Open thread: Headlines 6/12
posted at 9:21 am on June 12, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Hot off the presses, here’s today’s hedder thredder. Speaking of which, are there any WordPress experts out there among our readership? We have some ideas to improve the headlines feature but unfortunately both of our tech guys are swamped with work for other clients and will be for weeks. If you have the time, skills, and interest, please e-mail us at the tips address. Thanks.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
2 big events happened on my birthday, Reagan told Gorby to “tear down this wall” and OJ killed Nicole. Guess which one I’ll focus on today? :)
Capitalist Infidel on June 12, 2007 at 9:25 AM
I like the first paragraph in the NYT article.
amerpundit on June 12, 2007 at 9:29 AM
From the LA Times article …..
Needed fixin.
fogw on June 12, 2007 at 9:32 AM
Here’s a gem from the LAT:
amerpundit on June 12, 2007 at 9:35 AM
Happy Birthday Capitalist Infidel~
Catie96706 on June 12, 2007 at 9:41 AM
Now we can call the liberals 19%ers. It will be fun to turn the tables on them.
Stormy70 on June 12, 2007 at 9:42 AM
I thought Clinton would kill the Demo party after the ‘92 election. Now it looks as though Pelosi and her comrades may just do it this time. Most of the nutroots are just looking for leadership (they’re basically sheep, wanting to look “cool”), and a down-to-earth, charismatic conservative could sway many of them toward sanity.
GO FRED!
stonemeister on June 12, 2007 at 9:54 AM
RE: the NY Times article, “After the Bomb”
If only the NY Times could spend just as much time writing an article about how a victory in Iraq could be a stepping stone to quelling the violence in the unstable Middle East and make the terrorist community think twice about detonating a nuke on American soil. Stay the course, and they’ll know we’re in for the long haul. Cutting and running will only encourage these lunatics.
No, the NYT wants to focus on what to do after we’re nuked. They just don’t get it.
Incidentally, did ya notice who penned the article for the Times?
William J. Perry, a professor at Stanford, and Ashton B. Carter, a professor at Harvard, were, respectively, the secretary and an assistant secretary of defense in the Clinton administration.
Shocker. Now their teaching our youth how to cower and run from our enemies. But on the upside, their taking the time to instruct them on how to survive a nuke attack, as the result of failed foreign policy in Iraq – that was enabled and applauded by the slime printed in the NY Times.
Nice job, “professors”.
fogw on June 12, 2007 at 10:01 AM
Holy Crap, what a great list of goals and commitments:
From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
I find much to be enthusiastic about in this list, understanding that the devil is in the details. So, let’s flesh this out a bit, Rudy.
Jaibones on June 12, 2007 at 10:20 AM
He had me at: “I will end illegal immigration, secure our borders, and identify every non-citizen in our nation.”
Correct me if I am wrong, but I have not heard this clear and obvious statement of intention from anyone else, have I?
Jaibones on June 12, 2007 at 10:21 AM
I’m impressed with Rudy Giuliani’s Twelve Commitments. I hope he gets the nomination over Fred Thompson.
januarius on June 12, 2007 at 10:27 AM
R.E: Rudy’s 12 Commitments
It’s a good start. I’m curious to see who will be the first GOP top-tier candidate to support the Fair Tax.
Kid from Brooklyn on June 12, 2007 at 10:30 AM
Mueller predicts terrorists with nukes; Musharraf may soon be history
Little something to brighten your day.
JammieWearingFool on June 12, 2007 at 10:31 AM
Increase adoptions? Single women apply to adopt children and get turned down every day (and then everyone gripes that Angelina Jolie adopts overseas).
Tanya on June 12, 2007 at 10:35 AM
Those are awesome, impressive 12 Commandments. I’m very happy. He should compaign aggressively on them.
Darksean on June 12, 2007 at 10:36 AM
I’ve been known to code a little bit of PHP and MySQL here and there.
I don’t know if you’d care for my input, though, which would be to comment out all of the headline code, moving the Vent back to the top.
saint kansas on June 12, 2007 at 10:37 AM
Thou shalt have no other presidents before guiliani?
lorien1973 on June 12, 2007 at 10:55 AM
Note the order Rudy says this. Once you grant amnesty, illegal immigration will be no more. SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST.
Valiant on June 12, 2007 at 11:02 AM
“Too many Wangs as China runs out of names”
We have a few too many wangs in this country, too.
(Sorry.)
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on June 12, 2007 at 11:03 AM
I’m going to follow the Daily Tar Heel for a few days to see if there are calls in support of this idea:
There were many pleas at UNC that he not be called a “terrorist”, since that act wouldn’t “bring us together and help with the healing.” He hasn’t been brought to trial, and is only in the state mental hospital being “evaluated”.
I’m not sure I would have used that in any argument for my release, since we’ve had a little problem with the offspring of another general contractor – the Bin Laden Corporation.
eeyore on June 12, 2007 at 12:41 PM
He forgot a couple that are just as believeable:
“I will build a perpetual motion machine”
“I will make the Sun revolve around the Earth”
“I will permanently solve the Israeli conflict to everyone’s satisfaction”.
“I will eliminate both death and taxes”
Hollowpoint on June 12, 2007 at 12:48 PM
Little snarky there aren’t we HP?
At least we know where he stands.
CAD Daddy on June 12, 2007 at 1:14 PM
So yesterday she panders a twofer with blacks and corruptocrats with Alcee Hastings. Today, she panders to Hispanics with Menendez. Good odds tomorrow will bring a GLBT co-chair [female, a twofer with feminists]. After that a Greenie co-chair. Then, a union co-chair. Possibly a Muslim co-chair. Am I missing any important panders?
eeyore on June 12, 2007 at 1:29 PM
Capitalist Infidel, Happy Birthday!
Hollowpoint, he’s just human…funny.
eeyore – for the primary: feminists, nutroots, unions and peacenicks; for the general: business-owners, pro-lifers, religius figures, pro-Israel lobby, Soldiers-who-love-Hillary, the middle class, you get the picture.
On the Congress numbers – the best thing for the GOP might turn out to have lost in 2006 – if they get their act together and grow back a few.
Entelechy on June 12, 2007 at 2:11 PM
Uh, bagging Menendez for her campaign is just as much a twofer as Alcee Hastings. He’s as corrupt as they come. As a NJ resident, I’m quietly amazed that he hasn’t traded his pinstripes for prison stripes. He’s been under investigation for what seems like forever. If he were Republican, there’s no doubt he’d be doing 10 to 20 by now.
If Hillary really had a brain cell working when it comes to this election, she’d be looking to Florida for help, not NJ. Then again, it would also seem as though she should be asking upchucky Schumer for help, not Menendez. Schumer is corrupt enough, and he has a track record for, uh, delivering the goods on opponents in campaigns. If Rudy ends up being our nominee or our runningmate, Hillary will need all the help in her “home” state that she can get.
flutejpl on June 12, 2007 at 3:02 PM
re: Schwartz Video: Stephanie Miller drops the F-bomb on Glenn Beck
Uh. No she didn’t. She described the tenor of the debate as “almost getting to the John McCain, Cornyn — f— you” stage. [quote copy/pasted from the transcript in the post]
Now, I have no idea who this woman is, so am not defending her or condemning her; but that was just a silly headline.
Claire on June 12, 2007 at 4:20 PM
Securing the border will end illegal immigration, 12 step Rudy.
Attrition – by enforcing our current laws- will pressure those illegal immigrants already here to head back home and try applying legally.
But at least Guiliani says he’ll do something serious, and puts it in writing, instead of nebulously complaining about the (mysteriously) paralyzing “status quo” ala GWB.
profitsbeard on June 12, 2007 at 6:30 PM
from the NRO bit on Linda Chavez. It dawned on me the other day that this is a vital difference between today’s immigration wave and those of the past. Not only is there a land bridge to get here, there is far more history involved–and perceived claim to much of the territory in our southwest. I’ve heard the latter point made, but this was the first time I’d seen someone talking about the geographic influence on the psyche of immigrants. The situation is only exacerbated by the fact that they’re here illegally.
TexasDan on June 12, 2007 at 6:38 PM
Not in the headlines, but this should make your blood boil – re: rules of engagement in Iraq
thirteen28 on June 12, 2007 at 6:39 PM
Those were implied…
Jaibones on June 12, 2007 at 8:13 PM
Unbelievable
Spanish TV puts ’08 hopefuls into a bind
INC on June 12, 2007 at 9:42 PM
“I will bring the Dodgers back to Brooklyn.”
manwithblackhat on June 12, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Comment pages: