an ideology that bears responsibility for virtually all of the terrorism in the world at this time?

At this time and throughout all of History. And it will never stop, unless it is forcefully stopped.

Robert Spencer discusses on Hot Air about how the war on terrorism can or should effect immigration policies….

I admire the thoughtful comments preceding mine by those who were able to listen.

Thank you, thank you, thank you for your contributions to this website.

We have purchased over half a dozen of your books and audio CDs (TPIGTI&TC) and shared them with local officials and even one of our state reps, who promised to listen to it (the CDs) on his return trip. (Got a handwritten TH note for that).

Oh, yes, you make a difference, Robert. Oh, yes.

Mosques (“Schools of Islamic Learning”, et al) should all be considered political recruitment centers for the Koranically-declared overthrow of the West …with a quasi-”religious” coating of cultural saccharine for the suckers.

Robert Spencer lays out the most important reason for securing the borders….

You actually make me look FORWARD to getting the bad news.

XOXOXOXOXO

Janie

Replace – In God We Trust to In Allah We Trust, or Else.

Another good vent by Robert too – especially the parts about categorizing political mosques as political entities. Don’t churches, mosques, synagogues etc have to stay out of politics to maintain a tax exempt status? Any tax attorneys or CPAs out there who can explain the specific consequences of a tax exempt religious institution crossing the line on this?

The problem as I see it is twofold:

First, we have mistakenly declared a war on terror, not jihadists. Sadly, too few people in this country, and the vast majority of our elected officials, refuse to name the enemy. Until we correctly name the enemy, we can only prevent “terrors” from entering the country.

Second, the ACLU and others of their ilk will pull out all the guns should we attempt to disallow muslims entrance to the USA. Add to that screeching chorus every democrat, moonbat, lily-livered lib, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, the MSM, and half the republican party.

Serious people quickly realized the threat we faced on 9/11. Others more knowledgeable and keen (like Mr. Spencer,) knew years before. I hate having to say this again, but it is going to take a truly monstrous event of overwhelming proportions to wake the others up. When that finally does happen, we must act very quickly to put in place all the restrictions we have neglected to date. The “others” will only be outraged for a few weeks–after that they will have come up with many reasons why we deserved it, as well as conspiracy theories, etc.

Such statements would be worthless because all mosques support political Islam. Islamic doctrine allows Muslims to lie about the beliefs to infidels. The majority of the Koran is devoted to Mohammed’s political program. Only a fraction of it is devoted to religion. If you are a Muslim, you have a political program. There is no render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and render unto God what is God’s in the Koran. The Koran demands that you submit completely to Allah. There is no division between religion and politics in Islam.

That is why 80% of the mosques in American have been radicalized by Wahhabi-trained preachers using mosques as cover to promote Islamic imperialism. Mosques are political organizations with a political ideology of ill will to non-Muslims. Of course, we should monitor mosques. Every terrorist plot begins in a mosque. If the FBI is not planting listening devices in every radical mosque and recording the imam’s sermons, I want my tax money back.

However, I am nervous about requiring “statements” from mosques stating that they do not support political Islam
dominigan on June 13, 2007 at 10:02 AM

Maybe we can get them to “promise” that they won’t become radical Muslims. Our government seems to think it will work just fine with MS13 and other gang members, so why would it not work with Muslims? It’s not as if their religion COMMANDS them to LIE or anything!

Thanks R. Spencer for you relentless effort to try to wake up the brain dead!

Robert Spencer proposes some common-sense rules…….

I still wondering that Jehovah witnessed.

Burr had already been politically and socially disgraced by killing former Treasury secretary and Revolutionary-era hero Alexander Hamilton in a duel in 1804. After killing Hamilton, Burr, still Jefferson’s vice president, went into hiding to avoid prosecution for murder. (The charges were later dropped.) Burr then concocted a seditious plan to enlist the help of Britain and Spain to create a separate nation in the southwestern reaches of the American continent, including parts of Mexico, over which Burr would rule. The outrageous plan failed miserably when one of Burr’s co-conspirators, General James Wilkinson, betrayed Burr and alerted Jefferson to the plot. Burr was hunted down and arrested in 1806 and indicted for treason.

How could such a law be structured so that it 1) doesn’t violate the Constitution, and 2) doesn’t get used as a tool against other benign groups?

dominigan on June 13, 2007 at 10:02 AM

Robert said it himself, but I would extend it to Islam as a whole. Make them swear that they are abandoning the Islamic ideal of Jihad and Islamic supremecism. If they do not, or if they do they domonstrate by actions or inaction the contrary, be decared a political organization and therefore subject to the same scutiny that other radical political ideologies are subject, such as the American NAZI party.

My personal view is that Islam is a socio/political/economic system and not a “religion” in the western sense of the word. It should not therefore be treated as a religion under western law.

Excellent commentary that makes perfect sense. Don’t count on that influencing the Left however, they have their minds made up.