There are already plenty of North American organizations, but they hold no real power, and they’ll never make the USA go away, or Canada go away.

The EU is not going to make Germany, or France or Italy, etc… go away either.

reaganaut on June 1, 2007 at 11:04 AM

We are not concerned that the lands would go away reaganaut, we are concerned that our freedom would go away. You remember these don’t you?

Bill of Rights

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Or are you trusting that once sovereignty was lost, that the benevolent souls in power would automatically return these rights to us?

She’s done so before, of course. But this time, it’s personal. What political conservatives and on-the-ground Republicans must understand at this point is that they are not breaking with the White House on immigration. They are not resisting, fightin…

The EU is not going to make Germany, or France or Italy, etc… go away either. I’m fairly certain there will be some sort of international conflict in Eurpoe in the next 50 years that will show just how impotent the EU is.

I expect a monetary crisis that drops the Euro within that time frame as well.

Having been on the left in college and having a flushback (oh I mean flashback) I realized what my misinformed (boomer) generation really needed was a sense of discipline to put it right-not another label so the blind left can more easily identify those that do not agree with them so they can avoid any confrontation with them.

Having been on the left in college and having a flushback (oh I mean flashback) I realized what my misinformed (boomer) generation really needed was a sense of discipline to put it right-not another label so the blind left can more easily identify those that do not agree with them so they can avoid any confrontation with them.

“When you grow up in Texas like I did, you recognize the decency and humanity of Hispanics. And the truth of the matter is, a lot of this immigration debate is driven as a result of Latinos being in our country,” he said.

I would just like to know, who exactly is he talking to here? I personally have always liked the latinos as a whole, and thought they were a hard working group of people and I always thought they were a great addition to this country. Hell, before I got married I dated a couple of Latino guys. So I don’t understand who Bush is addressing when he says things like this. What I’m concerned with is, yes, what most everyone else on this thread seems to be concerned with, the sheer numbers of foreigners just waltzing in, with no respect for our laws, and no intention of assimilating to our culture. And a party who doesn’t seem concerned with enforcing the laws of this country and refuses to listen to the base of their party, instead are focusing on the extreme ones.

BULL!!

My own father, a lifelone public school administrator by the way, has been talking about that very thing both in ptivate and public for years. I can only imagine how many of YOUR CHILDREN have been exposed to the same crap.

Someone needs to let Bush finally know what his job description is.

I’m done with Bush… FOREVER, I’m sick of sticking up for that bafoon.

Who is with me!

It is not comforting to see the words “evolution by stealth” in the documents Judicial Watch obtained from a 2006 North American Forum meeting.

It is a disgrace that GOP Sen. Richard Lugar introduced a border security bill in 2005 while pushing the current amnesty bill

SEC. 5. IMPROVING THE SECURITY OF MEXICO’S SOUTHERN BORDER

Yes, Mexico’s southern border must be secured. Forget about the US-Mexico border.

The current push for amnesty will probably die in spite of NAU fears.

NAU? Not today, but keep an eye on the power-grabbing liberal one-worlders.

They may be setting up a scenario where one day, an NAU might make sense.

They would have to destroy the country first by allowing a massive influx of left-leaning voters who work hard and making a trade infrastructure so powerful that the borders become irrelevant. They would never try to pass amnesty or build international superhighways controlled by foreign corporations, would they?

What happens when every Mexican has dual citizenship with the US?

We’re workin on it folks…

That’s right. You just go back to sleep now, it’s ok. Nothing to see here.

Is it not true that the European Union consists of several European countries who each still have their own elected governments? Why is it so difficult to fathom something similar happening here?

All we need is little more amnesty and perhaps another forty or fifty years. By then, we’ll have a mostly Hispanic population VERY friendly to this idea of a NAU of some kind.

Ahh, but what the hell. Most of us will be dead and gone so who cares?

Goodnight…

CliffHanger on May 31, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Nice post.

And scary. It is kinda funny that anyone can look at recent European history and think it just can’t possibly happen here.

http://azbiz.com/lionel_waxman/

Seems the war may have already begun…

Iran, Putin and China will probably nuke us before the NAU plans are completed.

You honestly don’t see the difference between lax immigration enforcement and abdicating sovreignity as a nation?

BacaDog

You’re kidding right? A nation that can’t, or won’t control it’s borders or who it allows in has no sovereignty. Citizens of the US have every right to determine who comes here and when. It’s a right our leadership chooses to ignore. Immigration is not a right.

darwin on May 31, 2007 at 11:22 PM

I have to agree with Darwin. Rather strongly.

If a nation can’t – or won’t – exercise the most basic facets of national sovereignty, I’m not sure its much different than an abdication of soveriegnty.

Wanna bet that if 20 million Americans suddenly decided to move south, illegally, without paying taxes, without going through an immigration process … the Mexicans might bring up their national soveriegnty?

I’m still firmly in the batshinola camp, of course

Of course? Why of course? Does the practical application of the Senate not merge our population? Once our citizens are mixed to a degree that cannot be undone and our Southern border no longer applies to people what is the next step? What is so hard to believe?

Someone in Mexico beleives our economies are going to be heavily intertwined. Look at all the port projects. Do you think those goods are headed for Columbia?

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment “to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security.” The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that “our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.” Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

We can’t exactly say Bush has been working to keep our borders in place.

amerpundit on May 31, 2007 at 11:34 PM

I’m still firmly in the batshinola camp, of course, but that statements’ being proved false these days, isn’t it?

see-dubya on May 31, 2007 at 11:27 PM

Yep… sometimes the best way to hide something is to put it right out in the open. The guys running this show have a lot of experience at pulling the wool over people’s eyes.

But Mexico? Who the heck wants to merge with a country that’s so thoroughly corrupt, so immensely depressed, so awash in drug cartels and the rampant murdering that comes with it, that 10’s of MILLIONS of their own people won’t stay put?

SilverStar830 on May 31, 2007 at 11:23 PM

Can we at least steal their oil?