Video: Gwen Ifill outs Imus apologists Tim Russert, David Brooks

posted at 6:00 am on April 16, 2007 by Ian

Washington Week managing editor Gwen Ifill specifically named Tim Russert and David Brooks as two people who have been silent on the Imus issue, but could have spoken up. Russert and Brooks have appeared on Imus’ show several times and did not have any vocal reaction to the former radio hosts’ racially insensitive remarks while the rest of the world couldn’t stop talking about it.

Transcript:

MS. GWEN IFILL: You know, it’s interesting to me. This has been an interesting week. The people who have spoken, people who have issued statements, the pop—the people who haven’t. There’s been radio silence from a lot of people who’ve done this program who could’ve spoken up and said, “I find this offensive” or “I didn’t know.” These people didn’t speak up.

Tim, we didn’t hear that much from you.

David, we didn’t hear from you.

What was missing in this debate was someone saying, “You know, I understand that this is offensive.” You know, I have a seven-year-old goddaughter. Yesterday, she went out shopping with her mom for high-top basketball shoes so she can play basketball. The offense, the slur that Imus directed at me happened more than 10 years ago. I like to think in 10 years from now that Asia isn’t going to be deciding that she wants to get recruited for the college basketball team or be a tennis pro or go to medical school and that she’s still vulnerable to those kinds of casual slurs and insults that I got 10 years ago, and that people will say, “I didn’t know,” or people will say, “I wasn’t listening.” A lot of people did know, and a lot of people were listening, and they just decided it was OK. They decided this culture of meanness was fine until they got caught. My concern about Mr. Imus and a lot of people and, and a lot of the debate in the society is not that people are sorry that they say these things. They’re sorry that someone catches them.

When Don Imus said this about me when I worked here at NBC, when I found out about it, his producer called and said, “Don wants to apologize.” Well, now he says he never said it. What was he apologizing for? He was apologizing for getting caught, not apologizing for having said it in the first place. And that, to me, is the debate that we need to have. David’s right, about the culture of meanness, about the culture of racial complaint, about the internal culture in our community, about the way we talk to one another. But this week, just this week, it was finally saying “Enough.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

But this week, just this week, it was finally saying “Enough.”

I agree. Enough!

stonemeister on April 16, 2007 at 6:08 AM

Russert, LIAR, Bigot, fool, still a partisan Democrat.

Brooks, RINO, bigot, and fool.

They deserved what Ifil gave them — and much, much more.

georgej on April 16, 2007 at 6:49 AM

I think we can officially declare the 1st Amendment repealed.

Halley on April 16, 2007 at 7:13 AM

Good grief. This thing is spinning wildly into the PC Holy of Holies here. What Imus said about the Rutgers team was outrageous and he deserved everything he got. But that should be the end of it. These political whores who show up on his show are there for one reason and one reason only…to get air time. For people like Brooks, Gregory, and Russert to now assert that they didn’t know what his show was about is pure garbage. They don’t CARE what his show is about as long as it sells a couple more books, gets a couple more votes, gives them a few minutes of free airtime.

Sharpton and Jackson saw this train wreck happen and jumped on it with both feet as if the Rutgers team needed their assistance. I think the Coach and players handled this appropriately and a just outcome was had. I don’t think Sharpton nor Jackson had anything to do with the final outcome…they just did what they do…stir the racial pot for the sole purpose of getting their own names in the headlines.

A pox on all their houses. If only they would reserve this level of discussion for the barbarians and the very real threat they pose to us.

I wonder how much Rove spent to create all this mess…hmmm….

Pilgrim on April 16, 2007 at 7:39 AM

Imus vs Sharpton. Minority Liberals vs White Guilt Liberals. Heh. Gotta love it. As AP once said it’s like watching a war where I don’t really care who wins or loses I just hope there are lots of casualties.

Imus is embarrassing to them because it holds up a mirror to Leftist world that blatantly points out they view everyone through skin color first long before they worry about their character–and yet everyone else is supposed to be racist.

Faith1 on April 16, 2007 at 8:24 AM

What was the slur that Imus directed towards Ifill ten years ago?

greggish on April 16, 2007 at 8:33 AM

This morning on MSNBC, instead of Imus live is a collection of greatest hits mixed with long winded editorial fluff regarding his evil ways. His old time slot has becomd a media substitute for sticking someone’s head on a pike. Pig-pile stage two including the inquisition of all the slavers that knew or associated with the I-Man and have yet to confess. I wonder when Reverend Al will appear in public in the robes of the inquisitor?

Take heed ye vile, white villains and leaveth thee the foul word, wit and impudence towards Black women to Black males. artists.

Hening on April 16, 2007 at 8:45 AM

Wow, a political commentator remembers something someone said about her ten years ago? And she’s still holding the grudge? If Michelle Malkin held a grudge against everyone who said something mean about her, I think she wouldn’t have any brain cells (or time) left over for anything else! Gwen Ifill doesn’t strike me as being that thin-skinned. Either this is on-air therapy and she’s confessing that the bully scored a point on her all those years ago, or it really must have been a doozy to stick with her like this. Either way, she’s dredging it up by encouraging people to Google it and find out what has clearly been forgotten by everyone but her.

aero on April 16, 2007 at 8:51 AM

Just so we’re clear, I was totally unnecessarily going over the top to make a joke, and there wasn’t any real sentiment there in that ribbing.

RightWinged on April 16, 2007 at 2:38 AM

Yes, I figured that, so I followed it with continuing it. LOL.

amerpundit on April 16, 2007 at 8:52 AM

Just so we’re clear, I was totally unnecessarily going over the top to make a joke, and there wasn’t any real sentiment there in that ribbing.

RightWinged on April 16, 2007 at 2:38 AM

Yes, I figured that, so I followed it with continuing it. LOL.

amerpundit on April 16, 2007 at 8:52 AM

Yeah, wrong thread. Sorry.

amerpundit on April 16, 2007 at 8:56 AM

I think Imus called her the cleaning lady. Imus was offensive, but he was liberal, so all these holier than thou luminaries excused his behavior. They just wanted to appear hip and cool.

This is red on red, and like the above poster, I am hoping for lots of liberal casualties.

Stormy70 on April 16, 2007 at 8:57 AM

If Michelle Malkin held a grudge against everyone who said something mean about her, I think she wouldn’t have any brain cells (or time) left over for anything else!

I think the name calling fueled Michelle’s brilliant comeback to Malik Shabazz. If she hadn’t had all these disgusting comments directed at her, I’m not sure she could have pulled off a rebuttal so utterly dead on.

I’m not saying being called names is a good thing, but when it does happen it might even make you stronger.

wryteacher on April 16, 2007 at 9:34 AM

Halley

rethink your comment, calling someone a moron or even stupid is different that a ho or cleaning lady

EricPWJohnson on April 16, 2007 at 9:38 AM

As AP once said it’s like watching a war where I don’t really care who wins or loses I just hope there are lots of casualties.

[The] Imus [incident] is embarrassing to them because it holds up a mirror to Leftist world that blatantly points out they view everyone through skin color first long before they worry about their character–and yet everyone else is supposed to be racist.

Faith1 on April 16, 2007 at 8:24 AM

Two perfect points. Well said, Faith.

Jaibones on April 16, 2007 at 10:02 AM

I do not want political discourse in America reduced only to items that do not offend Gwen Ifil or her basketball shoe wearing granddaughter.

JayHaw Phrenzie on April 16, 2007 at 10:06 AM

Pwned!

I was trapped last week at the in-laws’, where Imus is a morning staple. My God, it was obscene: Imus sitting there like a whipped dog listening to regular (and white liberal) caller after regular (and white liberal) caller school the I-man on just how hard it is out there for a pimp. ‘Cause they know. They’ve been there.

Mike Barnicle couldn’t do enough to convince Imus that there is no hell more agonizing than being black in America today.

saint kansas on April 16, 2007 at 10:23 AM

Oh, by the way: Gwen Ifil?! This most apalling affirmative-action hire should stick to reading the politically correct news and stfu. She’s no better than the local news nitwits here in Chicago.

Jaibones on April 16, 2007 at 10:25 AM

Imus is like Archie Bunker a equal opportunity comedic bigot.

Wade on April 16, 2007 at 10:34 AM

What a Massive load of BS that interview roundtable was.

You’d think Imus was just captured for mass murder.
Those dim-wits sure are eating crow or acting the uppity
student caught sneaking out late to the girlfreinds room.

G.I. Get over it girl. Your Not That Wonderful. . . .

Texyank on April 16, 2007 at 10:34 AM

Nothing has been gained by stringing up Imus. A pretty little hanging party, full of gawkers and chest-thumpers, that’s all. The only take-away from all this is the idea that when one uses his God-given freedom of expression to express things that God would disapprove of, he tarnishes and degrades that freedom, and in some cases, he destroys it.

Thanks Imus for abusing your freedom of speech, to the detriment of us all. Thanks Jesse and Al for exploiting this moment in history for your own profit, further damaging free expression.

Everyone’s dirty on this one.

spmat on April 16, 2007 at 10:46 AM

Texyank,

You can agree or disagree but she was called a cleaning lady as uncalled for remark

Imagine a conservative

EricPWJohnson on April 16, 2007 at 11:07 AM

I agree with those that say that this Imus incident is turning into a bunch of self righteous hypocritical crap. Don Imus is Hitler number two! Oh those poor poor blacks who are once again being beaten on the plantation. BS! It was “enough” only because it was once again turned into the this racial beating at the hands of a WHITE man. When was the last time there was such an outrage 24-7, where people got fired and had everyone in a tizzy because of what a black man said? Oh that’s right blacks can’t be racist and they NEVER say such things. It may be enough but after a couple of weeks when the rappers are still rapping and the Jesse and Al show are still living in the limelight of Imus and BET and others talk shows are still talking about racist crap. Then what?

Altura Ct. on April 16, 2007 at 11:10 AM

Imus probably mistook Gwen Landfill as the cleaning lady when he saw her entering the building with her broom.

Wade on April 16, 2007 at 11:23 AM

Ya know, I’d like to see someone do a vid (still learning) of people apologizing after getting called out vs those apologizing right after they’ve said something. I think I’ve seen Bill O do that, like the beat right after he says something or like after he calms down.

- The Cat

MirCat on April 16, 2007 at 11:24 AM

You can agree or disagree but she was called a cleaning lady as uncalled for remark

Imagine a conservative

EricPWJohnson on April 16, 2007 at 11:07 AM

Well ! Whoppie Doo. She was called a cleaning lady.
S F W I’ll see if I can find that in any
of the lyric these Rap crap artists
use. Must be in at least one. Huh ! !

Texyank on April 16, 2007 at 11:27 AM

In Gwenworld, when Asia starts playing basketball, the opposing stands will be screaming at her “You ALMOST made that basket, and you TRIED REALLY HARD!!!”

That, or all those mean-inducing sports will have been eliminated, and athletic scholarships will be given out for playing healing sports like Earthball.

eeyore on April 16, 2007 at 11:29 AM

I like to think in 10 years from now that Asia isn’t going to be deciding that she wants to get recruited for the college basketball team or be a tennis pro or go to medical school and that she’s still vulnerable to those kinds of casual slurs and insults that I got 10 years ago, and that people will say, “I didn’t know,” or people will say, “I wasn’t listening.”

A call to arms for the thought police if ever I heard one. Ms. Ifill, you have every right to be offended by offensive things. You have NO right to demand insulation from ever being offended, and certainly you have NO right to try to create a world where such offenses are made criminal, or are somehow prevented.

When a Christian speaks up and says that things like Imus, Howard Stern, South Park, or whatever are offensive because they are immoral, vulgar, or obscene, we are told to shut up and turn the dial. When you listen to Imus, if you think you aren’t going to hear offensive things you are an idiot, because you have provided the culture for his offensive nature to thrive, and screamed “First Amendment!” to back you up. Now that it is your ox being gored, it’s no longer about his freedom, it’s about your feelings, and he’s got to go.

/rant

Freelancer on April 16, 2007 at 11:37 AM

Brooks and Russert are nothing more than freaking nappy haired crackers. And now that I think about it so are Sharpton and Jackson.

They are all freaking porch crackers.

there it is on April 16, 2007 at 11:57 AM

Is this serious enough for Russert and Brooks to have to make a pilgrimage to the Sharpton Shrine of Supplication?

eeyore on April 16, 2007 at 12:10 PM

Oh my God… I’m sorry.

I didn’t imemdiately and soundly denouce Imus for what he did.

Please don’t fire me.

Really, I didn’t much care. I don’t listen to Imus, and a shock-jock saying something rude & stupid is normal. But apparently my not saying anything is racism of the nth degree, and a violation of the thought-crime based racism decrees of 2007.

Take me away for my thought crimes against humanity. Place me in a thught-crime prison… I’d like to be around people who think.

gekkobear on April 16, 2007 at 12:25 PM

My daughter played college softball which like basketball requires a serious commitment to the team and studies. And I don’t care what the NCAA says, these teams regularly violate NCAA rules in order to be competitive. These gals work like dogs on their off time without official team involvement. That is the only way to be competitive.

Anyway, she wants to know what the big deal is. If these gals got to where they are at in college sports, I guarantee you being called nappy headed ho’s is nothing compared to the criticizm they get concerning things that have a direct reflection on them personally. And that would be their performance on the court.

These gals weren’t scarred for life, but they were manipulated by the powers that be at their university to turn this into a week long recruitment stunt for Rutgers.

“Nappy headed ho’s” my a$$!! Call them a bunch of slack, lazy, ball players that don’t deserve to play against the real teams that get all the top high school players, and I guarantee you, that you’d get genuine indignation.

Every parent of every high school player in the country heard this coach talk about how much she values the trust placed in her by the parents of her players. That is a powerful statement in the world of high school and college athletics. I’d bet dollars to donuts the Rutgers athletic department gets a huge influx of recruiting videos from every corner of this country.

So spare me the fake outrage Ifill.

csdeven on April 16, 2007 at 12:49 PM

What a Massive load of BS that interview roundtable was.

You can see the same load of BS every week on MTP.

Anyone else tune-in to MSNBC this AM to see what programming would replace Imus?

In case you missed it, they had three hours of David Gregory and friends talking about Imus. Brilliant!

fogw on April 16, 2007 at 12:50 PM

Hey Gwen, don’t you have some laundry to clean and fold???

Andy in Agoura Hills on April 16, 2007 at 2:22 PM

I don’t want to live in a world where I can only listen to things Gwen Ifill thinks are funny.

Jim Treacher on April 16, 2007 at 3:54 PM

This woman is so full of sh$te, her eyes are brown.

Oh, does that make me a racist?

tickleddragon on April 16, 2007 at 4:16 PM

Wow.

This is disgraceful.

Ifill is absolutely right. Imus has been slurring people for a long time, and I am glad she pinned some ears back. Maybe this doesn’t offend some of you without any kids, but he called my daughter a nappy headed ho I’d want to knock him on his ass.

And I would find that funny.

Maybe you also would not be offended by Imus calling Howard Kurtz a “boner nosed jewboy” but that offends me too.

It’s wrong. It’s been wrong for a long time. There is a reason I have referred to that self-righteous dope as “Anus in the morning” for many years.

THE question to ask Sissy Matthews, David Gregory, and especially John F’n Kerry is why THEY weren’t offended by this crap in the past.

drjohn on April 16, 2007 at 6:15 PM

Wow.

This is disgraceful.

Yup, sure is.

Speakup on April 16, 2007 at 6:29 PM

If free speech only applied to people who don’t say things you don’t like, we wouldn’t need it.

Jim Treacher on April 16, 2007 at 7:07 PM

I think we can officially declare the 1st Amendment repealed.
Halley on April 16, 2007 at 7:13 AM

Bull, Halley. Free speech? It was HATE speech. IF you think that should be OK, then walk up to a black woman and call her that. I dare you.

Dr John? That was Howard Stern, the original Stern, that imus was referring to.

Mazztek on April 16, 2007 at 7:09 PM

This woman is so full of sh$te, her eyes are brown.
Oh, does that make me a racist?
tickleddragon on April 16, 2007 at 4:16 PM

No, but it makes you a jackass. Prove her wrong.

Otherwise, you have slandered her.

Mazztek on April 16, 2007 at 7:11 PM

Maybe Russert thought he was going to get subpoenaed again…

Seixon on April 16, 2007 at 7:11 PM

“Where the speech is corrupted, the mind is also.” –
— Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Wade on April 16, 2007 at 9:27 PM

Dr John? That was Howard Stern, the original Stern, that imus was referring to.

Fair enough. The source I read said Kurtz. It changes nothing. It’s offensive.

Imus has gotten to think that he was invulnerable- that he could say absolutely anything he wanted and was immunized by the good things he did.

Doesn’t work that way.

Still, it’s the collective umbrage NOW that is miserably and suffocatingly hypocritical.

And I am bothered by the racism on display on this thread. I’d hoped that participants here were better than that.

drjohn on April 16, 2007 at 10:39 PM

I don’t think drjohn is funny. In fact, I find his intolerance for opposing views of humor quite offensive.

Ban him please.

B Moe on April 16, 2007 at 11:42 PM