Breaking: House passes “installment plan” Iraq spending bill
posted at 8:51 pm on May 10, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
It calls for funding the war only through July, at which point Bush would have to show that the Iraqi government has met the benchmarks set out for it in the bill. If it has, the military gets another two months of funding to wage war; if it hasn’t, the next stage of funding is for withdrawal. This is precisely the sort of piecemeal scheme Bush vowed yesterday to veto, and about which Gates said this earlier today:
“A ‘No’ vote in July would have dramatic consequences. The bill asks me to run the department of defence like a skiff, and I’m trying to drive the biggest supertanker in the world,” said Mr Gates. “We just don’t have the agility to be able to manage a two-month appropriation very well.”
Reid apparently has a totally different idea in mind for the Senate, along the lines of requiring withdrawal to begin on October 1 but giving Bush the power to push that date back by three months on a rolling basis if he reports progress regularly. Like I said this morning, I figure the compromise bill will end up simply giving him the money he needs through September, with an explicit or implicit understanding that if things don’t look dramatically better by then, it’s game over. Ironically, the less progress there is in Iraq in the interim, the more likely the Dems are to give him what he wants since they don’t want him blaming them for having withheld the money needed for victory if and when defeat finally does come.
Update: Iraq’s deputy prime minister is in D.C. and has been busy knocking on doors:
Bush and key lawmakers have stepped up expressions of frustration with the government in Baghdad in recent weeks, and Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Barham Saleh spent his day in a series of meetings with key senators appealing for patience.
In a brief interview with The Associated Press, Saleh said the purpose of the meetings was to convey the “imperative of success against terrorism and extremism” in the Middle East.
Update: In an earlier vote tonight, 59 Democrats crossed the aisle to vote with the GOP in defeating a bill that would have required withdrawal within nine months. Reportedly Pelosi let it come to a vote to placate the anti-war stalwarts, knowing that it would fail.
Update: I don’t know what the explanation is for this — bureaucratic inefficiency and Iraqi government sluggishness, presumably — but it’s really discouraging.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I agree with your hypothesis on the compromise bill. Strange that Reid wants to give the President more than Pelosi does.
amerpundit on May 10, 2007 at 8:55 PM
Doomed.
robblefarian on May 10, 2007 at 9:17 PM
Thanks for nothing, Democrat party and noodle spined Republicans.
SouthernGent on May 10, 2007 at 9:19 PM
It’s over, the traitors get what they want. I hope they get what they deserve. Anything happens, I won’t help pick up the pieces. They’re on their own.
rockhauler on May 10, 2007 at 9:38 PM
2 steps from treason
Freaking political power struggle that shouldn’t be
GWB should do some study on Ole Abe’s war decisions
lsutiger on May 10, 2007 at 9:40 PM
why are you trying to interfere with their 2 month vacation?
lorien1973 on May 10, 2007 at 9:45 PM
Ironic that the one thing democrats hate to spend money on is the only thing the Constitution specifically calls for.
Buck Turgidson on May 10, 2007 at 9:45 PM
EXCLUSIVE: F-16s Destroy Purported Terror Camp in Iraq
ABC News Obtains Dramatic Footage of Strike at Heart of Terrorist Operation
By MARTHA RADDATZ and STEPHANIE Z. SMITH
May 10, 2007
Print U.S. Air Force F-16s obliterated three truck-mounted anti-aircraft weapons and killed 10 to 14 al Qaeda operatives near Fallujah on Tuesday, according to the military.
The military believes they were al Qaeda terrorists engaged in an operation targeting coalition aircraft.
“We’ve had about 11 helicopters that have been shot at and hit over the last four months in that location,” Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, spokesman for Multinational Force Iraq, told ABC News.
Dramatic Video Documents Strike
The Department of Defense gave ABC News first access to imagery of the night operation that was carried out a little more than 48 hours ago.
The three-minute video begins with imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle.
The operator of the drone first spotted a truck with anti-aircraft weaponry mounted on it driving in the area. The drone followed the truck as it drove to a nearby training compound.
“When we spotted this truck, we continued to follow it until it went to that compound where it’s obviously doing some kind of training,” Caldwell explained.
The video shows what appears to be al Qaeda members firing anti-aircraft weapons from the trucks as they train to take over an abandoned building.
The small black images are artillery rounds being fired from the trucks and some can be seen richocheting off the structures. Because the operation began in the late evening, the drone used thermal heat imagery which made it easy to spot the activity.
Caldwell told ABC News, “We then called in aircraft support to bring in some precision munitions and once it was established there was no apparent civilians in the area, the decision was made to engage and destroy the anti-aircraft truck.”
The truck was taken out by an F-16.
Two other trucks and some other vehicles subsequently fled the compound.
“We continued to track them,” Caldwell said, “and when they stopped along the side of the road, they were taken out by F-16s as well.”
All of this is seen on the video shot by the drones as well as the F-16 gun camera. The tracking and eventual destruction of the three trucks took approximately two hours.
Major Operation for Coalition Forces
Caldwell describes the significance of this operation as a “seven to eight at least” on a scale of one to ten.
“They’re extremely lethal if they’re able to engage our helicopters and so for us, that was critical to get that type of equipment eliminated,” he said.
The military said the entire assault continued with a ground attack — not seen on the video — after the drone continued to track two cars that had fled the compound and driven to a nearby town.
“We launched a precision raid with helicopters and ground assault forces went in and we were able to detain eight individuals that we believe had been associated with that training earlier in the evening,” Caldwell said.
Based on preliminary debriefings of the detainees, Caldwell said, the military was able to determine they were al Qaeda. It is unclear if they were fighters from outside Iraq.
William Amos on May 10, 2007 at 10:10 PM
The USA Today article highlights the fact that our pace of reconstituting their infrastructure far outpaces the Iraqis’ ability to properly manage it. It’s like filling a thimble with a fire hose. The Iraqi people definitely need to pick up the pace, but I don’t know if they have enough people with the requisite talent/experience to do it at the pace the American public seems to be demanding.
Frustrating!
common sensineer on May 10, 2007 at 10:28 PM
Thanks for that article William, it does my heart good know that my Zoomies are takin’ care of business.
Tony737 on May 10, 2007 at 10:47 PM
Amos–thanks for the article. Couldn’t figure out if the video was posted on the ABC site. Is it there and I’m just looking in the wrong place???
doufree on May 11, 2007 at 7:36 AM
Was there a roll call on this bill? Do we know the names of the 59 Democrats who voted with the Republicans?
georgej on May 11, 2007 at 7:37 AM
Why do I get the feeling that the dems who voted against did so because the pullout wasn’t SOON enough?
csdeven on May 11, 2007 at 8:55 AM
I might too if I’d heard how badly the Democrats (and some Republicans!) wanted out. It may be their last chance before things get really bad.
eforhan on May 11, 2007 at 10:11 AM
Comment pages: