Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Four bombs in Baghdad kill 178; Update: Pelosi declines invitation from Petraeus to brief House on Iraq

posted at 3:50 pm on April 18, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

There isn’t much to say but the number alone merits a post. Four different neighborhoods, including Sadr City, and all within a short period of time in vintage AQ style. The biggest attack was in the Shiite market at Sadriyah, where a car bomb killed 122 people; among the victims were construction workers rebuilding the market from the last time it was hit back in February. All in all, it’s the highest death toll since the start of the surge. Iraqi blogger Hammorabi surveys the scene and pronounces the new security plan a failure.

Reuters has photos and reports one man at Sadriyah screaming for Maliki to do something. Exactly what Sadr wants to hear:

None of Maliki’s measures is as unpopular among Sadr’s supporters as this security offensive. Why, they ask, does our government join forces with the Americans to attack our own militia, the Mahdi Army, instead of putting an end to the terrorist attacks by the Sunni al-Qaida? This sentiment, shared by all Shiites, is especially prevalent among Sadr’s supporters, which points to a second, more powerful motive: Sadr himself put Maliki in power a year ago, his Mahdi Army serving essentially as a paramilitary wing for Maliki, a politician without a militia of his own.

Zeyad’s got his ear to the ground and reports rumors of death squads returning to the streets in Baghdad and elsewhere, with 67 bodies having officially been found on the streets of the capital in the past three days and possibly many more unofficially. That doesn’t mean the Mahdi Army’s responsible; in fact, word is that some of the victims are Sunnis targeted by AQ for their perceived collaboration with the government.

Meanwhile, some weirdness: until now the storyline has been that it’s the Sunnis who are split (between pro- and anti-AQ factions) and the Shiites who are, roughly speaking, united. Today, however, the news is that AQ is acting contrite towards the other Sunni insurgent groups and the Sadrists are starting to square off with SCIRI’s militia, the Badr Brigades:

But beyond the political jostling, analysts say, the ultimate fate of the Maliki government may depend on the outcome of the fight for power unfolding on the ground. “There is a real war going on between Shiites in Basra, Diwaniyah, Karbala, and Najaf, and it’s a mess,” says Jabar.

He says Sadr’s move Monday, as well as recent demonstrations, was simply a reaction to moves to dismantle his military capabilities, an effort being pursued cautiously by US forces, with the backing of Sadr’s nemesis Hakim, who controls his own paramilitary group, the Badr Brigades.

In fact, several sources confirm now that a national police unit loyal to Badr was drafted from the city of Hilla into the deadly battles in Diwaniyah earlier this month between elements of Sadr’s Mahdi Army and US and Iraqi forces.

I’ll leave you with a little good news. It’s something.

Update: Oh lord. Was it an inside job or is he just scapegoating someone?

An Iraqi army brigade commander was arrested Wednesday night after a string of bombings that killed more than 180 people around Baghdad, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s office announced.

A statement from al-Maliki’s office said the officer was removed because of “the weakness of security measures put in place to protect civilians in Sadriya,” the central Baghdad marketplace where more than 120 people died in a single bombing.

Update: Gen. Petraeus will be in D.C. next week to brief the Senate on the surge so the DoD offered to have him brief the House, too. No thanks, said Pelosi — an unusual response given how deeply interested the Democrats claim to be in the state of progress in Iraq, but maybe not so unusual considering his popularity and the fact that the left can’t/won’t attack a uniform at a hearing they way they can/will a cabinet member.

After Boehner attacked her, she relented. Petraeus will brief both chambers next week.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

is Sadr is in Iraq, bush needs to roll the dice and whack him, asap.

jp on April 18, 2007 at 3:56 PM

They blow each other up.

Why exactly is the left pissed off again?

Ringmaster on April 18, 2007 at 4:01 PM

One word.

Savages.

fogw on April 18, 2007 at 4:08 PM

Of course, the recent spate of spectacular attacks is designed precisely to get people like Hammorabi to despair and give up. The numbers tell a different story. In the two months since the new plan got started (and it is far from fully in place) civilian deaths in Baghdad were down 45 percent compared to the two months prior. Civilian deaths went up outside the capital, but nationwide, civilian deaths declined by 20 percent. AQ will have to pull off attacks like this one on a daily basis for the rest of the month to get the death toll for April out of the low end of the range of the past 10 months or so.

Nor should any of this be surprising. AQ has looked for and found soft spots in the new Baghdad plan. The US-Iraqi forces will learn from and adjust to it, while adding thousands of additional troops. Meanwhile, the radical Sunni and Shia blocs are fracturing as more Iraqis tire of terror and revenge, and seek to join the political process. Somehow, the MSM is trying to paint that as a bad thing.

Karl on April 18, 2007 at 4:13 PM

Definitely time for us to redeploy the troops to Okinawa

Zetterson on April 18, 2007 at 4:27 PM

HotAir: Initial post, plus an update.

Drudge: still nothing. Surely this development in Iraq should be enough to bump Simon from American Idol off the Drudge front page?

Score another scoop for HotAir.

Anton on April 18, 2007 at 4:28 PM

More Muslims killing Muslims. Bush is certainly to blame though.

WisCon on April 18, 2007 at 4:29 PM

More Muslims killing Muslims. Bush is certainly to blame though.

WisCon on April 18, 2007 at 4:29 PM

I generally live by the maxim, “Post or e-mail nothing you wouldn’t want to see on the front page of the Wall Street Journal.” Try it sometime.

Screw you, WisCon. This is an example of evil men targeting the innocent. Your comment is on a par with the Palestinians who were celebrating and passing out candy to the kids after hearing the news on 9/11.

The religion of dead civilians (shoppers, construction workers) is irrelevant. You are an embarrasment to conservatives everywhere.

Anton on April 18, 2007 at 4:53 PM

Pelosi… I’m so glad she finally broke that glass ceiling. It breaks taboos and sets a good example to other gorgons wishing to achieve high office.

Lehosh on April 18, 2007 at 4:53 PM

The Dems will stop at nothing to keep up the charade that the ’surge’ is an evil Bush plan and not the plan of the best military minds we have right now.

BohicaTwentyTwo on April 18, 2007 at 5:08 PM

So she didn’t want to meet with Petraeus? Didn’t want to hear from the boots on the ground.

We all know how that “most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history…” went. Now Nancy is reaching for the title of “most politically dense Speaker in history”.

Scheduling? Maybe she should have just said outright – “He has nothing to tell us we haven’t already made up our minds on.”

eeyore on April 18, 2007 at 5:39 PM

They blow each other up.

Why exactly is the left pissed off again?

Ringmaster on April 18, 2007 at 4:01 PM

Because we’re in the middle of it.

honora on April 18, 2007 at 6:02 PM

But she’ll sit down with a TERRORIST in a LIBERATED WOMAN’s outfit of choice, long sleeves and a HEAD SCARF?

Somebody needs to vomit right down her lapel.

seejanemom on April 18, 2007 at 6:59 PM

Because we’re in the middle of it.
honora on April 18, 2007 at 6:02 PM

178 IRAQIs were killed. Americans are there to try and stop this kind of thing. I would love to hear a logical explanation of how Americans not being there would improve things.

You have just revealed the sillyness of the left-America hating. It doesn’t matter how many killed or what bad things are happening in the world. It is just that as long the Americans are in any way involved then you can blame everything on them! Nevermind that all parties involved in the incident are IRAQI!

Resolute on April 18, 2007 at 7:16 PM

More Muslims killing Muslims. Bush is certainly to blame though.

WisCon on April 18, 2007 at 4:29 PM
I generally live by the maxim, “Post or e-mail nothing you wouldn’t want to see on the front page of the Wall Street Journal.” Try it sometime.

Screw you, WisCon. This is an example of evil men targeting the innocent. Your comment is on a par with the Palestinians who were celebrating and passing out candy to the kids after hearing the news on 9/11.

The religion of dead civilians (shoppers, construction workers) is irrelevant. You are an embarrasment to conservatives everywhere.

Anton on April 18, 2007 at 4:53 PM

I don’t know what you are talking about as I am not celebrating anything. I am pointing out that these fanatics are killing their own bretheren, but that in the end we (the U.S. and Bush) are the ones that get blamed for it. This will be used as further evidence that the surge isn’t working and that we need to leave.

So, go screw yourself, I guess?

WisCon on April 18, 2007 at 7:35 PM

have we considered that terrorism in iraq will be there even after we leave, regardless of whether we stablize the Iraqi government or not. This problem is so stretched out and in many cases so deeply intwined in the damn tribe mentality of iraq that it should be decades before there is absolutely no terrorism in Iraq. BUT by the same token our goal is to get the Iraqi government and army on its feet (we’re doing it and making outstanding progress) and end the terrorist threat and insurrgent threat as much as possible (making progress there too)

Defector01 on April 18, 2007 at 7:38 PM

Because we’re in the middle of it.

honora on April 18, 2007 at 6:02 PM

You know, the BDS left made an entire election campaign out of declaring that the reasons for going to Iraq made no sense, and keep changing after the fact.

But the reasons for leaving — as stated by the left — seem to change moment-by-moment, too, depending on the day’s news. Today’s position is that the left wants us out of Iraq because “we’re in the middle of a civil war”, which suggests that the left is now committed to an isolationist policy, within our borders. Quite a shift from Kosovo, Haiti, etc. and the concurrent calls for military action in Darfur.

It also seems to be in contrast to their stated position on Afghanistan, which I think is “kill Bin Laden and every memeber of the Taliban, even if you have to invade Pakistan to do so”.

honora, if a Dem ends up in the White House in 2009, what will your foreign policy position be then, beyond a firm commitment never to cross France, Germany, China and Russia (our “friends”)?

Jaibones on April 18, 2007 at 9:04 PM

Pelosi’s denial to General Petraeus the opportunity to speak to the House is disrespectful to the military and to General Petraues. It also shows that she must know that her efforts to undermine our nation’s commitment to the military and to the Iraq War cannot be sustained in the face of the kind of reasoned analysis that General Petraeus would give to the House.

As for the current high level of violence, it is al Qaeda’s counter-offenive to the new strategy and the new U.S. commander General Petraeus. Did you think that they would go away quietly? No, they intend on killing and maiming as many as possible to cause hand-wringing defeatists in the UNited States to run away ao that the democratically lelecte dIraqi government can be otherthrown and a radical Islamist, terror-sponsoring state be in Iraq instead. We are dealing with a deeply evil enemy.

Phil Byler on April 18, 2007 at 9:27 PM

Muslims killing Muslims.

ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz…….

It’s the Koran, stupid.

The playbook the the pedophile warlord murders onward.

profitsbeard on April 18, 2007 at 10:53 PM

Pelosi doesn’t need a briefing with Gen Petraeus. She got all the itel she needs in Syria.

oakpack on April 18, 2007 at 10:54 PM

Pelosi declines invitation from Petraeus

He’s got Bush cooties. Anyway, now that Pelosi is the shadow Sec-State, why not also become the shadow Sec-Def?

smellthecoffee on April 19, 2007 at 12:31 AM

The religion of dead civilians (shoppers, construction workers) is irrelevant. You are an embarrasment to conservatives everywhere.

Anton on April 18, 2007 at 4:53 PM

I disagree. The reason they’re dead is because the Muslim mass murderers believed that they would get to heaven for killing. Only Muslims believe this, and they believe it because it’s in the Koran. Only kooks from other religions go berserk and murder like this. In Islam it’s almost mainstream. WHAT you believe in matters.

Mojave Mark on April 19, 2007 at 2:17 AM

Can anyone say………. Iran? No, they’re not at war with us or anyone else, nothing to see here folks, just go about your busines, nothing to see………

PinkyBigglesworth on April 19, 2007 at 5:02 AM

So, go screw yourself, I guess?

WisCon on April 18, 2007 at 7:35 PM

Your original “Muslims killing muslims” comment seemed dismissive — as if it didn’t matter that over 100 people were killed, since they were just muslims. If that wasn’t your point, then I apologize for the strong language, WisCon.

Only kooks from other religions go berserk and murder like this. In Islam it’s almost mainstream. WHAT you believe in matters.

Mojave Mark on April 19, 2007 at 2:17 AM

Sure, but that runs very close to the liberal position that we should pull out now, since the situation is un-fixable due to the death-cult kool-aid running through radical Islam. I don’t buy it. I prefer to believe that most people in the Middle East are very much like you and I. We can distinguish between predators and ordinary muslims by imposing basic and just law and order. If we leave, scenes like this recent bombing play out all over the country.

Think of the example of Japan. Their culture was dominated by a warlike spirit throughout World War II. You could not have found a less likely environment for constitutional democracy than an Emperor-worshipping death cult with an attitude of racial superiority. And yet, within a generation, they were a peaceful democracy.

Anton on April 19, 2007 at 11:16 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.