29.9% of Canadian women accept “grinding” as a male approach in bars
posted at 11:40 am on May 20, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Dorkafork sends this with the pithy observation, “How to meet women: dry-hump them.” But only if they want you to, of course.
Which, apparently, many of them do.
The study, “Sexually overt approaches in singles bars,” published this month in The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, surveyed female university students aged 18 to 28…
The ‘grinding from behind’ tactic was reported by 83.9 per cent of the women surveyed, and ‘grinding pelvis-to-pelvis’ was reported by 68.3 per cent… Grinding from behind was initiated by 49.7 per cent of the women, grinding pelvis-to-pelvis 50.3 per cent, buttock touching 31.5 per cent, breast/chest touching 22.4 per cent and genital touching 8.4 per cent. The women said they engaged in the activity for fun, not as a means of developing relationships…
When asked if they were accepting of the advances, the women were most likely to accept grinding from behind — 29.9 per cent. Grinding pelvis-to-pelvis was accepted by 29.2 per cent, buttock-touching 14.6 per cent, breast/chest touching 3.5 per cent and genital touching 2.1 per cent.
I think/hope they’re talking about approaches by men on the dance floor. Exit question: What kind of dance move involves “genital touching”?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
first comment
Aylios on May 20, 2007 at 11:42 AM
If I tried that I’d be getting out in 3 to 6 months, depending on my good behavior.
lowandslow on May 20, 2007 at 11:48 AM
This sounds like it should be a “Bottom Story” in the “Best of the Web”.
debi118 on May 20, 2007 at 11:59 AM
What does this gave to do with the stagnanting campaigns of RINOs, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain?
paulsur on May 20, 2007 at 12:03 PM
Nothing. How do you mean?
Allahpundit on May 20, 2007 at 12:07 PM
lowandslow…and if you tried that while you were ‘in there’ you would be the most popular guy on the cell tier !
DoctorDentons on May 20, 2007 at 12:09 PM
Slouching toward Gomorrah.
Jaibones on May 20, 2007 at 12:22 PM
They’ve done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time.
thebrokenchair on May 20, 2007 at 12:23 PM
Canadians!
BJ* on May 20, 2007 at 12:28 PM
How animalistic … well, I guess my dogs my get lucky then if they cruise some Canadian bar and dry hump a few cuties.
darwin on May 20, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Kinda like the study that shows 55% of men have homoerotic fantasies.
The remaining 45% just lie about it.
Gottafang on May 20, 2007 at 12:31 PM
We likes us some uncovered meat up here.
Krydor on May 20, 2007 at 12:55 PM
i introduce myself to everyone – man or woman – like that. let’s them know who’s in charge.
lorien1973 on May 20, 2007 at 1:01 PM
I was at a wedding last night. It’s usually the same dance move that requires the consumption of large quantities of alcohol. Y’all don’t really think those statistics are less in the US, do ya?
Hootie on May 20, 2007 at 1:02 PM
After reading that article at CTV.ca, I felt like I had just had a Lambadamy: The Forbidden Surgery!
If you read the whole article, it says the majority of Canuck women admitted that traditional, non-sexual approaches were more acceptable in bars. The preferred methods included buying drinks, smiling, pulling a crisp stack of colourful Monopoly money painted with the Queen and ducks from your pocket, or the classic pickup line of “you wanna go to Tim Horton’s after we screw, eh?”
Oh… Canada.
ScottMcC on May 20, 2007 at 1:04 PM
This topic on the Lords day?
Blasphemer!
:-)
csdeven on May 20, 2007 at 1:34 PM
Michael Jackson impersonators? Maybe? Or maybe they’re dancing to “My Ding-a-ling” by Chuck Berry?
robblefarian on May 20, 2007 at 1:48 PM
Bob Seger’s Horizontal Bop.
Buck Turgidson on May 20, 2007 at 2:04 PM
Yeah,
99.7 % of all men in heterosexual relationships (with women, of course, after all, they are heterosexual relationships) fantasize while having hot, monkey sex with men while they are “making love” to their woman. Fantasizing about men by men helps them get erections and please their woman, because 55% of men have homoerotic fantasies-tendecies, and the other 45% are lying.
How do I know this?
Because 97% of studies show that 60% of this is -200 % true on the second Tuesday in February, when it falls on a leap year, if it is raining for at least seven hours straight, and if Venus is visible by 3:30 PM in the Southwestern Sky, if a Democrat is Speaker of the House and the Superbowl championship team is from a coastal state, and if the February in leap year falls on an even numbered year, except if the sky is blue that day, except when it is snowing, unless the snow is falling with a West-Southwestern drift, and if there is a person in Key Largo is sitting on a dive boat while wearing a Yarmulke while speaking Cantonese Chinese to an Arab person, only from Jordan or Saudi Arabia, who is speaking English to an Indian person speaking Punjabi while the Indian person speaking Punjabi is reading a Hindi news paper.
It is all very scientific, you see!
William
William2006 on May 20, 2007 at 2:48 PM
Plus the yankee dollar is at an advantage against the Canadian currency.
(A healthy batch of folding money, strategically placed, should either impress her …or confuse her. Is that a rolled-billfold in your pocket, or are you just trying to grind me?)
profitsbeard on May 20, 2007 at 2:49 PM
That sounds about right.
Seixon on May 20, 2007 at 2:51 PM
Robblefarian,
Speaking of Michael Jackson,
How did Michael Jackson’s security detail at “Never, Never Land” know when Michael Jackson had a date over to his mansion?
They saw the “Big Wheels” parked in the driveway!
William
William2006 on May 20, 2007 at 2:52 PM
I blame Kevin Bacon. If he hadn’t legalized dancing in the 1980’s none of this would have happened.
Buck Turgidson on May 20, 2007 at 2:54 PM
Well done, William!
Glynn on May 20, 2007 at 3:10 PM
OK William.
How can you tell when it’s bedtime at Michael Jackson’s place?
The big hand is on the little hand.
mikeyboss on May 20, 2007 at 4:17 PM
A guy hasn’t meaningfully scored until he’s gotten a girl pregnant. As long as the Canadians’ promiscuity doesn’t lead to the birth of very many new Canadians, that sort of behavior will die out as they do.
Kralizec on May 20, 2007 at 4:25 PM
Here ya go
Here ya go! (Language Warming – But don’t be too freaked out, this isn’t actually “monkey sex”, it’s a stand-up act with mention of such activities.)
RightWinged on May 20, 2007 at 5:15 PM
My first thought after reading this was a memory of a nature program I once saw. Wow, I am getting old. This type of action in a bar is totally foreign to me and the only experience I have that relates to it is watching a nature show. pity, ………..maybe.
abinitioadinfinitum on May 20, 2007 at 5:43 PM
buncha hosers!
jdpaz on May 21, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Comment pages: