She is a ditz.

EnochCain on April 13, 2007 at 9:38 AM

Indeed. She couldn’t even explain the term ‘conservative’, if pressed hard.

You think you got problems? I found myself agreeing with Ann Coulter. Sweet mother of God!!!!

honora on April 13, 2007 at 11:13 AM

Miracles happen…Imus bringing people together…

- The Cat

Then can you at least blame her for being a duplicitous twit? It’s a little silly to portray moral and ethical umbrage when you are admitting to a double standard. Sometimes you have to take a stand. Ah, well, this is the lovely Elizabeth. Vacuous but lovely.

Glynn on April 13, 2007 at 9:50 AM
No, I can’t. What I can do is say that she should’ve firmly declined to comment on internal policies at her company because she is not authorized to speak on such matters. Not every question that an interviewer or host asks must be answered. It’s only professional.

James on April 13, 2007 at 10:50 AM

In my opinion, she should have declined to comment on anything at all if she wasn’t prepared to take on everyone who is doing it. What’s only professional? Compromising your principles to keep your job? I am not sure I follow here.

A friendly face,” Ian? Do you agree with Al Sharpton? On Monday, this absolute ditz and FAKE conservative was cheering on Al Sharpton and how happy she was that he was involved in pressuring for Imus’ hiring. Even Baba Wawa and Joy Behar were aghast at her cheering for him and her utter ignorance about Sharpton and his racism and anti-Semitism. This girl’s only achievements were coming in 4th on Survivor and marrying the worse quarterback brother of a terrible quarterback. She’s a total dummy until she gets the talking points.

Just love how she attacks America’s “history of persecution of large groups,” too. Too bad we don’t persecute ditzes. They’re a large group, and they even have a representative on the View (her).

And FYI, she praised Al Gore’s fake-umentary, a soap opera’s promotion of a transsexual character, and a number of other liberal things.

Ian, with “friends” like this airhead, who needs enemies?

Debbie Schlussel on April 13, 2007 at 11:42 AM

I used to think you were kind of hard on Elisabeth, Debbie. I now see you were right all along. I never thought she was the brightest. Now I see not only is she not the brightest, she isn’t much of anything at all.

This is exactly what I was thinking. She can talk over Sean Hannity but not Rosie? Suuuurrre.

Watching her last night, was like listening to a 16 year old talk about racism after 10 years of attending our reeducation Government school system.

She was supposedly hired to express her opinions but she spouts nothing but talking points and really has no POV of her own.

She rationalized real racism while supporting the hypocrisy of firing Don Imus after the thundering storm of piling on by the real race hustlers Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson

What a spineless, disgusting, passive dolt.

She seems a little naive at times (probably because she is quite young).

lynnv on April 13, 2007 at 9:27 AM

Actually, she’s 30. Not so “young.” Just a dummy . . . regardless of age. Don’t look for that to change when she’s 40 or 50.

Just love how she attacks America’s “history of persecution of large groups,” too. Too bad we don’t persecute ditzes. They’re a large group, and they even have a representative on the View (her).

And FYI, she praised Al Gore’s fake-umentary, a soap opera’s promotion of a transsexual character, and a number of other liberal things.

Ian, with “friends” like this airhead, who needs enemies?

Mmmm. Oy. Ok, you know what it takes for me to say this…..I agree with Colmes, too.

amerpundit on April 13, 2007 at 10:27 AM

You think you got problems? I found myself agreeing with Ann Coulter. Sweet mother of God!!!!

Yes, O’Donnell, Behar, and Colmes are on the opposite side from The Irreverent Sharpton and Jackson.

You’ve got to love that.

Then can you at least blame her for being a duplicitous twit? It’s a little silly to portray moral and ethical umbrage when you are admitting to a double standard. Sometimes you have to take a stand. Ah, well, this is the lovely Elizabeth. Vacuous but lovely.

Glynn on April 13, 2007 at 9:50 AM

No, I can’t. What I can do is say that she should’ve firmly declined to comment on internal policies at her company because she is not authorized to speak on such matters. Not every question that an interviewer or host asks must be answered. It’s only professional.

I wonder how much Mooves is going to pay “Shakedown” Jackson?

Had Hasslebeck uttered “ching chong” does anyone doubt she’d be gone long ago?

Ameritrade order for today:

Sell 800 shares of Hasselbeck at market.

Come on guys! Of course she isn’t going to diss Rosie. It would be like you going off on your boss or a co-worker.

This is a great job. She is paid alot of money. She isn’t going to screw that up.

Then she should have kept her mouth shut about Imus. It shows nothing but craven cowardice to kick someone who is down and who can’t strike back while giving a pass to another who had done the exact same thing many times only because of personal reprecussions.

Good for the goose, good for the rotund blob of goo.

dalewalt on April 13, 2007 at 10:17 AM

Probably, and I don’t really care why they cut Imus off. If they wanted to knuckle under pressure, they have my blessing to do so. I think Imus got what he deserved.

Darth Executor on April 13, 2007 at 10:13 AM

Don’t misunderstand me; I don’t think what Imus said is OK. But CBS and MSNBC knuckled under to pressure generated in large part by Jackson and Sharpton.