Here it is.

LMAO

The gist of it was that Bill asked Ann if she would co-host any show as a counter to Rosie O Piggo. She took umbrage that Bill was suggesting the two were just opposite ends of the spectrum. (Which I don’t blame her because Rosie is an unhinged moonbat and Ann is a brilliant rational person) She refused to let him pigeon hole her and after he asked her one last time, she said that in order for there to be a counter to Rosie….

“that person would have to be on TV 5 days a week, spouting their personal agenda, be Irish, and have their last name start with “O”…….Right BILL?” (paraphrased)

She totally 8itch-slapped him and he cowered like a child!

Thanks for your interesting insights on the issue, as always. I honestly had not expected a troll from the fever swamp to defend Olbermann by claiming that O’Reilly is almost as bad. I don’t agree, but I must admit that you’re making progress, and the sessions seem to be helping you.

Freelancer on April 29, 2007 at 9:16 AM

Sorry, no. I dvr it and delete it after watching.

Bill O’ very often attempts to hunt for the “middle ground” of issues, from which he then criticizes those both left and right of him. However, he was perfectly in the right defending himself against Bill Moyers’ fabrications and distortions of his own words. Jane wouldn’t stop trying to answer simple questions with leftist agenda talking points. Bill wouldn’t allow that to continue.

csdeven, you have a link or a transcript for that?

Bill’s complaint about Moyers lying is less about Bill, and more about establishing that he is untrustworthy, and by extension, we know who to believe. Hence, he is looking out for the folks.

Jane was being a partisan tool and Bill slammed her for it.

With all this O’Reilly Derangement Syndrome around here, I am totally shocked that I haven’t read anyone mention the total smack down Ann Coulter did on Bill Friday night. She was all over him like ugly on an ape!

Is that clown saying that he believes his gmc truck is a jet aircraft?

.

The Machine on April 29, 2007 at 1:41 AM

Dude

- The Cat

P.S. I don’t know if it’s gmc or not :)

P.P.S. In the spirit of gmcjetpilot “I mean I don’t KNOW IF IT’S GMC OR NOT!!!1!11!!!one!!”

.

Keep it pithy, gmcjetpilot.

Stormy70 on April 28, 2007 at 5:41 PM

pithy – having substance and point : tersely cogent

This is dangerous to flying.

Downers are still needed.

Olberkind is still himself.

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/vohawhaw.htm

If you are critical of him he will attack you and make up pure BS.

Any examples?

I’m still annoyed at the outrage over Rudy saying something that he never said. It was just the latest bogus “scandal” created by the Democrats and media, only this time there wasn’t even something to spin from, it was a complete fabrication, Rudy didn’t say what they accused him of, and in fact he said something that Republicans have been saying for a long time, and what the Dems’ policies make clear, that the Democrats would take a defensive pre-9/11 tactic to deal with terrorism, rather than stay on the offense. Again, their policies prove this, but it was proven AGAIN by the fact that you could only get half of the Dems at the debate to acknowledge that there is a war on terror, and the ones that did acknowledge it are only pandering anyway because the recognize that they can’t win the popular vote if they don’t (Not sure what Edwards was thinking… in 2004 he wanted to be the pro-war candidate…. at least until he was picked up as Kerry’s VP because that’s what the polls told the Kerry camp would be the best choice)

RightWinged on April 28, 2007 at 8:14 PM

I don’t even understand why anybody would be upset if Rudy really had said that people will be safer from terror attacks by electing Republicans. That’s self-evident, when the choice is between them and what passes for the Democrat party these days. The only Democrat leaders with a shred of backbone, like Joe Lieberman, are vilified by their own party. Reid, Pelosi, and the rest of their America-hating ilk are more than happy to appease or submit to any threat, when they aren’t flat out running away from it. The Republicans deserve plenty of criticism on national security issues like the border, but a choice between them and gutless surrender monkeys is a no-brainer. The terrorists can certainly tell the difference, which is why they always root for the Democrats.

I’m not sure but I think that gmcjetpilot just called either Michelle (or maybe KP) an old wash rag.

Tsk, tsk. Isn’t that called insulting the host…..

gmcjetpilot on April 28, 2007 at 5:09 PM

Why are you always so out of control and off base? I’m not even going to get in to how badly you’re misrepresenting what Bill’s comments were (they were about people doing things to harm the country in a time of war, not simply opposing the war)… And he didn’t yell at and cut of Jane because she didn’t agree… He cut her off because he wanted a simple yes or no answer on something and she wanted to finish her talking points. This happens constantly with Democrats. They can’t debate an issue because it requires independent and on the spot thought. They come with a speech and just stick to the script.

What is the “roll of media?”

Is that what Moyers makes his Pastrami sandwich with?

Just wonderin’.