<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Defends Wolfowitz (AG Gonzo UPDATE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:49:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ThanksMo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387510</link>
		<dc:creator>ThanksMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387510</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did or did not the board insist that he set his girlfriend’s compensation for having to change jobs based on his employment, despite his efforts to recuse himself? 

Splunge on April 30, 2007 at 11:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely right. This Wolfowitz thing is ridiculous. The bank reviewed the case last year and determined nothing improper had occurred. It&#039;s all down to bank politics that this is coming out now. And where are all the feminists rising up to defend Shaha Riza? She&#039;s a highly respected professional who&#039;s had her career disrupted by this mess. But as we saw with the issue of female bloggers, liberals only protest unfair treatment of &lt;strong&gt;liberal&lt;/strong&gt; women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did or did not the board insist that he set his girlfriend’s compensation for having to change jobs based on his employment, despite his efforts to recuse himself? </p>
<p>Splunge on April 30, 2007 at 11:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely right. This Wolfowitz thing is ridiculous. The bank reviewed the case last year and determined nothing improper had occurred. It&#8217;s all down to bank politics that this is coming out now. And where are all the feminists rising up to defend Shaha Riza? She&#8217;s a highly respected professional who&#8217;s had her career disrupted by this mess. But as we saw with the issue of female bloggers, liberals only protest unfair treatment of <strong>liberal</strong> women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387287</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387287</guid>
		<description>Gonzales should learn that the best defense is a strong offense.  He has nothing to lose, so I second these great suggestions:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Gonzales ought to be impaneling a Grand Jury to investigate Harry Reid’s bribes and land deals. And another to investigate Henry Waxman’s income tax returns. And a third to investigate Schumer’s role in illegally obtaining Mike Steele’s credit report.

And two more to go after Jay Rockfeller and Dick Durbin for leaking top secret information to the New York Times.

And have the DOJ publish the name of the Democrats on the DC Madam’s “customer list.” Serve them all subpoenas to testify for the prosecution — and pull the rug out from under ABC news and their little plan to play “gotcha” with the list.
PLAY HARDBALL AND TAKE NO PRISONERS!

Give them a tast of their own medicine. 

georgej on May 1, 2007 at 8:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There&#039;s ol&#039; Sandy Berger - slap him with espionage charges -let him be busy with that - what else could he have possibily wanted White House notes for?  Perhaps he would want to explain himself better?
Any way to charge Nagin and Blanco with gross misuse of Federal Funds, gross neglet ... surely there are some chargesthat would be appropriate, above and beyond  the city and state level.
Lots of meat out there just waiting to be seared on the grill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gonzales should learn that the best defense is a strong offense.  He has nothing to lose, so I second these great suggestions:</p>
<blockquote><p>Gonzales ought to be impaneling a Grand Jury to investigate Harry Reid’s bribes and land deals. And another to investigate Henry Waxman’s income tax returns. And a third to investigate Schumer’s role in illegally obtaining Mike Steele’s credit report.</p>
<p>And two more to go after Jay Rockfeller and Dick Durbin for leaking top secret information to the New York Times.</p>
<p>And have the DOJ publish the name of the Democrats on the DC Madam’s “customer list.” Serve them all subpoenas to testify for the prosecution — and pull the rug out from under ABC news and their little plan to play “gotcha” with the list.<br />
PLAY HARDBALL AND TAKE NO PRISONERS!</p>
<p>Give them a tast of their own medicine. </p>
<p>georgej on May 1, 2007 at 8:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s ol&#8217; Sandy Berger &#8211; slap him with espionage charges -let him be busy with that &#8211; what else could he have possibily wanted White House notes for?  Perhaps he would want to explain himself better?<br />
Any way to charge Nagin and Blanco with gross misuse of Federal Funds, gross neglet &#8230; surely there are some chargesthat would be appropriate, above and beyond  the city and state level.<br />
Lots of meat out there just waiting to be seared on the grill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franksalterego</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387286</link>
		<dc:creator>franksalterego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387286</guid>
		<description>I disagree on letting EITHER Gonsales OR Wolfowitz go.

Both cases are put-up/frame-ups on baseless allegations.

Letting EITHER of them go, would only serve to validate the claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree on letting EITHER Gonsales OR Wolfowitz go.</p>
<p>Both cases are put-up/frame-ups on baseless allegations.</p>
<p>Letting EITHER of them go, would only serve to validate the claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegendHasIt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387228</link>
		<dc:creator>LegendHasIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387228</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gonzales ought to be impaneling a Grand Jury to investigate Harry Reid’s bribes and land deals. And another to investigate Henry Waxman’s income tax returns. And a third to investigate Schumer’s role in illegally obtaining Mike Steele’s credit report.

And two more to go after Jay Rockfeller and Dick Durbin for leaking top secret information to the New York Times.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And since he isn&#039;t about to do that...  That is the reason I want to see him gone.  He should have been gone LONG before this bogus case over U.S Attorneys being fired for good cause came up. 

If They had any &#039;Malkin gumballs&#039; they would (figuratively) grab Waxman &amp; co, by the collars and shake them until they understand that the President has the Constitutional authority to fire any or every single one merely if he doesn&#039;t like the color of their sox.

The only real negatives I can see to firing Gonzalez now is letting the moonbats think they won, and then getting Congressional confirmationl of anyone even slightly more agressive against criminals and traitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gonzales ought to be impaneling a Grand Jury to investigate Harry Reid’s bribes and land deals. And another to investigate Henry Waxman’s income tax returns. And a third to investigate Schumer’s role in illegally obtaining Mike Steele’s credit report.</p>
<p>And two more to go after Jay Rockfeller and Dick Durbin for leaking top secret information to the New York Times.</p></blockquote>
<p>And since he isn&#8217;t about to do that&#8230;  That is the reason I want to see him gone.  He should have been gone LONG before this bogus case over U.S Attorneys being fired for good cause came up. </p>
<p>If They had any &#8216;Malkin gumballs&#8217; they would (figuratively) grab Waxman &amp; co, by the collars and shake them until they understand that the President has the Constitutional authority to fire any or every single one merely if he doesn&#8217;t like the color of their sox.</p>
<p>The only real negatives I can see to firing Gonzalez now is letting the moonbats think they won, and then getting Congressional confirmationl of anyone even slightly more agressive against criminals and traitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387208</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 12:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387208</guid>
		<description>Bush should hang tough on Gonzo and Wolfie and DO NOTHING. He should give Waxman/Pelosi/Reid/Schumer/Spector, et. al, absolutely NOTHING!

No scalps.  Nada.  Zip.  ZERO.

Both scandals are made up out of whole cloth.  They&#039;re BS.

We have a saying:  &lt;em&gt;DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!&lt;/em&gt;  Firing either man is feeding the trolls and whetting their appetitite for more.  If you give the Democrats either, who in the administration would be next?  Condi?  Cheney? Bush himself?

If they want Wolfowitz and Gonzales out, let them do it the way proscribed in the Constitution: IMPEACHMENT.

Let them get a majority vote in the House, and a 2/3 majority in the Senate the way the Constitution says.  &lt;strong&gt;LET THEM TRY!&lt;/strong&gt;

I predict that the Democrats won&#039;t even.  If they do, they forever poison the well in an attempt to get either Bush or Cheney via impeachment. Nothing will turn the people off as the perception that the Democrats are being vindictive and petty with an uncontrollable case of extreme partisan BDS.  

Here&#039;s a thought.

Gonzales ought to be impaneling a Grand Jury to investigate Harry Reid&#039;s bribes and land deals.  And another to investigate Henry Waxman&#039;s income tax returns.  And a third to investigate Schumer&#039;s role in illegally obtaining Mike Steele&#039;s credit report.

And two more to go after Jay Rockfeller and Dick Durbin for leaking top secret information to the New York Times.

And have the DOJ publish the name of the Democrats on the DC Madam&#039;s &quot;customer list.&quot;  Serve them all subpoenas to testify for the prosecution -- and pull the rug out from under ABC news and their little plan to play &quot;gotcha&quot; with the list.

&lt;strong&gt;GEORGE BUSH!  STOP SCREWING AROUND AND GO AFTER THESE DEMOCRATIC SCABBED-OVER PIMPLES ON THE BUTT CHEEKS OF OUR REPUBLIC for playing petty partisan politics while the country is fighting a war!  PLAY HARDBALL AND TAKE NO PRISONERS!&lt;/strong&gt;

Give them a tast of their own medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush should hang tough on Gonzo and Wolfie and DO NOTHING. He should give Waxman/Pelosi/Reid/Schumer/Spector, et. al, absolutely NOTHING!</p>
<p>No scalps.  Nada.  Zip.  ZERO.</p>
<p>Both scandals are made up out of whole cloth.  They&#8217;re BS.</p>
<p>We have a saying:  <em>DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!</em>  Firing either man is feeding the trolls and whetting their appetitite for more.  If you give the Democrats either, who in the administration would be next?  Condi?  Cheney? Bush himself?</p>
<p>If they want Wolfowitz and Gonzales out, let them do it the way proscribed in the Constitution: IMPEACHMENT.</p>
<p>Let them get a majority vote in the House, and a 2/3 majority in the Senate the way the Constitution says.  <strong>LET THEM TRY!</strong></p>
<p>I predict that the Democrats won&#8217;t even.  If they do, they forever poison the well in an attempt to get either Bush or Cheney via impeachment. Nothing will turn the people off as the perception that the Democrats are being vindictive and petty with an uncontrollable case of extreme partisan BDS.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a thought.</p>
<p>Gonzales ought to be impaneling a Grand Jury to investigate Harry Reid&#8217;s bribes and land deals.  And another to investigate Henry Waxman&#8217;s income tax returns.  And a third to investigate Schumer&#8217;s role in illegally obtaining Mike Steele&#8217;s credit report.</p>
<p>And two more to go after Jay Rockfeller and Dick Durbin for leaking top secret information to the New York Times.</p>
<p>And have the DOJ publish the name of the Democrats on the DC Madam&#8217;s &#8220;customer list.&#8221;  Serve them all subpoenas to testify for the prosecution &#8212; and pull the rug out from under ABC news and their little plan to play &#8220;gotcha&#8221; with the list.</p>
<p><strong>GEORGE BUSH!  STOP SCREWING AROUND AND GO AFTER THESE DEMOCRATIC SCABBED-OVER PIMPLES ON THE BUTT CHEEKS OF OUR REPUBLIC for playing petty partisan politics while the country is fighting a war!  PLAY HARDBALL AND TAKE NO PRISONERS!</strong></p>
<p>Give them a tast of their own medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merovign</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387164</link>
		<dc:creator>Merovign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 09:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387164</guid>
		<description>Nonfactor: Admitting you have a problem with telling the truth is the first step toward recovery!

What is it with the left and lies, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonfactor: Admitting you have a problem with telling the truth is the first step toward recovery!</p>
<p>What is it with the left and lies, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaps</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387145</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 06:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387145</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if having Bush stick up for you is actually much of a good thing these days..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if having Bush stick up for you is actually much of a good thing these days..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegendHasIt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387129</link>
		<dc:creator>LegendHasIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 05:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387129</guid>
		<description>Wolfowitz at World Bank is one of President Bush&#039;s better ideas.  Not as good as Bolton at the UN, but dang sure better than letting Tenent stay at CIA or Gonzalez as AG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfowitz at World Bank is one of President Bush&#8217;s better ideas.  Not as good as Bolton at the UN, but dang sure better than letting Tenent stay at CIA or Gonzalez as AG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387123</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 04:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387123</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That and playing favorites with his girlfriend to get her a bit more money. 

Nonfactor on April 30, 2007 at 9:56 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ahh, I see you&#039;ve taken the Michael Moore method by using half truths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That and playing favorites with his girlfriend to get her a bit more money. </p>
<p>Nonfactor on April 30, 2007 at 9:56 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahh, I see you&#8217;ve taken the Michael Moore method by using half truths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387119</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 04:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387119</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;None of this is surprising when you consider that the &quot;ad hoc committee&quot; is dominated by Europeans who have been leading the campaign to oust Mr. Wolfowitz. Four of the committee&#039;s seven members are European, including its Dutch chairman, a Frenchman, Norwegian and Russian. The others hail from Ethiopia, Mexico and China, but the Europeans have the majority and are running this railroad.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To be &#039;railroaded&#039; by Europeans on anything to do with girlfriends is hysterically hypocritical. It&#039;s more likely they are using their votes against Mr. Bush and because they don&#039;t like a hard-nosed Jewish American, who&#039;s not liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>None of this is surprising when you consider that the &#8220;ad hoc committee&#8221; is dominated by Europeans who have been leading the campaign to oust Mr. Wolfowitz. Four of the committee&#8217;s seven members are European, including its Dutch chairman, a Frenchman, Norwegian and Russian. The others hail from Ethiopia, Mexico and China, but the Europeans have the majority and are running this railroad.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be &#8216;railroaded&#8217; by Europeans on anything to do with girlfriends is hysterically hypocritical. It&#8217;s more likely they are using their votes against Mr. Bush and because they don&#8217;t like a hard-nosed Jewish American, who&#8217;s not liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Splunge</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387082</link>
		<dc:creator>Splunge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387082</guid>
		<description>I have yet to hear a coherent narrative that leads to the conclusion that Wolfowitz did anything wrong at all. Did or did not the board insist that he set his girlfriend&#039;s compensation for having to change jobs based on his employment, despite his efforts to recuse himself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to hear a coherent narrative that leads to the conclusion that Wolfowitz did anything wrong at all. Did or did not the board insist that he set his girlfriend&#8217;s compensation for having to change jobs based on his employment, despite his efforts to recuse himself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonnyspats1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387026</link>
		<dc:creator>sonnyspats1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387026</guid>
		<description>Puuleeeze! Wolfowitz &#039;girlfriend&#039; #1 Was an employee before He took over the bank. #2 The raise was reviewed by the appropirate people before it was approved. Wolfowitz didn&#039;t give anyone a raise. #3 The woman earned a pay raise in the private sector. BFD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puuleeeze! Wolfowitz &#8216;girlfriend&#8217; #1 Was an employee before He took over the bank. #2 The raise was reviewed by the appropirate people before it was approved. Wolfowitz didn&#8217;t give anyone a raise. #3 The woman earned a pay raise in the private sector. BFD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387011</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387011</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m glad the President came to his defense.  I&#039;ll eat my words from the other day when I said I didn&#039;t think they&#039;d defend him.  Now here&#039;s hoping they stick with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m glad the President came to his defense.  I&#8217;ll eat my words from the other day when I said I didn&#8217;t think they&#8217;d defend him.  Now here&#8217;s hoping they stick with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387007</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387007</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That and playing favorites with his girlfriend to get her a bit more money. 

Nonfactor on April 30, 2007 at 9:56 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Go inform yourself some more on the politics of what&#039;s going on, the big power struggle being waged over there,  then comment.  At least he isn&#039;t buying himself chieftanships from Nigeran tribalelders,like some have done in the past... this accusation is pretty tame compared to what the Europeans have done using their positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That and playing favorites with his girlfriend to get her a bit more money. </p>
<p>Nonfactor on April 30, 2007 at 9:56 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Go inform yourself some more on the politics of what&#8217;s going on, the big power struggle being waged over there,  then comment.  At least he isn&#8217;t buying himself chieftanships from Nigeran tribalelders,like some have done in the past&#8230; this accusation is pretty tame compared to what the Europeans have done using their positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-387002</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-387002</guid>
		<description>The Africans are sticking up for Wolf.  Africans have had enough of Europeans and their neo-colonialism (the real kind, not the Leftie-pretend-make-you-feel-guilty kind).  Africans are very interested in looking to America for inspiration and support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Africans are sticking up for Wolf.  Africans have had enough of Europeans and their neo-colonialism (the real kind, not the Leftie-pretend-make-you-feel-guilty kind).  Africans are very interested in looking to America for inspiration and support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nonfactor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-386999</link>
		<dc:creator>Nonfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-386999</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the only thing Wolfowitz is guilty of is demanding competence and transparency in the World Bank.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That and playing favorites with his girlfriend to get her a bit more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think the only thing Wolfowitz is guilty of is demanding competence and transparency in the World Bank.</p></blockquote>
<p>That and playing favorites with his girlfriend to get her a bit more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoxArgon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/comment-page-1/#comment-386951</link>
		<dc:creator>MoxArgon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/30/bush-defends-wolfowitz/#comment-386951</guid>
		<description>I think the only thing Wolfowitz is guilty of is demanding competence and transparency in the World Bank.  And that&#039;s the only unforgivable sin in the world of international bureaucrats.

I have a sneaking suspicion that it&#039;s also, in part, revenge by all the UN-World Bank-IMF bureaucrats for the loss of Saddam and all the sweetheart corruption scams he ran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the only thing Wolfowitz is guilty of is demanding competence and transparency in the World Bank.  And that&#8217;s the only unforgivable sin in the world of international bureaucrats.</p>
<p>I have a sneaking suspicion that it&#8217;s also, in part, revenge by all the UN-World Bank-IMF bureaucrats for the loss of Saddam and all the sweetheart corruption scams he ran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
