Memo mystery: Is this document real or not?
posted at 4:51 pm on May 26, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Ace reports that former CIA intel officer Larry “No wonder Rove’s mother killed herself” Johnson is peddling a memo about food shortages at the American embassy in Baghdad which he claims comes from a U.S. military source.

Here’s the full-sized version. The subtance of the memo appears to be true: this WaPo article from earlier in the week quotes an embassy spokesman as confirming the shortage but emphasizing that it’s a temporary thing and has happened before.
[M]ouths turned dry Monday when an internal embassy e-mail announced a “Theater-Wide Delay in Food Deliveries.” Due to an unspecified convoy problem, it said, “it may not be possible to offer the dishes you are used to seeing at each meal. Fresh fruits or salad bar items will also be severely limited or unavailable.”…
[Embassy spokesman Dan] Sreebny, who said on Tuesday that the last supply trucks arrived in Baghdad two weeks prior, attributed the delays to paperwork problems on the border, traffic jams and “security issues.” He said the embassy stocks three weeks of non-perishable food for use in the event of emergency, so no one was yet in danger of MREs…
“This has happened before, in terms of convoys,” Sreebny said, although “this one may be a little bit longer than in the past. Then the food comes and we all gorge ourselves on apples and oranges and bananas again.”
In an e-mail update last night, Sreebny reported that the looming crisis was at least partially averted. “Some trucks have arrived at our embassy and are being unloaded even as I write.”
So why mention the memo at all? Follow the link to Ace and you’ll see. The icon in the upper right-hand corner turns out to be an image of a Lenox china figurine. Which brings me to my question: Is the document authentic, which would mean someone in the military was so lazy as to swipe an image of an eagle statuette for use as a logo? Or is this a crudely doctored facsimile of the internal embassy e-mail mentioned in the WaPo article, possibly created to make it look like the bearer has some inside access? If the latter it seems hard to believe a former CIA man could be so easily fooled, but then again, this is the same guy who once wrote:
Judging from news reports and the portrayal of villains in our popular entertainment, Americans are bedeviled by fantasies about terrorism. They seem to believe that terrorism is the greatest threat to the United States and that it is becoming more widespread and lethal. They are likely to think that the United States is the most popular target of terrorists. And they almost certainly have the impression that extremist Islamic groups cause most terrorism…
The greatest risk is clear: if you are drilling for oil in Colombia — or in nations like Ecuador, Nigeria or Indonesia — you should take appropriate precautions; otherwise Americans have little to fear.
Date of publication: July 10, 2001.
So how about it, Green Zone readers? Real or not?
Update: See-Dub notes that Iraqslogger had a copy of the same memo several days ago, although they might have gotten tipped by the same person who tipped Johnson.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
It shouldn’t be too hard to figure out. The “document creation properties” give the author as “khanp” and the creation date as May 23 at 7:15 Am–two days after the date on the document.
see-dubya on May 26, 2007 at 5:05 PM
A lot can change in 20 years, but that doesn’t look like any military document I’ve ever seen. Even a memo, if official, would have a DOD form # on it.
Unless this was sent by email. But, if it was sent by email, could it have been sent to “All Mission Employees”? And wouldn’t be addressed to “All Mission Personnel”?
And what is the “Mission”? Is it specific building in Baghdad?
My spidey senses are tingling, and I’m inclined toward it being a fake “document”.
Hmm. Any “Mission Employees” out there in Hot Air Land?
Tuning Spork on May 26, 2007 at 5:20 PM
It might be a State Department memo. Remember, the e-mail was an internal embassy document.
Allahpundit on May 26, 2007 at 5:24 PM
I’m confused…real or fake (and it’s my opinion that it’s fake), what is circulating this supposed to accomplish?
James on May 26, 2007 at 5:27 PM
AP–might be.
Still seems weird that it was created two days after the date.
see-dubya on May 26, 2007 at 5:29 PM
Many agencies don’t have standard email header formats and a variety of different ones are created. If that was the case, copying an image of the eagle and inserting into their personal template may be a possibility.
In the Air Force there is a reg saying that official email cannot have graphics and fancy stuff – one of the more ignored regs out there.
Bradky on May 26, 2007 at 5:32 PM
Ace of Spades says the document itself appears to be fake:
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/227970.php
Citizen Duck on May 26, 2007 at 5:39 PM
Whatever this is, it’s not an email…it looks more like a flier.
While that releases the ‘no graphics’ line of approach, it begs the question of why there’s no signature block from the top on it.
James on May 26, 2007 at 5:43 PM
I’m with JAMES…the purpose of this leak/phony leak would be?
SouthernGent on May 26, 2007 at 5:44 PM
To suggest that either 1 or 2 things
A) The Embassy has been cut off by the successful militants
or
B) That holding up the funding bill has caused shortages.
William Amos on May 26, 2007 at 5:46 PM
If it is, it’s a relatively dumb way to go about it.
“Those (supplies) who are late do not get fruit cup.”
Ohnoes! We have to rely on the heaps of nonperishables! Won’t somebody please think of the soldiers and their meal choices!
James on May 26, 2007 at 5:50 PM
Fake but accurate.
WTF is wrong with these people? Are they all just mentally ill? Is it that simple? Would they just be torturing their friends and coworkers if they didn’t have something bigger to focus their unstable brains upon?
TheBigOldDog on May 26, 2007 at 5:51 PM
Like AP said, go to Ace
TheBigOldDog on May 26, 2007 at 5:54 PM
Well they’d better get to the bottom of this fast before Lenox China finds out.
naliaka on May 26, 2007 at 6:05 PM
BUSH LIED, DIPLOMATS WERE SCURVIFIED
Jim Treacher on May 26, 2007 at 6:10 PM
Treacher, heh.
So when do they try to top a bogus document with a picture of a NASCAR collectible plate?
Bad Candy on May 26, 2007 at 6:20 PM
Ace has a great breakdown of the memo. It’ll be interesting to see the truth…
Bad Candy on May 26, 2007 at 6:24 PM
Bottom line: the 3 hots is not really that big of a deal. We do with much less during exercises.
James on May 26, 2007 at 6:29 PM
So it was CBS’d/forged in order to embarass Bush? Geez…new lows for the loons.
SouthernGent on May 26, 2007 at 6:53 PM
Don’t memos that specify a classification status usually include that information in both the header and the footer?
Slublog on May 26, 2007 at 6:57 PM
Hey, on such important issues, I thought “fake but accurate” had become a completely acceptable journalistic standard, now being taught in the Mary Mapes Honors Program at the Columbia School of Journalism.
eeyore on May 26, 2007 at 7:37 PM
What if the Democrats are planning to send out a Vegan menu to the troops?
Wouldn’t that count as treasonous?
naliaka on May 26, 2007 at 7:43 PM
if you want to see some funny fakery, check out this youtube comments thread, in which i demolish “Suz45″ so utterly, she pulls out a sockpuppet, but soon loses track of which she’s logged in as ans is EXPOSED!
http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=fxPkq8TCOJ8&fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DfxPkq8TCOJ8
if you hurry, you can watch her two identities chat to one another until the comment i called her out on drops of the bottom of the view page comments.
jummy on May 26, 2007 at 7:52 PM
No. Fake.
There is a standard military letter format for all correspondance, both internal and external. Weather it’s internal or not, it is still entered into record, and must follow the proper format.
There was no header.
The date is in the wrong format. Should be 20070521 or 070521.
It used arial, not Times New Roman, the only font allowed to be used on government documents.
Specualtion: Food for embassies are “usualy” bought locally, anyway, so why would they need a convoy?
Mazztek on May 26, 2007 at 7:54 PM
Iraqslogger, Larry Johnson, and Karen DeYoung at the Washington Post all published this on Wednesday the 23rd.
To me it looks like DeYoung never had the document authenticated, but quote-shopped people in Iraq to “mesh” with the document.
On May 23rd:
Johnson posted the PDF on his blog at 10:22am EST.
DeYoung posted the article on WaPo at 5:23pm EST.
Iraqslogger’s Christina Davidson posted a pic of the PDF and a short article at 5:24pm EST.
In other words, Johnson got the PDF from his friend Patrick Lang before WaPo even posted their story on it…
And lookie, lookie, I found a previous story where Christina Davidson relied on Mr. Lang.
So the Iraqslogger -> Lang -> Johnson connection is established. Now, did Karen DeYoung also rely on Lang or Johnson?
Seixon on May 26, 2007 at 8:20 PM
It meshes awfully well, though. The embassy spokesman admits to most of the basic facts of the memo.
Allahpundit on May 26, 2007 at 8:25 PM
Well, it meshes with there being delays now and then, but nothing specifically about a “theater-wide” delay at this point in time. If you read each of the quotes, they don’t seem to be anything about now specifically. It seems like they are trying to dress up a common and mundane problem as being some sort of mini-crisis. I mean, why is DeYoung writing about this when none of the supposed delays are really affecting anything?
Translation: Even though there was a supposed delay warning issued on Monday, the embassy was having normal meals, but COULD (according to my spiffy memo) have to resort to MREs soon.
Again, this could be talking about any time frame. This year. The past year. This week. This month. No way to know.
Again, the time frame is not in the quote, could be talking about any time, about anything.
What has happened? The convoy is longer this time? Huh? Meaning they are getting more food delivered this time than before, or…?
At the end of the article, basically stating that the entire article was worthless because there is no issue with the food supply at all.
Again, why is this article being written, other than to give readers the impression that there are food problems in Iraq, when there really aren’t?
Seixon on May 26, 2007 at 8:43 PM
I bank on a recreation or outright forgery.
All official communications have strict guidelines about graphics and such, and no way would that figurine be allowed on official communications.
Karl on May 26, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Same in the Army… only the official Army seal or nothing… and, in the units I have served recently, it is has not been ignored…
BadBrad on May 26, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Yah, it’s not full of typos, grammatical errors, and ostentatiousness.
Mojave Mark on May 27, 2007 at 12:47 AM
Yes, in accordance with CMS/EKMS standards, any electronically transmitted document identifying its classification (including UNCLASSIFIED) must do so on the top AND bottom of every page, in all caps. Umm, Mazztek, are you sure about Times New Roman? I’m thinking Courier. But this memo isn’t military, if it’s aimed at embassy staff, so I’m not sure that’s a salient point anyway.
As to this being a crisis, if the embassy has stocks of non-perishable foodstuffs PLUS MREs, it’s a long, long way from a crisis. MREs aren’t gourmet (ok, a few selections aren’t quite fit for dogfood), but they are edible. Nobody is on the road to starvation because a truck isn’t on time.
Freelancer on May 27, 2007 at 6:48 AM
Just don’t cut off the beer !!
gary on May 27, 2007 at 11:37 AM
There’s something odd about this whole thing. If an Embassy spokesman is in this, then State (Dept) is involved either offically or unofficially in disseminating this. Thus the question: State Dept is not the correct source for military info/management, so why it is being used as a source?
The long quotes are all State. The bottom line, one hopes that heavily leaning Left State Department staff aren’t being willing to be used to undermine the military. Every single military operation has logistical problems to solve – food, socks, sheleters, supplies. It’s a fact of life, usually not worth mentioning. And if there really was a problem, how does the Embassy justify complaining about it in a way that will be leaked to the public? It only emboldens the enemy. What happened to the fabled unified front? We are at war.
It may be a simple case of an overly naive and chatty State Dept type who is not savvy to how easily loquaciousness can be twisted into damaging smears by “journalists” with an agenda.
naliaka on May 27, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Folks:
I work in the IZ. Though right now I’m at a different FOB for a project, I still received this email.
Yes this is real. It’s also no big deal. There are convoy delays all the time.
It’s not really a military document, KBR does the food and they use this funny format for IZ-wide messages. I’d never noticed they used a figurine for the eagle, that’s pretty funny.
This is simply the IZ media guys navel-gazing. They don’t get out much.
LT Nichols
Jason on May 28, 2007 at 2:41 AM
Comment pages: