I saw this on the KVI Blog as well as Hot Air.

Stoprosie.com

Our Mission:  is to influence current and prospective viewers of The View to not watch the program until Rosie O’Donnell is replaced.

Our Reason:  for cal…

angryamerican on April 3, 2007 at 9:07 PM

You’re on a roll!

Per the video, a Clinton cabinet official is quoted as saying (annonomously of course!)….”We did a lot, but we did not see the gathering storm that was out there.”

hahahaha!

World trade center 1993 and two embassy’s bombed in the late 90′s. What the #ell?! Did a ton of bricks need to land on their heads?!

He told Chris Wallace he gave the CIA a standing order to kill him!

OOPS maybe not……This video was after the USS Cole bombing and after Clinton said he ordered the CIA to kill Bin Laden.

Why weren’t cruise missiles launched from a US Destroyer stationed and ready to fire on Clinton’s order???!!!!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=JuH1xwLUnbg

Well don’t let facts like actual CIA video stop you from trying to change history Bubba.

Clinton lied people died!

Personally I find Matt’s Dowd’s recent comments much more provocative and troubling than anything the Rosie circus does. But hey, that’s me.

honora on April 3, 2007 at 6:28 PM

I don’t. If I would have lost a twin child, and a wife, during very intense troubling times, while not having been home a lot, I’d also say/write weird things and wish to go to South America to regain my lost soul…Not as manna as you iterpret his article in the NYT or his book to be…but, heh, I’m the non-feeling independent…

Hell… replace Rosie with Honora…

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on April 3, 2007 at 2:28 PM

You sweet thing. I really don’t get this: I really, really dislike Rush L. So I don’t listen to him. He’s happy, I’m happy.

But I’m not so sure that’s a bad thing, and your comments make me lean even more that way. You’re obviously annoyed at her stupidity; she obviously makes all moderate Democrats and rational liberals look awfully bad.

Rational liberals? Moderate Democrats? You’re going soft in your old age kid. To be honest, I am more bored than annoyed with her. Once you jump the shark, it’s all more of the same. Personally I find Matt’s Dowd’s recent comments much more provocative and troubling than anything the Rosie circus does. But hey, that’s me.

As for the rest of your comment, I frankly agree: the brouhaha is keeping her on the air. We are indeed enablers.

yep

IMO censureship is self-defeating. It emboldens the object and elevates their argument beyond what it was, it becomes an issue of free speech. ABC will pull Rosie if and when her ratings go down, not before.

Have these folks lived in America long?

honora on April 3, 2007 at 10:31 AM

The word you’re looking for is “censorship,” and here’s my question for you: is there *ANYTHING* Rosie could say that would represent sedition or treason? She’s telling the world that our government attacked us – any way that wanders into a treason?

Does ANYTHING, in your opinion, meet that definition? Are you aware that treasonous speech is not protected constitutionally, and thus can’t be “censured” (sic) or even censored.

I’m not claiming she’s crossed that line yet. I’m just curious if you even know the line is there.

And you are once again making the same mistake about free speech that liberals always, always make: people calling for her to be fired is not censorship, no matter how you spell it. She speaks; her critics respond. That’s not only not censorship, it is the essence of the First Amendment.

True censorship would be if we – with government collusion – went to her studio and, I don’t know, shouted her down. Threw pies at her face. Actually silenced her. (Hey … that sounds familiar …)

People voicing their opinions about her opinions cannot be censorship. Why do you and your ilk never grasp that? (Well, until the shoes on the other foot, of course. Then you get it just fine.)

And criticizing her an an exercise of pure free speech includes voicing that opinion to her employer. Freedom, baby. Let it ring. Why do you liberals hate it so much, anyway?

As for the rest of your comment, I frankly agree: the brouhaha is keeping her on the air. We are indeed enablers.

But I’m not so sure that’s a bad thing, and your comments make me lean even more that way. You’re obviously annoyed at her stupidity; she obviously makes all moderate Democrats and rational liberals look awfully bad.

So maybe we should be enabling her. Maybe if we were smart, we’d be working to get her a prime time show.

In 2004, Michael Moore almost single-handedly gave George Bush a second term (with a little help from the SwiftVets and FlipFlopper himself). I think Rosie O’Donnell may just give the Republicans the White House in 2008.

Enable away. Nothing defeats liberals quicker than letting people know what they really think and feel.

Is that pic of Rosie upside down, really necessary?

JackM on April 3, 2007 at 2:12 PM

It what she has to do to keep her brains from falling out.

“Don’t fear the terrorists. They’re mothers and fathers” – Rosie O’Donnell

Wow. Rosie has four kids. If I were them, and I heard my mother say that people with a nasty habit of detonating their own offspring are a-ok, I’d be a smidge nervous.

I’ve been totally unimpressed with the “most fair Lady Elisabeth Hasselbeck”. She is at least good looking. However I think I could have a more stimulating conversation with bowl of oatmeal than either Rosie or Elisabeth.

Elisabeth has missed too many chanced to lay a serious smackdown on the Vampire Bat.

Pretty only gets you so far… after a few months of speaking to oatmeal, you kick her out of bed and find someone you can talk to…

Replace Rosie. And replace Elisabeth with a conservative with more fire. I’m sure Janie would love a change to lock horns with the likes of Joy and Bawbawa.

E L Frederick (Sniper One) on April 3, 2007 at 2:24 PM

Elisabeth is there to be a conservative punching bag whenever politics come up. I don’t think she’s stupid, she’s just passive and her passive nature is always locked in mortal combat with her need to fight back against the liberal juggernaught. That’s why she has those cute outbursts where she tells Rosie she’s wrong but then retreats back in her shell whenever Rosie turns her gaping maw upon her. Plus, what’s the point in asking to have them replaced? We can’t. We don’t run the show. We have no say. The liberals run it, and they’re not going to end the torture. Elisabeth is a naive victim, it’s hardly fair to compare her to Rosie.

Hasselbeck is (pun intended) WAYYYY out of her weight class… she should stick to being eye candy…

Romeo13 on April 3, 2007 at 1:10 PM

Nonsense. Having sweet innocent Elisabeth get bashed by the Devourer of Worlds all the time is a surefire way to turn every red blooded male against the latter.

Insult the honor of our most fair Lady Elisabeth Hasselbeck again, fiend, and thou shalt find thyself at the business end of mine blade.

Darth Executor on April 3, 2007 at 11:34 AM

I’ve been totally unimpressed with the “most fair Lady Elisabeth Hasselbeck”. She is at least good looking. However I think I could have a more stimulating conversation with bowl of oatmeal than either Rosie or Elisabeth.

Elisabeth has missed too many chanced to lay a serious smackdown on the Vampire Bat.

Pretty only gets you so far… after a few months of speaking to oatmeal, you kick her out of bed and find someone you can talk to…

Replace Rosie. And replace Elisabeth with a conservative with more fire. I’m sure Janie would love a change to lock horns with the likes of Joy and Bawbawa.

happy day
making te ‘right’ people mad
is 2 cool
sign ur petiton
wont stop truth
wont stop me
im here 2 stay

Slublog on April 3, 2007 at 10:48 AM

Slu,
U jest kant apprecyate free vurse, kan u?

If the lefties are forced to dump Rosie, they might get an effective spokesman. I much prefer to keep Rosie on the air as a Chernobyl of leftist thought. She is the Left’s biggest, and I do mean biggest, gift to the Right.

Stop signing petitions to get Rosie off the air and start sending thank you notes to the radical left for putting their ideas out in the open where sunshine can disinfect it.

I despise the woman, but hopefully they will just keep feeding her rope and let her finish the job herself. Our mole, Elisabeth, needs to keep setting up Miss Bloviate to let her keep scooting further and further out on her branch. At some point, gravity will take over.

Mallard T. Drake on April 3, 2007 at 12:00 PM

I tend to agree…except….did you *listen* to the audience respond to her 9/11 nonsense? Do they give potential “View” audience members a moonbat test before allowing them in?

The “impeach Bush” stuff, no shock at the laughter and applause there…the “Christian Terrorist” stuff a little more shocking, but still,…but the “9/11 Truth” stuff??? Was there really an audience full of truthers? They were actually applauding…cheering her on. Seriously…I can’t believe that even most liberals/View-fans buy into that insanity. ????

What I’d like to see is for them to keep her on, but add someone to support Elizabeth. Unfortunately I’m sure Michelle would rather undergo oral surgery sans anesthetic, but there must be someone that they could get to better counter the blowhard…and speak ‘truth to blather’

Insult the honor of our most fair Lady Elisabeth Hasselbeck again, fiend, and thou shalt find thyself at the business end of mine blade.

Darth Executor on April 3, 2007 at 11:34 AM

Rapiers? Sword Dagger??? or my favorite… Case???

SeaWolf
Band of Black Tigers
Blacktigers.us

141,000,000 registered voters in the United States

IF all viewers are registered voters that works out to less than 3% of the entire voting populus. Not sure why such a small segment is causing such high blood pressure amongst the rest…

IMO censureship is self-defeating. It emboldens the object and elevates their argument beyond what it was, it becomes an issue of free speech. ABC will pull Rosie if and when her ratings go down, not before.

honora on April 3, 2007 at 10:31 AM

Agree fully. A petition is not censorship, however. Not allowing diverse views in universities, hitting speakers one disagrees with in their teeth, hurling pies at the likes of Ann C., not printing news opposed to editors/reporters’ political views/agendas, not correcting MSM’s records, printing lies is, not writing about or publishing the Danish cartoons, not teaching about the Holocaust in some of the British schools, modifying history to our likes, etc. is.

I agree, that we should not censor and support all freedom of speech.