1de50d3f3625346c0806…

I just love what you posted. Gimme more!…

When he talks you wonder why he was ever in charge of the DNC..but then they put in howard dean so maybe they are just all insane.

Bryan- Doesn’t Joseph Kennedy have some bearing on this as well?

Is there a major Hugo hugging segment of the Democrat party?

In a word: YES.

This will be the last post of yours i waste my time on.

I haven’t thrown anyone overboard. I call ‘em like I see em. But see ya!

According to the account of Bryan Preston, McAulliffe blamed the rise to prominence in the South American continent of Hugo Chavez on – well, you guess:Also
during Q&A, several liberals in the audience came at McAuliffe from
the left, giving……

Down the hall a ways, he called out “It’ll be an interesting 2008!”

It sure will – and he won’t be happy. He’ll just have to transition syndromes.

Blaming Chavez on Bush is beyond unserious and verges on the insane.

The Democrat base.

Enrique on March 15, 2007 at 10:34 AM

Oh, how I wish that this unserious and insane base would be forced to live under the Chavez regime for at least one year, not knowing that they could ever return. If I had Warren Buffet’s money, I’d create a foundation for that purpose. Best lesson ever – to be cured for life after that!

How silly of the left to think that we’d regret not voting for Mr. Haughty. It’s not like we had a choice between super-smart and brilliant, but given what it was, no contest. Mr. Bush’s power in the next 2 years derives from two sources: the ridicule from the Left + the puerile behaviour from the Congress (both sides).

I’m just saying it to note that it’s possible to shake hands with someone that you disagree with across the board without being uncivilized.

This statement coming a few days after you threw Ann Coulter overboard and a day after you dis-owned President Bush is just laughable. This will be the last post of yours i waste my time on.

Is there a major Hugo hugging segment of the Democrat party?

Actually, yes. I used to live in a neighborhood full of ‘em. You know: Free heating oil for the poor, opposing Bushitler, yada, yada. One even sent out a neighborhood email trying to organize everyone into buying exclusively at Hugo’s local Citgo (which she kept so-well-informedly calling “Citco”), and to boycott the Exxon across the street since they’d never paid their (uh, still in court) Valdez fines, etc., etc.

D’Souza has been roundly criticized all over the right for his ludicrous book.

Bryan on March 15, 2007 at 11:33 AM

Good.

He is a cheerleader and a fundraiser, not a policy wonk.

He is also a PUNK!

Which, if he’s being logically consistent, means Castro is entirely the fault of John F. Kennedy.

Bryan, I’m shocked, I thought you knew better by now. Kennedy was a Democrat. Only Republicans can be responsible for bad things, not Democrats. Dems want to save the world, and live in peace and harmony.

The only itty-bitty thing I’d throw out is (and this is in the form of a question, since I’m slightly unclear – and I know it might be nit-picking):

Which, if he’s being logically consistent, means Castro is entirely the fault of John F. Kennedy.

Wouldn’t Castro be the fault of Eisenhower? If memory serves, JFK inherited the Bay of Pigs strategy.

D’Souza says 9/11 was America’s fault and you guys eat it up.

You’re insane. D’Souza has been roundly criticized all over the right for his ludicrous book. Our friend Robert Spencer debated D’Souza at CPAC. We don’t subscribe to the lefties-made-them-do-it thesis, at all, and never have.

As for the corruption with Global Crossing–handsomely repaid in Clinton Adult Bookstore Library donations, well, he’s a Clinton crony, so naturally he’s as dirty as they come. It reminds me a lot of Hillary’s cattle futures, or Dingy Harry’s land deal, etc., etc. It always amazes me how Democrats can profess to admire human slime like these people.

Amazing that a guy supposedly as idiotic as the left portrays him to be is capable of that kind of evil genius, isn’t it?…