Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Majority of Iraqi MPs endorse bill demanding timetable for U.S. withdrawal; Update: Parliament session ends early over quarreling; Update: Bush embraces benchmarks

posted at 10:57 am on May 10, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Blair’s gone, centrist Republicans are in revolt, the Iraqi parliament’s planning to take a little summer vay-cay while U.S. troops are busy dodging IEDs, and now this. It’s a perfect storm. I think it’s safe to say we’re at endgame.

A majority of Iraqi lawmakers have endorsed a bill calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops and demanding a freeze on the number of foreign troops already in the country, lawmakers said Thursday…

The Iraqi bill, drafted by a parliamentary bloc loyal to anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, was signed by 144 members of the 275-member house, according to Nassar al-Rubaie, the leader of the Sadrist bloc.

The Sadrist bloc, which sees the U.S.-led forces as an occupying army, has pushed similar bills before, but this was the first time it had garnered the support of a majority of lawmakers…

Al-Rubaie said he personally handed the Iraqi bill to speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani on Wednesday.

It doesn’t say which parties the 144 come from, but I noted last night that the Sadrists have been cuddling up to the Sunnis lately, presumably to broker exactly this kind of deal. I still don’t understand why the Sunnis would sign off on that unless some companion deal has been struck granting them de facto sovereignty over Anbar and a promise, for what little it’s worth, that the Shiites will keep out. Gates told Congress yesterday that a pullout would see Anbar transformed into an Al Qaeda base, but if this vacation thing goes through, I don’t think the American public’s going to care:

To many U.S. policymakers, the vacation has become a symbol of a lack of will by Iraqis to tackle the country’s deep divisions. An extended break this summer also would have important practical implications: The administration plans an assessment of its “surge” strategy in September and has promised to measure its success based on Iraqi political reforms and reconciliation policies, legislation that cannot be passed if the parliament is not in session.

Gates called the idea “unacceptable,” to which Iraq’s smartass parliamentary speaker, Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, said this:

In a barb at the Bush administration, he said those behind the criticism of Iraq’s parliament would make better use of their time trying to counter criticism by Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who is leading a campaign against U.S. President George W. Bush’s handling of the war in Iraq.

“You had better try and control Nancy Pelosi rather than Mahmoud al-Mashhadani,” the speaker said.

Captain Ed puts it succinctly:

If the Iraqis walk away from the Assembly without any [reforms] getting accomplished, and then spend two months without making any effort at all, the war effort is over. The surge will be a dead letter in Congress, and almost certainly Republicans will start to consider defunding as an option as well as Democrats. Dick Cheney understands this, which is why he made a surprise visit to Maliki to explain the situation in small words.

Ed also explains, in similar small words, to John Aravosis why the Democrats would be smart not to put up a fuss about war spending at this point and just give Bush the money he needs, a point I made myself on Tuesday. If they cut him a check, it leaves the looming failure in his hands alone, which is what they’ve been after all along.

Update: Very good news on a very bad day — the Patriquin plan is taking root in AQ’s new home base, Diyala province.

Update: Super.

Iraq’s parliament session Thursday ended abruptly amid quarreling in the chamber that reflects the tensions between Sunnis and Shiites and the dissatisfaction among politicians with the Nuri al-Maliki government.

Bickering and chaos erupted after a parliamentary delegation read a graphic report describing and cataloguing the tribulations of displaced Shiite families who fled their homes in Diyala province, north and east of Baghdad, for Karbala — a city in the south considered holy by Shiites.

Parliament speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani — a controversial Sunni who is not liked by all for his blunt and undiplomatic personality — asked the delegation to present parliament with its recommendations on the problems the families are facing on Saturday. He said the recommendations would then be forwarded to the government.

But the delegation members interpreted al-Mashhadani’s handling of their concerns and his grinning manner as dismissive and disrespectful, and they didn’t like the way other lawmakers greeted the report.

Update: With the political winds against him, Bush starts to bend.

Update: Reader D.J. Elliott e-mails to point out this excerpt, which suggests passage of the Iraqi bill is no sure thing:

Kurdish lawmaker Mahmoud Othman said he had backed the draft but only on the condition that the withdrawal timetable be linked to a schedule for training and equipping Iraq’s security forces.

“But the sponsors of the legislation did not include our observations in the draft. This is deception,” he said.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

You know what hurts? Knowing we lost troops because Bush et al were too arrogant to admit they had badly misread and misplayed this.

honora on May 10, 2007 at 2:14 PM

How so? Please, you seem to be a 4-star general, perhaps you could explain how this could have been perfectly executed?

Skywise on May 10, 2007 at 2:16 PM

The first day I went to school Harry Truman’s photo was on the wall in the class room. I remember Sputnik. I remember Freedom 7. I remember crouching under my desk, once a month, for years. I remember my draft card and the day my dad dropped me off at AFEES. I remember a different America. An America that didn’t let the bully keep the lunch money because it was hard to get it back from him, and an America that understood you cannot protect American lives by guarding the seashore. This neighbor you want to become, the neighbor who says ‘it’s none of my business’ makes me sick to my stomach. Saying that it is Abraham’s and Golda’s problem is exactly what the enemy wants you to say. Stay home, lock your door, wiggle your gun barrel out the front window.

Limerick on May 10, 2007 at 2:21 PM

honora on May 10, 2007 at 2:14 PM

So which is it Honora? Get out or cling? I’m having trouble following your logic? Is it a mistake or not? Oh liberals are sooooo complicated.

You know what hurts? The last 6 yrs of the dems demonizing our military, condemning our leaders, sidestepping our foreign policy to dine with terrorists, and most of all using are very own soldiers as pawns to advance to advance their own political ambitions. Pathetic.

frreal on May 10, 2007 at 2:23 PM

honora on May 10, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Honora, it wasn’t a mistake to go there. It wasn’t a mistake to have stayed. It would’ve been a mistake to leave before being asked to.

I’d also like to point out that the Republicans have stayed with their original vote, in favor of military action. They, unlike the Democrats, didn’t abandon their vote when the war became unpopular.

amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 2:27 PM

Limerick on May 10, 2007 at 2:21 PM “I remember …”

NEVER forget either, friend!

USA, all the way!

ValhallaMike on May 10, 2007 at 2:27 PM

honora you do realize that Al Queda and all the other like minded Islamofascists ain’t real big into this whole nuance thing and parsing of words. They don’t care how we leave just that we leave. It can be on the QE2 or ducking IED’s all the way to Navy ships anchored in the gulf, to them it is the same.
The venue may change but their message doesn’t. Death to America, Death to all who don’t believe as we do.
So while the Dems can attempt to assuage any feelings of guilt by all sorts of pretzel rationalizations, at the end of the day the jihadist wind up with new heroes and martyrs and we are left with convicted service members for every manner of crime from prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib to massacre of civilians in Haditha and Afghanistan to torture at Gitmo. That is the legacy of this operation.
Dems, you can go piss up a rope, but you come near me with your anti war, anti military crap and I will be sending you to a plastic surgeon.

LakeRuins on May 10, 2007 at 2:29 PM

The only thing the left can take credit for is exacerbating the situation by giving the enemy hope. Nice job … they’ve always been good at cheering for the other side.

darwin on May 10, 2007 at 2:30 PM

Ohhh but the Dem’s won’t be happy unless we admit defeat.

Then admit defeat. Admit that we can’t fight the terrorists, the insurgents, the media, the U.N. and Democrats all at the same time. Tell those f&*king cowards what they want to hear: we can’t do it without you, and you’ve finally aided and abetted the enemy to the point we simply can’t beat them, because they know all they have to do is hang on and you’ll do their work for them. They cheer your election, repeat your talking points, and count on your full support, which you have given to them at every turn.

I have been as strong a supporter of this war as anyone, from wire to wire, up to and including this very moment. I still think it was right to remove Saddam, and right to attempt to implement a democracy in Iraq. I’ve had a half-dozen friends and colleagues separated from their families off and on for the past four years fighting in the GWOT in one capacity or another, and have supported their mission completely. Thank God every one of them has come home safely.

But we can’t do it alone. From Day 1, this effort has been hamstrung by dishonest media coverage, treacherous allies, and dishonorable colleagues here at home. From Day 1 the enemy of Bush and the Republicans has been the terrorists, but the enemy of the Democrats, the media and the U.N. has been Bush and the Republicans. And there you have it. Despite the best intentions of hundreds of thousands of people, the left has finally poisoned the well and ensured our defeat. Again.

So if this is really where the Iraqis are at, or if they just can’t tell whether it’s more important to pass much-needed legislation in order to further our efforts or instead take an extended vacation, then f&*k ‘em.

Go ahead and withdraw the troops. Full defense and cover mode, just pull them all out right now. And God speed, boys. The widows and orphans, the terrorized and those rounded up for torture and execution, just f&*k ‘em. Apparently that’s not our problem, and while I believe every life in this world is valuable, their lives are simply not as valuable to us as your’s are.

Forget the bases (in fact, blow them up on the way out, please), forget the fledging government, and ignore the voices of every one of those weasels in the international community, who’ll now scream bloody murder that we CAN’T DO THAT, after sabotaging our efforts and insisting for four years that we do just that. You’d be surprised what we’re capable of when we finally wash our hands of a situation. We did it in Vietnam, and we can do it here.

Let the entire damn place burn to the ground, and the desert run red with the blood of the cowards, the corrupt and the God-forsaken lunatics of the Middle East. We’ve done what we can, and the troops deserve better than this nonsense.

Though it doesn’t seem like it now (just like it didn’t seem like it in the months following our withdrawal from Vietnam), the left will rue this war for decades. They are lying dishonorable cowards who deserve to have their heads cut off by the next passing terrorists. May Baghdad burn for years in their honor. Bastards.

Blacksheep on May 10, 2007 at 2:49 PM

shame.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006675.htm

RushBaby on May 10, 2007 at 3:09 PM

Blacksheep on May 10, 2007 at 2:49 PM

Amen. Well said.

BacaDog on May 10, 2007 at 3:23 PM

Blacksheep on May 10, 2007 at 2:49 PM

wow. you expressed your anger very well. and what you say is 100% spot on accurate. well vented.

pullingmyhairout on May 10, 2007 at 3:23 PM

The fault lies with the international community and democrats. They never supported the Iraqu people and this was bound to happen.

This cause was the right one and a just one…never forget that…our soldiers demand that honor. The result will still wind up being the right one in the long run. We may not realize it for a Long long long time.

Don’t turn on them now.

tomas on May 10, 2007 at 3:29 PM

Bush embraces benchmarks? No. Bush throws a bone to the dems and the media to take some of the heat off him? Yeah. The sky is falling attitude by some on this site is just embarrassing.

forged rite on May 10, 2007 at 3:32 PM

Heh, Allahpundit, you’ve crossed from admirable realism to embracing fatalism. Here’s the relevant line:

according to Nassar al-Rubaie, the leader of the Sadrist bloc.

Of course he’s going to claim that. The Sadrists also claim they’re the greatest army in the world, and probably claimed Al-Sadr was the father of Anna Nicole’s baby too.

Skepticism has to run both ways. I mean think about it: how many Iraqi MPs are really going to sign off on something that could be their death warrant?

This has “Jamil Hussein story” written all over it.

TallDave on May 10, 2007 at 3:39 PM

Personally I’d like to see the Senate abolished.

I’d rather see it reinstated as the body that represents state legislatures, acting as a brake on the transfer of power to Washington.

There are thousands if not millions of laws that force states to enact certain laws, and enforce them to the satisfaction of some USGOV agency, that never could have been passed by a Senate that had to be elected by the state lawmakers coerced by those laws. 55 mph, uniform 21/yo drinking age, mandatory seatbelts….

The Monster on May 10, 2007 at 3:40 PM

I think I need to clarify my viewpoint, as when I commented, I was terribly angry. So here it is.

I think we’re necessary for the future of Iraq and its people. However, if the government keeps pulling crap like this, or even on this one alone, its simply impossible to a) fight terror, or b) set up democracy. If the Iraqis themselves aren’t willing to cooperate in setting up their own democracy, there’s not reason our men and women should die doing so.

If the Iraqi government throws us out, there’s nothing we can do, but leave. Going against their will wouldn’t do anything but make the situation worse. If we need, we can bomb targets, to fight terror in Iraq. However, if the Iraqis themselves are going to do everything in their power to stop democracy, there’s no way to force it on them.

We, a rag tag group of minutemen, won against the British, because we wanted to. We wanted freedom more than anything, including life itself. We didn’t have the opportunity the Iraqis have. We didn’t have a world superpower come in, remove our problem, fight for us, build up a government for us, rebuild our country, strengthen our economy and defense, and stand by us.

Iraq has the opportunity, and the support of the President of the United States, and just enough of a majority in Congress, to give them that chance – a chance for freedom and self rule. It’s theirs to take or leave.

What I know is, the way you express your want for a stable, elected, free government, isn’t by teaming up with the very people who hate those qualities, and go off fighting for them. If the terrorist groups didn’t have support from the common man in Iraq, and in the Middle East, they’d be nothing. They’d be dead by now. Fact is, they have both support from the government, and regular people. All people? No. But enough.

Freedom is the Iraqis’ to lose.

amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 4:10 PM

Sorry for the vent, guys, but I’m extremely frustrated. So long as the plan is on and the generals say go, I’m down. My loyalties lie 100% with the troops and as long as they can hack it, then I’m willing, because I’m just watching it stateside, and my frustration is nothing compared to their sacrifice. I’ve been so angry at the weasels for so long, because they’re making this all so much harder than it has to be, that sometimes all I can can do is blow off steam. Guess that’s why they call it HotAir.

Blacksheep on May 10, 2007 at 4:15 PM

amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 4:10 PM
Blacksheep on May 10, 2007 at 4:15 PM

nothing compared to the rant of my own. Wish I could say I could blame the Irish in me but I can’t. The constant defeatism I hear on the MSM side got me boiling. To any I offended I apologize.

Limerick on May 10, 2007 at 4:30 PM

In fairness with Blair gone its gauranteed that the New British PM will immediately pull out British troops. And the other countries will soon follow.

Bush would have to have americans standing there alone.

William Amos on May 10, 2007 at 4:44 PM

Heh, Allahpundit, you’ve crossed from admirable realism to embracing fatalism. Here’s the relevant line:

according to Nassar al-Rubaie, the leader of the Sadrist bloc.

Of course he’s going to claim that. The Sadrists also claim they’re the greatest army in the world, and probably claimed Al-Sadr was the father of Anna Nicole’s baby too.

Skepticism has to run both ways. I mean think about it: how many Iraqi MPs are really going to sign off on something that could be their death warrant?

This has “Jamil Hussein story” written all over it.

TallDave on May 10, 2007 at 3:39 PM

TallDave’s exactly right.
Take a deep breath and step back, it’s from the AP, which I call Al-Presseera, who are thoroughly in the bag for the bad guys.

Jen the Neocon on May 10, 2007 at 4:47 PM

Jen the Neocon on May 10, 2007 at 4:47 PM

Even if it is inaccurate, there’s no debating the fact that the Iraqi parliament is on vacation while our troops are dying for them. Kind of like the Democrats.

amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 4:57 PM

What if the time table was the same as europe after WW2?

Have the other 131 pols be approached to see what their exit strategy is?

Canadian Imperialist Running Dog on May 10, 2007 at 5:32 PM

I would also note that this hasn’t been voted on yet.

Could you guys wait for that before wailing in a frothing panic? Or is it too much fun to whine and bitch about how doomed we all are?

Egads, I thought I was depressing.

Patrick Chester on May 10, 2007 at 7:27 PM

You go to war with the public you have. Right now we don’t have the public to fight, and we have to deal with this fact.

Keljeck on May 10, 2007 at 1:07 PM

Two words: PAPER TIGER. Anyone who doesn’t believe that’s what this is about is completely missing the farking point (I’m lookin’ at you, leftards), and God help us and the world if they think it’s just a rhetorical issue. Maybe it’s just time to knock the Iraqis back into line and stop kissing their collective behinds, so we can get the job done and secure their crappy country (and the rest of the region, in the process).

bamapachyderm on May 10, 2007 at 7:35 PM

“PAPER TIGER” And that will lead to the deaths of countless Americans in the future. We owe the left for helping the enemy!

USA, all the way!

ValhallaMike on May 10, 2007 at 9:16 PM

ok, trackbacks are not allowed today.

PRCalDude on May 10, 2007 at 11:33 PM

It’s all over but the consequences.

smellthecoffee on May 10, 2007 at 11:48 PM

Oh, and BTW they may not be on vacation; there’s some mention they may only take a week.

Anyways, did OUR Congress skip any of THEIR vacations? Aren’t we at war?

Keep in mind, aside from Sunni Arabs, most Iraqis are not that unhappy with things today. Over 50% of the non-Sunni-Arab population says life is “quite good” or “very good,” whereas the American public probably puts it at 90% “very bad.” It may seem like a hellhole of violence to us, but these people just spent 24 years under Saddam Hussein and many are still digging relatives out of mass graves.

TallDave on May 10, 2007 at 11:54 PM

I’m sure the Kurds will be happy to host the shifted coalition military forces in their independent region up north as we keep an eye on the chaos resulting from the inevitable Sunni-Shi’ite religious terorism that will boil up from their collective folly.

Asking the only force preventing pure unleashed carnage from erupting to leave, the Iraqis prove themselves to be hopelessly poisoned by their greed and tribal hatreds and ancient vendettas and sectarian Islamic insanity.

We gave them bowls and spoons- and they put the bowls on their heads and started poking each other’s eyes out with the spoons.

Incomprehensible ingrates.

Next time, cruise missiles.

profitsbeard on May 11, 2007 at 2:22 AM

Dems, you can go piss up a rope, but you come near me with your anti war, anti military crap and I will be sending you to a plastic surgeon.

LakeRuins on May 10, 2007 at 2:29 PM

Honey, you send me to a plastic surgeon and be prepared to hand over everything you own to me. Know what beats fists? Lots and lots of money. Ain’t American grand?

honora on May 11, 2007 at 8:55 AM

Honora, it wasn’t a mistake to go there. It wasn’t a mistake to have stayed. It would’ve been a mistake to leave before being asked to.

I’d also like to point out that the Republicans have stayed with their original vote, in favor of military action. They, unlike the Democrats, didn’t abandon their vote when the war became unpopular.

amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 2:27 PM

First, appreciate your ability (which is apparently really, really hard to develop) to disagree civilly.

Second, re: above. Heard Cheney on the news yesterday. He talked about how Iraq is the battle of our time, we can’t leave without risking mayhem and worse. In the next breath, he says, well our success in Iraq is really up to the Iraqis. You and others are now saying, well if they ask us to leave, that’s ok, we’re gone.

So, the “battle of our time” is largely out of our hands per Cheney. And, leaving Iraq when proposed by Dems is cutting and running because Iraq is now peppered with al Q and leaving will trigger a bloodbath. But if the Iraqi gov’t asks us to leave, that’s OK. ????

You can see my confusion: it looks for all the world like we are hoping to be asked to leave as a cover our ass thing. Are you suggesting the bloodbath won’t occur simply because the Iraqi gov’t gives us the heave ho???

honora on May 11, 2007 at 9:02 AM

Anyways, did OUR Congress skip any of THEIR vacations? Aren’t we at war?

That’s a false comparison. Right now EVERYTHING is riding on the surge, and tangible progress therefrom. Tangible progress would result from the Iraqi legislature acting like an effective and legitimate governing body. In the current US political climate that gives them what? A few months, tops, or so it seems right now. A vacation under those circumstances is not only insulting, it’s suicidal.

docob on May 11, 2007 at 9:13 AM

And I know they haven’t actually gone on vacation yet, so ammend my previous comment to “would be suicidal” rather than “is”.

docob on May 11, 2007 at 9:18 AM

Incomprehensible ingrates.

Next time, cruise missiles.

profitsbeard on May 11, 2007 at 2:22 AM

You know what would really be appropriate for these miscreants? Put a really monstrous dictator in charge who just makes their lives miserable.

Oy.

honora on May 11, 2007 at 9:46 AM

They, unlike the Democrats, didn’t abandon their vote when the war became unpopular.

amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 2:27 PM

postscript: most Dems voted against the war.

honora on May 11, 2007 at 9:47 AM

Let’s see what the Iraqis do on this vote. It’ll likely be defeated unless language is added that sets Iraqi security force training and readiness benchmarks as well as leaves some level of American forcing to handle emergency situations.

That’s the end game. Everything else is just political posturing.

CliffHanger on May 11, 2007 at 11:49 AM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.