Breaking: NC Attorney General dismisses charges in Duke lax case; Update: Shepard Smith explodes over Nifong; Update: Wormy Duke prez acts contrite
posted at 2:40 pm on April 11, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
He’s speaking live now and lowering the boom on Nifong and the accuser. He actually said he believes the kids are innocent, which he didn’t at all need to do, as Ace explains.
Stand by for amazing video.
Update: The clip is uploading. Here’s the transcript while you wait.
Update: Here you go. Money: “We believe that these cases were the result of a tragic rush to accuse and a failure to verify serious allegations. Based on the significant inconsistencies between the evidence and the various accounts given by the accusing witness, we believe these three individuals are innocent of these charges.” Note the line later on, too, about caution and bravado.
The clip has been slightly edited for brevity.
Update: While this is going on, race-baiting New York Times sports columnist/liberal caricature Selena Roberts is tut-tutting Don Imus for his insensitivity.
Update: Shepard Smith is identifying the non-victim for the first time on Fox News as I write this. Needless to say, it wasn’t a big secret.
Update: Awesome.
Update: Sweet — Collin Finnerty just thanked KC Johnson for all his hard work on their behalf. The left being what it is, that work’s going to go on.
Update: Slublog forwards the statement from Duke president Richard Brodhead, who’s quick to note that he’s always presumed them innocent and not so quick to note that he didn’t think to mention that back when he was in full racial and gender damage-control mode last April.
Update: My mistake — Brodhead did nod at the possibility that the three might be innocent last April, eleven paragraphs after he started in on his Teachable Moment bilge.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
A green light for lawsuits against Nifong and co.
Kokonut on April 11, 2007 at 2:41 PM
The accuser will probably go the Tawana Brawley route:
Convert to Islam, move to another state, and ignore all subpoenas in the civil suits.
Valiant on April 11, 2007 at 2:45 PM
Justice!
crowemate1 on April 11, 2007 at 2:45 PM
Where do they go to get their reputation back?
Paging Mr Sharpton, Al Sharpton, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
LakeRuins on April 11, 2007 at 2:48 PM
live news conference feed on foxnews
infidel4life on April 11, 2007 at 2:50 PM
“in the best interest of justice not to bring charges” against Crystal Gail. He basically said she’s mentally ill. (side issue: does she still have custody of her kids?)
Quisp on April 11, 2007 at 2:50 PM
Not to bring charges….?
Nappy…
Ok. I won’t say it.
Kokonut on April 11, 2007 at 2:52 PM
The AG says that the accuser may actually believe the many stories she has told.
Sounds like just a nice way of saying that she is a freaking nutcase.
infidel4life on April 11, 2007 at 2:53 PM
So when is Crystal Gail Magnum up for indictment?
tommy1 on April 11, 2007 at 2:55 PM
Now if the Duke 88 had any sense of decency they would all resign and Nifong will be disbarred.
TheBigOldDog on April 11, 2007 at 2:58 PM
He out for that was saying the investigators think it may be possible she believers her different stories.
TheBigOldDog on April 11, 2007 at 2:59 PM
Bout damn time.
Bad Penny on April 11, 2007 at 3:03 PM
I don’t believe she believes and I think that is lame. I think she was clearly looking for a civil suit payday.
tommy1 on April 11, 2007 at 3:04 PM
It is about time…Nifong must be prosecuted by the DA and then sued in civil court.
The Duke 88 must apoligize…they should also be suspended or terminated….they should have to meet with the 3 players and I wish them well in their lawsuit…
robo on April 11, 2007 at 3:06 PM
Her real name is not Crystal Gail Magnum. Its Janette Rivers. Now that she is no longer a “victim” and is in fact a criminal, her real name should be used.
BelchSpeak on April 11, 2007 at 3:07 PM
Let the recriminations begin. Wouldn’t it be fun to see 88 Help Wanted postings for Duke University go up on Monster.com?
Jaibones on April 11, 2007 at 3:07 PM
Why don’t you just call it a non-nappy phone, you racist.
/sarc
mattshu on April 11, 2007 at 3:10 PM
That’s raaaaaaacist.
In other news, about time. Although, the unhinged left are claiming the “rich whiteys” got away with it.
Enoxo on April 11, 2007 at 3:10 PM
I hope the coach of the team gets his job back. He was actually fired over this incident.
Enoxo on April 11, 2007 at 3:12 PM
My question also!!! This will follow them all thier lives. Sue that SOB Nifong!!
ChrisIansNana on April 11, 2007 at 3:13 PM
Would YOU go back to work at Duke?
Quisp on April 11, 2007 at 3:16 PM
Enoxo…will the coach sue to get the job back? Will he simply just sue the University? Has he filed a lawsuit?
Kokonut on April 11, 2007 at 3:16 PM
I think Crystal Gail Magnum is her real name and Janette Rivers was the “stage” name.
I picture the North Carolina AG Roy Cooper scanning the news waiting for a time when there is enough going on so that this story would be buried. “Imus, Birkhead’s the dad! Ok now.”
Anybody up for TPing Wendy Murphy’s house?
Bill C on April 11, 2007 at 3:17 PM
Don’t be so fast to say racist he didn’t put any emphasis on the word “white”. It’s a line you hear in airports and such. I thought it was funny. It didn’t matter what color the phone was.
ChrisIansNana on April 11, 2007 at 3:18 PM
This AG wants to run for governor in 08, he’s a dem too and this state has been screwed by dems. needless to say this is smart politics on his part.
jp on April 11, 2007 at 3:21 PM
We haven’t heard or seen from the coach since he was fired. But if I was him, I’d sue the University, and the 88 for wrongful termination and defamation of character.
He’s likely still without a job because of the predetermined circumstances.
Enoxo on April 11, 2007 at 3:28 PM
That was a joke. :) You know, because everyone always jumps the gun on the slightest appearance of anything and calls it racist.
Enoxo on April 11, 2007 at 3:29 PM
Nifong is just another power hungry, say anything, do anything political hack. These students at Duke were just grease for his treads to get reelected. And yes I do hold the black community in the area responsible. He played them like a violin and used their own prejudices to get reelected. Like it or not bigotry and racism are not the exclusive property of any one group of people.
Now, when is the African-American or black community going to get tired of acting with a herd mentality and start applying some critical thinking skills to lifes decisions. I suggest they start by reading this book by Herman Cain, a black Republican.
LakeRuins on April 11, 2007 at 3:32 PM
I think the most important lesson one can take from this tragedy of justice is the how effective the constant drumbeat of the new media has become in exposing the self-centered and shameful actions of “Lawyers Gone Wild”.
fogw on April 11, 2007 at 3:33 PM
Some members of the faculty still have doubts:
Quisp on April 11, 2007 at 3:34 PM
Funny. A “Crystal Magnum” is what you drink champagne out of. How did her family know to give her a stripper name at birth?
BelchSpeak on April 11, 2007 at 3:37 PM
Rot in hell Nifong.
WisCon on April 11, 2007 at 3:42 PM
Crystal Gail Magnum the next generation of Racism
Kini on April 11, 2007 at 3:48 PM
And why not show a picture of her lying ass or will that ruin any chance for a movie deal where she gets to tell her side of what happened on the Lifetime Channel and make more than she could earn in a lifetime of stripping!
Dread Pirate Roberts VI on April 11, 2007 at 3:52 PM
Whoops. I misspelled it. It should be Mangum. Still, very stripperesque.
Next on our list of victims to Prosecutors gone wild should be Ramos and Compean.
Bill C on April 11, 2007 at 3:53 PM
I guess they already had a Nosmo King in the family.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on April 11, 2007 at 3:54 PM
Folks,
I know her name was an open secret for months on the Web, but I’m really concerned by the precedent set by Fox and our own News & Observer (which helped gin up all the hysteria to begin with) of outing her.
Publishing her name strikes me as a punitive act, one that sets a bad precedent.
Real rape victims are going to see her name dragged through the mud, and my fear is that an under-reported crime will become even more under-reported, as legitimate accusers of real rapists will think this could happen to them if the police can’t build a rock-solid case.
Perhaps that is not a logical fear, but deciding to bring rape changes (or not) is an emotional decision, not a logical one.
As for Mangum herself, I fear for her physical safety. I don’t know that anyone will attempt to harm her, but once she see’s her name plastered all over the media, she may attempt to harm herself.
No good will come from how this is being treated.
Bob Owens on April 11, 2007 at 3:58 PM
The case is over, there are no future charges against the men she wrongfully accused and has all but held hostage for the past year.
Damn right it’s a punitive act, and it should be. There should be some justice for the three men who’s reputations she has raped for the past year.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on April 11, 2007 at 4:09 PM
Gee Bob, how do you think the Duke players who have been INNOCENT the entire time have felt?
WisCon on April 11, 2007 at 4:11 PM
I think she should be more concerned for her mental health rather than any possible physical danger she could be in. She obviously needs serious professional help.
infidel4life on April 11, 2007 at 4:14 PM
Uh, maybe the falsely accused Duke lacrosse players feared for their lives after Nifong turned the incident into a racist assault, and stirred the pot of the black community in his wreckless campaign to get re-elected.
Who plastered the lacrosse players names all over the media, and who’s fault was that?
fogw on April 11, 2007 at 4:15 PM
The Rape Shield law is what empowered her to begin this travesty and allowed Nifong to think that he might get away with it.
Three young men had their lives derailed for over a year and almost destroyed WHEN THEY DID NOTHING ILLEGAL.
No good will come of shielding people that make false accusatons.
One of the most disgusting things to come out of this is that people are more worried about the impact on future potential rape victims than the actual consequences of what was done to these THREE INNOCENT MEN.
I like to believe that the same standards of witness and testimony apply to all crimes and all victims. The Justice System can’t be titled in any groups favor. The law must be blind to gender. Otherwise we get more false prosecutions like this case.
Rape is one of the most horrifying thing that can happen to any human being, but being falsely imprisoned for decades in a hell like maximum security prison when you have done no crime, is worse.
JayHaw Phrenzie on April 11, 2007 at 4:16 PM
I agree with Bob. In many cases I am sure there really is not enough evidence to go forward, though something indeed happened. Do we want women to be routinely “outed” if their cases do not proceed throught the criminal justice system, for whatever reason?
RW Wacko on April 11, 2007 at 4:16 PM
Dave Evans is speaking at the press conference now. What an incredible young man. (He’s also the one who spoke at length last year about their innocence.)
IrishEi on April 11, 2007 at 4:18 PM
Bob Owens,
I can’t believe you are being serious? First of all, the boys were innocent. Mangum committed fraud and stirred up racial hatred. And you fear for the woman who brought these accusations?
The woman is a drug using prostitute who lies and steals from her johns. Her vile accusations brought a lynch mob of Black Panthers to the area to threaten the lives of college boys.
BelchSpeak on April 11, 2007 at 4:18 PM
Showing concern for future rape victims does not mean anyone is less concerned about the three lax players.
RW Wacko on April 11, 2007 at 4:18 PM
I think the accused Duke players were fearful of their lives when the Black Panther Party came to town and almost started riots at the school against them.
The rape shield law needs to be expanded and protect the accused, as well, until the time comes that it is proven the accused did commit a crime. Far too many people have had their lives ruined on false charges.
Enoxo on April 11, 2007 at 4:20 PM
In this case, yes, because of the media circus that this has been. Unless it is loudly shouted to the heavens that these men are innocent it could effect their entire lives. Limiting their job opportunities, etc.
This woman could of stopped this nonsense at any time, she is as guilty as Mike Nifong.
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on April 11, 2007 at 4:20 PM
Good link. OMG! She’s a nappy…oh, best not go there.
Cheers!
jaleach on April 11, 2007 at 4:22 PM
So who determines which accusers get outed? Shouldn’t it be black and white (no pun intended? Kobe Bryant’s accuser was outed, now this woman is outed…
If it is 100% certain she lied, she should be prosecuted, which would remove her anonymity. I was attacked by a few black guys years back (not rape, I’m a dude), and in the paper it identified me as a student, not by name. No charges ever came of it. Because no charges came out of it, would it be fair to publish my name? We all know, in this day and age to know one’s name is to know everthing about them, including where they live.
Kobe Bryant’s accuser was threatened with death by several disturbed individuals. Rape shield laws are designed to prevent this type of abuse. Just my opinion, I respectfully disagree with some of you.
RW Wacko on April 11, 2007 at 4:29 PM
The legal system in this country is based on the right to face your accuser and the process being completely transparent (i.e, public).
TheBigOldDog on April 11, 2007 at 4:33 PM
Wow, Shep almost blew a gasket.
Someone needs to get him and Geraldo and O’Reilly in the same room with a bong and some good bud.
infidel4life on April 11, 2007 at 4:36 PM
In the case where the women lie and knowingly drag the names and lives of innocent men through the mud, you’re damn right I want those women routinely outed. This wasn’t simply a case where there was a lack of evidence to convict, this was a case where the available evidence all pointed to the innocence of the players, yet this (numerous expletives deleted) chose to press forward with this case, be it for malice, greed, or whatever reason. She did so with no regard whatsoever for the lives of the innocent, the damage to race relations in the community, or the damage to the justice system. She could have stopped at anytime, yet she chose to push the case forward, changing her story to fit new facts as they emerged. This was an egregious case of knowingly and falsely accusing someone of rape.
She deserves to be outed and humiliated to the maximum extent possible. God may have mercy on her soul, but she certainly deserves none whatsoever from earthly beings.
And everything I said applies to Nifong as well, many times over, as he had the authority of the legal system behind him and abused it flagrantly. If there is anyone who deserves to be raped and beaten in prison more than he does, I certainly haven’t heard about them.
thirteen28 on April 11, 2007 at 4:37 PM
Who do Rape Shield Laws apply to? Hmm…. The Press? Do you know that citizens have absolute immunity to post whatever they want on blogs? Court rulings affirm that.
Secondly, in both cases, the motivation of the accuser was suspect, as were their morals. The worst thing is to use the “rape shield” law to smear and defame people with false accusations of rape. Such accusations are way too serious to level them at someone maliciously.
BelchSpeak on April 11, 2007 at 4:40 PM
Dear Messrs. Gutfeld and Levy,
Please please PLEASE lampoon this tonight on RedEye.
Thank you,
Your fans and friends at HotAir.com
ScottMcC on April 11, 2007 at 4:43 PM
The legal system should be predicated on the opportunity to kick Mike Nifong’s ass for being such a douchetool.
benrand on April 11, 2007 at 4:43 PM
Apart from Nifong’s malfeasance, and apart from the the criminal laying of a false charge by Mangum (or whatever her name is…she isn’t to be prosecuted anyway), I have another question.
Duke University. They bailed on these guys at the first rumour of trouble. Forget presumption of innocence. Forget their reputations. They suspended them immediately. Mighty big of them to invite them back last January…I honour the guys for not returning.
But, is there any action that can betaken against the University? Do they get their tuition back from last year? What about the year of their lives? The reputation?
Duke University is supposed to have one of the best law schools in the United States….what happened to the “golden thread” that runs through the common law?
Apart from suing Nifong until he squeals, I hope soomeone takes a good strong run at Duke. And if they do, no sealed settlement…I would like it to be made public.
Oh yeah….and good work Shep Smith.
Blaise on April 11, 2007 at 4:44 PM
What’s going on over at Fox? Did things go so well with O’Reilly and Geraldo that they’ve circulated a memo advising everybody to just yell more? Or is Shep just trying it on for size? Can we all look forward to a KP vs. MM screaming match? (Incidentally, have we ever even seen KP angry? Damn tolerant liberals!)
Blacklake on April 11, 2007 at 4:56 PM
You have the right to face your accuser in a court of law, not the press.
Y’all are right, though, in that rape shield laws as they apply to the media, or even self-imposed media restrictions, usually no longer apply after a case has been dropped.
False accusers, like this woman, ultimately deter women from pressing charges. They should be prosecuted.
RW Wacko on April 11, 2007 at 5:00 PM
Why should there be a shield when there was no rape?
Dudley Smith on April 11, 2007 at 5:02 PM
When the Durham truth movement comes to be, what will they call their documentary, Loose Screw???
rw on April 11, 2007 at 5:05 PM
I understand what you are saying. I just believe that rape is a crime that is different from all other crimes, in that the majority of victims are afraid/embarrassed to even lodge a complaint. Imagine a scenario where a woman is raped, files a complaint, but it never goes to court. That doesn’t mean a rape did not occur, only that there was not enough evidence to bring it to trial. BTW, I’m not talking about the Duke case! Yes, that does actually happen. Publishing details about these women deter other women from coming forward. I just think rape is a special case where it is better to shield everyone’s identity, unless the “victim” is prosecuted for filing a false report. The accused can still face their accuser in a court of law if it comes to that.
RW Wacko on April 11, 2007 at 5:12 PM
sbrover@duke.edu
Generally, I have found that most people — even leftist professors and newspaper propagandists — will engage in meaningful discussion, if you don’t attack them, or use profanity.
Jaibones on April 11, 2007 at 5:16 PM
I hope Nifong homesteaded.. he he he
Maggot deserves everything hes gonna get..
Viper1 on April 11, 2007 at 5:19 PM
So let’s see:
1) Party excesses of Duke atheletes: wrong
2) False accusations of stripper seeking a payoff: wrong
3) Investigators that can’t produce a coherent case: wrong
4) Over-zealous prosecutor looking to cash-in: wrong
5) Mishandling by Duke university officials: wrong
6) MSM capitalizing on the frenzy throughout: wrong
What did I leave out?
I hope the DNA analysis was done correctly. Hard to imagine (statistically) that anything else could go wrong here.
CyberCipher on April 11, 2007 at 5:21 PM
Allah, in between all the pandering Brodhead did say this:
RW Wacko on April 11, 2007 at 5:27 PM
The only problem is, it happens 11 paragraphs into the statement, after he says stuff like this:
Rape is the substitution of raw power for love, brutality for tenderness, and dehumanization for intimacy. It is also the crudest assertion of inequality, a way to show that the strong are superior to the weak and can rightfully use them as the objects of their pleasure. When reports of racial abuse are added to the mix, the evil is compounded, reviving memories of the systematic racial oppression we had hoped to have left behind us.
And this:
In regard to men’s lacrosse, I have announced today that the men’s lacrosse season and all associated activities have been cancelled. Lacrosse coach Mike Pressler submitted his resignation today to Athletics Director Joe Alleva and it was accepted, effective immediately.
And then this:
I assure you, however, that the Duke disciplinary system will be brought to bear as soon as this can appropriately be done.
Only then does he get around to the weak-tea defense of the presumption of innocence.
Slublog on April 11, 2007 at 5:31 PM
I suggested a way to get back at Duke and “The 88,” yesterday.
The parents of these 3 men should rent as many billboards in the Raleigh/Durham, NC area and post a simple message:
“Duke University, their president, and the following group of instructors rushed to judgement and publicly libeled our sons by wrongfully accusing them of rape.
These people are:
name and title 1, name, etc. 2, name, etc. 3, name, etc. 4, name etc. 5, name etc. 6, name etc. 7, name etc. 8
We, the parents of the defendants call for the immediate firing of these instructors from Duke University.”
Rotate all 88 names through the list, changing the billboard each month. Rent 11 billboards (or as many available) and saturate the county with as many different combinations of names as there are billboards rented.
From my own advertising experience using billboards, they will probably have to sign a contract for a year. But that’s okay, because for 12 months, 11 bill boards will be displaying the names of EVERY ONE of those 88 who PUBLICLY signed that newspaper advertisement.
The billboard’s message is non-slanderous. The 88 made themselves part of the public record with THEIR public document. And there is NOTHING that they can do about it except live every day for the next 12 months knowing that people are reading their name on a billboard that identifies them as a defamer.
This is the downside for those “brave” liberals who think they can publicly attack people with their “truth to power” nonsense and get away with it. These “teachers” can be and should be held accountable for their actions.
And as a finale, file a defamation suit against all 88.
georgej on April 11, 2007 at 5:31 PM
I think she was egged on by the ‘Reverend’ Jesse Jackson, who probably coached her into believing in the payout at the end.
I hope that everyone who should be held accountable for this miscarriage of justice is held accountable – the accuser, Nifong, his DNA Lab co-conspirator, the ‘Reverend’, the Duke faculty that wrongly asserted the boys guilt, and everyone else who piled on at the beginning of this mess. Lots of apologies and LOTS of money should be exchanged.
Watch Duke – it will be interesting how they handle the coach that was fired…
Timothy S. Carlson on April 11, 2007 at 5:32 PM
Heh – I just looked up Mike Nifong’s political affiliation.
Imagine my surprise that he is a Dhimmicrat…
It all makes sense now – Dhimmicrat District Attorney, defending the honor of a disadvantaged black women who was savaged – YES! SAVAGED!!! – by rich white boys (who are more than likely Republicans).
DOH!
Timothy S. Carlson on April 11, 2007 at 5:37 PM
As a resident of North Carolina, and not that far from Durham, I can already feel my tax burden going up, once the players (rightly) sue the pants off of Nifong and the Durham DA’s office.
William Teach on April 11, 2007 at 5:43 PM
Unimportant
Hopefully they all learned a lesson…
ar_basin on April 11, 2007 at 6:01 PM
Jackson shaking the hands publicly of the accused men, and Sharpton congratulating them on finding justice on his radio show, would go a long, long way towards improving race relations in NC as well as the whole country. It’s WJWD.
shuzilla on April 11, 2007 at 7:25 PM
…while politely removing the dagger from thier backs…
despite the libel and despicable acts of those rushing to the gallows…
Sorry, I think some of your post got lost in the Goracle’s internets. :P
CBarker on April 11, 2007 at 7:54 PM
Well, that was pretty unequivocal.
Christoph on April 11, 2007 at 8:17 PM
William Teach, as a fellow North Carolinian (Raleigh), I will be happy to pay that little extra in taxes to watch Durham, Duke, Nifong, Mangum and the Duke 88 get their a$$es sued off. But personally..I think that most of the tax burden should come on the backs of the jerkoffs in Durham who elected Nifong and fanned all this racial idiocy. Unfortunately, I’ve got liberal friends in that town that would be sharing that burden. Oh well…
tickleddragon on April 11, 2007 at 8:31 PM
The associate press story on this is ridiculous.
I lost track of how many times they said it brought attention to the privilege of college athletes and the gap between the working blacks and the rich white students in the area.
How did this case highlight any of those things?
The athletes privilege? Their season was canceled. They were indicted on the flimsiest of evidence. Their school suspended them. The faculty and students protested against them (again, all without evidence). What special privilege did these boys have for being on a sports team?
The gap between the working blacks and the rich white students? Well, there was a gap in ethics between the stripper and the college boys, but, I don’t think that’s what they meant.
Plus, the AP story points out how they “don’t name the accuser in sex crime stories”. That’s such a crock. The name of the accuser in a rape case is protected. However, once the accusers story unravels and it’s apparent that she/he was making up stories against innocent people, why do they merit the protection?
This whole thing is such a travesty.
JadeNYU on April 11, 2007 at 8:35 PM
I will not be holding my breath awaiting this moment.
JayHaw Phrenzie on April 11, 2007 at 8:43 PM
Not a good day for the race baiters.
Zorro on April 11, 2007 at 9:52 PM
Jackson and Sharpton are too busy basking in the glow of the firing of a two-bit shock jock to be bothered with this.
.
The Machine on April 11, 2007 at 10:32 PM
The Lacrosse players had planned this episode, fully intended to have sex with these prostitutes, film it send it across campus
They are hardly heroes….
No they didn’t commit rape but their punishment should have been expulsion from the University
this was against the law and against any code of moral decency
EricPWJohnson on April 11, 2007 at 10:45 PM
If you can get expulsed from a University for attending a party where a stripper was present, America’s Universities will be pretty empty.
There was NOTHING, I repeat, NOTHING that any of these three INNOCENT men did that deserved a false accusation of rape, a false arrest, a phony indictment and over a year of having their names dragged through the dirt.
They are INNOCENT. They were falsely accused. PERIOD.
THe Villains are:
Mike Nifong
Crystal Mangum
Group of 88
The Lacrosse players are Innocent.
They have been cleared.
THEY DID NOT DESERVE IT!
Sheesh, I am so sick of the “They are no angels” crowd. Get a clue, 99.9% of us Human Beings, “are hardly heroes….”, but we do not deserve persecution for crimes we did not commit.
Self righteousness makes me ill.
JayHaw Phrenzie on April 11, 2007 at 10:51 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »