Report: Thousands of Iraqi Shiites training for war in Iranian camp
posted at 8:50 pm on April 14, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Not the first time we’ve heard this.
“This is a new plan now for the Mahdi Army, it is part of a new strategy,” he said. “We know we are against a strong enemy and we must learn proper methods and techniques.”…
Abu Rafed [a Mahdi Army veteran] estimated a total of almost 4,000 Iraqi Shias, including “many important Mahdi Army leaders”, had received training there last month alone, living at the camp for weeks at a time. He said the number of Iraqi Shias arriving there had increased significantly since the start of the “surge” in February…
Abu Amer said: “The training was done by Iranian Revolutionary Guards. I saw Iraqi fighters from Missan, Basra, Diwaniyah and Nasiriyah [areas of southern Iraq]. They were mainly Mahdi Army, but not all of them.” More Iraqi Shias had sought military instruction, he added, after the 2006 bombing of the Samarra shrine, the event widely blamed for triggering widespread sectarian war between Iraq’s Sunnis and Shias.
The camp is in a town called Jalil Azad, outside Tehran. An independent expert on al-Sadr interviewed for the piece goes out of his way to say this doesn’t mean the mullahs are sponsoring it. Really? There’s massive paramilitary training going on outside the capital by members of the country’s most elite force and the Iranian government is indifferent in the matter?
According to the two JAM sources, the training emphasizes use of explosives and attacks on helicopters as “preparation for the time when we will have a big battle with the occupiers.” That time might be getting close: one of the Sadrist MPs promised today that they’re going to pull out of Maliki’s coalition soon if he doesn’t turn on the Americans, which presumably means the JAM will be back on the streets in force shortly thereafter. Al Qaeda’s trying to draw them out, too, setting off a car bomb today at a bus station 600 feet away from one of the Shiite shrines in Karbala. If they manage to hit one of them, or one of the shrines in Najaf — and given the emphasis lately on high-profile attacks, including another bomb on a bridge today, they must be trying — Sadr will have to take the gloves off.
Meanwhile, WaPo breaks down the split between Sunni insurgents and AQ that I’ve been writing about lately. Here’s the lay of the land right now:
The emerging confrontation between the Sunni groups and al-Qaeda in Iraq is the latest addition to a dizzying mosaic of battle lines. U.S. troops and Iraqi security forces are fighting al-Qaeda fighters, Sunni groups and Shiite militias. Shiite militias are combating Sunni insurgents and al-Qaeda. In the south, the Shiite militias fight each other for control. In the west, Sunni tribal leaders are suspicious of Sunni parties inside the government. And in the north, tensions are rising between the Kurds and neighboring Turkey. Oil-rich Kirkuk itself is a flash point as Arabs and Turkmens clash with the Kurds over the city’s future.
Sunni politicians are trying to get them to unite under one banner to make negotiation easier, but most are unwilling to cede any of their own turf. There’s also a problem with some groups being split between those who oppose and support AQ. After the parliament cafeteria bombing, a “senior Sunni politician” told the Guardian that he knows for a fact they’ve infiltrated his own security detail. Quote: “It is getting very, very difficult to spot.”
I’ve got no exit question so I’ll leave you with this grimly fascinating piece about what it’s like to be a detective these days in Iraq. CSI: Baghdad would be a very different kind of TV show, needless to say.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Yep, definitely time for a hippopotamus documentary.
RedWinged Blackbird on April 14, 2007 at 8:58 PM
What kind of college degree is needed to make such an informed conclusion (non-conclusion)? My HS education is showing again I guess.
Limerick on April 14, 2007 at 9:18 PM
So why don’t we just bomb this camp?
januarius on April 14, 2007 at 9:28 PM
Because it’s in Iran, and we wouldn’t want to commit an act of war or something.
Canadian Imperialist Running Dog on April 14, 2007 at 9:41 PM
Three words …………… MOAB, MOAB, M.O.A.B.
PinkyBigglesworth on April 14, 2007 at 9:50 PM
Follow up, What? Would the say they will go to War with us? People, they have been at war with us since 1978, don’t you think it is about time we start fighting back?
PinkyBigglesworth on April 14, 2007 at 9:53 PM
Meanwhile, the U.S. Administration has begun a new program called “Draft a liberal.”
Connie on April 14, 2007 at 10:02 PM
Daisycutter = Peace on Earth and good will to Islam.
Hening on April 14, 2007 at 10:07 PM
Sometimes it seems like it will never end unless it ends for every person on Earth.
What is the solution? …other than a small asteroid impaling planet Earth right in the center of the Middle East.
SilverStar830 on April 14, 2007 at 10:07 PM
Can you believe Moqtada al-Sadr still is breathing? I can’t either.
tommy1 on April 14, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Interesting times indeed.
techno_barbarian on April 14, 2007 at 10:37 PM
Good news weekend. Thanks AP for slogging through all this. I hope they’re paying you well.
spmat on April 14, 2007 at 11:13 PM
After reading all of this, does anyone else get the feeling that, even if we leave on a good note, the whole thing is just going to collapse into a power struggle? I really try to hold out for hope. I truly believe our troops are doing the absolute best jobs they can. But, at the end of the day, are the power-struggles in play going to win out?
thedecider on April 15, 2007 at 1:10 AM
Well if we knew anything about borders, we catch them there. But between the Afghan/Paki border and our own border with Mexico, we haven’t got a freakin’ clue.
These make no sense, they’re mad at US because AQ blew up something? For get 18 provinces, Iraq needs to be reorganized into 3 states within one federal nation, each with it’s own soccer team, let ‘em settle their score on the soccer field … if only it were that easy.
Tony737 on April 15, 2007 at 1:45 AM
It’s really up to the Iraqi’s, isn’t it? We can drag them to water, but we can’t make them drink. This, I think, is a harder task than winning our own Revolution; at least in that we had some extraordinary men on our side. Can it be done? Sure, but the Iraqi’s at some point will have to decide that they want to be a good nation, and eliminate their troublemakers, just as we had to eliminate most of our Tories.
It’ll be bloody, I bet.
Vanceone on April 15, 2007 at 1:47 AM
“The camp is in a town called Jalil Azad”
And why isn’t Jalil Azad a pile of rubble right now?
georgej on April 15, 2007 at 8:42 AM
The Iraqis are fighting hard. You just don’t hear about it because it isn’t always about death and destruction and that is all the MSM wants. May god have mercy on them.
tomas on April 15, 2007 at 10:09 AM
Ironically, the Sunni/AQ side of the problem sounds like it is fixing itself. Iran is stirring the pot amongst the Shia so our biggest problem will be maintaining scurity to convince the Shia to support the gov’t. If the majority of Shia don’t feel like the gov’t can keep them secure then we might as well leave.
Again, it all goes back to Iran and when we started to hit them at home either directly or, more likely, by openly supporting/arming dissendents.
Bill C on April 15, 2007 at 3:51 PM
Pinky, three words, ICBM, ICBM,ICBM
Viper1 on April 15, 2007 at 6:03 PM
Comment pages: