Kadhimiya, good, bad and ugly
posted at 11:17 am on May 22, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
We bloggers spend a lot of time bashing the MSM, and especially the New York Times, when they get a story wrong, when they slant a news story toward their own political point of view, etc. And that’s a good thing–it keeps the MSM honest, or at least it’s pressure applied toward that end.
But it’s also good to note when the MSM gets a story right. That’s what this post is about. As difficult as it is for our troops to make progress, it’s also tough for reporters to make sense of what they’re seeing and then convey a fair picture to their readers. That many reporters exit j-school with built-in biases against the US and/or the military certainly doesn’t help. But a couple of NYT reporters have managed to get a story about Baghdad right.
Last night, Allah sent me a link to a NYT story about Kadhimiya (or Khadimiyah according to the US military’s way of spelling it) and about Camp Justice’s efforts in that neighborhood. Camp Justice was where Michelle and I hung our helmets while we were in Baghdad, thus, it’s one of the few parts of Iraq that I know first hand and can therefore push back directly against MSM stories that get a thing or two wrong. But after reading the NYT story last night, I didn’t notice anything amiss. It seemed to capture the Khadimiyah that we saw pretty well–it’s a peaceful Shiite enclave where shops stay open late, parks and schools are open and functioning, and violence is rare by Baghdad standards, but where the Mahdi army is thick and the few Sunnis around are under threat. The article quoted Lt Col Steve Miska, commander at Camp Justice, so I emailed him to see if he had any problems with the article, and he didn’t. He went out of his way to praise the reporter’s professionalism.
So here’s the article. I realize that this comes across as a dog bites man post, but read through the article and you’ll get a sense of how tough it is to operate in Baghdad–even in one of the city’s best neighborhoods.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Good article. It’s just too bad that we all sit up and take notice when the MSM (esp. NYT) gets something right.
flipflop on May 22, 2007 at 12:02 PM
It sounds like they don’t need our guys in the middle of it. Or militia members should arrested, tried, and jailed and not left to control the streets with strong arm tactics. Are these people incapable of following a secular form of government for the good of all?
csdeven on May 22, 2007 at 12:08 PM
The problem is that Iraq had a very high crime/Murder rate before Saddam as well (while nothing on par remotely).
I think much of what we see is normal life that is being mixed into the operation, casualties etc. This is because there is an unrealistic idea of what ending the violence really means. The operations is going to be won, the victory won’t be given full merit because we lack perspective on Iraq’s history.
tomas on May 22, 2007 at 12:11 PM
tomas on May 22, 2007 at 12:14 PM
http://www.benbest.com/lifeext/murder.html
tomas on May 22, 2007 at 12:15 PM
Authors: EDWARD WONG and DAMIEN CAVE
With contributions by: Wisam A. Habeeb and Khalid al-Ansary.
Thank you for being a credit to your profession!
RushBaby on May 22, 2007 at 12:48 PM
I think the NYT reporters on the ground in Iraq have never been awful in the same way the Baathist Broadcasting Company or the AP “in other violence” hacks often are. John Burns, their bureau chief, is a reasonable guy.
Most of the problems in the NYT’s Iraq coverage, I believe, are the result of management and editorial bias and mistakes, picking, choosing, and slanting the news that their competent reporters send along.
see-dubya on May 22, 2007 at 3:28 PM
Comment pages: