Comments on: McCain: Without amnesty, we might have riots here! Update: Video added

By: Michelle Malkin » John McCain: La Raza’s voice in Washington

Michelle Malkin » John McCain: La Raza’s voice in Washington — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:47:46 +0000

[...] let’s remember McCain pulling the threat-of-violence card in support of immigration capitulation: If we don’t give in, it’ll be like the banlieus [...]

By: Michelle Malkin » The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain

Michelle Malkin » The New Hampshire verdict; NBC, Fox calls it for McCain — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:31:15 +0000

[...] here’s McCain’s fear-mongering rant from June 2007 warning about Paris-style ethnic riots if we get serious about deporting [...]

By: The Voices of Citizens to the Senate at Traction Control

The Voices of Citizens to the Senate at Traction Control — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:52:57 +0000

[...] McCain: Without amnesty, we might have riots here! Update: Video added [...]

By: Bearhopi

Bearhopi — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:03:11 +0000

The United States gives a group whatever it wants because it threatens to riot?

I don’t want to either, but the strategy has been working thus far. The Rodney King incident for example. Right or wrong the cops were acquited by a lawful judicial process and jury. RIOTS! Verdict overturned.

Case 2: O.J. Simpson! already riots were feared and heavily weighed on the outcome of that trial. “NOT GUILTY” was then the verdict.

Now we have illegals demanding rights and gettibng them when they riot under the guise of a “Protest” !

Cowards like McCain who run this country WILL give in to threats and intimidation! Right now that is the American way!

By: PRCalDude

PRCalDude — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:05:53 +0000

Listening to Drudge…Senators think the outcry is dying down, and are concluding that the bill must be okay

WisCon on June 4, 2007 at 12:37 AM

WisCon, if that’s what they hear, because that’s what the

They’re actually impervious to any kind of reason. They’ll use almost any justification to pass this bill. We don’t have democracy anymore.

By: gekkobear

gekkobear — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:41:38 +0000

I wonder why we invaded Afghanistan. Isn’t that more likely to cause unrest in the U.S. by offending terrorists?

I mean, since our foreign and domestic policies should be determined by whatever will minimize actions by violent non-citizens against U.S. Citizens, the Invasions of both Iraq and Afghanistan were obvious mistakes; that is if you take McCain’s talking points to their logical conclusion.

How come when I take McCain’s talking points to their logical conclusion I usually end up with something stupid?

By: Amnesty Bill: Daily Roundup for 06/04/2007 | Slobokan’s Site O’ Schtuff

Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:10:34 +0000

[...] John McCain and “scaremongering”. [...]

By: Claire

Claire — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:53:48 +0000

Well, saaaaay…. If ya get what ya want when ya riot: to the Torches and Pitchforks, Boys!!!

By: Red Alerts

Red Alerts — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:09:26 +0000

Who’re the Racists Now Linda Chavez?…

While I’ve already posted my reaction to Linda Chavez calling anyone who disagrees with the new immigration bill a racist, I do wonder if Linda’s reaction to John McCain’s racist views on why we should support the bill will be as veno…

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:18:55 +0000

WisCon, if that’s what they hear, because that’s what they want to hear, they’re more disonnected from reality than I thought. I believe the bill will pass the Senate and fail in the House.

By: WisCon

WisCon — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:37:39 +0000

Listening to Drudge…Senators think the outcry is dying down, and are concluding that the bill must be okay

By: sonnyspats1

sonnyspats1 — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:03:09 +0000

.” Yes, and burn a little, and wreck some things.
Please.

lizzee on June 3, 2007 at 3:01 PM

It won’t be a little burning. They’ll go after as many gas stations as they can on a national level. This is gona be BIG!

By: ej_pez

ej_pez — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:21:47 +0000

Gee, there might be riots? He should thank his lucky stars that the legal citizens of the US are not rioting! …and why is that, again?

Will some high-level elected official please pull this statement out of their @ss:

“We choose to go to reverse the tide of illegal immigration in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.”

Anything worth it is always hard. (hell, just check out the quality of my spelling) McCain, for one, should surely know that.

By: AZ_Redneck

AZ_Redneck — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:50:23 +0000

“In case you hadn’t noticed, the thousands of people who have been relegated to ghettos have risen up and burned cars in France,” McCain replied. “They’ve got huge problems in France. They have tremendous problems. The police can’t even go into certain areas in the suburbs of Paris. I don’t want that in the suburbs of America.”

In case McCain didn’t notice …

Millions of Americans relegated to paying for illegal immigration don’t want any form of amnesty provided to them …

We could have tremendous problems in America …

The kind of problems McCain doesn’t want in the suburbs …

Let them riot. I’ll be on the front lines telling you how it goes. I’m not worried one iota. …

PRCalDude on June 3, 2007 at 7:34 PM

I will be right next to you.

I’ll repeat now and for ever-more: McCain cannot be trusted!

pocomoco on June 3, 2007 at 7:22 PM

Apparently, neither can you trust John Kyl.

By: MCPO Airdale

MCPO Airdale — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:49:57 +0000

If mom doesn’t give me some cookies, I’m going beat up my sister! That will teach her!

By: msipes

msipes — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:52:32 +0000

FRED THOMPSON 2008!

By: NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » Noisy News Around the Web - 6/3/07…

Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:45:32 +0000

[...] McCain: Without amnesty, we might have riots here! Update: Video added – Hot Air [...]

By: Slublog

Slublog — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:38:02 +0000

fred? isn’t a candidate.
csdeven on June 3, 2007 at 7:29 PM

Not a declared candidate, no. But he’s running.

And his statement on this issue was stronger than that of the declared candidate I like right now. I was disappointed in the lackluster Rudy! response.

By: PRCalDude

PRCalDude — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:34:20 +0000

Let them riot. I’ll be on the front lines telling you how it goes. I’m not worried one iota. If these people were coming to be proud Americans, nobody would care if there was an amnesty. They’re not.

By: csdeven

csdeven — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:31:31 +0000

Buzzy on June 3, 2007 at 7:11 PM

My point is that fred? isn’t leading. He’s parroting what other conservatives have said and he’s doing it days and sometimes weeks later.

And Romney did come out strong right away.

By: csdeven

csdeven — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:29:18 +0000

Slublog on June 3, 2007 at 6:58 PM

fred? isn’t a candidate.

By: pocomoco

pocomoco — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:22:19 +0000

I’ll repeat now and for ever-more: McCain cannot be trusted!

By: Buzzy

Buzzy — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:11:11 +0000

Especially when Rudy is hiding under a rock hoping for all this to die out (since he supports this bill) and Romney sure hasn’t come out as strongly against ILLEGAL aliens as I would like. If Thompson is two weeks behind the curve on this then so are most of us. Personally I think “secure the border” is a timeless sentiment. I also agree with Fred that we shouldn’t even allow any sort of talk about what to do with the ILLEGAL aliens already here until our borders are secure and further illegal immigration stopped.

By: Slublog

Slublog — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:00:43 +0000

Actually, I’ll amend that. All politicians are worthy of snark.

By: Slublog

Slublog — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:58:40 +0000

Tsk, tsk, tsk. freddie, freddie, freddie. WHEN are you going to be original? That sentiment is 2 weeks behind the curve. I said this 2 weeks ago and I don’t NEED a red pickup truck!
csdeven on June 3, 2007 at 4:55 PM

And the difference between you and Thompson?

He’s the only presidential candidate saying it like he means it right now. I’m not quite fully on the Thompson train at this point, but I enjoyed the speech.

It was certainly not deserving of the snark.