<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters on Bush vs al Qaeda: So successful we&#8217;re bound to fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:13:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reuters: Bush destroying al Qaeda = bad for America : The Crimson Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-343613</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuters: Bush destroying al Qaeda = bad for America : The Crimson Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-343613</guid>
		<description>[...] And who does Reuters get to make this point - Michael Scheuer. Hot Air has the background: Remember him, author of Imperial Hubris? That book made essentially the same argument, which is that we can’t win for losing. Whatever we do won’t work. Whatever we try will fail. In Scheuer’s world, everything works to bin Laden’s benefit, including Israel’s self-defensive actions against Hezbollah. And to think, Scheuer was once the CIA’s go-to guy on the bin Laden hunt. Maybe he was Valerie Plame’s mystery walkabout guy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And who does Reuters get to make this point &#8211; Michael Scheuer. Hot Air has the background: Remember him, author of Imperial Hubris? That book made essentially the same argument, which is that we can’t win for losing. Whatever we do won’t work. Whatever we try will fail. In Scheuer’s world, everything works to bin Laden’s benefit, including Israel’s self-defensive actions against Hezbollah. And to think, Scheuer was once the CIA’s go-to guy on the bin Laden hunt. Maybe he was Valerie Plame’s mystery walkabout guy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thunder Run</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-342434</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thunder Run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-342434</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Reconnaissance for 04/04/2007...&lt;/strong&gt;

A short recon of whats out there that might draw your attention....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Reconnaissance for 04/04/2007&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A short recon of whats out there that might draw your attention&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LagunaDave</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-342359</link>
		<dc:creator>LagunaDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-342359</guid>
		<description>Taranto at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110009892&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Best of the Web&lt;/a&gt; mines another gem of &quot;Heads they win, tails we lose&quot; logic from the piece:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
IntelCenter chief executive Ben Venzke said the chance of an al Qaeda attack on U.S. soil has grown based on the militant network&#039;s increasing references to the American homeland in public messages. 

&quot;Our leading thinking is that we are closer now to an attempt at a major attack in the United States than at any point since 9/11,&quot; Venzke said.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Taranto observes:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
There is no denying Venzke is right. If an al Qaeda attack is in the future, then it is closer now than at any point since 9/11. Venzke has stumbled onto something profound: the linear and sequential nature of time. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank god the &quot;experts&quot; are not in charge of this war...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taranto at <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110009892" rel="nofollow">Best of the Web</a> mines another gem of &#8220;Heads they win, tails we lose&#8221; logic from the piece:</p>
<blockquote><p>
IntelCenter chief executive Ben Venzke said the chance of an al Qaeda attack on U.S. soil has grown based on the militant network&#8217;s increasing references to the American homeland in public messages. </p>
<p>&#8220;Our leading thinking is that we are closer now to an attempt at a major attack in the United States than at any point since 9/11,&#8221; Venzke said.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Taranto observes:</p>
<blockquote><p>
There is no denying Venzke is right. If an al Qaeda attack is in the future, then it is closer now than at any point since 9/11. Venzke has stumbled onto something profound: the linear and sequential nature of time.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank god the &#8220;experts&#8221; are not in charge of this war&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-342314</link>
		<dc:creator>GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-342314</guid>
		<description>When it comes to Al Qaeda and Iran, I prefer the &quot;Jim Malone&quot; brand of diplomacy.

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Al Qaeda and Iran, I prefer the &#8220;Jim Malone&#8221; brand of diplomacy.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinkyBigglesworth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341954</link>
		<dc:creator>PinkyBigglesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Like Valerie Plame, Scheuer is an unabashed Leftist, as he showed in his first CIA-approved book. He openly admires Al Qaida --- remember, this is the guy who was in charge of protecting us before 9/11 (!!!)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Note to next Republican President, .....  Do not try to set a &quot;New Tone&quot;. FIRE every leftist, liberal Democrat in every position throughout the entire government, as your fist command after taking the &quot;Oath of Office&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Like Valerie Plame, Scheuer is an unabashed Leftist, as he showed in his first CIA-approved book. He openly admires Al Qaida &#8212; remember, this is the guy who was in charge of protecting us before 9/11 (!!!)</p></blockquote>
<p>Note to next Republican President, &#8230;..  Do not try to set a &#8220;New Tone&#8221;. FIRE every leftist, liberal Democrat in every position throughout the entire government, as your fist command after taking the &#8220;Oath of Office&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341853</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 03:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341853</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t Scheuer hunting Bin Ladin, himself, if he&#039;s so smart?

He&#039;s got the retirement bucks, the book sales bucks, and the contacts.

Do the world a favor, Dr. Brilliantine, find your mortal enemy.

Show up Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t Scheuer hunting Bin Ladin, himself, if he&#8217;s so smart?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got the retirement bucks, the book sales bucks, and the contacts.</p>
<p>Do the world a favor, Dr. Brilliantine, find your mortal enemy.</p>
<p>Show up Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate&#8217;s Cove &#187; &#62;&#62;Americans Never Quit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Success In War On Terror Is Bad (?)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341704</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate&#8217;s Cove &#187; &#62;&#62;Americans Never Quit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Success In War On Terror Is Bad (?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341704</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air regarding Scheuer: Remember him, author of Imperial Hubris? That book made essentially the same argument, which is that we can&#8217;t win for losing. Whatever we do won&#8217;t work. Whatever we try will fail. &amp;c. In Scheuer&#8217;s world, everything works to bin Laden&#8217;s benefit, including Israel&#8217;s self-defensive actions against Hezbollah. And to think, Scheuer was once the CIA&#8217;s go-to guy on the bin Laden hunt. Maybe he was Valerie Plame&#8217;s mystery walkabout guy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air regarding Scheuer: Remember him, author of Imperial Hubris? That book made essentially the same argument, which is that we can&rsquo;t win for losing. Whatever we do won&rsquo;t work. Whatever we try will fail. &amp;c. In Scheuer&rsquo;s world, everything works to bin Laden&rsquo;s benefit, including Israel&rsquo;s self-defensive actions against Hezbollah. And to think, Scheuer was once the CIA&rsquo;s go-to guy on the bin Laden hunt. Maybe he was Valerie Plame&rsquo;s mystery walkabout guy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drtuddle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341703</link>
		<dc:creator>Drtuddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341703</guid>
		<description>Do the Shimmy Shimmy Shake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Shimmy Shimmy Shake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedinBlueCounty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341684</link>
		<dc:creator>RedinBlueCounty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341684</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They’re very simply defined in two phrases: spread out America’s forces and bleed the United States to bankruptcy. I’d argue America has been under attack successfully every day since 9/11 from that perspective.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Dude, Clinton was OUT of office by 9/11/01.  Since then, our military strength has grown and our economy has expanded with both unemployment and interest rates having dropped to low levels.  Let&#039;s hope that the democrats don&#039;t repeat the mistakes of the 90&#039;s and pull another Clinton era economic and military gutting phase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They’re very simply defined in two phrases: spread out America’s forces and bleed the United States to bankruptcy. I’d argue America has been under attack successfully every day since 9/11 from that perspective.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, Clinton was OUT of office by 9/11/01.  Since then, our military strength has grown and our economy has expanded with both unemployment and interest rates having dropped to low levels.  Let&#8217;s hope that the democrats don&#8217;t repeat the mistakes of the 90&#8217;s and pull another Clinton era economic and military gutting phase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341561</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341561</guid>
		<description>Michael Scheuer served in the CIA for 22 years. &lt;em&gt;He is the once anonymous author of Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror and Through Our Enemies&#039; Eyes: Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America.&lt;/em&gt; He served as the Chief of the bin Laden Unit at the Counterterrorist Center from 1996 to 1999. He resigned from the CIA in 2004. 

The emphasis section, above, is very significant. He released the book on &lt;em&gt;July 15, 2004&lt;/em&gt;, explicitly to affect the election in 2004, negatively for Mr. Bush. 

He was &#039;right&#039; then. And he&#039;s &#039;right&#039; now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Scheuer served in the CIA for 22 years. <em>He is the once anonymous author of Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror and Through Our Enemies&#8217; Eyes: Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America.</em> He served as the Chief of the bin Laden Unit at the Counterterrorist Center from 1996 to 1999. He resigned from the CIA in 2004. </p>
<p>The emphasis section, above, is very significant. He released the book on <em>July 15, 2004</em>, explicitly to affect the election in 2004, negatively for Mr. Bush. </p>
<p>He was &#8216;right&#8217; then. And he&#8217;s &#8216;right&#8217; now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defector01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341513</link>
		<dc:creator>Defector01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341513</guid>
		<description>this is certainly a unique way of looking at how Bush screwed america, so i&#039;ll give him credit for uniqueness

Only way this strategy would work is if Al Qaeda plans to work with China to get China to invade SF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is certainly a unique way of looking at how Bush screwed america, so i&#8217;ll give him credit for uniqueness</p>
<p>Only way this strategy would work is if Al Qaeda plans to work with China to get China to invade SF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341469</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341469</guid>
		<description>Uh .... huh?

This guy&#039;s way off the talking points reservation. Doesn&#039;t he know that all this war waged by the military-industrial complex is just shoring up our economy? Killin&#039; is good for America!

I saw it on DU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh &#8230;. huh?</p>
<p>This guy&#8217;s way off the talking points reservation. Doesn&#8217;t he know that all this war waged by the military-industrial complex is just shoring up our economy? Killin&#8217; is good for America!</p>
<p>I saw it on DU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341417</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341417</guid>
		<description>Duh, Allah.  Spin machines only go up to 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, Allah.  Spin machines only go up to 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limerick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341354</link>
		<dc:creator>Limerick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341354</guid>
		<description>Scheuer...........(*spit).....his speculations prove he is right....he couldn&#039;t get Bin so Bin wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scheuer&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..(*spit)&#8230;..his speculations prove he is right&#8230;.he couldn&#8217;t get Bin so Bin wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341340</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341340</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ooo, nice metaphor. I got another one… Dr. Smith from “Lost In Space.”&quot;

A better one:  Gaius Baltar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ooo, nice metaphor. I got another one… Dr. Smith from “Lost In Space.”&#8221;</p>
<p>A better one:  Gaius Baltar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorkafork</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341324</link>
		<dc:creator>dorkafork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341324</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The last time I saw him (within the last month), I think on O’Reilly, he seemed to pretty much be on “our side”.&lt;/i&gt;

Looks are deceiving.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110006274&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;He&#039;s a nut&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The last time I saw him (within the last month), I think on O’Reilly, he seemed to pretty much be on “our side”.</i></p>
<p>Looks are deceiving.  <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110006274" rel="nofollow">He&#8217;s a nut</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341294</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341294</guid>
		<description>Scheuer is an odd duck... because I&#039;ve seen him in interviews on FNC, months apart, giving two different impressions about where he comes from... Sometimes he sounds more like the guy in this Reuters article (but not nearly as bad, I suspect some selective quoting by the writer), and other times he sounds like the go get &#039;em terror warrior, who thinks we&#039;re being to reserved in our response.

Bryan, I don&#039;t know if you or Michelle have contacts with the ability to get in touch with him, but I would honestly like to hear his response, and whether he thinks he was represented fairly in this article.  The last time I saw him (within the last month), I think on O&#039;Reilly, he seemed to pretty much be on &quot;our side&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scheuer is an odd duck&#8230; because I&#8217;ve seen him in interviews on FNC, months apart, giving two different impressions about where he comes from&#8230; Sometimes he sounds more like the guy in this Reuters article (but not nearly as bad, I suspect some selective quoting by the writer), and other times he sounds like the go get &#8216;em terror warrior, who thinks we&#8217;re being to reserved in our response.</p>
<p>Bryan, I don&#8217;t know if you or Michelle have contacts with the ability to get in touch with him, but I would honestly like to hear his response, and whether he thinks he was represented fairly in this article.  The last time I saw him (within the last month), I think on O&#8217;Reilly, he seemed to pretty much be on &#8220;our side&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melba Toast</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341291</link>
		<dc:creator>Melba Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341291</guid>
		<description>The fact that Scheur was not successful in his mission of hunting down bin Laden, before 9/11, leads me to believe that Scheur&#039;s way of thinking can no longer be considered credible or relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Scheur was not successful in his mission of hunting down bin Laden, before 9/11, leads me to believe that Scheur&#8217;s way of thinking can no longer be considered credible or relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LakeRuins</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341264</link>
		<dc:creator>LakeRuins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341264</guid>
		<description>I cannot even comprehend the consequences if either Gore or Kerry had won. I am not a big Bush supporter except on his steadfast war to push back and expose the radical Islamic enemy that has been festering and waiting to take over. If he has done nothing else he did, at least temporarily knock them off schedule and raise awareness globally of the true mission of these Islamic fascists.
Am I happy with how he has handled issues like border security, illegal immigrants, spending, and Social Security reform? No, but at least I am still alive and free to say those those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot even comprehend the consequences if either Gore or Kerry had won. I am not a big Bush supporter except on his steadfast war to push back and expose the radical Islamic enemy that has been festering and waiting to take over. If he has done nothing else he did, at least temporarily knock them off schedule and raise awareness globally of the true mission of these Islamic fascists.<br />
Am I happy with how he has handled issues like border security, illegal immigrants, spending, and Social Security reform? No, but at least I am still alive and free to say those those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341248</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341248</guid>
		<description>Where would be be if we just bent over and took it every day post-9/11? In other words, had Gore been successful in stealing the 2000 election?

Sure as hell a lot worse off.

I suppose the fact basically nothing has happened in this country since then isn&#039;t newsworthy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would be be if we just bent over and took it every day post-9/11? In other words, had Gore been successful in stealing the 2000 election?</p>
<p>Sure as hell a lot worse off.</p>
<p>I suppose the fact basically nothing has happened in this country since then isn&#8217;t newsworthy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony737</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony737</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341239</guid>
		<description>HAAaaaaaa! Nice work there, Bohica! 

Doesn&#039;t Bush understand? Once you drop a JDAM, you can&#039;t get it back! You just spent a thousand dollars! On what, like 20 jihadis??? Big deal! There&#039;s plenty more where THEY came from! How long can we afford to do this? We&#039;ll go broke! This is how they destroyed the Soviet Union! They WANT to die for allah! Blah blah blah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAAaaaaaa! Nice work there, Bohica! </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t Bush understand? Once you drop a JDAM, you can&#8217;t get it back! You just spent a thousand dollars! On what, like 20 jihadis??? Big deal! There&#8217;s plenty more where THEY came from! How long can we afford to do this? We&#8217;ll go broke! This is how they destroyed the Soviet Union! They WANT to die for allah! Blah blah blah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fogw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341226</link>
		<dc:creator>fogw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341226</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does Mr Scheuer think we will simply lay down and play dead?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He &lt;strike&gt;thinks&lt;/strike&gt; knows the Donks &lt;strike&gt;will&lt;/strike&gt; have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does Mr Scheuer think we will simply lay down and play dead?</p></blockquote>
<p>He <strike>thinks</strike> knows the Donks <strike>will</strike> have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LakeRuins</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341212</link>
		<dc:creator>LakeRuins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341212</guid>
		<description>Scheuer is arguing from a false premise. Somebody needs to ask him this question. Okay everything we do works to Al Quedas&#039; advantage, and Bin Laden winds up winning his showdown with America, what does he do with us if, like you state, he wins? Al Queda does not have the manpower to &quot;occupy&quot; us. Does Mr Scheuer think we will simply lay down and play dead? How does all of the jihadi cheerleaders define success for Al Queda? Do they have the same definition for our victory in the War against Islamic Fascism? it is time to dump that War on Terror BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scheuer is arguing from a false premise. Somebody needs to ask him this question. Okay everything we do works to Al Quedas&#8217; advantage, and Bin Laden winds up winning his showdown with America, what does he do with us if, like you state, he wins? Al Queda does not have the manpower to &#8220;occupy&#8221; us. Does Mr Scheuer think we will simply lay down and play dead? How does all of the jihadi cheerleaders define success for Al Queda? Do they have the same definition for our victory in the War against Islamic Fascism? it is time to dump that War on Terror BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misha I</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341205</link>
		<dc:creator>Misha I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341205</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Remember him, author of Imperial Hubris? That book made essentially the same argument, which is that we can’t win for losing. Whatever we do won’t work. Whatever we try will fail. &amp;c. In Scheuer’s world, everything works to bin Laden’s benefit, including Israel’s self-defensive actions against Hezbollah.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Funny, that sounds like all of the members of the Neville Chamberlain wing of the Republican party, beclowning themselves again and again by howling that &quot;we shouldn&#039;t ever attack Iran, no matter what, BECAUSE THAT&#039;S EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT US TO DO!&quot;

Using their &quot;logic&quot;, Hitler and Mussolini must have been the happiest men in the history of the world right before they, out of sheer unadulterated joy, ate a bullet/got himself hanged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Remember him, author of Imperial Hubris? That book made essentially the same argument, which is that we can’t win for losing. Whatever we do won’t work. Whatever we try will fail. &amp;c. In Scheuer’s world, everything works to bin Laden’s benefit, including Israel’s self-defensive actions against Hezbollah.</p></blockquote>
<p>Funny, that sounds like all of the members of the Neville Chamberlain wing of the Republican party, beclowning themselves again and again by howling that &#8220;we shouldn&#8217;t ever attack Iran, no matter what, BECAUSE THAT&#8217;S EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT US TO DO!&#8221;</p>
<p>Using their &#8220;logic&#8221;, Hitler and Mussolini must have been the happiest men in the history of the world right before they, out of sheer unadulterated joy, ate a bullet/got himself hanged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kini</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-341201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/04/03/reuters-on-bush-vs-al-qaeda-so-successful-were-bound-to-fail/#comment-341201</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;spread out America’s forces and bleed the United States to bankruptcy. I’d argue America has been under attack successfully every day since 9/11 from that perspective.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I find that assessment hard to believe given the strength of our economy and the technological sophistication of our military.

I don&#039;t have a problem with my tax dollars being spent fighting these  extremist.   If only Blinky Palosi would get the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>spread out America’s forces and bleed the United States to bankruptcy. I’d argue America has been under attack successfully every day since 9/11 from that perspective.</p></blockquote>
<p>I find that assessment hard to believe given the strength of our economy and the technological sophistication of our military.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with my tax dollars being spent fighting these  extremist.   If only Blinky Palosi would get the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
