“It did not mention a more aggressive withdrawal proposal backed by Woolsey, Waters and Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.).”

Whenever someone mentions Barbara Lee, I’m reminded of David Horowitz’s “Another Low, Dishonest Decade on the Left.” Apparently I’m not the only one:

“In 1983, Lee and Dellums traveled to Grenada on official business of the House Armed Services Committee. They were there to gauge the military threat posed to the U.S. by a new airport that was being built there. U.S. military forces later captured documents that revealed that Lee had presented Grenada’s Politburo with a draft of Dellums’ report – before it was presented to the congressional committee!”

That’s from Neil Boortz’s editorial; go here to read the whole thing.

Would someone please explain to me why it is that porkbarrel spending is still allowed? Is it just good old fashioned corruption on the part of the people that should know better, or is there some ‘legitimate’ reason that their hiding behind?

Because between pork barrel spending and campaign finance reform, an incumbent is almost unbeatable. Why would an elected official want to change that?

After the caucus meeting, Rep. John Tanner (Tenn.), a leader of the conservative Blue Dog Democrats, said that he, too, will vote for the bill. “The alternative is an open-ended bleeding of our blood and treasure, with no end in sight and no pressure on the Iraqi government to make the changes necessary,” he said.

Idiotic crap like this makes my friggin’ blood boil. Does this pinhead really believe that the Iraqi government needs pressure from us to want to get rid of the savages trying to overthrow and kill them?

The answer, sung to the tune of “Here we go round the mulberry B0000SH.”

“This is the way we tax and spend,
Tax and spend,
Tax and spend.

This is the way we tax and spend,
we’re DEMOCRATS in office.”

Any questions?

We need more value based TV. For some reason, what this country needs is never admitted until the need has become desperation.

…but that doesn’t matter when claiming that one is Anna Nicole’s baby’s daddy, does it?
aero on March 21, 2007 at 12:33 AM

Oh heck no! It’s a freakin’ free-for-all. I have a one in a 2 billion chance of being the daddy! It’s like the freakin’ lottery baby! Go for it!

But guess what folks? It’s me! I’m the baby’s daddy! That’s right. Throwin’ my hat in the ring, baby!

thedecider on March 21, 2007 at 12:14 AM

No, it’s me! I’m the daddy! I’m a woman, but that doesn’t matter when claiming that one is Anna Nicole’s baby’s daddy, does it?

Seriously, I think it’s Bill Clinton. Is there a betting pool somewhere?

Too busy wondering who Anna Nicole’s “baby daddy” is.
aero on March 20, 2007 at 11:57 PM

Oooh! Oooh! I hear we’re going to find out within the next 24 hours. Yeah, a DNA expert has flown to the Bahama’s to get a DNA sample from the baby to compare with ANS and all the “baby’s-daddy’s-in-waiting”.

Ugh! I’m so sick of this.

But guess what folks? It’s me! I’m the baby’s daddy! That’s right. Throwin’ my hat in the ring, baby!

Democrats are playing the game again, only this time they are closer to the votes they need in the House according to the story Allah @ Hot Air picked up from the WaPo:To be sure, House Democratic leaders appear to be making progress toward securing…

Even if they win, the American people see this for what it is, and will remember…

Romeo13 on March 20, 2007 at 10:11 PM

Wish that were true, Romeo. Unfortunately, most of the American people are, as usual, not paying a bit of attention to all of this. Too busy wondering who Anna Nicole’s “baby daddy” is. And they can’t remember past last week. They’ve already forgotten 9/11, haven’t they? You’d think that would be a bit more memorable…

When he was Clinton’s enforcer, he was known to use techniques borrowed right from the Godfather, minus the blood and broken bones. The Treason Party is going all out on this. They and their masters at Moveon need more Americans to come home in bodybags to insure victory in 2008.

They want a defeated America, just as they did during Vietnam.

Pinky, is that Arlan Sphincter?….

Limerick on March 20, 2007 at 10:42 PM

Different Brothers from the same Mother……..

…and President Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, backed Pelosi’s proposal on Tuesday.

What more do you need to know?

Rightio, a win on any front is not a win for America but for the Republicans.
I think now I can question their patriotism, they said it out loud,

bbz123 on March 20, 2007 at 10:05 PM

Exactly.

There is no denying that they are playing politics with the lives of our soldiers. I am unequivocally questioning their patriotism. The Democrats behind this are a disgrace.

Exit question: Is Rahm the new Hammer?

No, I look at him like the new Sphincter!

And… why would anyone unsubscribe from MoveOn? It’s like not monitoring terrorist chatter because you oppose terrorism.

Know thy enemy. Someone smart said that once.

The Troop Readiness, Veterans Health & Iraq Accountability Act

Can you say ‘anytime minutes’? Maybe ‘runs like a bat outta hell’, or the good ol stand by ‘good as new’?

Pelosi, Emanuel, Rangle, Conyers, Boxer, Reid..et al…
Mordecai Jones warned you in 67 (The Flim Flam Man)…..
‘Curley…if they catch us now, they gonna hang us!’.

Yep, smoke, mirrors, bread, circus, a sucker born every minute….thats the donks. Not only working the public but working the nutroots too. They keep this crud up and the party will split before Nov 08. Good.

MoveOn put out a dishonest poll…

I don’t believe that for a minute…

MoveOn, dishonest? I you can’t trust a lefty propoganda website, who can you trust?

Even if they win, the American people see this for what it is, and will remember…