omnipotent on June 18, 2007 at 2:21 PM

You don’t have to worry about it, fred? is too busy hiding behind his wife and kids to actually take on anybody in a debate.

omnipotent on June 18, 2007 at 12:17 PM

Sorry, I wouldn’t lower myself to give a chick$hit non-candidate the credibility of treating him like he was an actual candidate. And if he ever actually grows a pair of balls.csdeven on June 18, 2007 at 1:30 PM

I didn’t think so!

Lawrence on June 18, 2007 at 11:51 AM

I haven’t seen that from the guy. In the Leno and Hoover interviews he did very poorly. When Hannity was leading fred? to the “right” answers I wasn’t impressed either. The video with him hiding behind his wife and kids looked so obviously contrived in feelings and sincerity. All that is left are his articles and speeches, in which he says all the right stuff, but those are all pre-scripted.

As far as looking presidential, Mitt! looks much more presidential than any of the candidates. That may work for some people, but I don’t really care. fred? could be bald and wear bad suits and I wouldn’t hold that against him. ;-)

Fred Thompson leads in a new South Carolina straw poll, and Allah has game on why it’s not just a Southern thing. You can also work it from the other direction, and gauge Fred’s potential run by looking at what……

omnipotent on June 18, 2007 at 12:17 PM

Sorry, I wouldn’t lower myself to give a chick$hit non-candidate the credibility of treating him like he was an actual candidate. And if he ever actually grows a pair of balls, he’s gonna have his hands full trying to defend his piss poor record to the American people via actual debates with real live candidates.

Fred! vs. csd in a debate!

If When Fred! wins….csd agrees to shut his pie-hole.

If csd wins…..Fred! runs for senator of SC instead of POTUS.

Anyone want to watch that one?

That may be, but how will he fare against the republican front runners? I’d bet McCain would be a real challenge for fred? because McCain knows him so well.

csdeven on June 18, 2007 at 8:00 AM

Fred’s greatest advantage is that he at least knows how to act and look “presidential”. Something the other GOP and Dems candidates are having serious problems with. Something that has been sorely lacking in the executive office since Reagan.

Going to be really interesting how this all plays out.

I still think that, in a debate, Fred can make Shrillery pee her pants on stage.
lynnv on June 18, 2007 at 7:45 AM

That may be, but how will he fare against the republican front runners? I’d bet McCain would be a real challenge for fred? because McCain knows him so well.

Why aren’t you jumping up and down about the dem candidates lack of executive experience?

First, I don’t care about the dems. 2nd, only Rudy, Mitt!, and fred? are saying the right things. Since fred? has the least experience and he refuses to get in the pool, he gets the brunt of my criticism. The minute he decides to be a real candidate, I’ll respect him as a real candidate.

Surely, you can understand how my conservative values demand him to show some respect to those who might support him.

Since when does being a senator afford any executive experience?

Why aren’t you jumping up and down about the dem candidates lack of executive experience? Or McCain’s? It’s not just that your arguements are lame; they’re not even spread consistently among the other turd sandwich candidates. This constant drumbeat of bashing on Thompson makes you sound like a jilted groupie he kicked off his campaign bus for being too familiar with his wife.

When fred? acts like an outsider when he is clearly a Washington insider…..LIE.

When fred? pretends he is a reg’lar Joe by renting a pickup truck, just so his staff can drive it away from rally’s etc…..LIE.

Since when does being a senator afford any executive experience?

I don’t have to lie to make fred? look bad. His lying does that all on it’s own.

csdeven on June 17, 2007 at 10:18 PM

See para 2 under Comments in the site Terms of Use.

Bye-Bye

I don’t have to lie to make fred? look bad. His lying does that all on it’s own.

csdeven on June 17, 2007 at 10:18 PM

Name the lie or lies. Empty accusations are tiring.

gekkobear on June 17, 2007 at 8:59 PM

Since when does being a senator afford any executive experience?

I don’t have to lie to make fred? look bad. His lying does that all on it’s own.

A foreign agent?

I’m not sure what this all means but clearly, fred? was lobbying well after his senate “career” and it’s also clear that the folksy persona he is trying to manufacture is a lie. freddie boy is the epitome of a Washington insider.

Either you’re immune to information, or you consistently lie yto make Fred look bad? Which is it?

I agree with that, but freds? problem, besides his weak record and having no executive experience, he was an arm twisting lobbyist for 20+ years. Once we find out if he was working for or against the American public, we can vet him out, or move on to his other problems. Sadly, once everyones exposed for their weaknesses, fred? will have to bow out having no qualifications for the office.

csdeven on June 17, 2007 at 6:46 PM

Ok, one more time, and try listening for once. He was a lobbyist for 18 years, not 20+. He lobbied in behalf of the gas and electric power industries which were under extreme regulations submitted by Johnson and increased by Nixon. He was working to have those and other unconstitutional legislation regarding those industries repealed or reversed. I’d say that favors “the people”, but even if you disagree, it was in favor of the correct level of governmental power, and in opposition to abuses of same.

But of course, the mere facts won’t slow down your tired, fact-free, and nauseously repetitive diatribes, so have at it. Hopefully the rest of the people will do the same research for themselves that others of us WHO DON’T CARE THAT HE’S AN ACTOR have done, and use that as a basis for preferring him over the REAL FAKES who have led the polls until recently.

Gotta go, church time.

but Fred doesn’t fit that category, and I think that is a huge advantage for him.
WisCon on June 17, 2007 at 2:16 PM

I agree with that, but freds? problem, besides his weak record and having no executive experience, he was an arm twisting lobbyist for 20+ years. Once we find out if he was working for or against the American public, we can vet him out, or move on to his other problems. Sadly, once everyones exposed for their weaknesses, fred? will have to bow out having no qualifications for the office.

The Fred! bandwagon is going to tip over. Just wait.
Halley on June 17, 2007 at 1:09 PM

Yeah, you got that right. I can’t believe these people vote for a guy because of some TV show he was on. The minute that fake opens his pie hole, his numbers will fall faster than McCain’s have. That’ll leave the battle between Rudy and Mitt!. That is a win/win for the republican party. Either guy has the class and experience to be qualified as POTUS. Of all the candidates freddie boy is the least qualified. It’s too bad this isn’t a TV show, fred? would be the best actor for the role.