Isn’t that the number of their guys who have already been killed?

Guess he forgot that part of the equation.

We’ve lost about 7,000 (counting Iraq, Afghanistan, 9/11, Bali, Beslian, 3/11, and 7/7).

Assuming that high figure of casualties (via Lancet) on the Islamic side are exaggerated by 2 times (via BDS), and that half of the so-called “civilians” were actually terrorists or synmpathizers, then 200-300,000 jihadists killed seems a reasonable call.

Thus, the ratio is at least 30 Lions of Islam killed for every infidel dog lost.

Nothing for psycho Z. to be proud of.

Or wishing for more of.

Too bad the Dems are all bent out of shape because they arent in charge of the whole thing. Let’s all be victors together. With that attitutde, it will wrap up quicker IMHO

However, this bill will deprive us of the opportunity to destroy the American forces which we have caught in a historic trap. We ask Allah that they only get out of it after losing two hundred to three hundred thousand killed, ….

Translation: Thank you Senator Reid for the pep talk. Thank you also for finally telling us when you will be leaving. My troops feel much better knowing you’re on our side. They were getting down due to your progress.

P.S. Just kidding about the 200,000 thing. Now that you’re leaving I can talk sh$t. Can’t wait for you to come see us. Make sure you brig Rosie. She’s a hoot.

- The Cat

P.S. Or ever a YouTube account, it’s not like they would ban him.

Bryan, can you take out the DIGG link on this page only?

shooter on May 6, 2007 at 5:29 PM

he could, but it’d be a pain in the ass and the better way of going about it would be to go to dig and comment your butt off.

I’m hoping that Ayman al-Zawahiri gets whacked soon, but if not, I hope he has another video like this around Oct of 2008 and that Michelle is sitting in for O’Reilly and has Robert Spencer as her guest to explain the tape… That, I hope, will help swing the election…

Zorro on May 6, 2007 at 6:58 PM

I don’t think Bill would let MM put anyone on his show that is more in tune with the threat of radical muslims than he is. Give Robert 1 week of prime time air, and you’d see an upheaval against islamo fascists in this country. Bill’s ego wont allow it.

We’d be in uncharted moonbat waters. I mean really, just how much crazier can they get?

Why in goodness name has this country come to the attitude that reality is subjective?

Easy. Thirty years ago the Marxists took over the academy. In order to bring on ‘the revolution’, they have to convince you that your deeply-held beliefs are groundless: their opinion is just as good as yours. They win.

I think Zawahiri is serious with his intentions. The democrats don’t get it and our system won’t let us fight like we need to in order to defeat these maniacs.

Religion of Peace huh? Praying to their God for the deaths of 300,000 seems just a tad unpeaceful.

Good thing it’s only Allah. It;s like prayihng to a light bulb. Just another invention. IMHO

Religion of Peace huh? Praying to their God for the deaths of 300,000 seems just a tad unpeaceful.

Some lib jack@ss hijacked this article by posting it on Digg with snide comments. Careful what you DIGG.

No self-reflection that it might not be the most positive, reinforcing thing to see the enemy parroting your own critique of your own government.

The Democrats are dancing on the head of a pin.

Bradky on May 6, 2007 at 4:41 PM

wrong Bradky, they are dancing in front of the ovens.

“The alliance, including MoveOn, chose to stick with Ms. Pelosi as she ushered through a war financing bill that included a timeline for withdrawal, but many peace advocates called the measure too timid. Some critics accused the alliance of becoming too cozy with the Democratic leadership and selling out the cause.

“There’s a dividing line between those groups who feel the most important thing is to be clear on bringing the troops home as soon as possible, and the groups that feel that unity within the Democratic Party is most important and the most important thing is for the Democrats to win the White House,” said Medea Benjamin, a co-founder of Code Pink, an antiwar group that is not part of the alliance. “So the groups who feel the most important thing is to win the White House would naturally be more inclined to listening to Speaker Nancy Pelosi when she says the only way we can get a vote through is if we water it down.”

The far left wing of the party is not going to go down without a fight. The original bill had 14 democrats who voted against and 2 republicans for.

Let the chips fall where they may. To go too far is to lose the blue dog democrats and the house. Not far enough is really kind of low risk on one hand because the solid democratic districts (reference famous blue red county maps) will reelect their reps in any event but on the other hand impacts the 2008 election if the far left stays home. The Democrats are dancing on the head of a pin.