Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: Newt unloads on Bush and the amnesty bill

posted at 2:34 pm on June 3, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view

Nothing here you don’t already know. But it’s nice to hear a high-profile Republican say it.


Update: Here’s what Newt’s talking about. Five and three-quarters years after 9/11 and radiation detectors at U.S. ports are expected “soon.”


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Thompson/Gingrich?

now that makes sense.

shooter on June 3, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Nice to hear a prominent Republican who still believes in common sense.

infidel4life on June 3, 2007 at 2:51 PM

With the perspective a history professor, Newt dissects the causes of the President’s problems with illegal immigration, in the final segment.

He focuses on what really needs to be done about immigration.

1. Make it harder to get in.

2. Make it tougher for businesses to employ illegals.

And watch the situation with illegal aliens begin to change and the (straw man) claim of necessity to “deport everyone illegal” vanishes.

Well done, Professor Gingrich.

Mr. President? Were you watching this?

georgej on June 3, 2007 at 2:53 PM

Gingrich did a much better job describing problems, they’re solutions and public outrage than did the FNS panel.

I was surprising to see Bill Kristol’s attack on the Senate bill and Brit Hume’s (and the panel’s) downplay of public angst about the Senate bill and the Presidents effect on public, though they all seemed to think the President impugning Americans as bigots and nativists was very stupid.

It was not surprising to see Juan’s defense of the bill and the poor downtrodden and hard working illegal migrants who have no right to be here even though they had demonstrated by the million in our streets where their loyalties do not lie.

Speakup on June 3, 2007 at 2:59 PM

shooter on June 3, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Hear that? It’s Newt’s baggage cart coming down the hallway.

amerpundit on June 3, 2007 at 3:00 PM

I’m glad Newt is stating things so clearly, because the solution to this problem is really very, very simple. It’s completely obvious, in fact. “Dry up the market” as he says, and they will self-deport.

Bush is so big on fighting a war in Iraq so we don’t have to fight it here, but without a secure border, it WILL be here.

Completely common sense a third grader can understand.

Which says a lot about leadership in Washington.

digitalintrigue on June 3, 2007 at 3:02 PM

Corporations have already paid this government good money for the right to cheaply hire illegal immigrants and it wouldn’t be fair to change the rules now. Besides, I believe this President is a man of his word, and I just don’t seeing him going back on a deal after he’s taken the money.

greggish on June 3, 2007 at 3:06 PM

Newt, Fred!, Romney, Guiliani……that is the debate I want to see. Should be some hair flying (sorry Fred!) by the time it is over. The way the party stands right now I don’t give us a snow-balls chance in 08. We need to get the infighting over with and focus on the main event. Whichever of these four get the nod they better be prepared for a bar-fight. President Billary or President Obama scares the hell outta me.

Limerick on June 3, 2007 at 3:09 PM

I have a man crush on Newt.

Lehosh on June 3, 2007 at 3:23 PM

President is a man of his word, and I just don’t seeing him going back on a deal after he’s taken the money.

greggish on June 3, 2007 at 3:06 PM

The President has a personal agenda here, if he can get progress for that agenda through Congress fine if he can’t he’ll do as Clinton and his father did and subvert the process and issue executive orders before leaving office.

The public will and the public good be damned.

Speakup on June 3, 2007 at 3:25 PM

I’m an avid Fred! supporter, but Newt is such a fantastic speaker/orator that I wish he had much less baggage.

Fred! / Newt ‘08 would be great if Newt weren’t so politically radioactive.

omnipotent on June 3, 2007 at 3:27 PM

subvert the process

Just like he already has.

Speakup on June 3, 2007 at 3:27 PM

Newt is nearly always BBR (Biggest Brain in the Room) but he is a globalist and he likes transnational Corporations if he wants my vote he has to prove he’s on my side and not loyal to Bangladesh or Beijing.

He has said some things that turned me off on the global elite score.

Speakup on June 3, 2007 at 3:33 PM

greggish on June 3, 2007 at 3:06 PM

Kind of cynical huh?
I would have to agree with you, but I believe it’s the whole government.

Newt makes too much sense, besides the left would never listen to him. To borrow but change a bit, a comment I just read – “There are none so deaf as those who do not want to hear.”

abinitioadinfinitum on June 3, 2007 at 3:34 PM

Hear that? It’s Newt’s baggage cart coming down the hallway.

amerpundit on June 3, 2007 at 3:00 PM

Exactly, that is why we need Fred!/Watts! Fred! has light baggage, and Watts! pretty much has none.

As a bonus Watts! negates the Obama as VP bonus that Hillary will get.

Steele would work well too.

Tim Burton on June 3, 2007 at 3:43 PM

If Ronald Reagan was the best thing to happen to Republicans in 30 years, G.W.B. was the worst. It’s going to take at least three election cycles to wash this taint off.

SailorDave on June 3, 2007 at 3:57 PM

I was watching “The Belt Way Boys” last night and both Barnes and Kondracke called Newt a “nativist”. Odd how FOXNews is pushing the amnesty agenda.

SouthernGent on June 3, 2007 at 4:09 PM

The last 60 seconds or so of the vid sums up the “plan” I want to see! And it will work, despite all of the whining that will come from the left about “women & minorities” being hardest hit, etc.

TwinkietheKid on June 3, 2007 at 4:32 PM

Thompson/Gingrich?

Sounds good to me. A Prez with common sense and a Veep with brains. Kinda strange that the two smartest candidates aren’t candidates yet. Or is it?

RedWinged Blackbird on June 3, 2007 at 4:36 PM

But still, it would be kind of fun if Newt got the nomination, just to watch the lib’s heads explode!

Until then, I’m (im)patiently waiting for Fred! to formally announce.

And greggish: Never attribute to malice when incompetence is much more likely.

rmgraha on June 3, 2007 at 4:47 PM

Fred! / Newt ‘08 would be great if Newt weren’t so politically radioactive.

omnipotent on June 3, 2007 at 3:27 PM

…and if they weren’t both from the South. One will be ridiculed enough. Two will be impossible to accept, and strategically not too smart anyway. Though I can see Newt playing a big role in helping Mr. Thompson formulate and disseminate big ideas. His brain is not doubt the greatest and he doesn’t come across like a perpetual nag and lecturer.

Entelechy on June 3, 2007 at 5:17 PM

greggish, it’s so much more/different than money and capitalism. I apologize for copy/pasting from my previous comment (nearly at the end of the Dobbs thread), but one can only hold so many thoughts on one given issue…some of them…

…his drivers are different from his constituents’, whom he no longer needs, as he never, ever, will run for office.

- the WoT is for the next at least 20-30 years and only history will prove him right or wrong
- immigration if very personal for him (his nanny, whom he loves like a mother, having grown up/lived in Texas, having relatives, etc.)
- pc advisors who tell him “be great by doing something extraordinary, something with your BDS’d foes, something the rest of the world, the MSM, the U.N. love”
- the wish of leaders to be remembered as humanitarians, above all other wishes
- the erroneous belief that if he signs this bill, a good chunk of the new immigrants, when citizens, will vote conservative – thus his choice for the leadership of the RNC and Commerce
- he no longer needs the base, religious or not, and he might not have agreed with the base’s platform in the first place [too religious, too not-for-choice (his mother, wife, daughters, and formerly his father for-choicers), too anti-gays, too financially restrictive, etc., etc.]
- the Iraq war is not going to end, or will shift into a different phase, and the Americans are bored with its latent form
- surely others which don’t come to mind now

What galls me is that he doesn’t simply call this an amnesty and then fights for it, win or loose. That he can’t communicate clearly is a given. That his communications dept. is as lacking as it is makes it complicated, at best. That they insult those who disagree is beyond an egregious mistake.

I don’t view this ‘divorce’ as a bad thing. I’m glad it is happening now, and not, say, mid 2008.

Solving the conflict now will resolve Limerick’s nightmares, which are most of ours too.

Entelechy on June 3, 2007 at 5:25 PM

…and if they weren’t both from the South. One will be ridiculed enough. Two will be impossible to accept, and strategically not too smart anyway.

Entelechy- Newt is really not a Southerner. He doesn’t have a Southern accent. He was born in PA and grew up in the military. He did not grow up in Atlanta even though that is where he got his B.A. and was a Congressman. He is a Northerner who happens to live in Atlanta.

I think Thompson/Gingrich or Giuliani/Gingrich would be great tickets for the Republican party.

januarius on June 3, 2007 at 5:58 PM

januarius, I have nothing against him or Southerners, to be absolutely sure. I like his thinking and don’t care whom he married, and when, or how often. Others, however, do, including the incessant Clinton years yakking which this would bring. Thanks for the update. I still think that the media, and those who wish to harp, would do so. I’m just looking for the winning ticket, no matter who’s on it, really. He can play a prominent role, though I still believe that not as a candidate, especially not with her royal highness being anointed on the other side.

To me Mr. McCain is out. I don’t consider him a bad man or citizen. In the contrary, I admire and am grateful for his service, in the military and to this country. However, as AP said he’s “spent”, and I believe his time is up. It’s simply 4-8 years too late. He should somehow graciously exit politics altogether and support whomever rides to the top. Otherwise, the struggle looks like Hillary’s “win at all costs” and that is an ugly thing to observe and go through for them, and for us.

Entelechy on June 3, 2007 at 6:24 PM

Entelechy on June 3, 2007 at 5:25 PM

What she said. The President hasn’t had to sneak around his intended agenda since November 2004. That the agenda is globalist is more apparent with each passing week. One argument I’ve heard recently is that he knows if a conservative is elected in ‘08, or even if his party regains a majority in either house, it might thwart his long-term goals, so he is intentionally fomenting party strife in the hopes of a Democrat party victory. How far-fetched is that?

Regarding Newt, he keeps it real, to borrow a phrase. His analysis would be nearly impossible to refute in a face-to-face debate. I do hope he offers his expertise to the nominee, it will make a world of difference. I’d also like to see him as Secretary of State in the next administration. Then it wouldn’t just be our own liberals, but soc*alists worldwide whose heads would explode.

Freelancer on June 3, 2007 at 6:50 PM

Newt rules!

John on June 3, 2007 at 6:52 PM

I think Newt is unelectable in the general election, but he needs to be somewhere in the cabinet if a Republican is election. On the other hand, my registered Democrat wife watched Newt this morning and said “I think I’ve been living with you too long because Newt Gingrich made a lot of sense.”

I still think the most enjoyable part of Fox News Sunday is the cutaway shots of Brit Hume when Juan Williams is talking. It’s the perfect expression of bemused patience, as he watches a person that speaks utter and complete nonsense.

Dudley Smith on June 3, 2007 at 6:57 PM

UNACCEPTABLE!!!!!!!

The use of logic and common sense are not allowed!

VikingGoneWild on June 3, 2007 at 7:47 PM

FRED THOMPSON boys.

Every conservative out there should be voting for FRED THOMPSON.

msipes on June 3, 2007 at 7:54 PM

I love Newt for his mind. I’m thinking, though, that he might be a better chief of staff than CINC. Newt should enter the presidential race despite his baggage. It’s not like Hitlery doesn’t have baggage of her own too.

On the other hand, my registered Democrat wife watched Newt this morning and said “I think I’ve been living with you too long because Newt Gingrich made a lot of sense.”

Congrats on making headway in the long campaign.

Mojave Mark on June 4, 2007 at 12:35 AM

I like most of what Newt says usually (his debate on global warming left a lot to be desired), but also agree he is unelectable. Deserved or not, he is more radioactive than Hillary!

Position in cabinet Thompson cabinet I could completely see.

How’s this sound:

Attonery General – Rudy
Secretary of Treasury – Mitt
Secretary of State – Bolton

SSG Fuzzy on June 4, 2007 at 1:05 AM

Forgot to mention Newt!

Chief of Staff – Newt

SSG Fuzzy on June 4, 2007 at 1:06 AM

Gingrich acted like Pelosi in regards to foreign policy counter to administration’s wishes – none other than chris Wallace called him on this
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/08/fox-confronts-gingrich-pelosi/

Bradky on June 4, 2007 at 1:23 AM

Sorry, but Newt is just shifting his position for expediency. He lost me when he said FEMA collapsed during Katrina, that is blatantly false, and a lie. FEMA had some small problems, but was stopped from doing it’s job by State and local officials, Brown was a scape goat plain and simple.

Newt has hopped on the green bus, when global warming is a pig in a poke, and nothing more than a way for UN and our own government to increase taxation through treaties.

Newt has hopped on the anti-immigration bandwagon because polls show it is the prevailing sentiment of the likely voters. I will not hop on Newt’s bandwagon.

Rode Werk on June 4, 2007 at 1:42 AM

Regarding

Update: Here’s what Newt’s talking about. Five and three-quarters years after 9/11 and radiation detectors at U.S. ports are expected “soon.”

If a nuclear bomb is in a cargo container, then it’s already too late for this country… I think anyone taking the risk of packing a nuke on a ship will be more than likely blowing up in port instead of letting some registered trucking company deal with trying to get the cargo out of the port.. past steamship , port, and customs control.

I’m not saying to not put the detectors on our cranes…and I cant believe they aren’t there yet. unbelievable.

They need to put radiation detectors globally on all cranes handling cargo that will be on any ship entering us waters no matter if the cargo is consigneed to the US or not.

VinceP1974 on June 4, 2007 at 7:59 AM

Thompson/Gingrich?

now that makes sense.

shooter on June 3, 2007 at 2:48 PM

Yeah. Two guys that aren’t even candidates makes sense.

csdeven on June 4, 2007 at 8:01 AM

Thompson/Gingrich… makes so much sense its almost euphoric!

Viper1 on June 4, 2007 at 8:12 AM

Viper1 on June 4, 2007 at 8:12 AM

See above.

Besides, freddie boy is a faker. His red pickup truck crapola is just as sickening as hillary’s fake accent when she’s speaking to black audiences. I don’t need, or want, to be lied to by a non-candidate.

csdeven on June 4, 2007 at 8:35 AM

Newt….Smarter Than A Fifth Grader!

soulsirkus on June 4, 2007 at 8:41 AM

I like a Thompson/Gingrich ticket. I think the days of looking for a VP candidate to “bring the votes” are past so two “southern” guys could make a run for it…Clinton did it with Gore already and Gore didn’t even bring his own state!

I love the idea of Rudy as AG and while my heart flutters at the notion of John Bolton as Sec State I think the Senate would implode during the confirmation hearings. I think someone like a Duncan Hunter would be good in that position. AT first blush I would say McCain for SecDef but upon further review I think McCain’s best position is under the bus. Can someone say Tommy Franks for SecDef?

Pilgrim on June 4, 2007 at 9:13 AM

csdeven,

His red pickup truck crapola

You mean that one he leased from his dad and then bought and still to this day owns, how right you are sir. How dare Fred buy a old Red pick-up………How dare he………

doriangrey on June 4, 2007 at 9:49 AM

Wow, that was a devastatingly effective attack by Newt. It’s too bad he’s got so much political baggage (and brainfarted on the global warming thing) because he would otherwise be an excellent candidate.

thirteen28 on June 4, 2007 at 2:06 PM

Thompson/Gingrich?

Now that is what I’m talkin about!!!

4shoes on June 4, 2007 at 3:49 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.