Empirical evidence of the vast gulf between conservative, and liberal. It is worth remembering that empiricism does not hold that we have empirical knowledge automatically. Rather, for any knowledge to be properly inferred or deduced, it is to be gained ultimately from one’s sense-based experience.

k2comp on April 11, 2007 at 1:02 PM

Never taken a philosophy class have you, specifically one in Logic…

Ultimately knowledge is known through reason. We know there are no square circles by logic, not experience. We can not know any truth empirically, we know it logically. We can empirically place data into logic, but not the other way around.

As an ode to all the ridiculous hysteria surrounding all the recent racist remarks made by people (Imas, Richards, etc.); I encourage you to read this article from Stand To Reason:
Hate Crimes Are Not About Hate
by Gregory Koukl

The result of criminal…

- The Cat

“I have a problem with you downplaying racism.”

An extremely revealing comment by someone who loves to perpetuate the “victim culture” in the African-American community.

P.S. Great screencap!

They don’t actually think it makes the argument more relevant. It’s just that they would have a hard time in an argument getting away with just sticking their fingers in their ears and screaming “La La La La La!!! I can’t hear you!!!!”

eeyore on April 11, 2007 at 1:12 PM

Didn’t Terrel actually do that once? Oh wait, I’m sorry, he hung up. He was on the Sean Hannity Show with Jesse Lee Peterson, and I guess he didn’t like what they were saying, so he hung up.

“Racism is alive and well in this country”

… because I refuse to stop playing a victim to it!

Great clip of Leo Terrell on Hannity and Colmes last night. He keeps reiterating that Byrd and Clinton are “private citizens,” even after Hannity starts laughing. Great stuff. …

Terrel and Huffington, throw them a little bait and they go on a feeding frenzy. The volume goes up, and their intellect goes down.

Therefore: An increase in liberal volume is in direct inverse proporton to liberal reasoning.

A new science is born. Based in fact…or as they put it; based on an inconvienient truth.

“racism is alive and well in this country”

And being propagated by those who hide behind it. Leo Terrell almost seems like he doesn’t get enough racism.

Meanwhile, he’s personally perpetuating the myth of the unthinking “angry black man.” Ironic, ain’t it? Terrell is probably personally responsible for more real racism than Imus could ever imagine.

But I love Terrell – love, love, love him. He’s on my list of wonderful, wacky liberals, along with Rosie the Realist and Michael “I Ate Pittsburgh” Moore. And, of course, the Great Goracle himself.

I love all of these people, because together and collectively, they work a thousand times harder than Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter combined to keep liberalism at bay.

Someday, some smart liberal might suddenly wake up and realize that if they put a muzzle on these people … they might win more elections. I fear that day, I really do. Liberalism is dangerous, and folks like Terrell expose the danger, and keep the country in some kind of balance. People like Terrell and Michael “Dude, I ate your car” Moore kept Kerry out of the White House. How could I not love them?

I swear to God I keep looking for wires in the back of Terrell’s (and Rosie’s) head … connected to the Rovian Remote Control device … because we all know that these people do more to elect Republicans than anybody else.

Preach on, Terrell. Truth to power. Damn the white man!

And I heard on the radio today (sorry, no link) that one of the Rutgers players has said she’s ‘scarred for life’.

Poor girl. Maybe she should sue!

Next time take your lithium.

Only white people (or oero’s… if I may use that term…) can be racist right?

Why do liberals think that shouting makes their message some how more relevant
LakeRuins on April 11, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Because if you’re not completely outraged, you’re not paying attention. Didn’t you know that, LakeRuins?