Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Shocka: U.S., Sunni states co-sponsoring covert ops inside Iran

posted at 5:12 pm on May 7, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Claims the Atlantic, but the article’s behind a firewall so we’ll have to make do with hearsay from Raw Story.

Since last Fall, he writes, “Rice and her colleagues in the administration decided to embark on a daring and risky third course: a coordinated campaign, directed with the help of the intelligence services of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, and the United Arab Emirates….The bill for the covert part of this activity, which has involved funding sectarian political movements and paramilitary groups in Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, and the Palestinian territories, is said to amount to more than $300 million. It is being paid by Saudi Arabia and other concerned Gulf states, for whom the combination of a hasty American withdrawal from Iraq and a nuclear-armed Iran means trouble.”

Samuels suggests that Iran has already faced a variety of internal attacks as a consequence of this covert program.

“They pointed to an upsurge in antigovernment guerrilla activity inside Iran, including a bomb in Zahedan, the economic center of the province of Baluchistan, that killed 11 soldiers in the elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on February 14; the mysterious death of the Iranian scientist Ardashir Hosseinpour, who worked on uranium enrichment at the Isfahan nuclear facility; and the defection of a high-ranking Iranian general named Ali Asgari, a former deputy minister of defense who was also the Revolutionary Guard officer responsible for training and supplying Hezbollah during its war against the Israelis in southern Lebanon in the 1980s,” Samuels notes.

More than that, Samuels warns that these covert actions may soon target Iran’s petroleum sector.

We were doing daily Asgari posts back in March but he’s dropped off the radar since then. The Financial Times published a report last month quoting “friends” of his who believe he willingly defected, but the Atlantic story seems more likely given reports of other Iranian officers mysteriously disappearing around that time. I’m curious to know if it’s just Sunni Arab states in particular or Sunni states generally that are involved in this, given the recent reports of U.S. collusion with a Pakistani terrorist group waging jihad along Iran’s eastern border. We’ll have to wonder thanks to the firewall, but note that prediction about attacks on Iran’s creaky oil infrastructure — it makes a boatload of sense, and the Sunni/Shia tensions in Iraq plus the known presence of AQ fighters inside Iran gives the U.S.-Sunni alliance a convenient scapegoat if and when bombs do start going off at the refineries.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

COVERT OPS!

You don’t say…………

seejanemom on May 7, 2007 at 5:18 PM

I hope if we’re working with whackjob radicals we’re going to seed them with agents for intel and keep track of them so we can kill them if needed so they they don’t go al-Qaeda on us. I’m fine with trying to destabilize Iran’s regime, but lets not forget what happened when we didn’t keep tabs on our shady clients last time.

Bad Candy on May 7, 2007 at 5:21 PM

Soooo, thats where you’ve been AP, huh?

shooter on May 7, 2007 at 5:21 PM

And as it gets slashed all over Atlantic, NYT and CNN everyone packs up and goes home. Especially when BaBaRa and Williams shove a mic in some prince’s face and ask them why they are supplying and paying for ‘terrorists’.

Limerick on May 7, 2007 at 5:27 PM

So I wonder which sheik’s assassination will trigger WWIV like Archduke Ferdinand’s did for WWI.

pedestrian on May 7, 2007 at 5:29 PM

When the traitorous dems claim we are not working with countries in the region, I always scream at the TV that just because the administration doesn’t plaster it all over the MSM, doesn’t mean they aren’t working with other countries!

This covert ops stuff is the way we are working with the countries in the region. We are not isolated and the libs couldn’t care less what the truth is. Why let the truth stand in the way of lying your way into the white house?

csdeven on May 7, 2007 at 5:36 PM

WWIV
pedestrian on May 7, 2007 at 5:29 PM

the way it is shaping up here it won’t be WW IV, it will be Jonestown.

Limerick on May 7, 2007 at 5:36 PM

Limerick,

With any luck the lib’s will get so scared that they all follow the good Rev. Jim Jones and drink the grape Kool-Aid……..


Rock on……………..

doriangrey on May 7, 2007 at 5:46 PM

maybe Bush isn’t such a dumb ass

Defector01 on May 7, 2007 at 5:48 PM

We’ve got to get a Shiite mullah to have a vision that the 12th Imam is coming to Earth on the next comet and to meet him you have to put on Addidas sneakers and do whatever those losers from California did to meet him.

What’s funny is that Iran probably though that British boat they captured was part of this op, when all they got was a bunch of Mr. Beans.

pedestrian on May 7, 2007 at 5:54 PM

Of course we’re doing ops against the Iranians. Will these idiots STFU already! We can watch it in 10 years on the history channel.

It’d be interesting to see a propaganda campaign against the Iranian Mullahs by denigrating them as Arab oppressors of the great Persian people.

Iblis on May 7, 2007 at 5:56 PM

The first time I heard the idea of targeting Iran’s petroleum sector was from Newt a few months ago.

Democrats will be screaming about the new Bush War in 3, …

DannoJyd on May 7, 2007 at 5:57 PM

NO doubt another “leak” to discredit the administration…

After all… covert ops are sooooo… icky…. cause your supposed to tell your enemy all about your plans… Like when we are going to pull out of Iraq!!! or redeploying to Guam… or whatever…

I mean… we have to play by the rules!!! Even if they don’t… it wouldn’t be huggy feely nice otherwise…

/sarc off

Romeo13 on May 7, 2007 at 6:04 PM

You Air Force vets……..how is the Saudi Air Force anyway? Like to know what to expect from these fellas if Iran gets froggy.

Limerick on May 7, 2007 at 6:08 PM

What I want to know is why we don’t seem to have used special ops to send Syria a serious message, which would be almost without risk — unlike this stuff. Syria isn’t doing as much damage as Iran, but if we could get Nancy Pelosi’s buddy to back off, it would be a real benefit.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on May 7, 2007 at 6:33 PM

Covert ops brought the CCCP down in Poland. Viva los spooks!

Mojave Mark on May 7, 2007 at 6:55 PM

Nope… I’m a strong proponent of the punishment RAID!!!

If they want to go medieval? Let’s oblige them.

F-22s with precision guided munitions…

Armored Columns…

You don’t bother taking and holding ground, you destroy their army… their infrastructure… then leave.

They mess with us again? We do it again!!!

Eventualy the POPULACE of those countries will get the hint.

Romeo13 on May 7, 2007 at 7:48 PM

Limerick, the Saudi’s have a decent air force, they fly F-15’s, even shot down a few Iraqi MiGs during Desert Storm. I can see why we’d sell F-15’s to Japan, but I never understood selling Eagles to Saudi Arabia. If they turned on us, they have our best planes to fight us with, just like when the Iranian air force, with it’s F-14 Tomcats, came under controllah of the ayatollah in 1979. It’s a good thing the F-22 is now operational.

But soon we’re gonna sell F-35’s to Turkey! They may be NATO and they may march to protest islamic radicals, but they might also turn on us in the name allah at any moment, just like Iran, or one of their pilots might turn jihadi and fly his invisible plane into a head on with Air Force One. I hope we have some sort if tracking device in these planes.

Tony737 on May 8, 2007 at 1:06 AM

This time our enemy is far less capable but has the backing of two members of the UN security council. While we could wash them away I see a staring match coming. Iran with Chinese and Russian hands on their shoulders while we can act as if we aren’t doing a thing. What? Us sabotage? Never.

“I love it when a plan comes together”

Theworldisnotenough on May 8, 2007 at 4:27 AM

Tony737 on May 8, 2007 at 1:06 AM

You forgot the order Saudi Arabia put in for the eurofighter.

As far as selling them our planes goes. We do it because we control their capabilities, keep them dependent on us for support and parts, and we can mothball their air force by cutting off said support. Every country we sell weapons to we own.

Theworldisnotenough on May 8, 2007 at 4:30 AM

Yeah, good point, but I would still rather see us only sell them F-16’s (I guess I didn’t mention that above) and not F-15’s. If they turn on us, they can cannabilize their planes for spare parts, now we gotta fight our own best fighters. If I remember right, we do sell them downgraded versions, but still, an Eagle is an Eagle and could do some damage.

And I sure as hell don’t trust Turkey with our shiney new F-35’s!

Tony737 on May 8, 2007 at 12:55 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.