honora on April 4, 2007 at 12:51 PM

Having the respect of your own kind isn’t respect. It’s cronyism. It isn’t about piling on. You could disagree with her and leave out the extra adjectives that a lot of use to describe her.

We don’t need a counter balance here. This isn’t huffpo or dkos.

And I know you’re sorry. Now apologize. J/K! Couldn’t resist.

Really though. Think about how you present yourself here.

Well then why take a swipe at bush? If you really want to earn some respect around here agree with us when you agree instead of ALWAYS presenting the negative view.

Your “counter productivity” statement is without context and the ONLY way for you to get it into context is to go off topic. It would sure be refreshing to see you give Pelosi the criticizm she deserves even if you never believe in conservatism.

csdeven on April 3, 2007 at 10:34 PM

I think I have enough respect, and if not, I’ll live. Interesting that you refer to my opposing opinion as “negative”.

You’re right, I don’t post my negatives re Pelosi–why pile on? I provide a counter-balance. If that offends you, I am sorry.

Well then why take a swipe at bush? If you really want to earn some respect around here agree with us when you agree instead of ALWAYS presenting the negative view.

Your “counter productivity” statement is without context and the ONLY way for you to get it into context is to go off topic. It would sure be refreshing to see you give Pelosi the criticizm she deserves even if you never believe in conservatism.

csdeven on April 3, 2007 at 10:34 PM

Good post cs.

It seems many on the Left can’t shake their Bush Derangement Syndrome, at any time, to offer intellectual honesty.

Yes I am. And I don’t think this trip is productive. My comment on Bush being the very embodiment of counter-productivity is not in conflict with that POV.

honora on April 3, 2007 at 3:54 PM

Well then why take a swipe at bush? If you really want to earn some respect around here agree with us when you agree instead of ALWAYS presenting the negative view.

Your “counter productivity” statement is without context and the ONLY way for you to get it into context is to go off topic. It would sure be refreshing to see you give Pelosi the criticizm she deserves even if you never believe in conservatism.

Honera,

Aren’t you put off by Pelosi’s silliy remarks about there being a new congress in town? Her waving around the gavel like a little kid who got what they wanted for christmas? Bribing members of her own party with silly pork to pass a bill that hasno chance of passing?

Yes I am. And I don’t think this trip is productive. My comment on Bush being the very embodiment of counter-productivity is not in conflict with that POV.

Nancy’s Chamberlain moment.

What message could Nancy possibly deliver, other than “We’re weak-kneed idiots, please come and attack us”?

As the gal at Pelosi’s San Fransisco office told me…”If Bush wont talk to Assad, then speaker Pelosi must!”.

csdeven on April 3, 2007 at 12:42 PM

Are you serious?? Pelosi has no authority to go off and do this (and neither does anybody else in Congress). Where’s the outrage? Pelosi (and the other members of Congress) doing this is the equivalent of Bush drafting legislation and passing it all by himself.

Aren’t you put off by Pelosi’s silliy remarks about there being a new congress in town? Her waving around the gavel like a little kid who got what they wanted for christmas? Bribing members of her own party with silly pork to pass a bill that hasno chance of passing?

Doesn’t it seem like she ought to be more mature and act like she’s been there before instead of like she thinks the position alone makes her qualified to be a responsible leader?

Unmitigated arrogance abounds in the moonbat mind!

Mother Pelosi’s efforts are the offspring of Jimmah’s and Jesse Jackson’s meddling efforts over the years. Where are the results?

Lets see… I didn’t get to vote on Pelosi… she aint my President. Why is she off in a foreign nation directly violating US Law (Logan Act) creating a seperate foreign policy?

Didn’t you know that Madam Pelosi is the Most Powerful Woman in America? My God, she’s third in line to the throne, I mean the presidency! Who are we to criticize the Most Powerful Woman in America! Never mind the fact that the Constitution assigns foreign policy to the executive branch, she’s the Most Powerful Woman in America and no one should be allowed to challenge her right to decide the fate of the world! Isn’t that right, honora?

Romeo13 on April 3, 2007 at 12:01 PM

Good point. What makes it even worse is that she is only a member of the House, which means she doesn’t even speak for the entire state of California. And yet, there she is, acting on behalf of all of us. Makes me so freaking proud.

I’m amazed people continue to show up at these things.

I’m sure you do. That would be fewer reporters salavating over the latest pronouncements from those who were NOT elected President.

Well if anyone is an expert on counter-productivity, that would be Bush. I’m amazed people continue to show up at these things.

honora on April 3, 2007 at 11:51 AM

Oh maybe they show up because he is the PRESIDENT??? The one who is supposed to conduct foreign policy?

Lets see… I didn’t get to vote on Pelosi… she aint my President. Why is she off in a foreign nation directly violating US Law (Logan Act) creating a seperate foreign policy?

And yes, I condemn Republicans who do the same dam thing.

She’s a woman, she just knows best what is good for us. It is like a Republican to criticize her for doing what she knows is best, what all smart people know is best.