Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Breaking: ABC News ID’s VT gunman as Cho Seung-Hui; Update: Killer’s warning may be a ‘Net hoax

posted at 9:27 am on April 17, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Just across. Looks like the bulletin board posting Bryan quoted last night was right on the money.

Seung Hui Cho, a permanent resident of the United States, a Korean national and a Virginia Tech student has been identified as the gunman in the shootings that left 33 people dead on the Virginia Tech campus Monday, ABC News has learned.

The student left a “disturbing note” before killing two people in a dorm room, returning to his own room to re-arm and entering a classroom building on the other side of campus to continue his rampage, sources said.

Cho’s identitiy has been confirmed with a positive fingerprint match on the guns used in the rampage and with immigration materials. It is believed that he was the shooter in both incidents yesterday. Sources say Cho was carrying a backpack that contained receipts for a March purchase of a Glock 9 mm pistol, sources said. Witnesses had also told authorities that the shooter was carrying a backpack. Sections of chain similar to those used to lock the main doors at Norris Hall, the site of the second shooting that left 31 dead, were found inside a Virginia Tech dormitory, sources confirmed to ABC News.

The university’s holding a press conference right now. Standby.

Update: The cops just confirmed his ID at the presser. He lived on campus at Harper Hall. Lab tests confirmed that one of the weapons was used in both shootings yesterday. WaPo had a hot tip about this early this morning, identifying the suspect as Korean, not Chinese as had previously been reported.

Update: They’re talking now about some of the heroes who helped slow Cho down during his rampage. Slublog sends along this story about Prof. Liviu Librescu, who held the classroom door shut while his students escaped through the windows. One fact it doesn’t mention: Librescu was a Holocaust survivor.

Update: Meanwhile, ABC still hasn’t retracted its alarmist post about high-capacity magazines.

Update: I still don’t understand how he managed to be so lethal while shooting randomly. 32 killed, 20+ wounded; how often does any sort of attack result in more dead than hurt? The cops did say that he lined some students up and executed them sequentially, but that’s strange too. He’s one guy, with (let’s assume) 10 guys in a line in front of him. After he shot the first two or three and the rest realized what was about to happen, wouldn’t they have rushed him?

A doctor interviewed this morning on CNN said the victims he’d treated had all been shot at least three times, so it could be that he came equipped with a huge volume of ammo and just kept spraying bullets. Although again, in that case, you’d expect more injured than killed. I wonder if we’re going to find out that he used an especially destructive form of ammo, hollow-tipped or something along those lines.

Update: Another thing. I haven’t read a single report yet of Cho saying anything during the shooting. In fact, a couple of people have noticed how calm and quiet he was. But to get people to line up, wouldn’t he have been screaming at some point (“Get in a line!” etc)? I’m assuming that no one would have lined up for him once they knew he was a killer, so the line up probably happened when he first entered the building, before anyone had reason to suspect him. But none of the students who were in the building at the time heard anything, at least from what I’ve seen, aside from gunshots.

Update: VTech’s student newspaper has an as-yet-incomple list of the dead and reports that people were shot in four different rooms in Norris Hall. The Times has an interactive graphic showing the layout of the campus and the buildings where the murders occurred.

Update: Surprise — Cho was a loner.

Update: Fox says there’s some sort of pending court proceeding against Cho that originated on April 7. They’re checking it now.

Update: Here he is.

cho.jpg

Update: All right, here’s a map I lifted from VTech’s homepage. Cho’s dorm room, Harper Hall, is in the black circle; Ambler Johnston, where the first shootings took place, is in red; and Norris Hall is up top in white. You can see why it wouldn’t have taken him long to get back to his own room after the initial murders.

vt-map.png

Update: The Blotter reports that Cho purchased his first gun on March 13 — presumably from the guy who posted that bulletin board message that we linked to — then apparently bided his time during the statutory 30-day waiting period until he could buy the second sometime within the last few days. A reader tipped us yesterday that there was a gun show in Roanoke County this past weekend.

Update: Drudge links a report from a local paper suggesting Cho also was responsible for at least one of the bomb threats the school received recently.

Update (Ian): Threatening note found at St. Edwards college in Texas:

note.jpg

Update: The Chicago Tribune’s got a tip on Cho’s suicide note. Sounds like he was an old-fashioned wackjob.

The note included a rambling list of grievances, according to sources. Cho had shown recent signs of violent, aberrant behavior, according to an investigative source, including setting a fire in a dorm room and allegedly stalking some women.

A note believed to have been written by Cho was found in his dorm room that railed against “rich kids,” “debauchery” and “deceitful charlatans” on campus.

The English major from Centreville, Va., a rapidly growing suburb of Washington, D.C., came to the United States in 1992, an investigative source said. He was a legal permanent resident.

His family runs a dry cleaning business and he has a sister who graduated from Princeton University, according to the source.

Now the ChiTrib has updated to add: “Cho also died with the words ‘Ismail Ax’ in red ink on the inside of one of his arms.”

Update: The Daily Mail reports that the woman killed in the first shooting was Emily Hilscher, who lived on the fourth floor of Ambler Johnston dormitory next door to the RA, Ryan Clark. Clark was also killed in the first shooting. They’re speculating that Cho was either involved with her or stalking her.

Update: A shot in the dark here from reader Ray F., but worth posting since Cho was, after all, an English major and this would be a golden we-told-you-so moment if it pans out:

You probably already know this, but in James Fennimore Cooper’s story “The Prairie,” the settler Ishmael Bush, who is attempting to escape from civilization, sets out across the prairie with two key tools, a gun and an axe. Each has a symbolic meaning. The axe — which can either kill or provide shelter — stands for both creation and destruction. Given that the VT killer was an English major, might this be the likely meaning of the words on his arm? Just my two cents.

Update: ABC News has a bit more about the note, which apparently shifts from present to past tense at some point. I wonder if he wrote some or all of it after killing Hilscher and Clark. If so, then the rampage in Norris Hall wasn’t necessarily planned; he might have figured “in for a penny, in for a pound” and decided to go out in a blaze of lunatic glory. Takeaway: “You caused me to do this.”

Update: Shocka: Cho’s creative writing teacher said she could tell from his work that he was “troubled,” and referred him for counseling.

Update: Drudge links to another story about Cho’s alleged connection to Emily Hilscher with an important fact I haven’t seen before:

Witnesses to the shooting said that the gunman was involved in an argument with a girlfriend and had later stormed out of the dormitory building.

A counsellor – believed to be Mr Clark, who was also a resident adviser – was called to calm the situation at the dormitory.

The gunman returned at 7.15am and shot Ms Hilscher and Mr Clark. US media reported that Mr Clark had been shot in the neck.

I thought he arrived at the building initially with gun in hand, i.e., planning to kill her. But that’s not necessarily true now; he might have gone there to argue with her, stormed off back to his room to get the gun, and then come back to kill her and Clark. The two hours between that shooting and the Norris Hall rampage would have given him time to write the note, too. So let’s not assume just yet that this whole thing was planned days in advance.

Update: An excellent point from reader Scott B. about why the dead-to-injured ratio might be so high:

From what I understand, due to the high winds yesterday, no area hospitals (or the VA State Police) were flying helicopters. Thus, all of the wounded—even the most critical victims—had to be transported to hospitals via ambulance.

On a normal day, the most critically injured could have been transported by air to Roanoke or even UVA Hospital in Charlottesville. With the helicopters grounded, UVA was no longer an option at all and Roanoke was a 20-30min drive, which left smaller, regional hospitals—less equipped to deal with very serious injuries—to handle most of the victims.

Update: Here’s an oddity. What would an English major have against the engineering department? “An affidavit for a search warrant filed this morning in Montgomery County, Va., circuit court said police found a ‘bomb threat note . . . directed at engineering school department buildings’ near the bodies of the shooter and some victims.”

Update: The Times is reporting that reporters noticed a “single spent long-rifle shell” on the ground outside the Cho family home this morning in Centreville, Virginia. No idea what to make of that. They also solved the mystery of Cho’s mysterious court appearance: it was for a speeding ticket.

Update: One of his classmates from the VTech creative writing course describes his work:

“His writing, the plays, were really morbid and grotesque,” Derry noted. “I remember one of them very well. It was about a son who hated his stepfather. In the play the boy threw a chain saw around, and hammers at him. But the play ended with the boy violently suffocating the father with a rice krispy treat,” [Stephanie] Derry said.

“He even wrote one play about students being stalked by a teacher.” Derry said.

“I mean, his kind of writing was pretty peculiar, but when we asked him if he had any comments after we’d reviewed his work, he would just shrug and say nothing,” Derry described.

“We made jokes around the class about his work, because it was just so fictional, so surreal, we just had to laugh,” Derry said, “We had to laugh because it couldn’t ever be real or truthful, I mean who throws hammers or chainsaws around?”

“But we always joked we were just waiting for him to do something, waiting to hear about something he did,” Derry said. “But when I got the call it was Cho who had done this, I started crying, bawling.”

Update: And just like that, the Smoking Gun has a copy of Cho’s play.

Update: Standing ovation for VTech’s president at the convocation. Wow. I guess he’s keeping his job.

Update: The Toronto Star claims to have spoken to his roommate. “He was always really, really quiet and kind of weird.”

Update: More from the roommates. Super freaky:

Mr. Grewal recalled how earlier in the year someone running for a student council position visited the suite to pass out candy and ask for votes. Mr. Cho would not even make eye contact with him, turning his head away and refusing to make conversation…

“I would notice a lot of times, I would come in the room and he would kind of be sitting at his desk, just staring at nothing,” he said.

Update: A bombshell from the ChiTrib:

It was 5:30 Monday morning and Karan Grewal was finishing a break after a long night of cramming for his classes at Virginia Tech. As he left the bathroom at Harper Hall, his dormitory mate, Cho Sueng-Hui, wearing boxer shorts and a T-shirt, entered for his morning ritual of applying lotion, inserting his contact lenses and taking his medication.

“He was, like, normal,” Grewal, a 21-year-old accounting major, said today, describing the ordinary start to what turned out to be an extraordinary day…

According to school officials, Cho even had time to post a deadly warning on a school online forum.

“im going to kill people at vtech today,” they said he wrote.

I guess that solves the mystery of whether it was premeditated. More from the Tribune: “After leaving the scene of the first shooting, Cho called a threat to authorities, saying there was a bomb at Norris Hall, about half a mile away from Johnston.” There was a bomb threat called in immediately after two people had been murdered, and they still didn’t lock down the campus?

Update: An interesting theory from reader Michael B. about why Cho would have targeted the engineering department:

On a chat room of (mostly Asian) engineers that I’m on, someone posited that the killer was probably a “real major” (i.e., engineer, scientist, etc.) who played too many video games, “got horrible grades and had to transfer to english.” This hypothesis was put forth by someone who didn’t know about the killers’s anti-engineer department ramblings, so I’d say it’s a pretty decent speculation that he wanted (and failed) to be an engineering major. It would explain the note.

He apparently told his roommates he was a business major when they first moved in together.

Update: Dan Riehl passes along a fascinating but probably apocryphal blog post from someone claiming to be a friend of a friend of Emily Hilscher. Word on the street is that Hilscher and Cho had been dating and that she broke it off two weeks ago when he became too weird and domineering. This would solve the mystery of the engineering department vendetta, perhaps:

Jane isn’t totally sure Emily was actually dating anyone else at this point. But days ago she did have a study group with several young men in it that could possibly have been what set Cho Seung-hui off. There were also several times that young men had walked with Emily on campus between classes, nothing more then casual conversation, but maybe in the eyes of Cho, it looked more intimate. What is clear to Jane is that when Cho Seung-hui entered the Engineering building, he was looking for a specific person or perhaps several people. A friend of hers recalls seeing Cho’s face peering through the door several times during her class, before the shooting started.

So why don’t I buy it? Because Cho’s roommates say they never knew him to have a girlfriend, and based on everything I’ve read about him, he was too introverted and antisocial to even speak to a woman let alone take her out. I’m flagging this anyway because it’s a juicy lead, but it’s almost got to be shinola.

Update: They’re holding a 5:30 press conference and the cop who introduced the governor dropped a mini-bombshell — there’s no evidence of any suicide note left by Cho. That simply can’t be right: WaPo has law enforcement sources telling them two notes were found, the bomb threat near Cho’s body and the “manifesto” found in his dorm room.

Update: Mary K e-mails to say that someone who appears to have been friends with Emily Hilscher (judging from the candid photos they have access to) has posted a message on Facebook denying that Hilscher was involved with Cho in any way. I’d bet anything she’s right. Follow the link and scroll down for the screencap.

Update: Robert from Alphabet City e-mails to say that the message board posting in which Cho allegedly warned that he was going to kill people at VTech seems to have originated at a site called Planet Blacksburg, but that the page in question is now down. Was it a hoax? The Farkleberries site has details. There’s no evidence of a post on the “4chan” site where, according to Planet Blacksburg, Cho left his message, because the archives only go back 10 pages. But Robert e-mails with this screenshot of the Planet Blacksburg. I’m honestly not sure what to think, but the timing does roughly coincide with the time Cho’s roommate met him in the bathroom on Monday morning. That was around 5:30; the posting at 4chan was 4:49.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6

The student left a “disturbing note” before killing two people in a dorm room, returning to his own room to re-arm and entering a classroom building on the other side of campus to continue his rampage, sources said.

Frightening.

sunny on April 17, 2007 at 9:31 AM

The Chief of Police said he was a South Korean national, here as a legal alien.

amerpundit on April 17, 2007 at 9:31 AM

wow. Cho, just as the post you found yesterday said.

MayBee on April 17, 2007 at 9:33 AM

I posted part of this in the other string. I lived in South Korea five years, and the students there are bombarded with nonstop government sanctioned propaganda.

Take a look at this webpage by an American over there who has documented it. Pay particularly close attention to the government sponsored anti-Americanism in their schools. Write the Korean embassy demanding that it stop.

http://www.usinkorea.org

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 9:38 AM

The gun shop owner was on the level.

Timber Wolf on April 17, 2007 at 9:41 AM

Now I don’t understand. Since he was a student living in another dorm room, the cops should have been able to ID him after the first murder.
Surly someone on that floor, the floor where the girlfriend lived, must have known about their relationship. They would have told the cops, yea he lives in such and such dorm. The University officials would have known there was a shooter on the lose.
He went back to his room for an hour or two and reloaded? And the cops/university police couldn’t put this together? They should have been at his dorm room within the hour.
Rusty

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 9:45 AM

Another thing: Take a look at this recent huge hit movie in South Korea with its virulently anti-American stance. It is even playing in the Washington area:

http://www.accessmylibrary.com/comsite5/bin/pdinventory.pl?pdlanding=1&referid=2930&purchase_type=ITM&item_id=0286-26366698

Here is the trailer.

http://www.hostmovie.com/

This Korean was exposed to nonstop anti-American propanganda in the South Korean media and school system. A person does not methodically kill as many people as he did without a real hatred for the country.

Bloggers need to demand the South Korean government cease it sanctioned approval of it.

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 9:47 AM

From AP on Bryan’s post:

Update (AP): WaPo confirms that the serial numbers were indeed removed from both guns. Hmmm.

None of this makes any sense. Why would he remove the serial numbers, but carry around the receipt for the guns?

Rick on April 17, 2007 at 9:49 AM

Prof. Liviu Librescu. My hero.

PattyAnn on April 17, 2007 at 9:53 AM

Rustyw- the police went after, and found, someone else after the first shooting. He was driving off campus at the time, and has been called a person of interest.
So it seems that whoever the police talked to about the first crime didn’t ID the shooter, but perhaps the current boyfriend.
I guess what we don’t know for sure is if the first victim was ever actually Cho’s girlfriend. That could all be a misunderstanding.

MayBee on April 17, 2007 at 9:58 AM

Prof. Liviu Librescu. My hero

Ditto that. He survives Nazi’s and Romanian dictatorship all to die saving lives.

danarchy on April 17, 2007 at 10:01 AM

And another thing. He was majoring in English, getting all the postmodern, Marxist hatred and deconstruction of America and the West. He received nonstop anti-Americanism in South Korean schools: http://www.usinkorea.org

Cho is a South Korean national, a Virginia Tech senior majoring in English and the man who killed 33 people — inlcuding himself — on the Virginia Tech campus Monday.

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 10:01 AM

Guns are illegal on that campus, it was a gun free zone. no one including students, teachers and employees are allowed to have a gun, either in their car or while on campus at anytime. I guess that bad guy didn’t follow the rules. If one good guy would of had a gun in that building, things would have been allot different and there’d be a whole lot less funerals this week. Gun control only hurts the defenseless.

KCtheKat on April 17, 2007 at 10:05 AM

I’m not gloating but I called that it was a Korean name. Maybe a little!

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:05 AM

A 9 mil with ordinary rounds will cause a ton of damage. If it hit bone, it could break it in half. If it hit torso, it would make a big hole.

Simply scoring a simple crisscross on the point of ordinary rounds with a utility knife increases the damage done, acting like a manufactured hollow point – projectile inflation after penetration.

My guess: most of the injured were probably hit with the .22, most of the deaths were from the glock.

moflicky on April 17, 2007 at 10:06 AM

Why bash South Korean schools? It’s not like he couldn’t get the constant anti-American bashing in schools and press right here in America too ya know?

Faith1 on April 17, 2007 at 10:08 AM

I wonder if we’re going to find out that he used an especially destructive form of ammo, hollow-tipped or something along those lines.

That, or he’s had professional training with firearms. Ex-military? How old is he? Is SoKo military compulsory or volunteer? I hear SoKo military are hardcore. Super BadAss. Dunno. But that would make more sense to me than the ammo explanation. If ammo made the difference I would think we’d have heard something along those lines by now, from the hospital staff caring for the wounded overnight.

The Apologist on April 17, 2007 at 10:09 AM

The Apologist,

It’s compulsive at the age of 18 that South Koreans serve at least 2 years in the Military. Having experience with guns is mandatory.

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:12 AM

Good point. South Korean schools wouldn’t explain Columbine, Little Rock, Paducah, et al. I’d take it a step further and submit that it has nothing to do with what any school of any country is necessarily telling kids. If that were the case these incidents would occur much more frequently – odds would favor that.
Something goes badly wrong in the psyche of people who commit these acts.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 10:12 AM

MayBee,
I thought the same thing at first. Actually, I thought it was going to be two shooters. But it is hard to find a report that doesn’t list them as lovers. And now he lives in the dorms? I would think with only two folks shot initially, every roommate on the floor of the girl friend would have told the cops who he was and which room he was in. The only way everyone wouldn’t have known the two were dating? They would have been friendless. Gateway has the pictures and some info on the first two victims.
Ryan Clark Columbia County Georgia, a leader in the Virginia Tech marching band and Emily Hilscher Rappahannock County, Va – a freshman- she may have been arguing with the killer…
Emily Jane Hilscher and Ryan Clark lived next door to each other on the fourth floor of West Ambler Johnston Hall — in rooms 4040 and 4042. They were the first vicitms.
They sound popular to me. No way could the police not have Ided the guy who shot these two. They would have known immediately he was a student. Also, they would have known he lived in the dorm and which room he had.

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 10:17 AM

We can only make an assumption we don’t know at what age he immigrated to the USA. Many South Koreans come the the USA just to avoid serving.

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:17 AM

Egfrow,

So he couldn’t transfer to the US to attend a college before having served right? Or do they grad high school earlier than 18? At any rate I’m leaning even harder toward military training as the deciding factor in lethality. It would also probably go some way towards accounting for his apparent calm while carrying out the killings. We’ll see.

The Apologist on April 17, 2007 at 10:18 AM

Apologist, It’s possible but it’s illegal. Meaning if he were to evver return to Korea would go to prison.

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:20 AM

NBC is reporting that he attended some high school here in the states and his parents live here too.

moflicky on April 17, 2007 at 10:22 AM

I don’t think that there was any lineup of victims. What I’ve picked up from my reading is that a group of students were caught by the assassin at the chained exit doors. He was able to perform his evil work with horrible efficacy.

thegreatbeast on April 17, 2007 at 10:23 AM

After he shot the first two or three and the rest realized what was about to happen, wouldn’t they have rushed him?

Similar to 9-11 where there was only one let’s roll story. He was probably very efficient in reloading and had one of the two guns loaded/firing on them the whole time.

It shows a need for every American to have a gun safety course and some gun experience beyond first-person shooter games.

Valiant on April 17, 2007 at 10:28 AM

Well if NBC is right that’s the military angle right out the window. So what else would account for his lethality? Besides ammo.

The Apologist on April 17, 2007 at 10:29 AM

I’m confused… how did this even happen? I thought the college had a strict policy against having weapons on campus. You don’t get much more hardcore on gun control than “no guns. period.”

It’s a mystery.

Lehosh on April 17, 2007 at 10:30 AM

Valiant,

This incident has not put me off the idea of increasing the use concealed weapon permits instead of more gun control.

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:31 AM

Cho Seung-Hui, 23, identified as killer in Virginia Tech massacre.

His photo here

Timber Wolf on April 17, 2007 at 10:33 AM

Why bash South Korean schools? It’s not like he couldn’t get the constant anti-American bashing in schools and press right here in America too ya know?

Faith1 on April 17, 2007 at 10:08 AM

Having been stationed there twice, I can say that their version is quite a bit more official than ours. At some colleges, their classwork includes ‘attend anti-US protests’ as mandatory events.

James on April 17, 2007 at 10:33 AM

Well if NBC is right that’s the military angle right out the window. So what else would account for his lethality? Besides ammo.

You don’t have to join the military to learn how to shoot.

RedWinged Blackbird on April 17, 2007 at 10:36 AM

I’m confused… how did this even happen? I thought the college had a strict policy against having weapons on campus

If you’re caught. It’s not like they check every car coming in and out, thousands arrive each day as they’ve been complaining. It’d be impossible to search everyone for guns.

So the people who obey the laws don’t bring them, the people who don’t like guns don’t bring them, the people who want to kill people bring them and hide them.

Keljeck on April 17, 2007 at 10:36 AM

Timber,

Why is the photo of the shooter on a website on gambling?

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:38 AM

By the way. Congrats to HotAir for breaking this before the MSM did.

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:40 AM

Guns are illegal on that campus, it was a gun free zone. no one including students, teachers and employees are allowed to have a gun, either in their car or while on campus at anytime. I guess that bad guy didn’t follow the rules. If one good guy would of had a gun in that building, things would have been allot different and there’d be a whole lot less funerals this week. Gun control only hurts the defenseless.

KCtheKat on April 17, 2007 at 10:05 AM

Look at DC – where there is another gun ban. How many shootings do they average per day? I told my sister yesterday; I’m getting her daughter a cute little semi-automatic that will fit nicely in her purse. My sister added, “Get her lessons, too.” So I will. My niece is a drop-dead gorgeous Hokie cheerleader who has been stalked and she’s a conservative who loves President Bush, (he is a fellow cheerleader) – she’s ripe for the picking for some campus weirdo. She needs to arm herself. Her aunt is going to help her out with that.

foxforce91 on April 17, 2007 at 10:40 AM

Surprise — Cho was a loner. Well there goes my hypothesis.

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 10:42 AM

Keljeck on April 17, 2007 at 10:36 AM

Hehe, I’ll make sure to use the /sarcasm tag next time.

Obviously, this is an appropos example of exactly why gun control is a toothless fantasy. People obeying the law aren’t prone to going on spree killings.

Lehosh on April 17, 2007 at 10:46 AM

Well. Its for sure we should ban all English majors from college campuses. These people are all deranged.

faraway on April 17, 2007 at 10:46 AM

Update: I still don’t understand how he managed to be so lethal while shooting randomly. 32 killed, 20+ wounded; how often does any sort of attack result in more dead than hurt? The cops did say that he lined some students up and executed them sequentially, but that’s strange too. He’s one guy, with (let’s assume) 10 guys in a line in front of him. After he shot the first two or three and the rest realized what was about to happen, wouldn’t they have rushed him?

Answer:
1. Frozen by shock.
2. No way out of the kill zone (classrooms usually have just one door).
3. He had TWO pistols.
4. I heard on the news that he had chained the exit doors (not sure) so there was no way out of the hallway except toward the shooter.
5. He had lots of ammo; a 9mm can hold 15 shots. With extra clips and two guns you can pump out a lot of rounds.

This was pure evil.

Mojave Mark on April 17, 2007 at 10:50 AM

As to his efficiency with multiple weapons, it still takes two hands to reload, so emptying a clip and then reloading would at least take a matter of seconds, theres no method that I am aware of that would allow him to continue to shoot with one weapon while reloading the other, that being said, a .22 cal handgun is not only a very accurate weapon but not very destructive, Id bet the wounded will more than likely be those who were shot with that weapon as opposed to those who were shot with the 9mm.

None of it explains the level of carnage he was able to achieve with just these two weapons. This also is no time to debate the second amendment from either side of the argument, insane people will do what they do regardless of what the law is or isnt.

I think the focus should be on comforting the families and victims to the extent to which that is possible and for serious examination of Campus/School security.

Viper1 on April 17, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Just because he is described as a loner, does not necessarily mean he acted alone. I can’t imagine that the school did not notify all buildings of the earlier shooting. Something seems so wrong here.

bloggless on April 17, 2007 at 10:52 AM

I’m confused… how did this even happen? I thought the college had a strict policy against having weapons on campus. You don’t get much more hardcore on gun control than “no guns. period.”

It’s a mystery.

Bingo. It wasn’t 15 minutes before the gun control crowd started banging their pots and pans. My question: What if VaTech didn’t have a totally gun free zone. How many lives could have been saved if an instructor was allowed to carry? Could it have served as a deterrent? We’ll never know. But we do know in this case that the “gun free zone” didn’t work. Oh, it worked for those willing to abide by it, but the CRIMINAL somehow ignored it.

Will wonders never cease?

Matticus Finch on April 17, 2007 at 10:53 AM

@ MojaveMark,
There are magazines readily available to hold far more than 15 rounds for that weapon. (Glock .9mm)

Viper1 on April 17, 2007 at 10:53 AM

Well I am waiting on some versions of the story from some of the wounded. So far it appears that the only person who acted with any courage is the 70 year old Holocaust survivor.
It is turning into a sad indictment of this generation and it makes the actions of those in our military all the more impresive. Look at the peer pressure they had to overcome prior to joining and the abuse they take from campuses full of these same people.
But I am waiting and holding onto the slim chance that at least one of the students at least issued a strongly worded admonishment to the killer.

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 10:55 AM

I heard a doctor on CNN say that most of the victims were shot multiple times. So you can add that they might have already been shot to that list.

This was pure evil.

That is true, he wasn’t making a statement or a cry for help, he came to end lives.

BohicaTwentyTwo on April 17, 2007 at 10:55 AM

Desecrate his body before returning it to Korea.

marianpaul on April 17, 2007 at 10:57 AM

Humm, Harper Hall and Ambler Johnston are right next to each other. I just don’t understand why the cops didn’t have this guy in the first hour. Loner or not. He was seeing a popular girl. Folks would have known who he was.
Rusty

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 10:58 AM

LakeRuins, shame on you for that post. That’s not right.

bloggless on April 17, 2007 at 11:00 AM

Well if NBC is right that’s the military angle right out the window. So what else would account for his lethality? Besides ammo.

Well, if the doctor who was quoted as saying the victim’s were shot at least three times was accurate, it seems the killer wandered around from room to room shooting people who’d already been shot until he took his own life.

shuzilla on April 17, 2007 at 11:01 AM

Having been stationed there twice, I can say that their version is quite a bit more official than ours. At some colleges, their classwork includes ‘attend anti-US protests’ as mandatory events.

James on April 17, 2007 at 10:33 AM

The anti-Americanism is shocking. http://www.usinkorea.org I lived in Daegu for five years from 1997-2002. Several of us complained to the American embassy. I know that the U.S. put pressure on Korea about four years ago about their egregious anti-Americanism in the official textbooks of the public schools (things like blaming the U.S. for North Korea invading in 1950, blaming the U.S. for Japan’s takeover in 1905, etc.)

I recall the entire history at Kyoungbuk University department with blatant North Korean propaganda and spit matts in front of buildings (i.e. an American flag on the ground to wipe your feet off of).

You get an unstable individual like Cho Seung-Hui, coupled with nonstop propaganda assault against America, and you have deadly results.

This blockbuster movie (even playing in Washington)is just one of numerous examples of anti-Americanism in their media.

No one should tolerate anti-Americanism in South Korea any longer.

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Prayer for Virginia Tech

Father, right now we acknowledge You & we acknowledge Your presence & Your sovereignty. Father we lift up Virginia Tech & the people affected by the evil that has taken place on the campus. We pray that Your Spirit be with them. We pray that Your loving arms be wrapped around them & comfort them in this tragic time. We pray for families, neighbors,& friends. We pray for staff, professors, & administrators. God, we pray for people. We pray for humanity. We pray that this event will not cause people to turn from You but it will cause a nation to run to You like they have never run before. We pray for increased faith. We pray for spiritual growth. We pray for Christian fellowship & salvation of souls. We pray that your hand will move mightily over Blacksburg, VA & over this nation. Touch souls right now & comfort broken hearts. Forgive us for our sins Father. In Your Son Jesus Christ name we pray. Amen.

sunny on April 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Sunny,

Amen.

Matticus Finch on April 17, 2007 at 11:07 AM

LakeRuins, shame on you for that post. That’s not right.

bloggless on April 17, 2007 at 11:00 AM

Really, well here is what one of the students wrote yesterday. Would you feel the same if your child was in Room 206 instead of Room 205? He traded his life for tose across the hall.

Finally one of the guys in the front of the classroom was brave enough to get up and move the desk in front of the door to prevent outside entry. About twenty seconds later, the shooter rattled the doorknob trying to get in. When he couldn’t get in he fired two shots through the door (single solid piece of wood) and left. We heard him go in to 206 (the room across the hall) and shoot the people in that room. If we hadn’t put the barricade up when we did, I and all my classmates would be dead.

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 11:08 AM

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM

South Korean schools wouldn’t explain Columbine, Little Rock, Paducah, et al. I’d take it a step further and submit that it has nothing to do with what any school of any country is necessarily telling kids. If that were the case these incidents would occur much more frequently – odds would favor that.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 11:08 AM

This blockbuster movie (even playing in Washington)is just one of numerous examples of anti-Americanism in their media.

No one should tolerate anti-Americanism in South Korea any longer.

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Give me a break. The media isn’t the problem, it’s the people. Is The Host against American control in Korea? Yes, and justifiably, but it’s also against government as a whole. It’s a huge libertarian movie.

Nonfactor on April 17, 2007 at 11:10 AM

Allah asks:

I still don’t understand how he managed to be so lethal while shooting randomly. 32 killed, 20+ wounded; how often does any sort of attack result in more dead than hurt? The cops did say that he lined some students up and executed them sequentially, but that’s strange too. He’s one guy, with (let’s assume) 10 guys in a line in front of him. After he shot the first two or three and the rest realized what was about to happen, wouldn’t they have rushed him?

Allah, honestly, probably not, I was amazed that at the shooting at our school NO ONE tried to disarm the student physically. People have been asking your since yesterday, so I’ll repost one of my responses(slightly edited) that I made late last night, might give you some unique insight:

We had a shooting at our school when I was there, and I will tell you, if my class had been there, the student would have been disarmed physically by the guys in my class. What I will tell you is, the student shot their intended target, a few students bolted and ALL the teachers bolted, but most students stayed put. The students were ordered on the ground by the shooter, and they all pretty much complied.

If a shooter’s intent is a large body count, even with a pair of pistols, these students are easy targets, espcially for someone looking to kill massively. Remember, most of the Columbine killers victims were killed with a sawed-off shotgun at point blank range in the library, sitting at or hiding under desks and tables.

Some people asked why the Columbine killers didn’t kill more than this guy with more weapons and bombs as well, the anser is, I believe they could have easily killed many more. They fired many rounds into the lockers and halls, and threw pipe bombs in the halls as well with no target, and also returned to the cafeteria to blow up those big bombs that failed to go off, again with no target. Those were rounds and bombs that could have just as easily been used to kill more people.

If it seems like I’m a little obsessive about school shootings and everything about them, its because of the shooting at my high school. When it happens again and you hear it in the news, it all rushes back to you, I can remember every second of that day, and most of the next.

For me, I study it, I don’t know why, I guess I just have to know what causes these things, and if I can, try and help people understand, or maybe help them prevent or minimize them. I used to keep it to myself, and try to be subtle about where I came from with my opinions on the subject when these things occured, but I felt like I had to out myself this time.

Bad Candy on April 17, 2007 at 11:11 AM

About the lethality: I’d guess it’s because he went back. He chains the door, goes through shooting people, then makes another pass and shoots them again. Of course I’m only basing this on one story a student told about him coming in the room and then coming back in again. But it would make a certain amount of sense. It would be a matter of him going back and shooting the wounded.

dorkafork on April 17, 2007 at 11:12 AM

1.

RustyW– I would think with only two folks shot initially, every roommate on the floor of the girl friend would have told the cops who he was and which room he was in.

Remember where you’re talking about. This is a college dorm. Many people are already out on campus, so they aren’t there to interview. Communication on campus wasn’t the best to recall the dorm residence. Additionally, the dorm had to be secured before they could start interviewing people. At this point, everyone in the dorm is a potential suspect until cleared. Processing a homicide scene can take many hours. The police have to consider illegal search issues to insure they don’t screw something up. Additionally, we don’t know he was the boyfriend. He may have just thought he was. Plus, you assume there were witnesses to the shooting. From my dorm days, at that time of the morning, if you weren’t in class or the cafeteria, you were alseep.

2.

I still don’t understand how he managed to be so lethal while shooting randomly. 32 killed, 20+ wounded; how often does any sort of attack result in more dead than hurt? The cops did say that he lined some students up and executed them sequentially, but that’s strange too. He’s one guy, with (let’s assume) 10 guys in a line in front of him. After he shot the first two or three and the rest realized what was about to happen, wouldn’t they have rushed him?

Again, remember where they were, engineering classes. Not trying to stereotype, but the probability is that you’re going to have more Captains of the Math Team than Captains of the Football Team. He was basically shooting “fish in a barrel”. He probably didn’t line them up, but they may have been lined up trying to get out the windows and doors.

Catseye on April 17, 2007 at 11:13 AM

You are sitting in a class, doing what is done in class, and suddenly a gunman appears and opens fire.

Unexpected occurrence, to put it mildly.

Reaction time, believability of what you are seeing, panic, etc. all would come into play here.

Blaming the victims for an apparent lack of tactical response is absurd.

Consider that campus officials had informed all that they were safe from those evil guns because of the idiotic concept that putting up a sign, “gun free zone” is enough.

The Machine certainly does not blame the victims here, The Machine even has LESS blame for the perp.

Those who went out of their way to block citizens’ right to self defense are the ones with blood on their hands today.

.

The Machine on April 17, 2007 at 11:15 AM

South Korean schools wouldn’t explain Columbine, Little Rock, Paducah, et al. I’d take it a step further and submit that it has nothing to do with what any school of any country is necessarily telling kids. If that were the case these incidents would occur much more frequently – odds would favor that.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 11:08 AM

Bradky- Sheer hatred explains all of the above. How did Cho Seung-hui get such a hatred for America? I can tell you from the experience of living in South Korea: from the nonstop anti-American propaganda in the media and in the school system.

I know what you are thinking. If you haven’t lived in Korea, you are thinking that the country is a staunch ally and that the anti-Americanism is no different than in American schools by liberals.

It is entirely different. Explore this link http://www.usinkorea.org The anti-Americanism would be more similar to what the Japanese were exposed to in 1930’s Japan. If you have lived in Korea, you will know what I am talking about from experience.

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:16 AM

sunny on April 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM

Amen, Sunny.

As a father, I can’t imagine the utter hopelessness and despair those families must feel today. I hope that somehow, someway, they will find peace.

BacaDog on April 17, 2007 at 11:17 AM

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM

South Korean schools wouldn’t explain Columbine, Little Rock, Paducah, et al. I’d take it a step further and submit that it has nothing to do with what any school of any country is necessarily telling kids. If that were the case these incidents would occur much more frequently – odds would favor that.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 11:08 AM

*groan* This is like twice in a week that I’ve agreed with Bradky…

He’s right, this isn’t being taught in our schools, but effective response to this type of situation isn’t being taught or enforced in the schools either. Our school had no effective system to try and prevent it from happening, either catching warning signs or encouraging students to warn about threats and bullying(which often sparks these things) or control these events, or any set crisis plan.

If you have students, take this as your wakeup to contact your school authorities to see what the schools plan is, if its drilled, actively used and enforced, or if there is none, demand one.

Bad Candy on April 17, 2007 at 11:20 AM

The MSM will need to blame the college adminstrators and the police because afterall in our politically correct times where suicide bombers are insurgents and freedom fighters there is no way a mild mannered South Korean immigrant can possibly be held responsible.
Let’s find the biggest, whitest, guy we can and blame them.
Eventually this will wind up at the feet of President Bush.

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 11:20 AM

Give me a break. The media isn’t the problem, it’s the people. Is The Host against American control in Korea? Yes, and justifiably, but it’s also against government as a whole. It’s a huge libertarian movie.

Nonfactor on April 17, 2007 at 11:10 AM

Really? Libertarian? Is that why North Korea is praising it? This blockbuster movie is just the tip of the iceberg. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/comsite5/bin/pdinventory.pl?pdlanding=1&referid=2930&purchase_type=ITM&item_id=0286-26366698

What “American control” in Korea are you talking about? Have you ever been there?

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:20 AM

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:16 AM

I am not disputing the propaganda you referenced. What I am disagreeing with is the conclusion that it is necessarily the cause. If the propaganda were that inflammatory to cause one student to act, there should have been other incidents before this. (In addition we don’t know yet how long he had been in the US and how many years of US school he attended before college — making him unexposed to the South Korean influence you mentioned. Too many assumptions at this point.) Assuming your opinion is correct, how is Columbine and the others different? Those are evil but the Korean angle is political? Doesn’t make sense.

People snap in every culture and do horrific things. It is not gun control, lack of gun control or tv propaganda. It is an evil that uncorks from time to time for which there seems to be little cure.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 11:24 AM

Just a thought- is it possible that Cho is an al Qaeda operative, and this is a test of our response?

I’m by no means a conspiracy theorist, but there was quite a bit of planning involved that goes beyond jilted boyfriend or picked on nerd. Maybe I just don’t want to believe that people are capable of this type of cruelty on their own…

doginblack on April 17, 2007 at 11:27 AM

You are sitting in a class, doing what is done in class, and suddenly a gunman appears and opens fire.
Unexpected occurrence, to put it mildly.
Reaction time, believability of what you are seeing, panic, etc. all would come into play here.
Blaming the victims for an apparent lack of tactical response is absurd.
Consider that campus officials had informed all that they were safe from those evil guns because of the idiotic concept that putting up a sign, “gun free zone” is enough.
The Machine certainly does not blame the victims here, The Machine even has LESS blame for the perp.
Those who went out of their way to block citizens’ right to self defense are the ones with blood on their hands today.
The Machine on April 17, 2007 at 11:15 AM

I agree with this, it isn’t fair to blame the students, this isn’t the military or police, where people are trained to have a coordinated response to threats. My post about why it would be so easy for this guy to kill so many is a explaination, not a critique, of students actions. That said, students SHOULD be taught a formal coordinated response that is actively trained if you are going to take away their means of self defense.

Bad Candy on April 17, 2007 at 11:27 AM

Just a thought- is it possible that Cho is an al Qaeda operative, and this is a test of our response?

I’m going to inch out onto the limb and guess … no.

Allahpundit on April 17, 2007 at 11:28 AM

I think I was the one on the limb

doginblack on April 17, 2007 at 11:29 AM

He’s one guy, with (let’s assume) 10 guys in a line in front of him. After he shot the first two or three and the rest realized what was about to happen, wouldn’t they have rushed him?

I grieve for those who lost their lives and I grieve for their loved ones as well. My comments below are not meant to disparage them in any way. It’s really a criticism of how we teach and lead our children.

With few exceptions, people practice that which we teach them – in this and other cases, namely non-violent, submissive behavior or passive resistance (Note: “Passive resistance” has always seemed like a contradiction to me).

In our country today, there are fewer “Old School” heroes like those who were aboard Flight 93. Sadly, we are succeeding in passifying our nation to the point where evil people can do much more harm to us than ever before and get away with it.

Yes, I believe Cho got away with his crime even though it ended his life. You know why? He got away with his crime because he ended it on his own terms – by killing himself. It would’ve been far better had Cho been stopped by a mob of heroes, or taken into custody alive by law enforcement so that before his ultimate punishment, he could live through a hell on earth reserved only for people like him.

CliffHanger on April 17, 2007 at 11:31 AM

Catseye,
Huh, I lived in dorms off and on for four years, (I have a MS). At that time in the morning there would be plenty of people. (He found the two he was looking for). Murder two folks and there would be even more. Also, and ALLAH help me here, I don’t recall needing search warrants to enter dorm rooms. The RAs have keys and often come in unannounced if they suspect rule breaking.
No, start firing a pistil in a dorm room, folks will notice. Folks know who is seeing who.
Rusty

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 11:32 AM

Cho is simply a defective human being who snapped. No reboot was possible. I am not going to ascribe any more motivation or rationale behind his actions. He at least had the decency to take himself out of the gene pool unlike our little courthouse shooter in Atlanta who continues to cost the tax payers millions to pay for his defense. (Nichols)

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 11:32 AM

That said, students SHOULD be taught a formal coordinated response that is actively trained if you are going to take away their means of self defense.
Bad Candy on April 17, 2007 at 11:27 AM

Exactly. I work in higher ed, so our office is talking about this and looking at the emergency response plans of our own universities. Here’s what one of them says:

CLASSROOM RESONSIBILITIES
1. Barricade the classroom door immediately with furniture from the classroom
2. Block the door window
3. Turn off lights
4. Secure your students and yourself in a corner of the room away from the door
5. Wait for further instruction from the Police Department or recognized authority

Each professor is given a copy of this.

Slublog on April 17, 2007 at 11:32 AM

Really, well here is what one of the students wrote yesterday. Would you feel the same if your child was in Room 206 instead of Room 205? He traded his life for tose across the hall.

Finally one of the guys in the front of the classroom was brave enough to get up and move the desk in front of the door to prevent outside entry. About twenty seconds later, the shooter rattled the doorknob trying to get in. When he couldn’t get in he fired two shots through the door (single solid piece of wood) and left. We heard him go in to 206 (the room across the hall) and shoot the people in that room. If we hadn’t put the barricade up when we did, I and all my classmates would be dead.

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 11:08 AM

This doesn’t prove that their lives were “traded.” For all you know, it only means that BOTH classrooms would have been hit instead. This jackass killed as many people as he could have. He didn’t go to the next room over just because a room was blocked. From all accounts, he would have gone to the second room anyway.

Yeah, it sucks that no one stopped the killer. It sucks that he killed himself instead of being stopped by a group of students, but there’s no reason to speak ill of the students who were there.

They’re not like the people on 9-11. Everyone on that plane new that no matter what that they were going to die, and that their ONLY hope was to stop the terrorists. Those people had no other choice.

Esthier on April 17, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Bradky- People snap, but they don’t kill dozens of people in a premeditated slaughter without hatred of some sort. The Columbine murderers had hatred for the popular kids.

Cho was a crazed individual, but I am convinced having lived in Korea that the nonstop anti-Americanism led him to the hatred to act as he did, just as the nonstop anti-Jewish propaganda leads Muslim suicide bombers to kill Israelis.

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Those are, of course, “RESPONSIBILITIES.” Fast typing causes many errors.

Slublog on April 17, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Hey guys, FNC is reporting that the shooter has been in this country since he was 10 years old. He and parents emigrated from SK and they live in Centreville, VA. Unless he was indoctrinated by age 10 I think that theory is a little off base. I’m not disagreeing with virulent anti-Americanism in Korea, I’m just not sure it applies in this case.

pistolero on April 17, 2007 at 11:35 AM

No, start firing a pistil in a dorm room, folks will notice. Folks know who is seeing who.
Rusty

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 11:32 AM

What would you see? When I lived in a dorm, I was only barely able to see into the hallway, and that’s if the door was open, which it wouldn’t have been at 7 am. At that time, I would have been fast asleep.

Plus, the instinct upon hearing a gun shot is not to stick your head in the direction of the shooting.

We had paramedics come into my dorm into the room across the hall from me my freshman year, and it still took hours before I had any idea what was going on.

Esthier on April 17, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Esthier
My point is even after this student knew the shooter had gone across the hall, which means he in all likelyhood had his back to you, nobody in the bypassed classroom thought enough of their students to try and attack this guy from behind. They simply cowered and waited for the shooting to stop.

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Loner or not. He was seeing a popular girl. Folks would have known who he was.

But how many students would have been out and about before 7:30 a.m. to see who it was? I seem to remember the dorm being a very quiet place when I was getting up for my 7:30 calculus classes.

taznar on April 17, 2007 at 11:36 AM

januarius on April 17, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Then why haven’t there been other mass killings by Korean immigrants?? Your hypothesis would seem to be a predictor of this happening several times in Korea as well as here.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 11:37 AM

This incident has not put me off the idea of increasing the use concealed weapon permits instead of more gun control.

Egfrow on April 17, 2007 at 10:31 AM

You misunderstood me. I am arguing every American needs gun experience (gun safety is an essential part of that equation).

Valiant on April 17, 2007 at 11:37 AM

Well, he was 23 and an undergraduate. From 18-20 in the Soko military, and after that in college at VT. That explains the competence with the firearm. He was trained by the Sokos.

At this point, I’m not feeling very charitable towards Seoul. Let them fend for themselves if they hate us so much.

spmat on April 17, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Rustyw- I am going to take a giant leap and say it was not actually Cho the first victim was dating. I think the first witnesses were talking about the guy the police picked up, and either he was in her dorm room before Cho got there OR he looked like Cho. Either way, I think it will turn out to be incorrect information that Cho ever dated that poor girl.

MayBee on April 17, 2007 at 11:39 AM

They had nothing to take him out with, attacking the shooter would most likely have only gotten them killed. Just because he had their back to them doesn’t mean he couldn’t have easily have turned around.

Esthier on April 17, 2007 at 11:40 AM

pistolero on April 17, 2007 at 11:35 AM

Too bad everyone is missing your post. If true a lot of baseless speculation for naught has been done.

Bradky on April 17, 2007 at 11:43 AM

Each professor is given a copy of this.

Slublog on April 17, 2007 at 11:32 AM

Its decent, but I would go further, every person on campus should be given this and have it actively drilled until the response is practically involuntary, of course we teach young kids to have a formal plan for fires and tornadoes, but not this?(we should!) Our school actually had a written policy, but I don’t think anyone knew it existed, student, teacher or admin.

Bad Candy on April 17, 2007 at 11:46 AM

They had nothing to take him out with, attacking the shooter would most likely have only gotten them killed. Just because he had their back to them doesn’t mean he couldn’t have easily have turned around.

Esthier on April 17, 2007 at 11:40 AM

They were in a building which taught enginering and besides I don’t care if all they had was the chair they were sitting on to use as a weapon so be it.
But if you can sleep at night knowing that while you sat and did nothing your friends and fellow students were being murdered right across the hall from you then so be it.
Personally I think I could sleep a little better knowing I tried to do something. And if he wheels on me I would hoep somebody who is now behind him would attack. Sometimes all it takes is one person to take action to inspire others.

LakeRuins on April 17, 2007 at 11:46 AM

Taznar, Esthier,
My point was not that their were eye witnesses to the shooting. I was responding to;
Remember where you’re talking about. This is a college dorm. Many people are already out on campus, so they aren’t there to interview. Communication on campus wasn’t the best to recall the dorm residence. Additionally, the dorm had to be secured before they could start interviewing people. At this point, everyone in the dorm is a potential suspect until cleared. Processing a homicide scene can take many hours. The police have to consider illegal search issues to insure they don’t screw something up. Additionally, we don’t know he was the boyfriend. He may have just thought he was. Plus, you assume there were witnesses to the shooting. From my dorm days, at that time of the morning, if you weren’t in class or the cafeteria, you were alseep.
By Catseye
So, my point was that folks were around, which you both seem to agree with. As I wrote earlier;
Humm, Harper Hall and Ambler Johnston are right next to each other. I just don’t understand why the cops didn’t have this guy in the first hour. Loner or not. He was seeing a popular girl. Folks would have known who he was.
So Taznar are you saying that you wouldn’t know anything about the folks that lived across the hall? At my school, those folks were you’re friends. Friends know who friends are dating.

Rustyw on April 17, 2007 at 11:46 AM

And by the way, these are still kids here. We expect our military men and women, even those of college age, to be able to handle these situations but only because they’re trained to do so.

It’s likely that many of the students in there had never even seen a gun before. At least one of them was brave enough to try and save the others in the room with him.

Esthier on April 17, 2007 at 11:47 AM

Just speculation:

Google Hanchongnyon

Speakup on April 17, 2007 at 11:47 AM

None of this makes any sense. Why would he remove the serial numbers, but carry around the receipt for the guns?

Rick on April 17, 2007 at 9:49 AM

Maybe the same sense as killing 33.

Wade on April 17, 2007 at 11:47 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6