<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Mary Katharine Ham defends Michelle on CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:49:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gianni</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-354581</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-354581</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;John Edwards Second Life campaign HQ was vandalized. The fact that it was news is telling…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Except the person who admitted to doing it was a lefty...  hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>John Edwards Second Life campaign HQ was vandalized. The fact that it was news is telling…</p></blockquote>
<p>Except the person who admitted to doing it was a lefty&#8230;  hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nice Deb</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-353574</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-353574</guid>
		<description>Very well done, MKH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well done, MKH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxforce91</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352270</link>
		<dc:creator>foxforce91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352270</guid>
		<description>Ugh. It&#039;s just gross that these women think they&#039;re &quot;progressive&quot;. Most humans start off being rebellious, liberal teens - then they graduate, get a real job, pay taxes and become at least fiscally conservative. So, again, remind me, what&#039;s &quot;progressive&quot; about liberalism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. It&#8217;s just gross that these women think they&#8217;re &#8220;progressive&#8221;. Most humans start off being rebellious, liberal teens &#8211; then they graduate, get a real job, pay taxes and become at least fiscally conservative. So, again, remind me, what&#8217;s &#8220;progressive&#8221; about liberalism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BitsBlog &#187; Controlling the conversation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352207</link>
		<dc:creator>BitsBlog &#187; Controlling the conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352207</guid>
		<description>[...] Big props to Mary Katharine Ham for calling out the one-eyed, left-wing women bloggers (who still won&#8217;t admit their blind spot) and for demonstrating tough, but civil disagreement by example. Brava. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big props to Mary Katharine Ham for calling out the one-eyed, left-wing women bloggers (who still won&#8217;t admit their blind spot) and for demonstrating tough, but civil disagreement by example. Brava. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali-Bubba</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352087</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali-Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352087</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;WE LOVE MKH!!!! Love her, love her, love her!

But not in a creepy way.

Enrique on April 9, 2007 at 2:09 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Enrique&#039;s apartment has an altar with photos of MK pasted all over it, a screen playing continuous looped footage of her TV appearances, candles, pentagrams, etc. 

... but not &lt;em&gt;creepy&lt;/em&gt; or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WE LOVE MKH!!!! Love her, love her, love her!</p>
<p>But not in a creepy way.</p>
<p>Enrique on April 9, 2007 at 2:09 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Enrique&#8217;s apartment has an altar with photos of MK pasted all over it, a screen playing continuous looped footage of her TV appearances, candles, pentagrams, etc. </p>
<p>&#8230; but not <em>creepy</em> or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352086</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352086</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks for giving Arianna some ammo, Coronagold. 

dalewalt on April 9, 2007 at 1:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Amen. We don&#039;t need that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thanks for giving Arianna some ammo, Coronagold. </p>
<p>dalewalt on April 9, 2007 at 1:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen. We don&#8217;t need that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352078</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352078</guid>
		<description>The Deroy Murdock piece is just plain funny. 

Does anybody with a brain really doubt that it is clearly the left that is the party of racism, sexism, and bigotry? Is there even any doubt left on that question?

And isn&#039;t it deliciously ironic that they seem to just HATE Southerners .... and yet every Democratic president for almost 50 years has been a Southerner?

I wonder how that makes liberals feel - to know that they can&#039;t even win an election unless they nominate someone from the place they hate most .....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Deroy Murdock piece is just plain funny. </p>
<p>Does anybody with a brain really doubt that it is clearly the left that is the party of racism, sexism, and bigotry? Is there even any doubt left on that question?</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t it deliciously ironic that they seem to just HATE Southerners &#8230;. and yet every Democratic president for almost 50 years has been a Southerner?</p>
<p>I wonder how that makes liberals feel &#8211; to know that they can&#8217;t even win an election unless they nominate someone from the place they hate most &#8230;..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352041</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352041</guid>
		<description>&quot;Both sides do it&quot; is the payoff of projection.

Accuse your opponent of doing what you, yourself, are doing so that when you get caught you can cry &#039;Well both sides do it!&#039;.

Somehow I don&#039;t think Huffington often gets the kind of vile email calling her some of the things Michelle probably suffers on a daily basis from the left.  Some of the comments left at michellemalkin.com (back when it open) were extreamly offensive and disgusting.

Ann doesn&#039;t do it anonymously but firmly signs off on her statements right out in the open and stands up and takes and debates any heat which results without whineing about it &#039;well they do it to!&#039;.

&#039;Progressive&#039; is the new term for &#039;Socialist&#039; or &#039;Communist&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Both sides do it&#8221; is the payoff of projection.</p>
<p>Accuse your opponent of doing what you, yourself, are doing so that when you get caught you can cry &#8216;Well both sides do it!&#8217;.</p>
<p>Somehow I don&#8217;t think Huffington often gets the kind of vile email calling her some of the things Michelle probably suffers on a daily basis from the left.  Some of the comments left at michellemalkin.com (back when it open) were extreamly offensive and disgusting.</p>
<p>Ann doesn&#8217;t do it anonymously but firmly signs off on her statements right out in the open and stands up and takes and debates any heat which results without whineing about it &#8216;well they do it to!&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8216;Progressive&#8217; is the new term for &#8216;Socialist&#8217; or &#8216;Communist&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omnipotent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-352034</link>
		<dc:creator>omnipotent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-352034</guid>
		<description>If IMUS had called Condi a &quot;Nappy headed Ho&quot;, the MSM would be lining up to pat him on the back.

Sharpton and Jackson only care about $ not racism....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If IMUS had called Condi a &#8220;Nappy headed Ho&#8221;, the MSM would be lining up to pat him on the back.</p>
<p>Sharpton and Jackson only care about $ not racism&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351883</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351883</guid>
		<description>Babs wrote:&quot;Does anyone else cringe when the “progressive” term is used?&quot;

My favorite line about this is:
&quot;You&#039;re a Progressive? Great! So what you were doing before must have failed or not been good enough. When you finish progressing, what do you expect to be?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babs wrote:&#8221;Does anyone else cringe when the “progressive” term is used?&#8221;</p>
<p>My favorite line about this is:<br />
&#8220;You&#8217;re a Progressive? Great! So what you were doing before must have failed or not been good enough. When you finish progressing, what do you expect to be?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjohn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351882</link>
		<dc:creator>drjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351882</guid>
		<description>Where was Sharpton when Condi Rice was being racially assaulted by the left?

Where was Jesse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was Sharpton when Condi Rice was being racially assaulted by the left?</p>
<p>Where was Jesse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seejanemom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351881</link>
		<dc:creator>seejanemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351881</guid>
		<description>LOVE THAT LAST LINE, MKH....STICK IT IN AND TWIST IT!....

&quot;our place&quot; ...you did GREAT, girlie. Our &lt;a href=&quot;http://cotillion.mu.nu/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;COTILLION&lt;/a&gt; Google group is all lit up this morning with pride for you!!!!

You sounded very genteel and Southern in that segment. And SMART SMART SMART ....two things that are NOT mutually exclusive, but usually are assumed to be.

(But then again, Huffy sounds like she&#039;s drunk most of the time, so that didn&#039;t hurt.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE THAT LAST LINE, MKH&#8230;.STICK IT IN AND TWIST IT!&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;our place&#8221; &#8230;you did GREAT, girlie. Our <a href="http://cotillion.mu.nu/" rel="nofollow">COTILLION</a> Google group is all lit up this morning with pride for you!!!!</p>
<p>You sounded very genteel and Southern in that segment. And SMART SMART SMART &#8230;.two things that are NOT mutually exclusive, but usually are assumed to be.</p>
<p>(But then again, Huffy sounds like she&#8217;s drunk most of the time, so that didn&#8217;t hurt.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351879</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351879</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ignore them, delete their comments, ban them, but don’t react. 

Rick Donaldson on April 10, 2007 at 8:59 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In other words:  &quot;Don&#039;t Feed the Trolls!&quot;
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ignore them, delete their comments, ban them, but don’t react. </p>
<p>Rick Donaldson on April 10, 2007 at 8:59 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words:  &#8220;Don&#8217;t Feed the Trolls!&#8221;<br />
;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351778</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351778</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The liberal female blogger echo chamber...&lt;/strong&gt;

The techblogging elite, liberal femme bloggers, and their friends in the MSM are still yammering amongst themselves about the Kathy Sierra incident. Bloggers&#039; code of conduct. Civility badges. Blah blah blah. Big props to Mary Katharine Ham for callin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The liberal female blogger echo chamber&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The techblogging elite, liberal femme bloggers, and their friends in the MSM are still yammering amongst themselves about the Kathy Sierra incident. Bloggers&#8217; code of conduct. Civility badges. Blah blah blah. Big props to Mary Katharine Ham for callin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351699</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351699</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter doesn&#039;t hide.  That&#039;s the difference. I have been dealing for YEARS with &quot;anonymous&quot; people who leave rude, base, and just plain dirty statements about people on web sites.  They do it because they can hide.  (Well, they can&#039;t really hide, since we usually know who they are, IP addresses CAN be tracked down as well as locations and you know, people who post on web sites a lot have a pattern of posting, as well as writing patterns.)

Anyway, my mom used to say &quot;Sticks and stones&quot; etc about this sort of thing, but sometimes you really want to pick up the stick and stones and throw them back at the name callers, and that is honestly what they are looking for.  A reaction.

Ignore them, delete their comments, ban them, but don&#039;t react.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter doesn&#8217;t hide.  That&#8217;s the difference. I have been dealing for YEARS with &#8220;anonymous&#8221; people who leave rude, base, and just plain dirty statements about people on web sites.  They do it because they can hide.  (Well, they can&#8217;t really hide, since we usually know who they are, IP addresses CAN be tracked down as well as locations and you know, people who post on web sites a lot have a pattern of posting, as well as writing patterns.)</p>
<p>Anyway, my mom used to say &#8220;Sticks and stones&#8221; etc about this sort of thing, but sometimes you really want to pick up the stick and stones and throw them back at the name callers, and that is honestly what they are looking for.  A reaction.</p>
<p>Ignore them, delete their comments, ban them, but don&#8217;t react.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unabrewer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351539</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unabrewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351539</guid>
		<description>Hey, how does one get invited to these parties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, how does one get invited to these parties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351486</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351486</guid>
		<description>Methinks they protesths too much.... a sign of the times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks they protesths too much&#8230;. a sign of the times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rode Werk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351484</link>
		<dc:creator>Rode Werk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351484</guid>
		<description>There is a huge difference in what Anne Coulter does, and some buffoon hiding behind anonymity and spitting hatred. Cowardice must be seperated from people who stand up and defend what they believe.

MM and AC share some views, and seperate on others, but they do it without the comfort of an anonynous posting. Anne diliberately antagonizes, many times satirically, and usually gets her point across without paying homage to the PC police.  MM is more congenial, yet many times says the same basic thing, just nicer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a huge difference in what Anne Coulter does, and some buffoon hiding behind anonymity and spitting hatred. Cowardice must be seperated from people who stand up and defend what they believe.</p>
<p>MM and AC share some views, and seperate on others, but they do it without the comfort of an anonynous posting. Anne diliberately antagonizes, many times satirically, and usually gets her point across without paying homage to the PC police.  MM is more congenial, yet many times says the same basic thing, just nicer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351366</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;alflauren on April 10, 2007 at 12:22 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bad idea. Anyone can use your email address and name. You may be able to prove it didn&#039;t originate from the company but you may not get the benefit of the doubt.

Not comfortable with the idea of punishing people for having views you disagree with. Even those that are offensive. The other computer geeks who post here can attest to just how easy it is to do what I mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>alflauren on April 10, 2007 at 12:22 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bad idea. Anyone can use your email address and name. You may be able to prove it didn&#8217;t originate from the company but you may not get the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>Not comfortable with the idea of punishing people for having views you disagree with. Even those that are offensive. The other computer geeks who post here can attest to just how easy it is to do what I mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alflauren</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351358</link>
		<dc:creator>alflauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351358</guid>
		<description>For the most part, leftists are not shy about their opinions and many actually use their real names and e-mail addresses. Why not post the whole e-mails, just as they are received? Or perhaps forward them on to the IT department at so-and-so&#039;s employer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part, leftists are not shy about their opinions and many actually use their real names and e-mail addresses. Why not post the whole e-mails, just as they are received? Or perhaps forward them on to the IT department at so-and-so&#8217;s employer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351346</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351346</guid>
		<description>Vik_R, nice to see you on the site!

&lt;blockquote&gt;He brought canisters of NO2 to our parties ... It only kills a few thousand brain cells with each balloon.

natesnake on April 9, 2007 at 2:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You&#039;re not being serious, are you?  Dentists use it as legal quasi-anesthetic.  Doesn&#039;t seem right turning all those paying customers into zombies...

And for any newbies out there, the symbol ain&#039;t NO2.  If you want to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epa.gov/iaq/no2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;breathe in NO2&lt;/a&gt;, go stand next to a coal-burning power plant...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t try to sound black. Don’t try to sound like a tough guy with comments like “STFU” ...
Ouabam on April 9, 2007 at 2:25 PM

Hey bro, how do you sound black on a blog? &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Point taken... from now on, no typing black, I promise!  And no tough acros either... it&#039;s STPhU from here on out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vik_R, nice to see you on the site!</p>
<blockquote><p>He brought canisters of NO2 to our parties &#8230; It only kills a few thousand brain cells with each balloon.</p>
<p>natesnake on April 9, 2007 at 2:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re not being serious, are you?  Dentists use it as legal quasi-anesthetic.  Doesn&#8217;t seem right turning all those paying customers into zombies&#8230;</p>
<p>And for any newbies out there, the symbol ain&#8217;t NO2.  If you want to <a href="http://www.epa.gov/iaq/no2.html" rel="nofollow">breathe in NO2</a>, go stand next to a coal-burning power plant&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Don’t try to sound black. Don’t try to sound like a tough guy with comments like “STFU” &#8230;<br />
Ouabam on April 9, 2007 at 2:25 PM</p>
<p>Hey bro, how do you sound black on a blog? </p></blockquote>
<p>Point taken&#8230; from now on, no typing black, I promise!  And no tough acros either&#8230; it&#8217;s STPhU from here on out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Im_no_dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351263</link>
		<dc:creator>Im_no_dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351263</guid>
		<description>Oh, and MKH rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and MKH rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Im_no_dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351256</link>
		<dc:creator>Im_no_dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351256</guid>
		<description>Since fabulously-wealthy Arianna is Greek, does she have to buy her carbon credits in Euros? Can I still cash in a lira? 

It&#039;s nice that she deletes the objectionable comments about Cheney, but does she do the same for Michelle? (I&#039;m &lt;em&gt;really &lt;/em&gt;asking...I don&#039;t visit that siite.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since fabulously-wealthy Arianna is Greek, does she have to buy her carbon credits in Euros? Can I still cash in a lira? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice that she deletes the objectionable comments about Cheney, but does she do the same for Michelle? (I&#8217;m <em>really </em>asking&#8230;I don&#8217;t visit that siite.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lothar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351017</link>
		<dc:creator>Lothar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351017</guid>
		<description>Did you notice Arriana smaile when the reporter repeated the comment about Dick Cheney &quot;escaping&#039; assassination?

When exactly did Arriana lose her mind?  How obsessed was she with SUV&#039;s????  

I still have her book &quot;Greetings from the Lincoln Bedroom&quot;.   Maybe I should dispose of it somehow.   Is &quot;whip-it&quot; flammable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice Arriana smaile when the reporter repeated the comment about Dick Cheney &#8220;escaping&#8217; assassination?</p>
<p>When exactly did Arriana lose her mind?  How obsessed was she with SUV&#8217;s????  </p>
<p>I still have her book &#8220;Greetings from the Lincoln Bedroom&#8221;.   Maybe I should dispose of it somehow.   Is &#8220;whip-it&#8221; flammable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-351001</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 01:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/09/video-mary-katharine-ham-defends-michelle-on-cnn/#comment-351001</guid>
		<description>Imagine, all these years I&#039;ve been using whip cream on my strawberries!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine, all these years I&#8217;ve been using whip cream on my strawberries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
