<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo mystery: Is this document real or not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:45:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Memo mystery solved: It&#8217;s real, says Iraqslogger</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-429928</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Memo mystery solved: It&#8217;s real, says Iraqslogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-429928</guid>
		<description>[...] As noted in Saturday&#8217;s post, WaPo had already confirmed the basic facts so even if the document itself was fake &#8212; which even one of Larry Johnson&#8217;s associates had claimed it was &#8212; the substance was nevertheless accurate. But it&#8217;s not fake. It&#8217;s real. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As noted in Saturday&#8217;s post, WaPo had already confirmed the basic facts so even if the document itself was fake &#8212; which even one of Larry Johnson&#8217;s associates had claimed it was &#8212; the substance was nevertheless accurate. But it&#8217;s not fake. It&#8217;s real. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-429337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 06:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-429337</guid>
		<description>Folks:
  I work in the IZ.  Though right now I&#039;m at a different FOB for a project, I still received this email.

  Yes this is real.  It&#039;s also no big deal.  There are convoy delays all the time.  

  It&#039;s not really a military document, KBR does the food and they use this funny format for IZ-wide messages.  I&#039;d never noticed they used a figurine for the eagle, that&#039;s pretty funny.

  This is simply the IZ media guys navel-gazing.  They don&#039;t get out much.
LT Nichols</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks:<br />
  I work in the IZ.  Though right now I&#8217;m at a different FOB for a project, I still received this email.</p>
<p>  Yes this is real.  It&#8217;s also no big deal.  There are convoy delays all the time.  </p>
<p>  It&#8217;s not really a military document, KBR does the food and they use this funny format for IZ-wide messages.  I&#8217;d never noticed they used a figurine for the eagle, that&#8217;s pretty funny.</p>
<p>  This is simply the IZ media guys navel-gazing.  They don&#8217;t get out much.<br />
LT Nichols</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-427860</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 15:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-427860</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something odd about this whole thing.  If an Embassy spokesman is in this, then State (Dept) is involved either offically or unofficially in disseminating this.  Thus the question: State Dept is not the correct source for military info/management, so why it is being used as a source?
The long quotes are all State.  The bottom line, one hopes that heavily leaning Left State Department staff aren&#039;t being willing to be used to undermine the military.  Every single military operation has logistical problems to solve - food, socks, sheleters, supplies.  It&#039;s a fact of life, usually not worth mentioning.  And if there really was a problem, how does the Embassy justify complaining about it in a way that will be leaked to the public?  It only emboldens the enemy.  What happened to the fabled unified front?  We are at war.
It may be a simple case of an overly naive and chatty State Dept type who is not savvy to how easily loquaciousness can be twisted into damaging smears by &quot;journalists&quot; with an agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something odd about this whole thing.  If an Embassy spokesman is in this, then State (Dept) is involved either offically or unofficially in disseminating this.  Thus the question: State Dept is not the correct source for military info/management, so why it is being used as a source?<br />
The long quotes are all State.  The bottom line, one hopes that heavily leaning Left State Department staff aren&#8217;t being willing to be used to undermine the military.  Every single military operation has logistical problems to solve &#8211; food, socks, sheleters, supplies.  It&#8217;s a fact of life, usually not worth mentioning.  And if there really was a problem, how does the Embassy justify complaining about it in a way that will be leaked to the public?  It only emboldens the enemy.  What happened to the fabled unified front?  We are at war.<br />
It may be a simple case of an overly naive and chatty State Dept type who is not savvy to how easily loquaciousness can be twisted into damaging smears by &#8220;journalists&#8221; with an agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-427851</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-427851</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t cut off the beer !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t cut off the beer !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-427387</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-427387</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t memos that specify a classification status usually include that information in both the header and the footer? 

Slublog on May 26, 2007 at 6:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, in accordance with CMS/EKMS standards, any electronically transmitted document identifying its classification (including UNCLASSIFIED) must do so on the top AND bottom of every page, in all caps. Umm, Mazztek, are you sure about Times New Roman? I&#039;m thinking Courier. But this memo isn&#039;t military, if it&#039;s aimed at embassy staff, so I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s a salient point anyway.

As to this being a crisis, if the embassy has stocks of non-perishable foodstuffs PLUS MREs, it&#039;s a long, long way from a crisis. MREs aren&#039;t gourmet (ok, a few selections aren&#039;t quite fit for dogfood), but they are edible. Nobody is on the road to starvation because a truck isn&#039;t on time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don’t memos that specify a classification status usually include that information in both the header and the footer? </p>
<p>Slublog on May 26, 2007 at 6:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, in accordance with CMS/EKMS standards, any electronically transmitted document identifying its classification (including UNCLASSIFIED) must do so on the top AND bottom of every page, in all caps. Umm, Mazztek, are you sure about Times New Roman? I&#8217;m thinking Courier. But this memo isn&#8217;t military, if it&#8217;s aimed at embassy staff, so I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s a salient point anyway.</p>
<p>As to this being a crisis, if the embassy has stocks of non-perishable foodstuffs PLUS MREs, it&#8217;s a long, long way from a crisis. MREs aren&#8217;t gourmet (ok, a few selections aren&#8217;t quite fit for dogfood), but they are edible. Nobody is on the road to starvation because a truck isn&#8217;t on time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426861</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 04:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426861</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A lot can change in 20 years, but that doesn’t look like any military document I’ve ever seen.

Tuning Spork on May 26, 2007 at 5:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yah, it&#039;s not full of typos, grammatical errors, and ostentatiousness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A lot can change in 20 years, but that doesn’t look like any military document I’ve ever seen.</p>
<p>Tuning Spork on May 26, 2007 at 5:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yah, it&#8217;s not full of typos, grammatical errors, and ostentatiousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BadBrad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426758</link>
		<dc:creator>BadBrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426758</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In the Air Force there is a reg saying that official email cannot have graphics and fancy stuff - one of the more ignored regs out there.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Same in the Army... only the official Army seal or nothing... and, in the units I have served recently, it is has not been ignored...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the Air Force there is a reg saying that official email cannot have graphics and fancy stuff &#8211; one of the more ignored regs out there.</p></blockquote>
<p>Same in the Army&#8230; only the official Army seal or nothing&#8230; and, in the units I have served recently, it is has not been ignored&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426589</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 02:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426589</guid>
		<description>I bank on a recreation or outright forgery.

All official communications have strict guidelines about graphics and such, and no way would that figurine be allowed on official communications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bank on a recreation or outright forgery.</p>
<p>All official communications have strict guidelines about graphics and such, and no way would that figurine be allowed on official communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seixon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426423</link>
		<dc:creator>Seixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426423</guid>
		<description>Well, it meshes with there being delays now and then, but nothing specifically about a &quot;theater-wide&quot; delay at this point in time. If you read each of the quotes, they don&#039;t seem to be anything about now specifically. It seems like they are trying to dress up a common and mundane problem as being some sort of mini-crisis. I mean, why is DeYoung writing about this when none of the supposed delays are really affecting anything?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Instead of rice pilaf with turkey or fish -- Monday night&#039;s main entree, according to embassy spokesman Dan Sreebny, who said he topped it off with two cookies -- the staff would have to make do with military Meals Ready to Eat, freeze-dried concoctions with prescribed amounts of starch and protein, capable of withstanding parachute drops and remaining edible for three years after packaging.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Translation: Even though there was a supposed delay warning issued on Monday, the embassy was having normal meals, but COULD (according to my spiffy memo) have to resort to MREs soon.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;We&#039;ve run out of some things,&quot; Sreebny said. &quot;I miss my yogurt in the morning and my fresh-cut melon.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again, this could be talking about any time frame. This year. The past year. This week. This month. No way to know.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Asked about the convoy problems, Col. Steven A. Boylan, spokesman for Gen. David H. Petraeus, the U.S. military commander in Iraq, cited bad weather in Kuwait and along the routes north. &quot;Visibility was very poor and [it] would not have been safe to drive,&quot; Boylan said in an e-mail.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Again, the time frame is not in the quote, could be talking about any time, about anything.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;This has happened before, in terms of convoys,&quot; Sreebny said, although &quot;this one may be a little bit longer than in the past. Then the food comes and we all gorge ourselves on apples and oranges and bananas again.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What has happened? The convoy is longer this time? Huh? Meaning they are getting more food delivered this time than before, or...?

&lt;blockquote&gt;In an e-mail update last night, Sreebny reported that the looming crisis was at least partially averted. &quot;Some trucks have arrived at our embassy and are being unloaded even as I write.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

At the end of the article, basically stating that the entire article was worthless because there is no issue with the food supply at all.

Again, why is this article being written, other than to give readers the impression that there are food problems in Iraq, when there really aren&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it meshes with there being delays now and then, but nothing specifically about a &#8220;theater-wide&#8221; delay at this point in time. If you read each of the quotes, they don&#8217;t seem to be anything about now specifically. It seems like they are trying to dress up a common and mundane problem as being some sort of mini-crisis. I mean, why is DeYoung writing about this when none of the supposed delays are really affecting anything?</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead of rice pilaf with turkey or fish &#8212; Monday night&#8217;s main entree, according to embassy spokesman Dan Sreebny, who said he topped it off with two cookies &#8212; the staff would have to make do with military Meals Ready to Eat, freeze-dried concoctions with prescribed amounts of starch and protein, capable of withstanding parachute drops and remaining edible for three years after packaging.</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation: Even though there was a supposed delay warning issued on Monday, the embassy was having normal meals, but COULD (according to my spiffy memo) have to resort to MREs soon.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve run out of some things,&#8221; Sreebny said. &#8220;I miss my yogurt in the morning and my fresh-cut melon.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, this could be talking about any time frame. This year. The past year. This week. This month. No way to know.</p>
<blockquote><p>Asked about the convoy problems, Col. Steven A. Boylan, spokesman for Gen. David H. Petraeus, the U.S. military commander in Iraq, cited bad weather in Kuwait and along the routes north. &#8220;Visibility was very poor and [it] would not have been safe to drive,&#8221; Boylan said in an e-mail.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, the time frame is not in the quote, could be talking about any time, about anything.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This has happened before, in terms of convoys,&#8221; Sreebny said, although &#8220;this one may be a little bit longer than in the past. Then the food comes and we all gorge ourselves on apples and oranges and bananas again.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What has happened? The convoy is longer this time? Huh? Meaning they are getting more food delivered this time than before, or&#8230;?</p>
<blockquote><p>In an e-mail update last night, Sreebny reported that the looming crisis was at least partially averted. &#8220;Some trucks have arrived at our embassy and are being unloaded even as I write.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>At the end of the article, basically stating that the entire article was worthless because there is no issue with the food supply at all.</p>
<p>Again, why is this article being written, other than to give readers the impression that there are food problems in Iraq, when there really aren&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426389</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426389</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To me it looks like DeYoung never had the document authenticated, but quote-shopped people in Iraq to “mesh” with the document.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It meshes awfully well, though.  The embassy spokesman admits to most of the basic facts of the memo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To me it looks like DeYoung never had the document authenticated, but quote-shopped people in Iraq to “mesh” with the document.</p></blockquote>
<p>It meshes awfully well, though.  The embassy spokesman admits to most of the basic facts of the memo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seixon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426378</link>
		<dc:creator>Seixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426378</guid>
		<description>Iraqslogger, Larry Johnson, and Karen DeYoung at the Washington Post all published this on Wednesday the 23rd.

To me it looks like DeYoung never had the document authenticated, but quote-shopped people in Iraq to &quot;mesh&quot; with the document.

On May 23rd:

Johnson posted the PDF on his blog at 10:22am EST.

DeYoung posted the article on WaPo at 5:23pm EST.

Iraqslogger&#039;s Christina Davidson posted a pic of the PDF and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2909/US_Mission_Alert_Food_Convoy_Problems&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a short article&lt;/a&gt; at 5:24pm EST.

In other words, Johnson got the PDF from his friend Patrick Lang before WaPo even posted their story on it...

And lookie, lookie, I found a previous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2622/Anbar_Alliance_Proposed_Rejected_in_2004&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;story where Christina Davidson relied on Mr. Lang&lt;/a&gt;.

So the Iraqslogger -&gt; Lang -&gt; Johnson connection is established. Now, did Karen DeYoung also rely on Lang or Johnson?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iraqslogger, Larry Johnson, and Karen DeYoung at the Washington Post all published this on Wednesday the 23rd.</p>
<p>To me it looks like DeYoung never had the document authenticated, but quote-shopped people in Iraq to &#8220;mesh&#8221; with the document.</p>
<p>On May 23rd:</p>
<p>Johnson posted the PDF on his blog at 10:22am EST.</p>
<p>DeYoung posted the article on WaPo at 5:23pm EST.</p>
<p>Iraqslogger&#8217;s Christina Davidson posted a pic of the PDF and <a href="http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2909/US_Mission_Alert_Food_Convoy_Problems" rel="nofollow">a short article</a> at 5:24pm EST.</p>
<p>In other words, Johnson got the PDF from his friend Patrick Lang before WaPo even posted their story on it&#8230;</p>
<p>And lookie, lookie, I found a previous <a href="http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2622/Anbar_Alliance_Proposed_Rejected_in_2004" rel="nofollow">story where Christina Davidson relied on Mr. Lang</a>.</p>
<p>So the Iraqslogger -&gt; Lang -&gt; Johnson connection is established. Now, did Karen DeYoung also rely on Lang or Johnson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 23:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426339</guid>
		<description>No.  Fake.

There is a standard military letter format for all correspondance, both internal and external.  Weather it&#039;s internal or not, it is still entered into record, and must follow the proper format.

There was no header.
The date is in the wrong format.  Should be 20070521  or 070521.
It used arial, not Times New Roman, the only font allowed to be used on government documents.  

Specualtion:  Food for embassies are &quot;usualy&quot; bought locally, anyway, so why would they need a convoy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Fake.</p>
<p>There is a standard military letter format for all correspondance, both internal and external.  Weather it&#8217;s internal or not, it is still entered into record, and must follow the proper format.</p>
<p>There was no header.<br />
The date is in the wrong format.  Should be 20070521  or 070521.<br />
It used arial, not Times New Roman, the only font allowed to be used on government documents.  </p>
<p>Specualtion:  Food for embassies are &#8220;usualy&#8221; bought locally, anyway, so why would they need a convoy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jummy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426332</link>
		<dc:creator>jummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426332</guid>
		<description>if you want to see some funny fakery, check out this youtube comments thread, in which i  demolish &quot;Suz45&quot; so utterly, she pulls out a sockpuppet, but soon loses track of which she&#039;s logged in as ans is EXPOSED!

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&amp;v=fxPkq8TCOJ8&amp;fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DfxPkq8TCOJ8

if you hurry, you can watch her two identities chat to one another until the comment i called her out on drops of the bottom of the view page comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you want to see some funny fakery, check out this youtube comments thread, in which i  demolish &#8220;Suz45&#8243; so utterly, she pulls out a sockpuppet, but soon loses track of which she&#8217;s logged in as ans is EXPOSED!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&amp;v=fxPkq8TCOJ8&amp;fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DfxPkq8TCOJ8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&amp;v=fxPkq8TCOJ8&amp;fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DfxPkq8TCOJ8</a></p>
<p>if you hurry, you can watch her two identities chat to one another until the comment i called her out on drops of the bottom of the view page comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426318</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 23:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426318</guid>
		<description>What if the Democrats are planning to send out a Vegan menu to the troops?
Wouldn&#039;t that count as treasonous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the Democrats are planning to send out a Vegan menu to the troops?<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t that count as treasonous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeyore</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426307</link>
		<dc:creator>eeyore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 23:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426307</guid>
		<description>Hey, on such important issues, I thought &quot;fake but accurate&quot; had become a completely acceptable journalistic standard, now being taught in the Mary Mapes Honors Program at the Columbia School of Journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, on such important issues, I thought &#8220;fake but accurate&#8221; had become a completely acceptable journalistic standard, now being taught in the Mary Mapes Honors Program at the Columbia School of Journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slublog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426223</link>
		<dc:creator>Slublog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426223</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t memos that specify a classification status usually include that information in both the header and the footer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t memos that specify a classification status usually include that information in both the header and the footer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernGent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426217</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernGent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426217</guid>
		<description>So it was CBS&#039;d/forged in order to embarass Bush?  Geez...new lows for the loons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it was CBS&#8217;d/forged in order to embarass Bush?  Geez&#8230;new lows for the loons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 186k Per Second &#187; Nutroot Forgery - Another Forged Memo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426215</link>
		<dc:creator>186k Per Second &#187; Nutroot Forgery - Another Forged Memo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426215</guid>
		<description>[...] Ace of Spades HQlgf: Fake But Not Very Accurate, Nutroots EditionHot Air » Blog Archive » Memo mystery: Is this document real or not? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ace of Spades HQlgf: Fake But Not Very Accurate, Nutroots EditionHot Air » Blog Archive » Memo mystery: Is this document real or not? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426170</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426170</guid>
		<description>Bottom line: the 3 hots is not really that big of a deal. We do with much less during exercises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom line: the 3 hots is not really that big of a deal. We do with much less during exercises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Candy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426164</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426164</guid>
		<description>Ace has a great breakdown of the memo.  It&#039;ll be interesting to see the truth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace has a great breakdown of the memo.  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see the truth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Candy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426154</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426154</guid>
		<description>Treacher, heh.

So when do they try to top a bogus document with a picture of a NASCAR collectible plate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treacher, heh.</p>
<p>So when do they try to top a bogus document with a picture of a NASCAR collectible plate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426134</guid>
		<description>BUSH LIED, DIPLOMATS WERE SCURVIFIED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUSH LIED, DIPLOMATS WERE SCURVIFIED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426124</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426124</guid>
		<description>Well they&#039;d better get to the bottom of this fast before Lenox China finds out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they&#8217;d better get to the bottom of this fast before Lenox China finds out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426120</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426120</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WaPo Suckered by Fake Memo...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ace of Spades unravels the mystery behind another &quot;fake but accurate&quot; memo making the rounds....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WaPo Suckered by Fake Memo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ace of Spades unravels the mystery behind another &#8220;fake but accurate&#8221; memo making the rounds&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-426105</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/05/26/military-memo-mystery-is-this-document-real-or-not/#comment-426105</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m with JAMES…the purpose of this leak/phony leak would be?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like AP said, go to Ace

&lt;blockquote&gt;Some brave soul in the U.S. military sent Pat Lang a memo issued Monday that shows the U.S. ability to support its troops is collapsing and very vulnerable to disruption.

 We don&#039;t have enough convoys to give our troops three hot meals a day. We want them to step up the patrolling. We want them to search 24-7 for missing soldiers. But, by God, they don&#039;t deserve three hot meals a day.

Excuse my rudeness, but that is f[censored] up. Way to go General Petraeus.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m with JAMES…the purpose of this leak/phony leak would be?</p></blockquote>
<p>Like AP said, go to Ace</p>
<blockquote><p>Some brave soul in the U.S. military sent Pat Lang a memo issued Monday that shows the U.S. ability to support its troops is collapsing and very vulnerable to disruption.</p>
<p> We don&#8217;t have enough convoys to give our troops three hot meals a day. We want them to step up the patrolling. We want them to search 24-7 for missing soldiers. But, by God, they don&#8217;t deserve three hot meals a day.</p>
<p>Excuse my rudeness, but that is f[censored] up. Way to go General Petraeus.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
