Video: Does Nancy Grace rape puppies?

posted at 6:05 pm on April 13, 2007 by Allahpundit

Prove that she doesn’t.

Update: Can a disgraced, race-baiting, cancer on his profession actually be criminally prosecuted for his cancerousness?

Why, yes. Yes, he can.

Update: Jummy comments, “speaking of, i’d be curious to see how impartial the daily show was at the onset of the case.” So would I.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Grace is a tool. I’d love to see one of these on the Olberfarce.

elpresidente on April 13, 2007 at 6:13 PM

How dare he insult that precious woman. That sweet, sweet beacon of all that is right and good and pure and full of justice! How dare he not respect her authoritah!

thedecider on April 13, 2007 at 6:14 PM

Jon really skewers her and deservedly so.

Benaiah on April 13, 2007 at 6:15 PM

That’s gonna leave a mark.

Blacklake on April 13, 2007 at 6:22 PM

That was beautiful.

JaHerer22 on April 13, 2007 at 6:24 PM

Pigs and acorns and all that. Funny stuff.

spmat on April 13, 2007 at 6:25 PM

I didn’t pay attention to Fox’s coverage of Duke. Did they jump on the “THEY’RE GUILTY!!!” bandwagon all along? It just seemed odd that Stewart would single them out like that when it seems like that’s what the more leftist news outlets were doing.

tikvah on April 13, 2007 at 6:28 PM

I didn’t pay attention to Fox’s coverage of Duke. Did they jump on the “THEY’RE GUILTY!!!” bandwagon all along?
tikvah on April 13, 2007 at 6:28 PM

Not that i saw. But the droolers that make up the daily show audience want to hear the faux news jokes, so that’s what little johnny boy gives them. Grace and stewart deserve each other, both their schticks have gotten old and annoying.

forged rite on April 13, 2007 at 6:38 PM

Nancy who?

crosspatch on April 13, 2007 at 6:38 PM

Couldn’t happen to a nicer gal.

Citizen Duck on April 13, 2007 at 6:39 PM

Nifong spent the afternoon in front of the State Bar committee watching his lawyer try to parse the meaning of “reasonable time” and “critical stage.” The committee responded that “an uncharitable person” might think he was hiding evidence and one of the members called him “scary.” Nifong’s motion to dismiss the ethics charges was itself dismissed. See you at the trial. KC Johnson liveblogged.

Quisp on April 13, 2007 at 6:40 PM

Thanks, forged rite, that’s what I figured.

tikvah on April 13, 2007 at 6:54 PM

speaking of, i’d be curious to see how impartial the daily show was at the onset of the case.

jummy on April 13, 2007 at 7:04 PM

jummy on April 13, 2007 at 6:39 PM

LMAO! There wasn’t much difference between her and the actual Nancy Grace.

thedecider on April 13, 2007 at 7:24 PM

Jon finally gets something right. Just wished it happened more than once a blue moon. Nice crack on the Imus stuff. It’s always amusing when the left starts to eat their own.

Jiggity on April 13, 2007 at 7:32 PM

The last part was priceless, i.e. how Nancy Grace “handled” the dismissal.

She’s humiliated, and rightfully so.

thirteen28 on April 13, 2007 at 7:33 PM

How do we know that those no-good, dirty rotten, low-down puppies won’t rape Nancy Grace? After all, some of the puppies might be rich, white, lacrosse playing collegiate athletes. Maybe we should do some DNA analysis.

CyberCipher on April 13, 2007 at 7:48 PM

Classic. I loved it.

Glynn on April 13, 2007 at 8:14 PM

It just seemed odd that Stewart would single them out like that when it seems like that’s what the more leftist news outlets were doing.
tikvah on April 13, 2007 at 6:28 PM

I think Grace is on CNN if that’s what your referring to.

Jon usually gets it right, and yeah, it’s usually left of center. But he uses the ammunition given to him. It’s not hard to find examples of politicians acting foolishly, no? But he does give it hard to the Dems from time to time.

SouthernDem on April 13, 2007 at 9:13 PM

Poor little Puppy!
Dam You Nancy!
Dam you to hell!

Mazztek on April 13, 2007 at 9:36 PM

Nancy Grace is a little hooded-eyed viper who will bite anyone, anytime she gets the chance!

NEMETI IN SYRACUSE on April 13, 2007 at 9:43 PM

Quisp, thanks for that link. Fascinating.

TheBigOldDog on April 13, 2007 at 9:52 PM

i’ll do some more searching in a bit, but this so far appears to be the clip of record regarding the daily show’s take on the duke rape hoax. it mocks the cable news media’s handling of it, but all it appears to presume of the case is that allegations of rape should be handled with some gravity. it’s from the week after the hoax became the big story and mocks nancy grace in particular, so, unless there’s something else out there predating november 2006, i’d say the verdict is “not guilty”.

jummy on April 13, 2007 at 10:50 PM

Isn’t she the same one that badgered a woman to suicide?

– The Cat

MirCat on April 13, 2007 at 11:43 PM

Actually very funny……… nice.

How about reporting all the success in Iraq, then doing the same to the MSM and the Democrats?

What success? What, you have not received fair, objectionable, true reporting of the number of terrorists killed, detained, the rebuilding of the country? What, you have only heard every news story of every casualty of American and Coalition forces on a day to day basis like they were traffic accidents in your local newsw, as they report a war? What? You don’t have the clear facts of what is actually going on?

My point, to the point……….

PinkyBigglesworth on April 13, 2007 at 11:55 PM

Ah, Nancy Grace…her track record on predicting high-profile cases seems to be less-than-stellar…

And it seems that any time anyone criticizes Jon Stewart and the Daily Show for content, he always comes back with “…my show isn’t a ‘real’ news show”, and that gets him off-the-hook.

JetBoy on April 14, 2007 at 12:04 AM

“…my show isn’t a ‘real’ news show”, and that gets him off-the-hook.
JetBoy on April 14, 2007 at 12:04 AM

I agree – it’s lame. He knows very well his audience takes his “news” stories much more serious than that. To deny culpability is hypocritical. I catch the show now and then, but I know it’s political humor, and I know it leans to the left.

thedecider on April 14, 2007 at 12:18 AM

@ thedecider…

Good point…a lot of people, mostly college-age from what I understand, see the Daily Show as their main source of current news.

JetBoy on April 14, 2007 at 12:36 AM

I think Grace is on CNN if that’s what your referring to.
SouthernDem on April 13, 2007 at 9:13 PM

Mmm, no, I meant the clip he showed of Shep “revealing” the identity of the accuser.

tikvah on April 14, 2007 at 1:14 AM

Shep explained along with the announcement that it is Fox’s policy not to reveal the identity of victims of sexual assault & rape, & also noted that she had already been identified by several other news outlets.

Since it was determined that there was no crime committed, she obviously cannot be a victim & therefore is not covered by this policy.

DJ Dubya on April 14, 2007 at 11:24 AM

Bravo Jon! Awesome takedown. My heartfelt sympathies also extend to Wendy Murphy (not!).

RD on April 14, 2007 at 4:49 PM

It wasn’t just Nancy Grace that went off the deep end, trying these innocent players in the media. Initially,Greta Van Susteren, Kimberly Guilfoyle(the ormer under wear model) and Lis Wiehl all had decided they were guilty before they had their day in court.

I have yet to see one of them apologize. The underwear model even had the unmitigated gaul to go on Hannity and criticize the media for having it all wrong last week. This, after her repeated appearances where she portrayed the Duke lacrosse players as rapists or worse.

I hope each and every one gets sued in a civil court for libel and slander.

ScottyDog on April 15, 2007 at 8:11 PM