If we are blown to bits or vaporized by our enemies, there will be issues that won’t matter anymore. The abortion issue, won’t matter if we been aborted by Islamo Nazi’s would it, unless you thinking we are being punished, I guess.

I am for survival of us all, less taxes and less government interference. I want people to want to have all the kids they want to have as long as they can afford it. Who is going to want to have kids if it is too dangerous a society we live in? We have an enemy to worry about. Everything else, will take care of itself in other ways.

Republicans lose when conservatives stay home and when the Republican gets challenged from the right. The lesson should be is that conservatism wins elections and Rudy just doesn’t cut it.

Don’t count out Rudy just yet and don’t worry about people bashing him. He’s been bashed before and he did quite well despite of it.

“The media” wants nothing more than to lock Rudy in as the Republican candidate which would assure them a liberal in the White House. The only two names they even mention is Giuliani and McCain. If you didn’t read the conservative blogs you wouldn’t even know Tancredo or Thompson exist.

Gregor on April 6, 2007 at 11:37 PM

True story

A guy can dream, can’t he?

Janos Hunyadi on April 7, 2007 at 3:41 AM

All fine points indeed, and clearly you’ve proved yourself much more educated then myself. I commend you for your unequaled accomplishments in life and I bow to your superiority. I could only wish to one day match your wit and wisdom, if only for a day.

I support Rudy, and I’m “freakin serious” about it–and I’m relieved that a moron like you cannot understand, and I’m not going to stop posting my views just because some drunk pops up with half-wit remarks

Why don’t you try calling me a troll again? That worked really well for you last time…….

Roe v. Wade is a done deal and will probably never be overturned; certainly, not in our lifetime. Like other controversial USSC decisions (Dred Scott, Plessy v. Ferguson) it will take a major act or a long passage of time to overturn Roe.

It took the Civil War and 660,000 American lives to overturn Scott.

It took almost 60 years to overturn Plessy, and needed a Chief Justice still suffering pangs of conscience over the Japanese-American internment to make it happen. It took another 10 years to pass the Civil Rights Act and, 43 years later we are STILL dealing with the fallout of Plessy.

I may be wrong, but obsessing about abortion and Rudy’s statements about it, is a waste of time.

Rather, we should be worried about what happens when President Giuliani is presented with a total and complete gun ban law for his signature, passed by a Congress run by Speaker Pelosi and Marjority Leader Reid.

There is very little we can do to reverse Roe for now, if ever. But we can prevent President Giuliani from signing a bill that bans all privately owned firearms by making sure that another Republican — one who actively supports the right to keep and bear arms and the Second Amendment — gets the nomination, and not Rudy.

My 2 cents.

Gregor, you’re as dumb as you ever were. Good luck being You

Janos Hunyadi on April 7, 2007 at 12:24 AM

LOL! Classic. I think I saw that same insult thrown out in the Gorebots gone wild post.

Nor shall I support him with cash, volunteer work or bumper stickers etc.

OH, if he gets the nomination, I’ll vote for him. But not happily.

Unless, maybe, he promises to get a REALLY vicious, patriotic Attorney General, and the both of them start enforcing the Logan Act and the other various treason and sedition laws, wherever they may lead (cough, Congress, cough); (cough, State, cough) ; (cough, NYT, cough). You know, I think I’d actually be willing to let Rudy have my firearms if I could see Pelosi, Murtha, McDermott, Rockerfeller, Sandy Burglar and a few others doing some hard time in prison.

“There must be public funding for abortions for poor women,” Giuliani says in the speech that is posted on the video sharing site YouTube. “We cannot deny any woman the right to make her own decisions about abortion.”

And later “But it is your choice, an individual right.”

That’s just straight-down pro-choice. And even if you thought baby-killing was in the penumbra of the emanations of the constition, that’s still different from a guarantee of free abortions. Otherwise where to I go to get my free press or my free gun. There is no way this guy is a conservative on this point, either social or fiscal.

This is nothing….. just wait.

PinkyBigglesworth on April 6, 2007 at 11:41 PM

Yep. Tip of the iceberg.

I have some more accurate and appropriate words for what the media is doing / trying to do to Rudy

Janos Hunyadi on April 6, 2007 at 9:29 PM

Are you freaking serious? You truly believe the media is bashing Rudy?! OMG! There might be some conservative blogs and conservative writers rightly bashing him on his non-conservative stances on various issues, but to suggest “the media” as a whole is bashing Rudy is like liberals believing the media slants to the right.

“The media” wants nothing more than to lock Rudy in as the Republican candidate which would assure them a liberal in the White House. The only two names they even mention is Giuliani and McCain. If you didn’t read the conservative blogs you wouldn’t even know Tancredo or Thompson exist.

januarius on April 6, 2007 at 9:10 PM

Where in the constitution does it say we can post anything on the internet we want to? Or that the airwaves can be government controlled? 90% of what the government does is not in the constitution, it falls under several catch all phrases like “pursuit of…”, or “life, liberty…”, that is what the courts do, interpret the constitution…right or wrong.

Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani speaks after picking up the support of South Carolina Treasurer Thomas Ravenel, far left during a news conference, Thursday, April 5, 2007, at the Statehouse in Columbia, S.C.
Giuliani: Take Me Or Leave Me…

I think a lot of the support for Rudy has to do with the fact that in this election, competence is going to trump ideology for many Republican voters.

I hope so, amigo. Otherwise, say hello to my leeetle friend: President Pantsuit

I think a lot of the support for Rudy has to do with the fact that in this election, competence is going to trump ideology for many Republican voters.

I was a bit put off by his comments regarding public funding for abortion, but I still like the guy quite a bit – because he fights. After seven years of a guy who worried more about a “new tone” than winning political battles, having a fighter in the White House would be a welcome change.

Ace thinks it got annoying a few days ago when people objected to Rudy saying he supports public funding of abortion but only in cases of rape, incest, or where the life of the mother is threatened, i.e., the current state of the law.

In other words, just what the Catholics and Christians think.

Rudy!-bashing starting to get annoying

Aww…

I have not noticed a proliferation of Rudy criticism. At least not more or less than any other candidate. It’s his turn in the news cycle. *shrug*

It seems you are sympathetic to Rudy Allah. Is it an Italian thing, a New York thing, or both?

Annoying? Finally? Thanks for the ‘heads-up’, AP: It was a lot more than Annoying a long time ago. I have some more accurate and appropriate words for what the media is doing / trying to do to Rudy

Dishonest; partisan; juvenile; petty; bitter; fear-mongering; race-baiting

…..and did I mention ‘dishonest’?