aimed at ending U.S. sovereignty by creating a borderless world is in print, often by the authors of its own longstanding advocates, for those who can read plain English. Screaming “conspiracy theory” is nothing more than committing a strawman (an informal fallacy of basic logic).

Ridicule is the last resort of those who have lost the argument, as the skeptics clearly have.

Illegals using fire to clear border

U.S. Border Patrol agents seeking to secure the nation’s border in some of the country’s most pristine national forests are being targeted by illegal aliens, who are using intentionally set fires to burn agents out of observation posts and patrol routes.

The article goes on to say that in Coronado National Forest in Arizona firefighters have to escorted by armed law enforcement officers.

Who is involved?

“North American” nations, -the U.S. ,Mexico and Canada.

Since Canadians are not flooding south, it is mainly a problem with Mexico, and all aliens who can get into Mexico to use their non-border as a means to infiltrate the U.S. [for whatever aims].

Whether it is considered a conscious move [by a sinister cabal] for a specifically named goal [NAU], the results are good enough to be the same.

It doesn’t have to be “official” to be just as deadly to the U.S.

Balkanization, ho!

Whatever name [or namelessness] it goes by.

Meanwhile:

BUILD THE WALL!
ENFORCE THE LAWS!
FIRE THE POLITICAL PIMPS!

Almost brings a tear to my eye.

Enrique on June 18, 2007 at 5:43 PM

Too late, Enrique, I already have a tear in my eye. From LMAO…

Thanks. Canadians have an inferiority complex. Those who are anti-American are partly because the United States could take us over, or at least make life very miserable with ease.

I don’t see an NAU ever happening without force and no reason why an NAU would ever even be proposed. We already have NAFTA which deals with trade between our three countries. Culturally, each country already knows as much about the other’s culture as they need or desire to know. And since our countries didn’t war amongst each other last century killing tens of millions, there’s no need for an NAU arrangement similar to the EU.

I am proposing open amnesty Canadian borders though to any Americans, legal Americans as of this date and not citizenship retroactively granted back to this date by any act of Congress, so that you can come, bring all of your possessions, knowledge and skills to Canada. We’ve taken conscientious objectors before.

To quote Allahpundit f%ch you and the donkey you rode in on if you don’t like it go find another blog to hang out at……
doriangrey on June 18, 2007 at 8:19 PM

Isn’t the whole point of comments to post when you don’t agree? What is the use of a blog with hundreds of “yes men” as commentators. I don’t even bother posting in threads when I already agree with the sentiments in them.

Who knows what Allahpundit even really thinks because he obviously posts certain things just to generate traffic and comments and repeatly posts about the NAU yet ignores the distinction I made above every time.

Are you kidding me dorian. That is your best contribution? I complain about the insults and the shabby treatment of a very large percentage of this blog and conservatives in general and you and AP both insult me. Nice.

Allah you are seriously pissing me off

To quote Allahpundit f%ch you and the donkey you rode in on if you don’t like it go find another blog to hang out at……

Why do you degrade the image of the falice like so? I can see the resemblance but it’s purely coincidental.

Allah you are seriously pissing me off with what appears to be, at best, a deliberate obfuscation combined with hostility and insult.

Frankly being called a racist by my president and party is bad enough, I really don’t need to be called stupid by one of my favorite web news sources. Frankly, you remind me of Al Gore declaring that the debate over global warming is simply over.

The point (still unadressed by you) was and still is, that the majority of YOUR readers believe that all of the folowing add up to at least a de facto NAU. Despite serious discussion of all the below points by a majority of your readers, you continually declare the debate pointless and those desiring the discussion to be “stupid.”

Why don’t you shock everyone and do a serious treatment of the issue. Because frankly, right now, you have about as much credibility on this issue as Bush does.

-86 Amnesty
-Nafta
-Current Amnesty (with all it’s dreadful consequences)
-Security & Prosperity Partnership
-Cafta
* Bonus European Union: how it started and where it is headed now with Blair trying to ram through the unpopular proposals that were overwhelmingly opposed by the people.

As a Nevadan I apologize for his existance and no I didn’t vote for him.

You seem unable to grasp the distinction between the nuts you cited who think there is a grand conspiracy underway versus just being concererd the future is headed in the direction – no conspiracy needed.
Resolute on June 18, 2007 at 6:13 PM

Exactly

“Once the civil unrest and chaos caused by the overwhelming human tsunami of illegal aliens and MS-13 gang members reduces America to complete anarchy … the federal government will institute martial law,” Peterson said.

I guess I’m a nut too, because this makes perfect sense to moi.

amerpundit on June 18, 2007 at 6:11 PM

Uh-Oh! Time for someone’s psych meds!

Dude, there’s a world of difference between Amnesty and NAU, and the word is competence. Amnesty, like most disastrous actions of the elite, are a function of mindnumbing incompetence. For a sneaky, clever plan like the NAU to be real, it would require the elite to show themselves as functionally competent, and as we can see, the elite of the US are anything but. They’re too stupid to pull anything like that off under people’s noses.

Because those among them who believe in this nonsense deserve to be bashed.
Allahpundit on June 18, 2007 at 5:28 PM

You seem unable to grasp the distinction between the nuts you cited who think there is a grand conspiracy underway versus just being concererd the future is headed in the direction – no conspiracy needed.

I really don’t want to believe this NAU stuff either, BUT…

We are NOT controlling our own borders, even though we could EASILY.

We are NOT making law to penalize sanctuary cities…

We ARE about to make a bunch of Mexicans legal…

They ARE soon going to allow mexican shipping companies to use their trucks here (part of NAFTA)…

Tell me… just why are they doing all this? What is their GREAT PLAN?

Bad Candy on June 18, 2007 at 5:35 PM

Extremely insane. Even a little more insane than thinking that we, a sovereign nation, would grant amnesty to 12 million criminals! Whew. Funny stuff. The only thing more insane would be, after 6 years of support, President Bush stabbing us in the back! A riot I tell you.

That means Friday afternoon is our last chance to voice our disgust to our senators before they vote for cloture on this POS over the weekend.

csdeven on June 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM

I’m getting real tired of wasting my nickel on calling my senators, only to get an intern who is clearly not interested in what I have to say. I ask if they are getting a lot of calls against this bill and they tell me they are but it seems as if they don’t even have a list or count of the calls that are against this bill. I have received only (1) one response from my many e-mails. It was to advise me to view senator David Vitter’s website and stance on this bill. Both of my senators are against this bill, but I still make it clear too them how much I am for border security, and against amnesty!

Why do I have a bad feeling that this bill is going through this time around?

Bad Candy on June 18, 2007 at 6:06 PM

I have the same bad feeling BC.