Evitare poker no limit holdem www poker spielen poker spielen deutschland poker on line italiano carte gioco…

Tutti free casino bwin casino poker regel texas holdem regles poker texas hold black jack online…

At normativa video poker casino italiani bonus gratis best casino online casin craps download roulette gratis…

Maybe they mean out of the week at least 30 million unique people tune in to the show (whether for 1 minute or for the full hour).

Ian on May 16, 2007 at 1:54 PM

Could be but those would be numbers pulled firmly from their ear. I don’t think Nielsen gauges viewership that way. It sounds good for the ones who are her fans, but sets them up for a fall when debating others with facts.

William2006 on May 16, 2007 at 4:38 AM

I double checked the link Ian gave and sure enough prisonplanet is saying 30 million. In their wildest dreams…

To add to my previous comment …

I doubt that 30 million US citizens would tune in to television to the View even to watch Jesus the Christ, Krisna, Buddha, Ba’haula, Vishnu, Brahma, or Guru Nanak speak to the world either!

The View has 30 million viewers?

If they truly claim that, they are truly deranged!

William

Ian,

Are you sure about the 30 million number for audience size? I checked Nielsen and it seems that viewership is around 3.4 million.

Bradky on May 16, 2007 at 4:10 AM

Bradky,

You make a strong point!

30 Million people of the 300 million US citizens, equals 1 in 10 US citizens sitting before their television sets and watching “The View.”

Come on!

There are not that many people watching television all at one time, let alone all watching “The View.”

In fact, since many of the 300 million US citizens are children, and others are at work, while others just don’t watch television, or are watching another station rather than ABC’s “The View,” it is a stretch to claim that 30 million people are watching the View.

How many watched the Superbowl?

I doubt 30 million would watch Miss Universe strip naked live on television and have hot, animal sex with Mister Olympia for all the world to see, or that 30 million would tune in to watch a national broadcast in which someone in the US would be drawn at random to win 300 Billion dollars!

30 Million viewers for the View?

And pigs fly (of their own, not via the aid of an aircraft).

William

I’ll bet that the View holds a one sided “View” featuring 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and no one from the other side, or, if they have anyone, they drown them out, cut them off, or that the “other side” isn’t either really the “other side” or just someone who is no more informed that Hasselbeck is.

Let us see just how honest this “View” presentation will actually be.

William

Are you sure about the 30 million number for audience size? I checked Nielsen and it seems that viewership is around 3.4 million.

Just curious. 30 million translates to more than 14% of all voters, where 3.4 million makes it a little less than 4%.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117955333.html?categoryid=14&cs=1

For perspective on conspiracy theorists I found that 80% of all Americans believe there is a coverup on UFO information by the government (http://www.cnn.com/US/9706/15/ufo.poll/)
and six percent believe Elvis is still alive (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60353,00.html).
That is a lot of people and goes to show how popular conspiracy theories are. Not a bad thing to keep in mind when seeing what the “truthers” believe.

Entelechy on May 15, 2007 at 6:01 PM

Just curious if he is referring to the same poll that was discussed a couple of weeks back – the numbers sound similar. But that poll also claimed that 22% of all voters believed Bush knew and had a sample size of only 800. I couldn’t find the poll source in the article.

Are you adding the 26% that “are not sure” to make the majority of democrats conclusion?

Falling Panda has a partial sponsor list here, and Freedom Eden a more comprehensive list here.

They will simply stack the deck against Hasselbeck.

mojowire on May 15, 2007 at 4:56 PM

This inspired a funny thought: can it be that the great and wondrous Babs Wawah, groundbreaking journalist-with-uterus, hired a pretty plaything (EH) to model fashions for her brainless housewife audience, not knowing that she could hold her own in a political argument? And subsequently had to go 3 on 1 with a couple of bull dikes to keep her from making them all look really stupid every day?

Can they really not outwit Elisabeth Hasselbeck without 3 leftists at the table?!

Maybe they are just a little bitter about the hawtness…

And do what? Find somebody to read it to her?

Blacklake on May 15, 2007 at 6:46 PM

The NIST report is pretty technical in many places. I find it hard to debunk truthers with it; since they cannot grasp much simpler concepts.

Rosie should pick up the NIST’s report on the collapse of the WTC. I just got one last week (they are free).

And do what? Find somebody to read it to her?

Mark Roberts, writer of the LooseChangeGuide.com, debating against the Loose Change boys.

Part 1
Part 2

MOST FAIR-MINDED readers will no doubt take me at my word when I say that a majority of Democrats in this country are out of their gourds.

My question was to ask them to comment on the turther movement and the lies they spewed after 9/11. I hope it gets asked tonight and later for the democrats.

It’s a total truth smackdown. I especially enjoy the sputtering indignation of the Cro-Magnon Truther in the center left seat when the truth smacks him in the face, over and over.