Video: President Bush addresses Centcom Breaking: Bush will veto the spending bill; Update: Bush video added
posted at 6:44 pm on May 1, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view
President Bush addressed the Centcom conference today. His speech centered on the war on terrorism, and while much of what he said will be familiar to readers here, he does mention some plots that have been broken up thanks to good anti-terror activities among our allies. He also connects terrorist action around the world to the global war on terrorism which is currently centered in Iraq. Click to play.
Update: Just heard from Tony Snow that President Bush will announce at 6:10 pm tonight that he will veto the war funding bill. He will transmit that veto to Congress tomorrow.
Update (Ian): Bush press conference:
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
This is his first veto, isn’t it?
BTW, seems a few other places are actually bringing up the USS Lincoln carrier landing.
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2007/05/another_flights.html
This was actually in the WH press briefing??!?!
Kai on May 1, 2007 at 2:17 PM
I hope he signs it with “what now, bitches?”
lorien1973 on May 1, 2007 at 2:22 PM
No, it’s his second. Congress has decided on a petulant, really childish, confrontational policy with the President and I’m pleased to see that he is this time playing the role of the authoritarian parent–something he needs to do far more frequently with the overgrown children currently occupying both the House and the Senate.
Matt Helm on May 1, 2007 at 2:32 PM
He will veto this one and fold like a lawn chair on the next most likely, citing the great need to fund the war effort.
Neo on May 1, 2007 at 2:35 PM
This is his first veto, isn’t it?
There was a stem cell veto before.
Typewriter King on May 1, 2007 at 2:35 PM
he vetoed stem cell research as his first veto
William Amos on May 1, 2007 at 2:35 PM
Well, shoot, my block quote failed.
Typewriter King on May 1, 2007 at 2:36 PM
How long has Tony been back?!!
jatfla on May 1, 2007 at 2:39 PM
Happy “Mission Accomplished” anniversary!!! Anyone who looks at that footage of W in that flyboy get-up striding across the deck like he had actually “accomplished” something, and doesn’t cringe, well you have a really, really, really high cringe threshold.
Note to self: never vote for a frat boy.
If I were the Dem candidate in 08, I would run this footage over and over and over.
honora on May 1, 2007 at 2:40 PM
“There will be no dialogue with them.”
Stick it Pelosi.
CrimsonFisted on May 1, 2007 at 2:44 PM
The funny thing is this Congress has been a colossal flop. They can only get this silly iraq war bill to Bush.
Every thing else in their agenda, minimum wage, Health care, immigration, ect… has been locked up in the senate and hasnt even had a chance to be vetoed by Bush.
Its telling that not ONE bill that I can think of put forward by this congress has made it into law.
More proof of the ineffectiveness of the democratic congress
William Amos on May 1, 2007 at 2:44 PM
Count me then. Since he was a pilot why would anyone have a problem with him getting into a flight suit as Commander-in-Chief? As I recall, he was a pretty advanced pilot, much more a pilot than Kerry was a skipper.
CrimsonFisted on May 1, 2007 at 2:47 PM
They got Gonzo doing some ’splainin and are starting to look into war profiteering. It’s been 4 months, give them time. And I thought you conservative boys were all about less government action? So what’s your beef exactly?
honora on May 1, 2007 at 2:48 PM
I think this Congress will go down in history as one of the most ineffective, most divisive, most incompetent legislative bodies in this nation’s history. When all is said and done, I think future generations are going to curse the names Pelosi, Reid, Durban, Biden, et al.
Matt Helm on May 1, 2007 at 2:48 PM
Hey haven’t you heard their is breaking news from Aruba, right after the footage of another car chase in CA. I can’t believe this many people are really interested in what the President does. Hey they are having a parade in Phoenix, AZ today to celebrate Communist May Day.
Oh yeah “Death to America”
LakeRuins on May 1, 2007 at 2:54 PM
Seriously, you compare service in Texas to service in Vietnam? Seriously? Wow.
As for the fly-boy business: why would anyone have a problem. Well I have a problem because it exemplifies this whole disastrous policy–all show, no go. I’m not a real President, I just play one on TV.
But the question you should be asking is not why does Honora have a problem–I’m a known traitor/Democrat/liberal/yadayadayada. The question is why do the hotair.com kids have a problem. The site today has yet more Rosie stuff, a bit about 24, a rehash of a rather pedestrian article on Rudy, but not one mention of this high point in US history.
Now why would that be…..
honora on May 1, 2007 at 2:56 PM
Here’s another fast one the Dhimmicrats are trying to slip past us while everyone is focused on the Funding bill.
P. James Moriarty on May 1, 2007 at 2:57 PM
Either that or they will be heroes in the history books of our Muslim Overlords.
infidel4life on May 1, 2007 at 2:58 PM
Like Kerry, Gore, Clinton? Nah…dems would never vote for a frat boy.
George strapped into an F104 more times then any above. Musta been on autopilot I guess.
Limerick on May 1, 2007 at 2:58 PM
LakeR: none of my business but are in a profession that involves writing, communications? You have a real flair. Ok, that’s my one nice thing to say this month. Glad I got THAT out of the way…
honora on May 1, 2007 at 2:58 PM
There’s a difference between an ex-frat boy and an over-aged frat boy. And Clinton was not a frat boy if I recall. Too busy working on that Rhodes Scholar thing. What an asshole he must have been, huh?
honora on May 1, 2007 at 3:01 PM
Very important contents to a speech that should be made in Prime Time.
It is unfortunate that the Administration has not repeatedly explained in detail what the Jihadists truly desire.
It would seem that many Americans do not understand that a focused and clear ideology to establish a radical Islamic Caliphate, which will not compromise and it is literally a fight to the death!
Oxybeles on May 1, 2007 at 3:03 PM
Still is.
infidel4life on May 1, 2007 at 3:05 PM
You need to read up on the Radical Republicans and Reconstruction.
Tim Burton on May 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM
Well, let’s ask Paula Jones….
ScottG on May 1, 2007 at 3:06 PM
Gonzales is an incompetent–most conservatives would agree to that. In many ways, the President puts me in mind of Napoleon III–who often gets a far worse rap than he deserves. To be honest, I don’t think GWB will rank in the top or even second tier presidents. He’s made some poor choices for positions such as Gonzales–however, he’s also made some good choices such as Alito and Roberts. He also seems to have a tendency to rely on poor advice at the most inopportune times. He’s also not very good at utilizing the bully pulpit–which has hurt him tremendously. I think this comes from his time as Governor of Texas where he did govern as a conciliator. His problem is that he wants everyone to like him–even his political enemies.
His positives are that he can be a most personable and approachable figure–this is a trait that, along with the bully pulpit, he should have used more frequently. He also is a very pragmatic individual and a man of deep convictions. He has the right idea in that Islamic extremism is the critical threat to our civilization in the 21st century–global warming is a chimera. However, he just cannot seem to communicate the seriousness of this threat to the people as a whole. He’s most definitely a man of courage–any man who’s flown F-102’s has my respect for that fact alone. The F-102 was an incredibly dangerous plane to fly–they didn’t call it the ‘widowmaker’ for nothing.
To be honest, do I agree with every decision he’s made regarding the war? No. But we are at war–and we have to win it. As Tip O’Neill once said regarding the invasion of Grenada when asked by a reporter whether Congress had any questions he told the reporter that yes, Congress did have questions, but they would wait. That the country was at war right now and that we all had a duty to rally around the President. But then Tip O’Neill, even though I might have disagreed with his politics, was, at heart, a man of honor and integrity and came from a generation and school of thought which firmly believed that politics was not personal and that politics ended at the water’s edge.
Matt Helm on May 1, 2007 at 3:07 PM
Matt Helm on May 1, 2007 at 2:48 PM
Concur. I think a more accurate statement would be, “After it was all said and done, much more was said than done.”
DCA on May 1, 2007 at 3:07 PM
I do know about the Radical Republicans and Reconstruction–I’m a historian by trade. And yes, I firmly believe that future generations will see this Congress as more incompetent and dangerous than that one. And that’s saying something…
Matt Helm on May 1, 2007 at 3:09 PM
“I think between us, Bill Clinton and I have settled any lingering myths about the brilliance of Rhodes scholars”
Kris Kristofferson – Rhodes Scholar
ordi on May 1, 2007 at 3:13 PM
Honora: “Seriously, you compare service in Texas to service in Vietnam? Seriously? Wow.”
As usual, Honora, our resident liberal troll, is full of crap.
Lt. George W. Bush spent 2 years on active duty flying the F102, a high performance jet nick named “The Widowmaker” for its notorious low speed landing characteristics. He spent those 2 years flying intercept missions over the continental United States as part of Air Defense Command.
John Kerry did serve in Vietnam — 4 months!
“Clinton was not a frat boy if I recall. Too busy working on that Rhodes Scholar thing. What an asshole he must have been, huh?”
Yep. Clinton was a DRAFT DODGING, COWARDLY asshole who grew up to be a serial sexual predator more interested in raping, gropping, and disgracing himself in the White House.
HTH, HANCD.
georgej on May 1, 2007 at 3:15 PM
Man, I can’t stand Shep Smith. He’s serving up lefty talking points on this, and capped it off with, “much more on this, and some analysis coming up as well.” Well, you can’t have too many editorials on a news station I guess.
Now they’re serving up illegal alien talking points. So much for the “right wing” news.
Laura on May 1, 2007 at 3:18 PM
Call it my Air Force upbringing, but I dig a guy (even a President) in a flight suit.
KelliD on May 1, 2007 at 3:20 PM
I’ve decided to join the “white feather” campaign. I’m using MS publisher and glossy card stock to create my own personalized post card to send to my US Rep and two libby-dem traitor-sucking Senators, demanding that they send the President a clean bill without pork or surrender timetable.
Be advised that after May 14, the long-time post card postage rate disappears and the postage will cost 41 cents.
georgej on May 1, 2007 at 3:22 PM
honora, why read and post here then? Sheesh.
Let’s see, Kerry joined a branch of the military against a country that had no navy. ok.
Oh and the planes Bush flew? A little background.
CrimsonFisted on May 1, 2007 at 3:22 PM
Why would a Dem run that footage at all? They’re not running against George W. Bush. It would seem to be easily deflectable by any Republican candidate by just stating, “They’re looking at the past, I’m looking at the future.”
Matticus Finch on May 1, 2007 at 3:22 PM
Honora,
In case you really want to know:
There were some minor aerodynamic problems with the F-102. For example, at certain power settings and angles of attack – like, say, take-off — the jet compressor would stall and the aircraft would roll inverted. It is no picnic, skill-wise, to fly a modern F-16 with advanced avionics and fly-by-wire flight control systems. The workload on the F-102 was far higher. The F-16 has an accident rate of 4.14 occurrences per 100,000 flight hours. The F-102’s accident rate was more than three times that: 13.69 per 100,000 hours. 875 F-102A interceptors were built; 259 – almost 30% – were lost to accidents or enemy action while serving in Vietnam.
scroll down to WAR OF THE BUMPER STICKERS
Here is another link that will clear the fog for you.
But I betting you don’t really want to know.
ordi on May 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM
You and me both. He looked great, I don’t care what anyone says. I wish I were as fit as he is.
CrimsonFisted on May 1, 2007 at 3:26 PM
Opps the links don’t work
1st link
http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000136.html
2nd link
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0185.shtml
ordi on May 1, 2007 at 3:27 PM
I agree! He was SEXY!! By being my hubby was in the AF I am partial to MEN in flight suits.
ordi on May 1, 2007 at 3:29 PM
Honora
Answer this question for us.
What should be the approximate elapsed time from the BOSEMAN (BZN) VOR to the DUBOIS (DBS) VORTAC if the wind is 24 knots from 260 degrees and your intended True Air Speed is 185 knots? (The magnetic variation is 17deg. E)
A. 33 minutes
B. 37 minutes
C. 39 minutes
President Bush would have had to have passed 60 questions like this with at least 70% correct. Questions on weather, radio communications, mechanical systems, aerodynamics, pilot physiology, airspace, navigation and a hundred other things. But, since he was military, he also had to know how to operate that primitive in-flight radar, plus weapons systems, rules of engagement, electronic warfare, hydraulics, fuel systems…it goes on and on.
George W. Bush is not stupid. It’s not possible to be a moron and fly a supersonic jet fighter, and everyone knows it.
(From Eject-Eject-Eject)
ordi on May 1, 2007 at 3:34 PM
Hmm.
President Bush: Skull and Bones Society
Senator John Kerry: Skull and Bones Society
Senator Ted Kennedy: No Frat. Expelled from Harvard for Cheating.
President Clinton: Kappa Kappa Psi National Honorary Band Fraternity, Inc., Youth Order of DeMolay, Alpha Phi Omega, Phi Beta Kappa
amerpundit on May 1, 2007 at 3:41 PM
ordi, CrimsonFisted, KelliD, all.
Don’t confuse Honora with the facts.
Things like “facts” cause the brains of libby-dems to swell up and the contents (it’s brown, not grey matter) to dribble out of their noses, ears, and mouths.
georgej on May 1, 2007 at 3:42 PM
Ah yes the infamous “we will investigate investigate investigate and waste tax payer dollars for McCarthistic withc hunts”
Yet another white feather in the democratic congress’ cap.
William Amos on May 1, 2007 at 3:50 PM
We’re against unnecessary government action, first of all. Second, Congress has no bearing to fire “Gonzo”, he works for the President. So, it’s a waste of hard earned American tax dollars.
amerpundit on May 1, 2007 at 3:52 PM
That is what I was trying to do. LOL
ordi on May 1, 2007 at 3:56 PM
The most dangerous thing about this Congress is its blatant efforts to usurp power traditionally held by the Executive. Murtha has threatened impeachment should the President carry out his lawful right to veto legislation; Pelosi et al have carried out foreign policy initiatives without the consent of the Executive; Congress is attempting to usurp the President’s role as commander in chief through the most recent legislation; and, while I have no love for Gonzales, it is intruding into traditional executive territory as regards the hiring and firing of US Attorneys. What else lies on the horizon?
Matt Helm on May 1, 2007 at 4:01 PM
Kerry served his country
Bush served his country
While one has more medals and one went to a more violent part of the globe I respect and thank both men for their service. Service to one’s country should be honored one way or another.
However Honora I’m not so young that I don’t remember that Clinton’s lack of service was seen as something positive when compared to Bush I who had an incredible record of military service. In fact when bush I mentioned that, he was seen as a proto-fascist or something out of Starship Troopers for questioning Clinton’s lack of military service.
Defector01 on May 1, 2007 at 4:03 PM
forgot to mention the fact that Lurch injured himself, accepted a purple heart for it, and went home to bash our troops with hanoi jane
pmoshields on May 1, 2007 at 4:16 PM
Bush to congress “Palomino”
Wade on May 1, 2007 at 4:21 PM
At least, I think he (she?) ran away in tears. All in all, not bad.
CrimsonFisted on May 1, 2007 at 4:28 PM
Shshhh! Don’t tell them -they haven’t figured it out yet!
I’m still chuckling over Russert et. al crowing about the recent debate and how all the democrat candidates stuck together against their common opponent -GWB.
taznar on May 1, 2007 at 4:31 PM
(rolls eyes)
Kai on May 1, 2007 at 4:37 PM
As opposed to your high BDS factor. Get over yourself honora. You know you’re just trying to get some back for Dukakis’ ridiculous tank driver stunt. The difference is….Bush IS a fighter pilot and was completely natural in wearing it. And I can’t reference this assinine Kerry moment fast enough.
Bush doesn’t have to pretend to be qualified as CinC and that is why he is natural at it and why you are barking moonbat crazy trying to justify your BDS.
csdeven on May 1, 2007 at 4:55 PM
No I am not. I am simply a retired Army Infantryman (1999) who works in corporate America now. You know, just one of those dumb, irganant military types that are the bane of such luminaries as John Kerry and Rosie O’Donnell.
LakeRuins on May 1, 2007 at 4:56 PM
Ouch… thats gonna leave a mark…
Romeo13 on May 1, 2007 at 5:20 PM
LOL, Yippee-ki-yay Mother Pelosi!
infidel4life on May 1, 2007 at 5:53 PM
Agree 100 percent. My big criticism of the president is that he hasn’t been making the case for Iraq and the GWOT more articulately and more frequently to the American people.
But yeah, he looks good in a flight suit.
ThanksMo on May 1, 2007 at 6:21 PM
You are projecting your own preconceptions into the scene that are not there for any nuetral viewer. It is a banner put up by personal that says ‘mission accomplished’. It is not a badge on Bush’s flight suit that says I just bombed Saddam myself. I’m forced to conclude that complainers about this object to the fact that the air craft carrier in fact completed its mission and was going home to port, since that is clearly the meaning of the banner.
Resolute on May 1, 2007 at 6:44 PM
If you add “and the peanut farmers” after every sentance in palomino’s response, it wasn’t a bad speech.
And the way she called Reid, “THE LEADER” was a little creepy.
sunny on May 1, 2007 at 7:13 PM
Maybe, just maybe we remember the facts a little differently without the spin. How quickly we forget that our military completely destroyed the third or fourth largest military on the planet in a matter of days in one of the most brilliant military campaigns in history. The cessation of offensive combat was a mission accomplished. Saddam was gone, regime change was effected.
I remember clearly President Bush telling us over and over and over again that it was going to be a long, hard struggle. New democracies don’t just spring into being. Iraqis have a lot of distrust of government to overcome before they will be really invested in a government of “we the people.”
The left ridicule and try to spin everything positive in a negative way. I guess for them, every silver cloud has a defeatist lining.
Tennman on May 1, 2007 at 7:20 PM
Thanks for the “heads up.” A letter has been dispatched to my representative.
mojojojo on May 1, 2007 at 7:31 PM
Well, I had understood Iraqi Freedom was the invasion and successful deposing and incarceration of Saddam Hussein’s regime. That was the immediate task to accomplish before anything else could be initiated.
What planet are you on? DOn’t you know the first thing about military stages of engagement with the enemy? First is to win the battle. Bush was absolutely correct to celebrate – which was simply a cheer expressly for the troops for a job well done -the brilliant tactical and logistical feat carried out by our military. Guess you don’t think that transporting an army/navy/air force and everything it requires thousands of miles, over an ocean, over hostile nations, to the battlefield, invading the enemy’s territory which is always to the defender’s advantage is no big deal. That displays your collossal ignorance of how hard it is to do. Real military operations are not Hollywood productions. The leadership of every other nation on the planet noticed, especially the Russians and the Chinese – and have tasked their itelligence and military stategists to full-time studying everything about how the US pulled it off – but it is meanless to you?
You throw about “frat boy.” Lots of guys are frat boys, so quit the sneer. Quite a few are standing in Iraq and Afghanistan, between radical fascists who want to cut your head off and you, are you doing anything as significant with your life?
Is Nancy Pelosi a sorority girl? DO you find it condescending to be called a girl at your age? WHy do women snarl and spit when they think they’re being dimished by being called girls, but turn on a dime and think it’s okay to constantly refer to men dismissively as “boys” when they’re taking bullets and IEDs for you.
Run that photo of Bush, it’ll remind me that there are a bunch of girls out there who haven’t grown up yet.
naliaka on May 1, 2007 at 7:34 PM
Honora’s problem is that she is more concerned about bashing Bush than she is concerned about the welfare of her country. I’ll bet she’s even a truther…she appears to have the same intellect. Her arguments are based on emotion and sound bytes. She doesn’t have the intellectual capacity to do any kind of real analysis, because that takes time, and all she does is read a few lines here and there and makes some snarky comments and she actually thinks she may make a point here that someone cares about. It’s good to let her ramble on, though, because it’s always easier to spot the enemy if you know how it thinks. Keep up the good work, honora!
JustTruth101 on May 1, 2007 at 7:45 PM
Well “seminar caller” comes to mind often with honora so it seems usually that we’re really rebutting a talking points fax rather than a person. Still, get tired of the Left trying to force the terms of debate into their one-dimensional, artificial constructs, so, got to fight back.
naliaka on May 1, 2007 at 8:01 PM
Honora is a troll, but Bush needs to work up a little emotion every now and then. I don’t know about everyone else, but good grief man: show us some anger over these stunts. The democrats want to cut Bush and the troops off at the knees and Bush apparently thinks coming off like an automaton is “setting a civil tone” or something.
Wise up. The American people would like to see that the president is engaged in this fight on a visceral level. God knows the moonbats are. Bush’s statement, while spot on with respect to the facts, left me cold.
Fred on May 1, 2007 at 8:01 PM
I listened to the clip of President Bush’s Centcom speech. Now I am confused. The libs told me President Bush is a cowboy who is forcing America to fight the War on Terror alone. We have no allies. But, what was all that the President was talking about world wide networks of nations sharing intelligence and resources to disrupt and defeat terror activities. He said something about “we are working TOGETHER to make the world a safer place.” Who were all those numerous countries he was naming. Could it be that the President actually does have a global coalition working to defeat these terrorists? Did the libs lie to me?
[/sarcasm]
There is more going on behind the scenes than any of us can imagine. To the libs: either pull in the same direction, or provide HELPFUL critism/advice to advance us to victory. If you can’t do that, then, with apologies to Dick Cheney, go f*ck yourselves.
Mallard T. Drake on May 1, 2007 at 8:10 PM
Hands down, best speech by Bush in his second term. He spoke the name of the enemy … and the party that is enabling them in Iraq.
Anil Petra on May 1, 2007 at 8:19 PM
I’m all for a tied up Congress that can’t pass anything in normal circumstances. But when you’re in the middle of a war and the Democrats are unfamiliar with the concept of loyal opposition its a serious problem. Ted Kennedy gives speechs about repliving the Vietnam era. It’s clear he doesn’t care about the aftermath of that conflict. The Democrats long for passivity. The death of millions of Vietnamese, Cambodians or Iraqis is a distraction to the latest legislation on healthcare or abortion. The fact that it erodes American credibility is irrelevant.
aengus on May 1, 2007 at 8:20 PM
Isnt it so ironic that Bobby Byrd and Teddy Kennedy both voted for the Gulf of Tolkin Resolution in 1964 ?
Yet they have the nerve to say the vote for the invasion of Iraq was wrong ?
William Amos on May 1, 2007 at 8:37 PM
Egads. There’s a lot in that one sentence. “Term limits” leads the pack, though!
naliaka on May 1, 2007 at 9:10 PM
Once again a thumbsucking liberal (honora) taking things out of context and/or manipulating events to further their inept, inane, and subversive agenda of dividing our nation during a time of war when we should be uniting to defeat the clear and present danger of a fascist Islamic ideology that wants to snuff out our freedoms, our nation, and our lives!
First of all honora, you need to get your facts straight (oh, what was I thinking, I forgot, liberal thumbsuckers don’t care about those pesky little things called “facts” just like all the moonbat “truthers”!).
Bush didn’t place the banner on the carrier that read “Mission Accomplished” nor did he ever in his speech that day utter the words “Mission Accomplished.”
In addition, the referrence to “Mission Accomplished” was addressing the completion of the main mission in Iraq which was to defeat Saddam’s military and removing him from power, which the military did accomplish, therefore the “Mission” was “Accomplished.”
Also, in that same speech on the carrier that day Bush clearly communicated (at least clearly to those with half a brain or aren’t blinded to the truth for some warped agenda) that while the major combat phase of the war was successfully “Accomplished” that there were still many difficult hurdles to overcome (like establishing a free and democratic government, etc.) and there were still difficult times ahead! But of course those are just trivial facts you thumbsucking liberals choose to gloss over because it doesn’t support your “war for oil” and “imperialist America” or whatever your warped ideology/agenda of the day is!
Perhaps you and your girlfriend Tokyo-Rosie should move somewhere in the Middle East under Taliban and AQ control since you have it so bad in this country and our government is so terrible! Should you and Tokyo-Rosie decide to go (one can only hope) when you arrive there be careful what you say, what you eat, what you read, what movies you watch, and don’t listen to music as it’s un-Islamic and not being careful of any of the above could very easily get you stoned to death, beheaded, or just plain shot in the head by their Virtue and Vice Squads…oh and one other thing, I would advise you tell Tokyo-Rosie on your trip over to go back to laying with men and not women, Shari law tends to really frown on lesbians and that is a sure ticket to being hung at the end of a rope in the local town square or stadium!
Then you and Tokyo-Rosie can look around, sigh a heavy sigh of relief and say, “ah…freedom…we are finally free from the tyrannical and imperialistic regime called America!”
Now go lick some Islamo-fascist boots honora, you’ll need the practice before you surrender to our enemy and end up in one of their slave/death camps for non-believers!
Liberty or Death on May 1, 2007 at 9:54 PM
wow. Bush finally shows some balls. Brownie point!
Democrats = Party of Appeasement.
msipes on May 1, 2007 at 10:11 PM
GWB should have vetoed a lot of incompetent people in government on 9/12/2001, like the CIA head and the FBI head and the NSA head, in order to get some killer instincts into those jobs
GWB’s worst failing is his inability to Fire! FIRE!! FIRE!!!
useless space-filling slugs quick.
It has crippled his effectiveness, and led him into this impasse with Congress.
He showed indecision- always political chum in the power-hungry waters- and the House and Senate sharks have gone into increasing frenzies ever since.
profitsbeard on May 1, 2007 at 10:30 PM
Both Matt and infidel hit that one right on…all the Islamo-fascist boot licking dems and thumbsucking liberal pascifists like honora will probably have a Mosque named in their honor for helping divide our nation by spreading their propaganda, unfortunately for us the Mosque in their honor will be built on top of a mass grave filled with our bones!!
But lets try and look at the bright side, once these traitors and fools are honored by their Muslim Overlords they will be quickly dispatched to hell, after all the Islamo-fascists can’t have any unclean, filthy, stinking-non-believers in their midsts now can they!
Liberty or Death on May 1, 2007 at 11:18 PM
.
.
T R O L L S
many trolls are sharing this nic.
It’s
The Many Faces of Honora
RushBaby on May 1, 2007 at 11:21 PM
See the comments in the “Rosie” post. I explained there what the Mission Accomplished banner really was all about.
Mallard T. Drake on May 1, 2007 at 11:44 PM
I watched this live but haven’t had a change to comment until now.
I knew Bush wasn’t going to take the tough stance after his third sentence when he said, “… and my desire to work with congress to resolve this matter as quickly as possible.”
He’s playing the nice guy under the misconception that this will help in getting congress to pass a clean bill. I have to admit that playing tough would likely cause many in congress to just want to push back that much harder, but playing nice gives the dems some consolation that they may have put him into a corner.
In the few instances where he spoke hard words, his demeanor and expressions were almost commical.
The key issue is the perceptions of the public. He needed to show a stronger belief in what he was saying and take a stronger stance against the defeatists on the Hill.
Most of his words were good, but the delivery was horrid. He would have been better off having Tony Snow deliver this message.
I simply can’t accept that the majority of the American public are for a pullout and all the devastating results that accompany such action. But the dems are out there saying that they have a mandate based on the last election.
The president needs to show some real resolve in the next few weeks, or this truly will become a lost cause. I started to spell out exactly what that means, but it is too depressing, and the majority of you already know far too well what a withdrawal means to Iraq, the middle east as a whole, America, her allies, and her world standing.
db on May 2, 2007 at 12:19 AM
I agree, he really needed to put some passion behind such a critical issue, and he needed to really get passionate when he spoke of the evil we face and that it’s the dems that are placing politics above our nations security and our troops safety by not funding them.
Also, Bush has never been a good public speaker, he’s not stupid as the democraps like to paint him. You can be highly intelligent and be a really lousy public speaker, and unfortunately while Bush is intelligent, he’s not “The Great Communicator” Reagen was, and at this point in our history with the evil we are facing I really wish he was.
Liberty or Death on May 2, 2007 at 12:32 AM
Mallard, I’m trying to find your post, but there are two articles on “Jabba-the-Hut” (er, uh, I meant Tokyo-Rosie) and I’m interested in reading your post, where’s it at?
Liberty or Death on May 2, 2007 at 12:37 AM
You gotta love this guy!
This just up at NRO
The Pen W Used [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
“Our troops and their families deserve better, and their elected leaders can do better,” Bush said.
“Whatever our differences, surely we can agree that our troops are worthy of this funding and that we have a responsibility to get it to them without further delay,” the president said.
Bush signed the veto with a pen given to him by Robert Derga, the father of Marine Corps Reserve Cpl. Dustin Derga, who was killed in Iraq on May 8, 2005. The elder Derga spoke with Bush two weeks ago at a meeting the president had with military families at the White House.
Derga asked Bush to promise to use the pen in his veto. On Tuesday, Derga contacted the White House to remind Bush to use the pen, and so he did. The 24-year-old Dustin Derga served with Lima Company, 3rd Battalion 25th Marines from Columbus, Ohio. The five-year Marine reservist and fire team leader was killed by an armor-piercing round in Anbar Province.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWQ0Y2Q3NjcyNDNhY2QwYzI1ZGY2ZmViN2UxNjYwMGE=
ordi on May 2, 2007 at 12:42 AM
I really hope Mr. Bush will stay with the courage of his convictions and keep vetoing any such bills. I hope he will go so far as to shut down any part of the government that isn’t esential to the prosecution of the war if thats what it takes.
opusrex on May 2, 2007 at 1:55 AM
When the President chooses to speak, he makes Reid, Pelosi, et al look like real morons. I just wish he would do it more often!
CrimsonFisted on May 2, 2007 at 9:45 AM
I do not doubt our President one bit anymore.
unamused on May 2, 2007 at 12:40 PM
Thank you! It was either that or randomly off the meds to explain the different voices.
naliaka on May 2, 2007 at 1:15 PM
Comment pages: