I do have another suggestion to add: If the priary in your district does not pan out, go ahead and vote-but only for President. You don’t have to cast a vote for the other Congressional races. I think this is as good a backup plan as we can get, given the alternatives.

Lancer on June 14, 2007 at 9:08 AM

Vote for President and the House if your Senate candidate isn’t to your liking. The Republican House members have been pretty strong on immigration! It would also be easier to make changes there in the primaries if he isn’t strong. We could at least try to regain the House, especially since they have to run ever 2 years! It would be possible if we make that our focus along with the White House!!

That is where you do that. Else in the General Election even a Rino is better than a Dino(saur)

I’m sorry but I disagree. How is it better to elect someone that takes your vote and your money and then gives you the finger once they get into office? They think, act, and vote like a Democrat and they think you’re stupid because you put them there. I’d rather have someone in office who I know what they stand for than a RINO sack of weasel cr*p who took advantage of me and is acting the exact same way the democrat would. You don’t reward backstabbers. I won’t anyway.

The sticks of enforcement are fine, but you need some carrots in there too.

NPP on June 14, 2007 at 1:45 AM

Not if the enforcement is actually enforcement. We don’t have to provide anything for people who break into this country. We could simply ban them for life if we chose. And so long as the enforcement measures are actually keeping illegal aliens out, it won’t matter.

And really, we need to stop blaming our own country for illegal immigration: we have so much money, and they’re so poor; it takes years to come in here legally; keeping Mexicans out (cause supposedly they’re the only ones breaking in /sarc) is akin to slavery, or worse.

The only blame that I see this country as having when it comes to illegal immigration is that we treat it like it’s not illegal.

Exit question:

Are you serious? I thought you were one of the ones saying we shouldn’t stay home when this idea was brought up for the past election. I guess I could be wrong.

The ones arguing that we should go for the primaries are right; that’s our best bet to get rid of the open-borders RINOs and put real Republicans in their place. I do have another suggestion to add: If the priary in your district does not pan out, go ahead and vote-but only for President. You don’t have to cast a vote for the other Congressional races. I think this is as good a backup plan as we can get, given the alternatives.

So run for his seat………..

Exit question: Bla bla bla…

Cutting ones nose off to spite their face is NEVER an acceptable solution.

Americans favor incremental immigration reform

Finally! Pres. Bush, and idiots like Kennedy, and Graham, keep talking about how important it is to have “comprehensive reform.” Then there’s this “of course no one’s going to like everything in it; it’s comprehensive,” shpiel I keep hearing. What mountain did this truth descend from? Could someone in the press corps please as the President or Tony Snow, or Kennedy, or Graham, or anyone who is pushing this monstrosity, “Why is it more important to have a comprehensive bill than a good bill?”

Did the Pentagon just detonate a “Kinky Bomb?”

We should also avoid donating to the party in general and committees such as the NRSCC and so forth, instead donating directly to the candidates we support. The grass roots needs to get on the ball to defeat the party apparatus, which will continue to support RINO’s like Specter, Chaffee, and so on, who will sell us down the river every time.

thirteen28 on June 13, 2007 at 8:09 PM

Ring-a-ding-ding. Morever, we cannot be complacent and think 1 or 2 “lessons” will be enough.

Some of our readers are giving me static for suggesting that we should stay home next year if they pass amnesty rather than sit out, hand the election to the Democrats, and teach our own side a lesson.

Splain dis;
The term ‘rather than’ denotes options to consider. Looks like only one choice here using different words for the same suggestion. Political double speak….

Are you Federal or State politician?

Bush said it before, “Money Trumps All”

Kini on June 13, 2007 at 7:26 PM

You know, it don’t trump a vote out of office. Ask McVain…there isn’t enough money in the world to get that b!tch elected now.

Some of our readers are giving me static for suggesting that we should stay home next year if they pass amnesty rather than sit out

You should get static. Is far worse facing America than just immigration. The issue are far too serious to play democratic party games.

If you want to get rid of problem Republicans then there is such a thing as a primary. That is where you do that. Else in the General Election even a Rino is better than a Dino(saur)

How will the Lindsey Grahams of the party learn their lesson if we don’t show them we mean business?

Defeating them in primary?

I don’t think he could pull a Lieberman and win.

These traitorous termites and seditious slime must go.

If you have no borders, you have no country.