Apparently we tried to levy economic and diplomatic pressure against them prior to the day that will live in infamy. Thus, the peaceful and rightful use of American sovereignty was an act of war and fully justified the sneak attack.

So, when the nutroots complain that we should have given sanctions a chance in Iraq, just realize that they will argue that the US caused the Japanese aggression in WWII because we were imposing sanctions.

Ingraham, I think her response was pretty lame, “we should not listen to the terrorist”. Yea brilliant. Let make it up like they hate us because of jealousy of our Freedom. Please they love their oppressive societies and religion.

However if all you don’t think ALL politicians are BIG BAGS OF WIND, especially a New Yorker like Rudy, you are kidding yourself. He is going to use 9/11 and his self appointed I’M THE WORLDS EXPERT IN SECURITY AND TERRORISM ALL HE CAN. If it was not for 9/11 HE WOULD BE NOTHING. Why because HE DID NOTHING to protect the city or improve the fire and police response to large scale emergencies in 8 years. He ignored advice and put the command and control center in the WTC, even after he was told that was a bad idea. It turned out to a bad thing on 9/11. RUDY WAS JUST A MAYOR OF A CITY THAT GOT THE GREATEST BLUNT OF 9/11. He does not deserve any awards or to be president because of that.

He was a marginal figure before 9/11 and that is where he belongs.

Laura- Pick on someone your own intellectual size.

driller on May 17, 2007 at 8:36 AM

That doesn’t leave her very many options for picking, especially on the left. She’s one bright woman. In a way, it’s actually kind of fun to see Colmes, on a purely intellectual level, take a knife to a gunfight and try to go on offense anyway. He’s so overmatched here, I almost pity him.

VinceP1974 on May 16, 2007 at 10:31 PM

Thank you, that was extremely interesting.

In return, the Saudis reciprocated with bitter hate because we are not Muslims. They preached hate against America in the mosques created with oil profits and on the media we built for them. The indoctrinated their young to hate America in their universities, which produced mostly degrees in Islamic studies which amounted to a degree in jihad. They exported their jihad around the world and financed terror against non-Muslims everywhere. Examine any Islamic terror atrocity and a thread leads back to Saudi Arabia.

15 of 19 of the Sep 11 skyjackers were Saudi, the little nation we lifted up into the modern world. Saudi princes footed the bill, $500,000, for the Sep 11 attacks. The Saudis, who have benefitted most from America, hate us the most because America is the most powerful infidel nation in the world which Muslims claim for themselves and their religion.

It all boils down to murderous Muslim bigotry. That’s the cause for Sep 11 and for the Muslim jihad against the world.

Your mom wouldn’t let you watch Howdy Doody? You poor, sick bast@rd.

I thought that by using such an outlandish example that it was be obvious it was merely hypothetical. So, for the literal-minded out there, I should have written, “One has a hard time relating to women because one’s mother wouldn’t let one watch Howdy Doody sort of thing?” Sheesh.

I have a hard time relating to women because my mother wouldn’t let me watch Howdy Doody sort of thing?

Your mom wouldn’t let you watch Howdy Doody?

You poor, sick bast@rd.

Come on folks, we all know Colmes is a moron. Laura is too clever to get trapped by him. Actually she was too cordial. He deserved a bitch slap.

Another thing. Didn’t that whole root cause thing have it’s origin in psychology? You know, I have a hard time relating to women because my mother wouldn’t let me watch Howdy Doody sort of thing? Can anyone tell me which brilliant intellect it was that demonstrated that what is true for an individual’s psyche is true for geopolitics? Do we understand nations as having some kind of national psyche? Seems like a pretty archaic concept to me–kind like when they used to talk about nation’s as being a race, e.g. “the French are perplexing race”–unless I’m missing some nuance or other.

Man does Laura rock my world.

And look, taking on Ron Paul in the debate on this one point is like taking on the Army of Monaco, alright. This is not like that big of a deal. Yeah, it was a cute exchange,

Wow. I’ve been pretty hard on her and here she goes trying to get along with me by echoing exactly what I said about Rudy’s “smack down” of the stupidest candidate of the ten.

Knock it off Laura. I’ll give you a second chance.

hee hee hee

Excellent recap. So, how do we fight them?

stonemeister on May 16, 2007 at 11:02 PM

Cry havoc, and let loose the dogs of war.

Especially when they kill us for them.

Or are we supposed to surrender to those who want a global theocratic tyranny?

How can bombing Iraq have caused 9/11?…the left,MSM and Dems keeps saying Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11..which is it guys ?

mlong

It’s both, stupid! Just like Bush is an evil genius and an idiot. And it’s wrong to kill unless it’s a baby in the womb or an old guy who’s just in the way anyway, or if its Dick Cheney. Jeesh!

VinceP1974 on May 16, 2007 at 10:31 PM

Nice post VinceP1974, very informative.

Excellent recap. So, how do we fight them?

stonemeister on May 16, 2007 at 11:02 PM

Nuke em and take their oil?

Ron Paul is a complete and utter asswipe.  The utter gall of this man to blame 9/11 on America.  He sounds like any other Michael Moore, Howard Dean, and KosKiddie and should be completely and utterly ashamed of himself. On……