Gen. Clark released/leaked classified information during the Kosovo conflict. Information that he was not authorized to release/leak. Since this action could have been considered treason the CJCS, designated it as a “breach of moral and ethical conduct so distasteful as to make clarks continued service in uniform impossible to consider”. He was however supreme commander of allied forces at the time so charging him with treason was pretty much out of the question.

Wasn’t this guy somebody once?

Yes, he was universally despised by his subordinates and an extreme annoyance to most of his superiors.

Help me, is that the Commander of the Joint Chiefs of Staff?

Chairman.

Iran has been supplying the Taliban with weapons, a high official in the admin. said today.

With all the libs who’re running for ’08 having served, not, it’s going to be interesting next year. Not much serving, except for McCain, on the right either. However, this BS can’t be applied, if they can’t argue from example.

Help me, is that the Commander of the Joint Chiefs of Staff?

And I suppose there is some sort of “death by self-inflicted gunshot” penalty if the real story gets out? That sucks; I’d love to hear it. He probably was schtupping the cabin boy, Pablo.

Only someone who never wore the uniform or thought seriously about national security would make threats at this point.

Only someone who was a shark-eyed sociopath would suggest the ability of American taxpayers, and their duly elected representatives, to think seriously about national security would be conditional on their having experienced boot camp.

“breach of moral and ethical conduct so distasteful as to make clarks continued service in uniform impossible to consider”
colorfulbeachpersona on June 12, 2007 at 7:20 PM

Perhaps some blessings from the prophet?

Someone once named him “the single U.S. general most likely to be shot by his own troops” and implied that Clinton removed him from leadership for Clark’s own protection. Heh.

Still, he was top in his class at West Point, and was three times wounded in Vietnam.

All in all, I’d sooner follow Lieberman into battle than Clark.

V15J on June 12, 2007 at 7:01 PM

And why Clinton fired him during Kosovo.

Where will that leave Clark?

Making pancakes in New Hampshire?

This kind of rhetoric is irresponsible and only plays into the hands of President Ahmadinejad, and those who seek an excuse for military action.

So is he admitting that the Iranians want to attack us or our allies, they just need an “excuse”? And the best way to prevent this is to “fully engage” them?

WTF?

What does that even mean?

The Iranians are very much aware of US military capabilities

But because of appeasement democrats like Clark, they don’t think we’ll use them. Which is why we need people like Lieberman to make it clear that we will.

We should be striving to bridge the gulf of almost 30 years of hostility and only when all else fails should there be any consideration of other options

But dems like clark will never say their appeasement has failed, so we end up with endless capitulation that puts us in ever increasing danger.