Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


New VTech thread: Was Cho schizophrenic, “mean,” or both? Update: NBC receives material mailed by Cho; Update: Video added; Update: Cho called Columbine killers “martyrs” in manifesto; Update: Envelope signed “A. Ishmael”

posted at 4:40 pm on April 18, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

There’s new information about him this morning but most of it is stuff we already know. The cops held a press conference to say that he stalked two women in 2005 and then got sent away to a mental hospital for a spell, which we learned last night from that bizarre CNN interview with his two former roommates. Meanwhile, the NYT has a scoop about the cops having initially misidentified the suspect in the first shooting as Emily Hilscher’s gun-aficionado boyfriend. If only the LA Times hadn’t had the same scoop hours earlier.

Here’s some genuinely new information, though, via ABC News. A forensic psychiatrist who’s been following the story says Cho’s behavior sounds familiar, and it goes way beyond depression:

What then leads you to believe Cho had schizophrenia?

How he related to his roommate was just too bizarre to be depression. The bizarre content of his plays — mashing a half-eaten “banana bar” in someone’s mouth, the hypersexual, nihilistic (death obsessed) obsessions in the absence of depressive guilt or tearfulness are another clue. The progressive decline of a period of years. Those with schizophrenia, especially in their earliest years, are not readily recognizable as such — their condition is evolving. But here was someone who, as early as 2005, was carrying himself so strangely that he was a spectacle. The depressed withdraw and disappear. Those who are so peculiar in their manner so as to be inappropriate (taking cell phone pictures of his teacher, speaking inaudibly, pulling a cap low over his eyes) exhibit signs and symptoms more indicative of schizophrenia. He was communicating in a rambling manner reflective of what we appreciate as autistic thinking — characteristic of schizophrenia. In a similar vein, Mr. Cho’s stilted communication in his homicide note (deceitful charlatans — not the language of a 23-year-old college kid) is also the manner of a schizophrenic’s communications, as is his pronounced delay in responding to questions.

Poet Nikki Giovanni, who taught Cho in one of her classes, tells the LA Times that she actually had guards stationed nearby at one point to intervene in case Psy-Cho (as See-Dub dubs him) went off. And here’s what she told CNN:

“I knew when it happened that that’s probably who it was,” Giovanni said, referring to her former pupil. “I would have been shocked if it wasn’t.”…

[In the fall of 2005,] Giovanni went to the department’s then-chairwoman, Lucinda Roy, and told her she wanted Cho out of her class, and Roy obliged.

“I was willing to resign before I was going to continue with him,” Giovanni said. “There was something mean about this boy.”

Giovanni said she’s taught her share of oddballs in the past, but there was something malicious about Cho’s behavior.

“I know we’re talking about a troubled youngster and crap like that, but troubled youngsters get drunk and jump off buildings; troubled youngsters drink and drive,” she said. “I’ve taught troubled youngsters. I’ve taught crazy people. It was the meanness that bothered me. It was a, really, mean streak.”

We all knew weird, quiet kids at college, but I certainly never knew anyone so weird that the teachers felt they needed guards around in order to teach him. British journalist Toby Harnden (who’s been reading this blog, among others, to keep tabs on the story) is promising an interview on Thursday in the Telegraph with Cho’s roommate that’ll reveal even more warning signs about his lethal strangeness. And so I repeat my question from last night: how did they let this time bomb keep ticking for so long?

The other stuff I’ve got right now is just a grab bag. The Times has posted a new graphic showing the layout of the second floor of Norris Hall; so far as I know, no one’s explained yet why he went upstairs instead of sticking to the first floor. Bob Owens discovers that ABC News is deleting comments that challenge them on their crappy reporting about large-capacity magazines. And readers are kicking up a fuss about the Australian Telegraph’s sensationalistic headline and lede about Cho’s possible obsession with Emily Hilscher. I think it’s nonsense: they’re just being tabloidy about the fatal attraction element, not blaming her for her own murder.

I’m sure there’ll be updates here throughout the day, albeit (hopefully) not as many as the last few posts have had. In the meantime, compare Iran’s reaction to the shooting to the “teacher’s lesson” on terrorism for “Bowling for Columbine.”

Update: Steyn tries to parse the rules for what constitutes “adulthood” these days: “[W]e live in a selectively infantilized culture where twentysomethings are ‘children’ if they’re serving in the Third Infantry Division in Ramadi but grown-ups making rational choices if they drop to the broadloom in President Clinton’s Oval Office.”

Update: Just breaking — NBC says it received a package from Cho which it has reason to believe was sent between the first and second shootings. Supposedly it contains photos and video, which probably means they’re images he took of the first shooting on his cell phone right after it happened. You’ll recall he was known to take cell-phone photos of his classmates during class, one of his little habits that freaked them out.

NBC says it’s already turned over the information to the police. Stand by.

Update: Multiple photos, video, and “rambling writings” were in the package.

Update: It sounds like the video, at least, wasn’t of the crime scene but of Cho listing his “grievances.” He must have mentioned the first shooting, otherwise I don’t how they could be so sure that he filmed it after that had happened: “Cho Seung-Hui sent NBC News a long and rambling communication and video about his grievances, the network said Wednesday. Network officials turned the material over to the FBI and said they would not immediately disclose its contents pending the agency’s review.” Update: They’ve updated the article to say that the timestamp is the giveaway. Hmmm.

Update: I won’t repeat my ticking-time-bomb question yet again, but … okay, I will repeat it. If they knew in 2005 that he was “mentally ill” and an “imminent danger to himself,” why did the magistrate refer him for outpatient treatment?

Update: More: “The package, timestamped in the two-hour window between Monday’s shootings, was sent to NBC News head Steve Capus. It contained digital photos of the gunman holding weapons and a manifesto that ‘rants against rich people and warns that he wants to get even,’ The Associated Press quoted an unidentified New York law enforcement official familiar with the case as saying.”

Update: NBC says it’s going to air portions of the video tonight. Wow.

Update: Still more. Why would Cho have sent the video to the president of the NBC News instead of Brian Williams or whoever? “The package, timestamped in the two-hour window between Monday’s shootings, was sent to NBC News head Steve Capus. In an interview with MSNBC.com, Capus said Cho talks to the camera in the videos. In one instance, he makes a vague reference to the massacre, Capus said, and said, ‘This didn’t have to happen.’ ‘The statement is hard to follow, kind of rambling. He speaks about hatred,’ Capus said, adding that it was ‘distrubring, very angry, profanity laced.’”

Update: The post office must have been his last stop before Norris Hall: “The package bore a U.S. Postal Service stamp recording that it had been received at a Virginia post office at 9:01 a.m. ET Monday, about an hour and 45 minutes after Cho shot two people in the West Ambler Johnston residence hall on the Virginia Tech campus and shortly before Cho entered Norris Hall, where he killed 30 more people.” There are 23 Quicktime files in the package, according to NBC.

Update: Go see the photo on MSNBC’s front page. The survivors said he was wearing a tan shirt during the attack, almost like a boy scout’s uniform.

Update: I admit I’m keen to see what Cho had to say for himself, but Mona Charen makes a good point. Does NBC realize what it’s doing here by extending Ismail Ax’s 15 minutes of fame?

And speaking of which, I don’t see any writing in red ink on his inner arm in that NBC photo.

cho3.jpg

Update: Yet another update from NBC. Lest there was any doubt left, this was highly premeditated. And as I speculated the other day, the ammo appears to have been unusually lethal:

The production of the videos indicated that Cho had worked on the package for some time, because he not only “took the time to record the videos, but he also broke them down into snippets” that were embedded paragraph by paragraph into the main document, Capus said…

Other photographs show Cho holding a knife, and some show hollow-point bullets lined up on a table, Capus said.

Update: Spruiell thinks this is a bad call by NBC too. I think it’s a close call, but I’m not sure I agree.

Update: The NBC Nightly News is airing now. Brian Williams just said the return address on the envelope was signed “Ismail” — or “Ishmael,” as Williams pronounced it. Pete Williams says there’s evidence that he was preparing this at least six days before the shooting.

Update: Here’s the segment from the Nightly News. Question: Where were these videos shot? I assumed it was in his dorm room, but that white brick background looks more like a hallway.

Update: They aired a little more video at the end of the show. More of the same: Cho ranting about trust funds, hedonism, Jesus Christ — and then, in the written document he gave them, a reference to “martyrs like Eric and Dylan.”

Update: Catherine Herridge is on Fox News right now telling Shep Smith that a VTech spokesman said this afternoon they had no idea Cho was taken a mental hospital or investigated for stalking in 2005.

Update: All right, two screencaps. First is the envelope slip, showing pretty clearly he signed it “A. Ishmael.” Presumably that means what was written on his arm was “Ishmael Ax,” not “Ismail Ax,” which makes the already dubious jihad theory that much more dubious.

ax003.jpg

Recall that reader Ray F. theorized a few days ago that “Ismail/Ishmael Ax” was a reference to James Fenimore Cooper’s story “The Prairie,” the lead character of which was “Ishmael Bush” — spelled the same way Cho spells it here. So let’s not rule that theory out just yet.

Now the second photo. Is this him wielding his “ax”? It’s a strange way to hold a hammer.

ax.jpg

Update: NBC’s got a slideshow with new photos in the sidebar here. You can see clearly in their copy of the envelope slip that it’s “Ishmael.” Note the array of hollow-tipped bullets in photo 7.

Update: Williams and Williams say there’s no way to tell (yet) when the videos were recorded, but note that at one point he says, “You had a hundred billion chances and ways to have avoided today.”

Update: Newsweek’s got a great, terrifying article up about Colin Goddard, a senior who was in French class in Norris Hall when Cho shot his way through the locked door and began walking up and down the aisles, pumping bullets into students. Goddard was hit in the leg but played dead until Cho left. Then:

Suddenly, the classroom door burst open again. The killer was back. “He came back in and started going around the room again, shooting people.” Up one aisle and down another, Cho moved through the room, repeating the path he had taken the first time. When the killer reached Goddard, he felt two more bullets punch into his body, one in the shoulder, and one in his buttocks. “My chest and torso were kind of underneath a desk, that’s why I think I got shot in my extremities,” he told NEWSWEEK.

It sounds like Cho committed suicide in that very room just a few moments later, moments before the cops burst in.

Update: I know people are going to start sending me this link soon, so let me flag it now and warn you: the Northeast Intelligence Network is a notoriously alarmist site. Before you go jumping at shadows about jihad and 9/11, wait for a credible media source to report it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Well, ya know, if he really was schizophrenic, then that means he was sick, which means it wasn’t his fault, which means he too, was a victim, which clears the way to blame the whole incident on those evil guns.

infidel4life on April 18, 2007 at 12:56 PM

Probably an angry liberal, or perhaps leaning towards the works of Federico Fellini?

Kini on April 18, 2007 at 12:59 PM

Can we count him among the victims now?

JammieWearingFool on April 18, 2007 at 1:00 PM

I completely agree that it is utterly puzzling why somebody so obviously far gone as Psy-Cho (brilliant, See-Dub) was allowed to “tick on” as long as he was, but we should be wary about the obvious slippery slope here.

We all know how prone authorities are to overreact and go completely overboard (witness the “zero tolerance” anti-drug policies leading to elementary schoolers getting expelled for bringing their asthma medicine to school, for example), after all.

Yes, clearly Psy-Cho was way beyond merely “strange”, but be careful what you wish for, because you might just get it. In spades.

I’d be interested to see what such new “anti-violent thoughts guidelines” would have to say about the screenplays of, say, Tarantino and Lynch. Actually I’m not, because I already know what their findings would be.

A lot of armchair quarterbacking going on these days and a lot of people, myself included, have put on our 20/20 Glasses of Hindsight (+4 against potentially violent psychos), but let’s take a deep breath before we demand measures that, in a few years, will lead to mandatory psychological treatment for every student mentioning a naughty word in a written assignment. And you know that will be the end result.

Misha I on April 18, 2007 at 1:01 PM

Inclusion. Tolerance. Don’t point. Diversity. Special needs.

This is how madmen get on airplanes.

Off topic? Nope. The system says we need to be ‘understanding’. Screw that. He was a problem that was shifted from place to place, person to person, and nobody took a stand.

Limerick on April 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM

BTW, the same day Iran sent their condolences, they also wished Death to America.

JammieWearingFool on April 18, 2007 at 1:02 PM

“I know we’re talking about a troubled youngster and crap like that, but troubled youngsters get drunk and jump off buildings; troubled youngsters drink and drive,” she said. “I’ve taught troubled youngsters. I’ve taught crazy people. It was the meanness that bothered me. It was a, really, mean streak.”

I have thinking about this. This is a kid who is not a nerd, a geek, or even those people that were black. This is really downright meaness. It is not that he lost it or something. He had a target: smart people. Instead of studying to become something, he used some stupid literature–ismail ax (whatever that means)–as his defense.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 1:08 PM

You can be nuts, and still be held accountable. Insanity is not a get-out-of-jail-free card in most (not all) jurisdictions, contrary to popular belief. It can be a mitigating factor with regard to the nature of a charge or sentencing in many.

Changing the subject, years ago I attended a community college, and by way of work on the student newspaper encountered someone who (looking back) sounded much like Cho. He was the son of one of the school’s deans, and got a little bit of a pass on some of his weirdness. However, as he began to get more obsessive regarding one female student (he used to pray for her to get pregnant, believing she would then have to marry him), plus some somewhat violent outbursts (swearing, threats) and other weird behavior (he was especially fond of wearing two pairs of pants at a time) his folks did what needed to be done, and had him committed.

The object of his praying obsession went on to a state university, and got a degree in psychology (coincidentally), focusing on environmental influences on behavior, as I recall. I saw her once, a year or two later at the university and greeted her by asking, “Pregnant yet?” Seemed funny at the time, at least to me.

End of story.

doufree on April 18, 2007 at 1:12 PM

I have thinking about this. This is a kid who is not a nerd, a geek, or even those people that were black. This is really downright meaness. It is not that he lost it or something. He had a target: smart people. Instead of studying to become something, he used some stupid literature–ismail ax (whatever that means)–as his defense.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 1:08 PM

I have to disagree, completely. If this kid was this sick then he was not at all in control of his life or his actions, and yes he too is a victim, a victim of being passed off from place to place where no one took a firm stand and confronted the problem outside of a brief mention that he was odd and creepy. Half the students on any given college campus are odd and creepy. Im not being an apologist for this guy Psy-Cho, but clearly there was more pathology there then just “Meaness” and some BS literature.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 1:16 PM

There are thousands of people like this and if people continue to ignore the warning signs they are giving off this will happen time and time again.

EnochCain on April 18, 2007 at 1:18 PM

And so I repeat my question from last night: how did they let this time bomb keep ticking for so long?

I know this is going to be a radical suggestion that nobody’s considered, but I’m going to say it was because if VT kicked Cho out because he kept to himself and downloaded crappy music to his computer, his parents would’ve cried foul and using their new best friend The Slick Lawyer would have sued:

-the school
-the faculty
-the administration
-the almuni association
-the Commonwealth of Virginia
-AOL
-Microsoft
-the RIAA

…for 20 Godzillion dollars.

I know it’s a stretch, but that’s what I’m thinking.

(A “Godzillion” is a stack of $1 bills the size of Godzilla as described by the International Standards Body of Weights and Measures. Godzilla is owned by Toho, Inc.–please don’t sue HotAir Networks, LLC or me)

ScottMcC on April 18, 2007 at 1:22 PM

I wonder if Virginia Tech will eliminate this program?

fogw on April 18, 2007 at 1:23 PM

Both and so much more.

He should have been reevaluated and taken out of school – some are not meant for trying, stressful and lofty goals, such as school.

And since we are describing people here –

Poor pacifists kids that died. They didn’t have a chance – for crying out loud, they were probably Anti-War protesters.

Some have asked what would have happened if this occurred in the presence of non-pacifists? Like say, a crowd of confined inner city High School kids or a group of brave Service men?

Carlos Mencia the comedian, made a similar point when he said in the age of Terror attacks it’s most safe to fly on Southwest Airline due to, and according to him, the rough crowd. He continued by referring to a case in where an unruly passenger was asphyxiated by a mod of Southwest Airline passengers (pre-9-11).

ar_basin on April 18, 2007 at 1:23 PM

The background check system is broken and needs to be fixed. Mental health professionals should be required to report people who are a danger to themselves or others so they can be prevented from buying guns. Just like they are required by law to report suspected cases of child abuse. There should be an appeal process to allow people to get off the list and the dealer should not be given the specific reason why the application was denied in order to maintain privacy.

TheBigOldDog on April 18, 2007 at 1:24 PM

What a preposterous liar! He relishes war, violence, bloodshed and destruction. He has completely destroyed the infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan. He unabashedly supports the bloodcurdling crimes of the Zionists against Palestinians.
He has scant regard for the life of Americans as well. His buddies had masterminded the supposed hijacking of aircraft from Boston and the subsequent implosion of New York World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001 that killed over three thousand US citizens. He sends young Americans to die in foreign lands in order to satisfy his insatiable lust for power and wealth.
According to reliable reports so far 12,000 US soldiers have been killed in Iraq and another 28,000 wounded, most of them disabled for life, although the heavily censored figures of the Pentagon claim a mere 2,304 deaths as part of the plot to deceive mislead public. Yet Bush wants to send more troops to that terrorised land and is ready to risk the loss of the entire armed forces of the US by trying to pick up a fight with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

This, coming from one of the most oppressive regimes in the world. Whose leaders want to “wipe Israel off the map”. This is not the time for your little games, Iran.

Rick on April 18, 2007 at 1:25 PM

But what grieved many Americans were the motives of the regimes marching in and out of the White House – whether Republican or Democrat – that refuse to ban or limit public possession of firearms despite the frequency of such gory incidents. Why, because the regimes have connections to the arms manufacturers, and thrive on the profits earned through violence and bloodshed.

You know, these idiot foreign nations blaming our “lax” gun laws are just jealous. They know gun control was the death of any greatness they might have had and they want us to join them on their list of has beens. Not gonna happen.

wytammic on April 18, 2007 at 1:27 PM

You know, these idiot foreign nations blaming our “lax” gun laws are just jealous. They know gun control was the death of any greatness they might have had and they want us to join them on their list of has beens. Not gonna happen.

wytammic on April 18, 2007 at 1:27 PM

Agreed!

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 1:33 PM

blockquote>how did they let this time bomb keep ticking for so long?

It seems like his teacher’s and those who knew him did a pretty good job of identifying his psychotic tendencies, but really what could they do?

It’s not against the law to be completely batshit crazy. Unless an adult breaks the law you can’t force them to seek counseling or be institutionalized. They can strongly advise that he seek help, perhaps even refuse to let him attend school again until he does, but that’s about it.

In and of itself, being insane isn’t crime.

JaHerer22 on April 18, 2007 at 1:33 PM

He’s not evil. He’s troubled. Good call.

spmat on April 18, 2007 at 1:36 PM

how did they let this time bomb keep ticking for so long?

Allah, I think you are looking to blame someone – I’d buy it if your looking to blame the PC culture that won’t let us intervene because of warning signs, but beyond that he was a psycho and NO one has a crystal ball.

As far as the police doing a better job or the administration doing a better job – maybe, but hindsight is 20 20 — I think the ONLY variable worth what if’ing is what if someone else was able to use their legal firearm to take the guy out.

Topsecretk9 on April 18, 2007 at 1:38 PM

Just because one has paranoid schizophrenia doesn’t mean one can’t distinguish between right and wrong. Ted Kaczynski and David Berkowitz are both examples of paranoid schizophrenic murderers who were quite aware that what they were doing was both illegal and wrong.

Finding that the VT gunman was a paranoid schizophrenic is helpful merely in that it potentially fills in the blanks as to what motivated his actions (the most likely answer being “delusions not liable to be comprehensible to any sane mind”). It doesn’t necessarily absolve him from responsibility for his actions.

Blacklake on April 18, 2007 at 1:38 PM

He’s not evil. He’s troubled. Good call.

spmat on April 18, 2007 at 1:36 PM

where’d you see that?

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 1:39 PM

“Mini-Bombshell” from earlier post

Is it true that they are now saying there was no letter(s)?

Someone hiding something? Media is known to lie – maybe they are lieing for the authorities?

Do you remember the Columbine massacre? “Survival of the fittest” evidence was apparently hidden – but I don’t know all the facts.

ar_basin on April 18, 2007 at 1:41 PM

I can’t wait to see what kind of crappy grades this Hokie Killer got. I think it will become even more shocking that VT allowed a failing student to be dragged along for so long just to get his tuition- especially in light of him having been identified as a troubled person.

BelchSpeak on April 18, 2007 at 1:41 PM

wytammic on April 18, 2007 at 1:27 PM

Iran preaching to the U.S. about tougher gun control, while at the same time: encouraging kids to strap on bomb vests and committing mass murder; encouraging, enabling and supplying militant groups like Hezbollah; perpetrating mass killings in Iraq to instigate chaos and civil war.

Rick on April 18, 2007 at 1:47 PM

OK, folks . . . his roomies, his teachers, other students – everyone knew he was weird and some recognized “meanness”. What, really, could they legally do? Basically, nothing. I wonder where was this guy’s family and how do they fit in all of this. Where were his parents? How were they dealing with him? What sort of warning signs did they ignore? His parents were the ones who needed to be intervening and getting him help. Not the school. Not his roommates.

woodie4827 on April 18, 2007 at 1:53 PM

Hard to believe a schizophrenic in this day and age would be undiagnosed and untreated, especially when he was apparently more than once evaluated by mental health pros.

honora on April 18, 2007 at 1:56 PM

His parents were the ones who needed to be intervening and getting him help. Not the school. Not his roommates.

woodie4827 on April 18, 2007 at 1:53 PM

I’m with you there; and that is exactly what I meant. Those that needed to reevaluate him were his family.

His parents probably were living their dreams through him, sad.

ar_basin on April 18, 2007 at 1:57 PM

I knew someone very well who had complex borderline personality disorder, as well as symptoms of other personality disorders. His brain over-processed certain events. There were triggers that sent him back into his past and in some cases, even led to pseudo-seizures. He was highly intelligent. His IQ was off the charts and there was barely anything he couldn’t do. He loved entertaining and could tell stories for hours on end. I “jokingly” told his psychiatrist if it wasn’t for his narcissism, he’d be a real SOB. His overt behavior was almost completely opposite from Cho’s, although he did occasionally show some amount of paranoia and knee-jerk type violent tendencies.

But he lived inside his own head. As I think Cho did. My friend had one thing that saved him from going Cho’s route. Even though he found it difficult to love, he wanted to be loved. I think Cho gave up on that or something snapped and passed the point of no return a long time ago.

The biggest key to his prior life and his childhood will probably be interviewing his sister and possibly teachers or classmates from his high school. Was there a lack of maternal bonding? Was he abused?

His parents didn’t speak English. There was probably some amount of culture shock for them. If they even perceived a problem, would they have felt comfortable asking for help? Do any of us?

Lots of questions. When does mental illness become pure evil? I’m not sure it can be prevented from crossing that line in all cases. It’s looking more and more like it crossed that line in Cho’s case. And people saw it, but for whatever reasons, not enough critical steps were taken to separate him from society.

Connie on April 18, 2007 at 1:57 PM

a victim of being passed off from place to place where no one took a firm stand and confronted the problem outside of a brief mention that he was odd and creepy.

You have a point. If the boy was offered the type of help that you suggested, do you think that he would have changed? Well, the guy lacked basic resources that makes a man–an opportunity to have sex, doing something amazing, e.t.c. Do you think there is an instituiton that will provide him with that opportunity? I have heard of psychologist having sex with their clients to help them overcome sexual problems. Before I move on, I still need to read the reports filed by the mental institution. It might give me some clue. Still, the big question is how do we make somebody forgo their fantansies. You need to be more than psychologist to do this. The most prevalent method is by substitution. Offering them another fantasy or something similar (something that is stronger than what they already believe) is a way. It rarely works because humans have something called self-control–they can think for themselves. We should not act as if this boy is a total zombie. He knew what he was doing. He has been to a mental health institution. You can take your horse to the stream if the horse is getting hicupps, but forcing the water into the horse mouth can be a struggle that you might not want to engage in.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 2:00 PM

Just because one has paranoid schizophrenia doesn’t mean one can’t distinguish between right and wrong. Ted Kaczynski and David Berkowitz are both examples of paranoid schizophrenic murderers who were quite aware that what they were doing was both illegal and wrong.

A schizophrenic has delusions and hallucinations and generally withdrawn from reality. Right and wrong are moot–it’s not that he doesn’t know if something is right, it’s that he doesn’t know what that something is.

honora on April 18, 2007 at 2:00 PM

ScottMcC on April 18, 2007 at 1:22 PM

Understand what you’re saying, but considering who his parents are, I doubt they would have sued, and if the school had booted him out, he probably would have ended up killing them.

Connie on April 18, 2007 at 2:03 PM

We might want a nice neat solution to this problem and it isnt that easy.

We either toughen our gun laws so kids like this cant get access to them or we take closer looks at troubled people and have government infringe on their rights.

Both require giving the government greater power over its people than it should have.

Again this all seems to be a problem of a lack of communication. Cho was in a mental instituion for a breif time and while that shouldnt prevent him from going to college it should have prevented him from getting a gun.

Id suggest the solution is that its a requirement of any mental intitution to give names and details about individuals that pose a danger to themselves and others. The police then take those names ONLY and pass them on to gun dealers and the like.

This way you dont have to toughen gun laws and you dont have limit people with mental illness from from being in public.

The solution isnt giving government more power its givin people the right info to make the right choices.

William Amos on April 18, 2007 at 2:08 PM

I’m not buying that “nothing could be done.” All the warning signs were there, even a teacher had guards nearby (?!), yet none of these people thought it wise to get the guy some help. Now 32 people are dead. I don’t blame them, but I do beleive something could have been done. At least the effort should have been made.

Patriot33 on April 18, 2007 at 2:11 PM

A schizophrenic has delusions and hallucinations and generally withdrawn from reality. Right and wrong are moot–it’s not that he doesn’t know if something is right, it’s that he doesn’t know what that something is.

honora on April 18, 2007 at 2:00 PM

That’s not necessarily true. They may be having hallucinations in which they are being told that what they are doing (or about to do) is the only right thing to do, even though they are aware of what it is they are doing (killing someone to save the world, etc.).

Rick on April 18, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Along with what BelchSpeak said above, did I hear one of the MSM reports saying that he was going to “graduate” at the end of term? He was an English major and he was going to graduate? You can graduate with all of this, and “Richard McBeef?”

MikeHu on April 18, 2007 at 2:24 PM

When is the public going to start demanding that we round up all the weird and mean people and preemptively put them in jail or commit them to mental facilities, just in case they start shooting one day? (sarcasm)

I used to be a teacher (11th grade, public school in Texas), and there were always a small handful of kids who would scare me from time to time. I found a drawing of a little stick figure with a gun and lots of little bleeding stick figures and desks in one boy’s notebook. I had several kids who regularly refused to meet my eyes or answer me. I had a boy who left my class one day seemingly perfectly happy and fine who was dead by morning because he got in a gang-related gunfight over drugs that night. I told the principal and counselor about the drawing–made a copy of it for the records and everything. I don’t think they ever called the kid in to talk or anything. This was an average school–not a “bad” school in a “bad” part of town.

I don’t teach anymore.

My point is that every teacher in America, at every level of education, is seeing these weird, scary kids all the time. What are we supposed to do about it? I could have refused to teach the death-porn artist, but if they transferred him to another class, he still would have been a threat to the school. (He dropped out soon after that, and I don’t know what became of him.) I do think the principal could have done something, but I’m not sure what. Kicking the kid out would just have spread the risk to the entire community. He hadn’t done anything for which he could be arrested. It’s frustrating as a parent and a member of the community that we can clearly see these “ticking time bombs” and be helpless to do anything until they go off. But we can’t just round them up, so what do we do? Even hypervigilance doesn’t do the trick when they don’t do anything against the law until the day they start killing people.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 2:24 PM

Add my voice to those warning against going too far in future profiling of ‘odd’ people. I’m a Christian-there are some countries where that is treated as a mental disorder,or a prosecutable crime-Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, for example. I don’t want to see that happen here in America. But there is something to be said for profiling/education about ‘ticking time bomb’ types. They come in all colors, shapes and sizes.
But after we have identified them…what do we do?

Doug on April 18, 2007 at 2:28 PM

Here’s a couple odd questions that have me wondering. Where did he keep his guns? In his vehicle?

2. What time did it end? That is, what time was Cho killed?

Kai on April 18, 2007 at 2:33 PM

Add my voice to those warning against going too far in future profiling of ‘odd’ people. I’m a Christian-there are some countries where that is treated as a mental disorder,or a prosecutable crime-Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, for example. I don’t want to see that happen here in America. But there is something to be said for profiling/education about ‘ticking time bomb’ types. They come in all colors, shapes and sizes.
But after we have identified them…what do we do?

Doug on April 18, 2007 at 2:28 PM

great point. This is a view that I have not yet read. I guess that we are now walking on the edge of things.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 2:35 PM

You have a point. If the boy was offered the type of help that you suggested, do you think that he would have changed? Well, the guy lacked basic resources that makes a man–an opportunity to have sex, doing something amazing, e.t.c. Do you think there is an instituiton that will provide him with that opportunity? I have heard of psychologist having sex with their clients to help them overcome sexual problems. Before I move on, I still need to read the reports filed by the mental institution. It might give me some clue. Still, the big question is how do we make somebody forgo their fantansies. You need to be more than psychologist to do this. The most prevalent method is by substitution. Offering them another fantasy or something similar (something that is stronger than what they already believe) is a way. It rarely works because humans have something called self-control–they can think for themselves. We should not act as if this boy is a total zombie. He knew what he was doing. He has been to a mental health institution. You can take your horse to the stream if the horse is getting hicupps, but forcing the water into the horse mouth can be a struggle that you might not want to engage in.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 2:00 PM

Did you read what just wrote? Im curious if that makes sense to you? how you segued into psychologists having sex with their patients is an interesting stretch, that alone deserves further research, or perhaps “study” would be the correct term..

Lets be clear;
Cho, while perhaps being shcizophrenic or at the very least sociopathic, should have been identified by the so called “professionals” who had contact with him and found concern in his behavior. That being said, some of them did, however it appears no follow up was ever done and his issues were allowed to fester until finally we saw the result on Monday morning. There can be no doubt he knew it was wrong but could he control the impulse to act? I dont table it lightly but it merits examination. You dont just kill 32 kids with a hand gun, its not like mowing them down with a fully automatic weapon, he had to pull the trigger each time. Theres something more wrong there than just some whackjob loner who liked to stalk girls on campus.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 2:36 PM

What do you do about the people that after they have committed their acts people say “I never saw it coming” or “He seemed like such a nice normal guy”…not everyone who goes on a killing spree or ends up being a serial killer shows signs of psychosis.

EnochCain on April 18, 2007 at 2:38 PM

I’m not buying that “nothing could be done.” All the warning signs were there, even a teacher had guards nearby (?!), yet none of these people thought it wise to get the guy some help. Now 32 people are dead. I don’t blame them, but I do beleive something could have been done. At least the effort should have been made.

Patriot33 on April 18, 2007 at 2:11 PM

Thank you, Ive been trying to say this.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 2:42 PM

What do you do about the people that after they have committed their acts people say “I never saw it coming” or “He seemed like such a nice normal guy”…not everyone who goes on a killing spree or ends up being a serial killer shows signs of psychosis.

EnochCain on April 18, 2007 at 2:38 PM

True. Charles Whitman, the 1966 U. of Texas tower sniper, was typing his letter/manifesto (his plan to kill people the next day) the night before his killing spree and was interrupted by friends dropping by. They said he seemed a little quiet but normal–he visited with them for awhile and I believe even went out for some ice cream. He was typing his killing plan, and he seemed normal. Scary stuff.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 2:44 PM

how did they let this time bomb keep ticking for so long?

But whaddaya do? He had harassed two women, but not threateningly enough to make them press charges. He went to a mental health facility, where he clearly didn’t get right. He’d been on meds and referred to counselors on numerous occasions. And, the student body of Va. Tech, his roommates, and neighbors had apparently tried to reach out to him.

If he hadn’t made direct threats, hurt himself, or hurt anyone else, you can’t by law, do much with him, can you? You can’t compel him to see a counselor or take his medicine or go to the hospital. Then there’s the fact that the few people who could have been supportive of him and intervened more actively (you mentioned he opened up to his roommates) were rightly looking out for their own safety and mental health by not getting in too deep with this guy, which left him isolated.

I just don’t understand what’s to be done in a situation like that.

marykatharine on April 18, 2007 at 2:46 PM

I’m not buying that “nothing could be done.” All the warning signs were there, even a teacher had guards nearby (?!), yet none of these people thought it wise to get the guy some help.
Patriot33 on April 18, 2007 at 2:11 PM

They did try to get him help. He was recommended for counseling. I don’t know if he went, but they couldn’t force him to do it. I suppose they could have kicked him out of the university for not going, but that would have only helped the school in the short-term. He would have gone off in a shopping mall in Centerville or something.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM

marykatharine on April 18, 2007 at 2:46 PM

Youre right, what do you do, I just find it so hard to believe that someone so far gone would slip by without one of these people taking serious actions to intervene with him. But you are right.

The whole thing is tragic and horrifying.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 2:50 PM

They did try to get him help. He was recommended for counseling. I don’t know if he went, but they couldn’t force him to do it. I suppose they could have kicked him out of the university for not going, but that would have only helped the school in the short-term. He would have gone off in a shopping mall in Centerville or something.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 2:47 PM

They absolutely couldve forced him if he was deemed a potential danger to himself or others.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 2:52 PM

Cho, while perhaps being shcizophrenic or at the very least sociopathic, should have been identified by the so called “professionals” who had contact with him and found concern in his behavior. That being said, some of them did, however it appears no follow up was ever done and his issues were allowed to fester until finally we saw the result on Monday morning.

Like I said, we need to read the reports filed by the psychologist. As for my comments, they are assumptions. I assumed that he was offered him. If he had a real brain disorder, taking him out of the mental institution is another issue that we need to deal with. Given what Doug on April 18, 2007 at 2:28 PM said, they would have would not taken that approach. We do not know whether he is actually schizophrenic or he just wanted to satisfy his pleasures. Bin Laden knew that people was going to die before he ordered the attack. He also wanted to satisfy his pleasures. So, I stand by my comment.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 2:54 PM

They absolutely couldve forced him if he was deemed a potential danger to himself or others.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 2:52 PM

Do you realize how many high school and college students could legitimately be deemed to be a danger to themselves or others? Do you want your sullen, angry but non-homicidal teenage son dragged off and forcibly committed by his school for being an angry and sullen teen? You really want to give schools, psychologists, and/or the government to have the power to forcibly commit people? There are lots and lots and lots of young men like Cho out there who will never hurt anyone–they’ll just dream about it. Should they rot in mental institutions for thinking about it? Slippery slope, big time.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 2:58 PM

Like I said, we need to read the reports filed by the psychologist. As for my comments, they are assumptions. I assumed that he was offered him. If he had a real brain disorder, taking him out of the mental institution is another issue that we need to deal with. Given what Doug on April 18, 2007 at 2:28 PM said, they would have would not taken that approach. We do not know whether he is actually schizophrenic or he just wanted to satisfy his pleasures. Bin Laden knew that people was going to die before he ordered the attack. He also wanted to satisfy his pleasures. So, I stand by my comment.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 2:54 PM

Fair enough.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 3:10 PM

aero on April 18, 2007 at 2:58 PM

Aero, “A danger to himself or others” its pretty specific, based on what weve seen of his writing etc. it isnt too much of a stretch to say he was a danger.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 3:12 PM

…considering who his parents are, I doubt they would have sued, and if the school had booted him out, he probably would have ended up killing them.

Connie on April 18, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Yes, and immigrants and their progeny don’t typically murder 30+ innocents if we’re gonna view this situation through the lens of traditional Korean-American family life… I’d rather be outrageously outraged reading: “Dry Cleaners’ Son Booted from VT For Being Too Darn Korean” for a day or two than “Worst. Massacre. Ever.” for the next frickin’ week.

The whackjob that pulled the trigger has 99.9% of the blame here, but let’s not discount the .1% role played by absent/apathetic parents that give their kids their coveted “privacy” and “space” rather than real world wisdom.

ScottMcC on April 18, 2007 at 3:19 PM

MM

WOW! This has got to be a first. The blogosphere’s version of a psychiatrist’s couch.

pocomoco on April 18, 2007 at 3:30 PM

TheBigOldDog wrote:

The background check system is broken and needs to be fixed. Mental health professionals should be required to report people who are a danger to themselves or others so they can be prevented from buying guns.

The background check system is not broken.

The Brady Act (Public Law 103-159) states that a person can purchase a firearm if he: “(iv) has not been adjudicated as a mental defective or been committed to a mental institution;”

This has been the law of the land since 1993.

Every state is required to notify the National Instant Check System (NICS, the FBI data base used for real-time background checks when purchasing a gun) when a person is committed to a mental institution, is convicted of a felony, or is convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence after representation by counsel. This applies to both voluntary or involuntary treatment for mental illness.

In Illinois, being a patient in a mental institution will result in a PERMANENT, FOR LIFE, loss of firearm ownership rights, as these are reported to the State Police and get entered into the state database as well as the NICS, even though the state of Illinois only asks about the previous 5 years on the FOID application.

Illinois has had a Firearms Owners ID card system since 1968, possession of which is a prerequisite to purchase or own firearms or ammunition. The mentally ill (specifically those treated within the previous 5 years) are prohibited from obtaining a FOID card by statute.

There was a period when there was no linkage and obviously mentally ill people were able to purchase a firearm. The Laurie Dann case (1988) is an example. Dann was violently insane, had been committed to a mental institution on more than one instance, but was still able to purchase firearms because FOID system was never told of her illness, and her FOID card was never revoked.

Coupled with FAILURES to prosecute her for the various violent felonies she committed in Cook County by the then States Attorney (Richard M. Daley, the current mayor of Chicago and a rabid gun banner), and Lake County, AND the failures of the local police departments in Wilmet, Evanston, and Winnetka to seek a court order to involuntarily commit Dann based upon repeated complaints of violent threatening behavior that had been going on for over 2 years, Dann “slipped through the cracks,” as the professional apologists for the local police departments put it.

Let me be precise here. It was known by local law enforcement Dann was in possession of a .357, that she was mentally ill, that she had been voluntariliy instutionalized, and that she was being treated for mental illness AND THEY STILL DID NOTHING TO TAKE HER GUNS AWAY, which they were required to do under the FOID law.

The net result is that Dann finally flipped, invaded a home, and then an elementary school, shot up a classroom, killing one child.

And then the local police (and States Attorney, now Chicago Mayor Daley) beat their chests in righteous indignation, demanding MORE gun control. As a result, the nearby communities along the north shore of Lake Michigan BANNED the possession of handguns. In other words, the people of these communities LOST THEIR RIGHT TO OWN A HANDGUN BECAUSE THE COPS AND THE STATES ATTORNEY DID NOT DO THEIR JOBS!

The word “comitted” has a specific legal meaning. If Cho was committed, either voluntarily or involuntarily, to a stay in any mental health facility, then he, by law, was prohibited from purchasing either firearm.

FWIW, being treated for “depression” is not enough. It takes either a voluntary comittment (which includes signed acknowlegement that NICS will be notified) or a finding that a person is a threat to himself or others that triggers the Brady prohibition for firearm ownership.

If Cho HAD been legally comitted and NICS was NOT notified, then the mental practitioner involved should be prosecuted. If he HAD NOT been legally comitted, then the mental practictioner involved failed to do his job and should be sued for malpractice. Because clearly the guy was nutzo!

georgej on April 18, 2007 at 3:31 PM

georgej on April 18, 2007 at 3:31 PM

You have a point. We need more facts.

Ouabam on April 18, 2007 at 3:35 PM

The issue of forcibly committing someone is very dicey. As some have pointed out, it can be abused by the state. But I do think in contemporary times the balance has shifted too far toward a hands-off approach. I live in a city whose sidewalks are full of ranting, shambling, disheveled homeless people who are obviously mentally ill. I’ve talked to police officers about it and they say there is nothing they can do unless the person commits an act of violence (to others or himself). Of course by then, an innocent bystander (or 32) could be dead. I have a friend who is a paranoid schizophrenic, his parents have tried to get him committed several times, but the state keeps letting him out because he hasn’t done anything wrong (yet).

I’m not saying we should swing back to the days when mere oddity could get you thrown in a mental hospital. But there must be a place somewhere between the “bad old days” when committing somebody was relatively easy, and the present state when it is virtually impossible to get somebody committed before they engage in an irreversible act of violence.

Cato on April 18, 2007 at 4:10 PM

Aero, “A danger to himself or others” its pretty specific, based on what weve seen of his writing etc. it isnt too much of a stretch to say he was a danger.

Viper1 on April 18, 2007 at 3:12 PM

To my knowledge, his writings were disturbing but never contained any specific threats or plans to kill anyone. Regardless, disturbing writing alone is not any indication that someone is a clear danger to others. Should Stephen King be hauled off in chains and put in a rubber room?

Cho’s stalking behavior is more of an indication that he might be a danger to others, but those cases never got to the point of arrests or prosecution, so he couldn’t be committed to a mental institution for them either. He also scared some kids and at least one teacher. Still not enough to have him involuntarily committed.

Did you read what I wrote above about how, when I was a high school teacher, I found a disturbing drawing of a little stick figure with a gun (labeled “me” by the student) shooting a whole school full of little bleeding stick figures? Would that be evidence of a “danger to himself and others”? I thought so, so I turned in this evidence to the principal. Nothing ever came of it. The kid dropped out, and to my knowledge never killed anyone. Should he have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution for that drawing? Perhaps, but it would not have been legal without his parents’ consent. It probably also wouldn’t have been justifiable. Since Cho was an adult, they didn’t need parental consent. So he could refuse on his own. Nothing I’ve read or heard about the Cho case indicates that it would have been legal for anyone to have him forcibly committed based on the evidence they had.

I’m not defending anyone here, by the way. I, too, am upset and disturbed every time something like this happens and we as a society are helpless to prevent similar events in the future. But we can’t go around committing people for behaving strangely or even scaring people with weird writing. And anyway, many mass and serial murderers show absolutely no signs that there is anything wrong with them until the day they start killing people. Committing all the people who are clearly a danger to others still wouldn’t catch those psychopaths who seem like entirely normal, nice guys except for the heads in their freezers.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 4:16 PM

A schizophrenic has delusions and hallucinations and generally withdrawn from reality. Right and wrong are moot–it’s not that he doesn’t know if something is right, it’s that he doesn’t know what that something is.

Do you ever know what you’re talking about?

Blacklake on April 18, 2007 at 4:28 PM

Someone may have floated this already, but my theory about why Cho killed the girl (with whom he apparently had no connection) and the RA and then waited before going to Norris Hall was so that campus and local police would all be at the dorm trying to figure out a murder that they weren’t going to be able to figure out quickly. This left Norris Hall–all the way across campus–with no authorities anywhere near it for quite some time. Plenty of time for him to do his evil work.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 4:38 PM

Should Stephen King be hauled off in chains and put in a rubber room?

Yes, based solely on his idea to do the extra long and crappy “uncut” version of The Stand in 1990.

Of course, he’s not alone in this because it should’ve been a jailable offense for his publisher.

ScottMcC on April 18, 2007 at 4:42 PM

can’t wait to see what kind of crappy grades this Hokie Killer got. I think it will become even more shocking that VT allowed a failing student to be dragged along for so long just to get his tuition- especially in light of him having been identified as a troubled person.

BelchSpeak on April 18, 2007 at 1:41 PM

At Virginia Tech, you have to maintain a 2.0 or you are put on academic suspension. The academic quality at Virginia Tech is very high.

januarius on April 18, 2007 at 4:50 PM

Multiple photos, video, and “rambling writings” were in the package.

You mean to tell me this guy prepared a package for NBC and went to the damn post office between murders?

Good Lord.

BacaDog on April 18, 2007 at 4:51 PM

The madness is just beginning …

Asians are fearful of a backlash – so sayeth MSNBC

And guess who is planning to go to the funerals? Yup … good old Freddy and his hateful gang of pseudo-religion ghouls (no linky for these monsters, find it on your own)

LissaKay on April 18, 2007 at 4:55 PM

Remember Norman Mailer’s championing of the writings of convicted murderer Jack Abbott? (Mailer helped him get paroled, after which Abbott killed again.) I can’t help but wonder if the reason the VT English department indulged Cho for so long was because they thought that maybe they had a boundary-pushing literary genius on their hands.

Now I wonder how long it will be before some “edgy” artist puts on a production of Cho’s plays? And how long before he is awarded a posthumous Pulitzer?

Cato on April 18, 2007 at 4:56 PM

Thank goodness we protected his right to privacy on his medical condition(s). It would have been unthinkable for that information to have fallen into the hands of the ATF or VA State Police. Glad to see the system has rules that are followed to the letter.

Limerick on April 18, 2007 at 4:57 PM

It’s a good thing NBC picked up on this so quickly. Usually when they receive packages of photos, video, and rambling writings it’s just more fan mail for Olbermann.

Blacklake on April 18, 2007 at 4:57 PM

januarius, I read in one newspaper article that the VT English department gave Cho straight As because they were worried what he would do if they gave him bad grades. Talk about grade inflation….

Cato on April 18, 2007 at 4:58 PM

Blacklake: Hilarious.

Cato on April 18, 2007 at 5:05 PM

Freaky

He was booted from a class. I remember, as a Grad Instructor, teaching a wacko. Well really he didn’t show up all semester then the last day he showed. He never took a test. I even received weird calls – I lied and said I wasn’t in – “yeah he is not available”.

Another time, as a Grad Instructor at another school, some Bozo frightened an entire room filled with Instructors and Professors by their “creative writing” used to answer a Math problem. I didn’t read it, was too busy grading papers – but these Instructors around me were literally shaking where they stood. They said they were sick to their tummies.

His Plays:

http://newsbloggers.aol.com/2007/04/17/cho-seung-huis-plays/

ar_basin on April 18, 2007 at 5:06 PM

Oh my… those plays are so stupid

ar_basin on April 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM

If he wanted his package released to the public, why didn’t he send it to the NY Times. They’ll put anything out no matter who it may hurt.

sunny on April 18, 2007 at 5:10 PM

The most destructive forces on earth are natural in occurrance and completely without malice or guile: tornados, hurricanes, volcanoes, earth quakes. Nobody calls them evil.

I suffer from bipolar disorder and have gone off the deep end more than once. A *truly* crazy person does not believe he is crazy. Cho needed help that he did not get.

Who is at fault? Where is the evil? Sometimes tragic things happen to good people. Sometimes all we can do is move on.

unamused on April 18, 2007 at 5:18 PM

ABC News reports that Cho *WAS* committed.

A Virginia court found that Virginia Tech killer Seung-Hui Cho was “mentally ill” and potentially dangerous. Then the state let him go.

In 2005, after a district court in Montgomery County, Va., ruled that Cho was either a danger to himself or to others — the necessary criteria for a detention order — he was evaluated by a state doctor and ordered to undergo outpatient care.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/print?id=3052278

Now, assuming that this is true, the question to be answered is why the gun purchase background check did not cause a denial as required by law.

georgej on April 18, 2007 at 5:20 PM

I suffer from bipolar disorder and have gone off the deep end more than once. A *truly* crazy person does not believe he is crazy. Cho needed help that he did not get.

Who is at fault? Where is the evil? Sometimes tragic things happen to good people. Sometimes all we can do is move on.

unamused on April 18, 2007 at 5:18 PM

Even a mentally ill person must know that murder is evil. So that still makes him evil. If you ever do the same thing, I’ll call you evil too.

Tim Burton on April 18, 2007 at 5:24 PM

unamused on April 18, 2007 at 5:18 PM

Enters the physicalist
_______________

Many sane people do evil things.

ar_basin on April 18, 2007 at 5:25 PM

I’ve see profs talk about how he was a bright kid. Don’t know about Cato’s rumor.

High-intelligence tends to correlate very highly with unstable personalities. Very low precentage of high-IQ people are unstable, but a very high percentage of unstable personalities are high-IQ. Similar with autism.

I haven’t read the McBeef play, but there’s a difference between troubling and bad. It’s all about the assignment and how you fulfill the objectives. Even though it’s the english department (and thus not rigorous) you still don’t get marks for being a good person or writing happy things, you get marks for writing interesting and well (or by catering to your instructor’s prejudices).

From what I’ve seen, it looks like everyone did what they could. None of us have his medical records, so it’s hard to say how his past encounters with counselling were handled, but it doesn’t sound out of line. People thought he was weird, but vast numbers of students are. They got him to counselling and on medications. People who are sick need help, rather than punishment – kicking out anyone who is on medication, seeks treatment, or has a suicidal event is a bad policy.

Standards on involuntary treatment do need to change (almost all homeless have mental health and substance problems) but an intelligent kid from a good family who’s starting to have some problems isn’t easily committable. In hindsight it looks like he was on a downward trajectory, but you never know how someone will progress. Many people get better on treatment and drugs do wonders. Some don’t and get worse, 2 days after this massacre with no information is no time for obviously ignorant and uninformed peopel to start spouting off about huge, dangerous changes to policy.

Let’s use this as a teachable moment to reconsider how you deal with troubled people you know (try a little harder to get treatment, try to get them to open up) and how to deal with dangerous situations (stand up and rush an attacker, rather than hiding and letting a 77-year old take point). Gun-control, everyone is just re-affirming their previous stand. For all other issues, lets wait to see what comes out. We’re not 1 of 5 cable nets with 24 hours of shout TV to fill. Reflect and come up with thoughtfull ideas on how to fix the gaps founf in the next weeks and months.

libertarianuberalles on April 18, 2007 at 5:30 PM

I have an emotional bond to the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

Stormy70 on April 18, 2007 at 5:30 PM

how did they let this time bomb keep ticking for so long?

Answer: he’s a minority. Best not to make a judgment that could lead to charges of racism. Best just to sit down and wait for the bullet in the head.

The madness is just beginning …

Asians are fearful of a backlash – so sayeth MSNBC

Yep, that’s the MSM I know and hate. Always worried that ignorant and violent whitey will lash out at a minority group. They do this with the regularity of a fracking clock.

It’s a good thing NBC picked up on this so quickly. Usually when they receive packages of photos, video, and rambling writings it’s just more fan mail for Olbermann.

LOL!

jaleach on April 18, 2007 at 5:34 PM

I am so sick of hearing about his “disturbing plays”… And I’m far from the hippy “it’s all art” type, but seriously – IT’S ART! Sure, in his case it may have come from a weird place… but how many disturbing books and movies are there out there that rank among the best of all time? Even the mainstream Silence of the Lambs, I can’t even imagine what’s in lesser known stuff.

My point is, his writings weren’t an indication of anything at face value. Now if they were told to right a short story on romance and his comes out about a kid killing his stepfather with a rice crispy treat, that’s another story. But to make the leap that he’s crazy because of his disturbing writing, leaves me concerned for how pathetic the writing of movies and books in the future will be if people are censored because their writing is out of bounds.

That whole snippet from the forensic psychologist is idiotic.

RightWinged on April 18, 2007 at 5:34 PM

RightWinged on April 18, 2007 at 5:34 PM

Good point..its like when an author writes from the perspective of a sick and twisted killer..does not mean he is going to go on a rampage.

EnochCain on April 18, 2007 at 5:37 PM

Good point..its like when an author writes from the perspective of a sick and twisted killer..does not mean he is going to go on a rampage.

EnochCain on April 18, 2007 at 5:37 PM

Exactly, I’ve just been focused on so many other parts of this, but I’ve heard about his “disturbing” writing thousands of times now. We’d be committing people left and write if “disturbing” writing was an indication that they were about to murder 32 people.

RightWinged on April 18, 2007 at 5:41 PM

But what grieved many Americans were the motives of the regimes marching in and out of the White House – whether Republican or Democrat – that refuse to ban or limit public possession of firearms despite the frequency of such gory incidents.

Yes, Iran… you’re right. Law-abiding Americans should give up their right to bear arms so Hezbollah can waltz in and take over.

I couldn’t tell by reading that screed whether I was on a DU/DKos site or an Iranian site. I had to keep looking up at the banner.

CliffHanger on April 18, 2007 at 5:43 PM

But to make the leap that he’s crazy because of his disturbing writing, leaves me concerned for how pathetic the writing of movies and books in the future will be if people are censored because their writing is out of bounds.

I get the impression, though, that it wasn’t his writing alone that set anybody off. It was the writing coupled with a lot of peculiar classroom behavior.

Blacklake on April 18, 2007 at 5:46 PM

aero: “I found a drawing of a little stick figure with a gun and lots of little bleeding stick figures and desks in one boy’s notebook.”

I drew a lot of stick figures in battle in school on loose leaf paper, sometimes with bazookas and tanks and planes and subs.

Thank goodness you weren’t my teacher or I would have been in prison for drawing politically incorect pictures.

Tantor on April 18, 2007 at 5:46 PM

Okay, I finally gave in and read the plays. They’re badly written and filled with profanity and violent wishes, but they do not in any way indicate that he was about to go on a shooting spree.

I’m no psychologist, but if someone told me I absolutely had to draw some conclusion about the author’s state of mind based on these plays, I’d say that they seem to indicate that he was very likely sexually abused by an older, overweight man who was an authority figure in his life. The plays seem to indicate anger and a sense of helplessness, perhaps a desire for revenge, but no overt indication that he had any plans to hurt others. And if I thought based on these plays that he was going to hurt someone, I’d say it would be the overweight older male authority figure who apparently inspired these abusive characters who should be the most worried.

I noticed that in the “Richard McBeef” play that it was the boy who was killed by the man, not vice versa. Yes, he shoved the cereal bar in the step-father’s mouth, but that didn’t kill him–the dad killed the son instead. In the other play, the kids lose the battle as well–the old man outsmarts them and “wins.” There’s the impression that the kids want to get revenge as they’re being dragged out of the casino, but Cho didn’t write anything about their revenge. His writing ends with the kids losing to the old man.

As for Cho’s being briefly institutionalized, it was apparently at his parents’ behest because they thought he was suicidal. A danger to himself, but not necessarily to others. If he convinced the docs he wasn’t going to kill himself, they wouldn’t keep him against his will.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 5:49 PM

I drew a lot of stick figures in battle in school on loose leaf paper, sometimes with bazookas and tanks and planes and subs.

Thank goodness you weren’t my teacher or I would have been in prison for drawing politically incorect pictures.

Tantor on April 18, 2007 at 5:46 PM

Well, in my defense, this was pretty soon after Columbine.

But your point is well-taken. That’s why I wrote in other comments above that we can’t make a policy of forcibly committing or incarceratign every angst-filled young man who says, writes, or draws something we find to be “disturbing.” Based on the continually narrowing definition of what makes a person “disturbed,” we’d have to institutionalize 75% of all males between the ages of 15 and 25!

aero on April 18, 2007 at 5:53 PM

“I haven’t read the McBeef play, but…”

Libertarianuberalles, you write the above, and then ramble on for six paragraphs, and we’re the “obviously ignorant and uninformed peopel [sic]?”?

I suggest you read the play — in fact, read both — before you spout off again. They’re both only about 10 pages long, with lots of white space, so you should be able to knock them off in five minutes.

As for the rumor, from the Evening Standard:

“One teacher even suggested today he was given A grades because he was so ‘intimidating and staff wanted to keep him happy’.”

I don’t think anybody is suggesting that we lock up everybody who writes sick material. One must look at the totality of the circumstances here to judge whether authorities didn’t have enough warning signs to act more definitively than they did.

When you add in the facts that 90% of a class refuse to show up because they fear for their lives, he was accused of stalking by two different women in less than a month’s time, and a court ruled that he was a danger to himself or others (all of these things happened in Cho’s case, months before the massacre), maybe something should have been done. At the very minimum he should been placed on the do-not-buy-a-gun list.

Cato on April 18, 2007 at 6:01 PM

In and of itself, being insane isn’t crime.

JaHerer22 on April 18, 2007 at 1:33 PM

My uncle is schizophrenic. He isn’t kept locked up, but if there is any reaon to believe that he is a threat to himself or others, he gets locked up, no matter what.

So in a way, it is a crime, at least if you pose a danger to anyone.

Esthier on April 18, 2007 at 6:04 PM

By the way guys, I found the myspace pages of many of the victims last night in the other thread. Just want to pass them along in one post to everyone so that you can put a face with a name. Seeing the victims as “real” people, their friends, what they said about themselves, see posts from their friends desperate to find out if they are okay, and later posts saying goodbye…. rather than just 1 in 32 names in the paper.

Anyway, set up an account if you don’t have one already so that you can view the other photos some people have (you can view other photos by clicking the main profile photo of anyone, if they have more, but you need an account)

Here is Emily J. Hilscher, shot first and for about 24 hours the media convinced everyone that she was his ex-girlfriend. SHE WASN’T. She also obviously didn’t use myspace much after setting up her page:
http://www.myspace.com/captivepixie

The RA that was shot with her was Ryan C. Clark. He had two pages, one that he apparently abandoned shortly after setting it up and another that is set to private, but is newer… Last login was 2 days ago
old:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=10336168
new:
http://www.myspace.com/vtones

Here’s Ross Abdallah Alameddine
http://www.myspace.com/kazinkilu

This was Brian Bluhm, looks like his sister has accessed the page
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=167170728

Here’s Dan O’Neil
http://www.myspace.com/residenthippy

Dan wrote and played music too. DaveS found his web site in another thread http://www.residenthippy.com/

Only the “music” link works on that page, but here’s what I posted last night

Most of his links aren’t working from his homepage, but I searched Yahoo and got his bio:

http://www.residenthippy.com/aboutme.htm

and more of his songs with a couple photos here
http://www.residenthippy.com/songs.htm

covering songs here
http://www.residenthippy.com/dan&matt.htm

RightWinged on April 18, 2007 at 1:28 AM

Austin Cloyd:
http://www.myspace.com/rckmyworld

Matthew La Porte:
http://www.myspace.com/mattjlaporte

Mary Karen Read:
http://www.myspace.com/blueluver6

Maxine Turner
http://www.myspace.com/super_sneaky_ninja

Lauren McCain
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=14903990

I’m sure there are more out there, but those are the ones I was able to find.

It’s really sad to read the messages from their friends and family on a lot of them, begging them to call and let them know they are okay two days ago, then the sad RIP statements when these same people found out that their friend or family member was one of the victims.

RightWinged on April 18, 2007 at 6:05 PM

Strange Psycho

Drtuddle on April 18, 2007 at 6:06 PM

I drew a lot of stick figures in battle in school on loose leaf paper, sometimes with bazookas and tanks and planes and subs.

Thank goodness you weren’t my teacher or I would have been in prison for drawing politically incorect pictures.
Tantor on April 18, 2007 at 5:46 PM

Well, in my defense, this was pretty soon after Columbine.
aero on April 18, 2007 at 5:53 PM

Also, I would not have been as disturbed by a boy drawing war images as I was about this kid’s drawing. In his drawing, the main figure was holding a handgun and a shotgun, and the figure was labeled “me” by the student. The setting was clearly a school–multiple classrooms with desks, etc. And there was lots and lots of “blood” in the image. That soon after Columbine, I absolutely felt it was worth reporting.

aero on April 18, 2007 at 6:11 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4


You must be logged in to post a comment.