<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosie O&#8217;Donnell, 9/11 Truther</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another &#8216;Anti-Government Right Wing Extremist of the Ron Paulian Persuasion&#8217; : The Other McCain</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-3336556</link>
		<dc:creator>Another &#8216;Anti-Government Right Wing Extremist of the Ron Paulian Persuasion&#8217; : The Other McCain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-3336556</guid>
		<description>[...] to Afghanistan,&#8221; Press TV reported Ahmadinejad as saying.Mahmoud Ahmadenijad, Patrick Bedell, Rosie O&#8217;Donnell, Charlie Sheen &#8212; all those notorious libertarians!Probably Belgian, too. IYKWIMAITYD. var [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Afghanistan,&#8221; Press TV reported Ahmadinejad as saying.Mahmoud Ahmadenijad, Patrick Bedell, Rosie O&#8217;Donnell, Charlie Sheen &#8212; all those notorious libertarians!Probably Belgian, too. IYKWIMAITYD. var [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Carden Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-1413100</link>
		<dc:creator>The Carden Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-1413100</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;9-11 Outrage from Syria...&lt;/strong&gt;

I thought the 9-11 conspiracy theorist were bad.   I thought the comments by Rosie O&#039;Donnell were horrible.   But this borders on outrageous. 

A former Information Minister of the Terrorists Government of Syria has issued a statement BLAMING the U....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>9-11 Outrage from Syria&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I thought the 9-11 conspiracy theorist were bad.   I thought the comments by Rosie O&#8217;Donnell were horrible.   But this borders on outrageous. </p>
<p>A former Information Minister of the Terrorists Government of Syria has issued a statement BLAMING the U&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: Trutherism gets new celebrity spokesman!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-932096</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: Trutherism gets new celebrity spokesman!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-932096</guid>
		<description>[...] less relevant than Rosie but certainly more accomplished than Charlie Sheen. Kudos to &#8220;Friend of Ron&#8221; Alex Jones [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] less relevant than Rosie but certainly more accomplished than Charlie Sheen. Kudos to &#8220;Friend of Ron&#8221; Alex Jones [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: New &#8220;View&#8221; co-host not sure if the world is round</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-697909</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: New &#8220;View&#8221; co-host not sure if the world is round</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-697909</guid>
		<description>[...] The Rosie vacancy required someone who&#8217;s sassy, &#8220;funny,&#8221; and capable of believing outlandish theories that defy all logic and science. Whoopi only gave them the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Rosie vacancy required someone who&#8217;s sassy, &#8220;funny,&#8221; and capable of believing outlandish theories that defy all logic and science. Whoopi only gave them the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Rosie blows the lid off the British sailor hostage crisis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-324558</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Rosie blows the lid off the British sailor hostage crisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-324558</guid>
		<description>[...] All smoke and mirrors, says our Ro. She knows where the boat was and she knows who&#8217;s behind this and it has nothing to do with the Iranian government, even though they, er, admit to having the sailors in their custody. Which brings us to what I believe is a milestone for &#8220;The View&#8221; &#8212; the first time she&#8217;s engaged openly on the air (but not off it) in conspiracy theorizing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All smoke and mirrors, says our Ro. She knows where the boat was and she knows who&#8217;s behind this and it has nothing to do with the Iranian government, even though they, er, admit to having the sailors in their custody. Which brings us to what I believe is a milestone for &#8220;The View&#8221; &#8212; the first time she&#8217;s engaged openly on the air (but not off it) in conspiracy theorizing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rosie getting a bad rap on connection to &#8220;Loose Change&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-320353</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rosie getting a bad rap on connection to &#8220;Loose Change&#8221;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-320353</guid>
		<description>[...] We know she&#8217;s a Truther, but a Looser? That&#8217;s the word from Access Hollywood in this link that people keep sending me, but as much as I hate to say it, I think big Ro&#8217;s the victim of a smear here. AH cites Page Six for news that Rosie&#8217;s involved in a new version of &#8220;Loose Change&#8221; bankrolled by Mark Cuban and narrated by Charlie Sheen. Except &#8230; Page Six doesn&#8217;t say that. It names her in the piece with Cuban and Sheen, but only as an example of another celebrity who&#8217;s gone batshinola on 9/11 per her blog posts about WTC Building 7. No link to the movie at all. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We know she&#8217;s a Truther, but a Looser? That&#8217;s the word from Access Hollywood in this link that people keep sending me, but as much as I hate to say it, I think big Ro&#8217;s the victim of a smear here. AH cites Page Six for news that Rosie&#8217;s involved in a new version of &#8220;Loose Change&#8221; bankrolled by Mark Cuban and narrated by Charlie Sheen. Except &#8230; Page Six doesn&#8217;t say that. It names her in the piece with Cuban and Sheen, but only as an example of another celebrity who&#8217;s gone batshinola on 9/11 per her blog posts about WTC Building 7. No link to the movie at all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Angry Christian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-311354</link>
		<dc:creator>One Angry Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-311354</guid>
		<description>but there is no bias in the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but there is no bias in the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tantor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-307752</link>
		<dc:creator>Tantor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-307752</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;VinceP1974:  &quot;What’s weird about the Truthers is that none of them will ever explain to me why Osama and KSM admit doing it when they had to know they would be attacked by our armed forces for admitting such. Do the Truthers suggest that Al Qaida is willing to be killed in order to keep Bush’s secret?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; 

Vince, Vince, Vince.  Osama &amp; Khalid are part of the conspiracy, CIA agents ordered by Bush to take the blame so that it would draw attention away from Bush who ordered Karl Rove to mastermind the whole thing.  It&#039;s really all so very easy to explain if you&#039;re completely insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><i>VinceP1974:  &#8220;What’s weird about the Truthers is that none of them will ever explain to me why Osama and KSM admit doing it when they had to know they would be attacked by our armed forces for admitting such. Do the Truthers suggest that Al Qaida is willing to be killed in order to keep Bush’s secret?&#8221;</i></b> </p>
<p>Vince, Vince, Vince.  Osama &amp; Khalid are part of the conspiracy, CIA agents ordered by Bush to take the blame so that it would draw attention away from Bush who ordered Karl Rove to mastermind the whole thing.  It&#8217;s really all so very easy to explain if you&#8217;re completely insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-307703</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-307703</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gregor, got a problem? You seem to be at odds with the HA staff quite a bit…

Anyway, my guess is use of slurs is what set off the mods. I could be wrong and if I violated policy, my apologies, I signed up during the first open signup, and haven’t bothered to examine the ruleboard since.

Bad Candy on March 16, 2007 at 10:00 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, not really too much.  That comment wasn&#039;t directed at you in any way.  It was a little sarcasm related to the banning of another member last week for making similar comments.  I wasn&#039;t suggesting that you should be banned and I have absolutely no problem with your comment.  I had argued that the previous poster should NOT have been banned.

I simply pointed out that there are remarkable similarities to what that member had said about Muslims, to what members say about other religions or beliefs every day without so much as a mention, including Christians, Mormons, truthers, NAU believers, Rosie, Hillary, and liberals in general.  I&#039;m just not sure of the difference, other than Allah seems to have some personal reaction whenever anyone speaks negatively toward Muslims or homosexuals.  Meanwhile, he seems to enjoy negative comments toward Christians, truthers, and NAU believers.  So to me, it&#039;s more a personal issue than a moral issue with Allah.

With that said, this post was by Ian and was in no way directed at Ian.  Again, it was sarcasm directed toward the previous banning for using the word &quot;hate.&quot;  While I didn&#039;t agree with the way the member wrote the comment, I didn&#039;t feel it was excessive or that it broke the terms of use.

But that&#039;s not my call.  The HotAir staff has the right to make that call as I do on my own blog.  We are obviously guests here, but that doesn&#039;t mean we must always agree.

Other than the occasional issue I have with attacks on Christians and Tancredo, as well as the customary over-reaction to any negativity toward homosexuality, I think Allah does a fantastic job and I&#039;ve actually defended him several times against some who ask for his firing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gregor, got a problem? You seem to be at odds with the HA staff quite a bit…</p>
<p>Anyway, my guess is use of slurs is what set off the mods. I could be wrong and if I violated policy, my apologies, I signed up during the first open signup, and haven’t bothered to examine the ruleboard since.</p>
<p>Bad Candy on March 16, 2007 at 10:00 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>No, not really too much.  That comment wasn&#8217;t directed at you in any way.  It was a little sarcasm related to the banning of another member last week for making similar comments.  I wasn&#8217;t suggesting that you should be banned and I have absolutely no problem with your comment.  I had argued that the previous poster should NOT have been banned.</p>
<p>I simply pointed out that there are remarkable similarities to what that member had said about Muslims, to what members say about other religions or beliefs every day without so much as a mention, including Christians, Mormons, truthers, NAU believers, Rosie, Hillary, and liberals in general.  I&#8217;m just not sure of the difference, other than Allah seems to have some personal reaction whenever anyone speaks negatively toward Muslims or homosexuals.  Meanwhile, he seems to enjoy negative comments toward Christians, truthers, and NAU believers.  So to me, it&#8217;s more a personal issue than a moral issue with Allah.</p>
<p>With that said, this post was by Ian and was in no way directed at Ian.  Again, it was sarcasm directed toward the previous banning for using the word &#8220;hate.&#8221;  While I didn&#8217;t agree with the way the member wrote the comment, I didn&#8217;t feel it was excessive or that it broke the terms of use.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not my call.  The HotAir staff has the right to make that call as I do on my own blog.  We are obviously guests here, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we must always agree.</p>
<p>Other than the occasional issue I have with attacks on Christians and Tancredo, as well as the customary over-reaction to any negativity toward homosexuality, I think Allah does a fantastic job and I&#8217;ve actually defended him several times against some who ask for his firing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-307623</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-307623</guid>
		<description>So&lt;blockquote&gt;uthernDem on March 16, 2007 at 3:58 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Just the ones who put up with this nonsense.  Which leaders have condemned Rosie, Gere, Baldwin, Penn, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So<br />
<blockquote>uthernDem on March 16, 2007 at 3:58 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Just the ones who put up with this nonsense.  Which leaders have condemned Rosie, Gere, Baldwin, Penn, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frenchman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306997</link>
		<dc:creator>Frenchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306997</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rosie vs. Trump: The war continues...&lt;/strong&gt;

This time with Donald Trump showing his class by taking pot shots at mental illness.Look, I&#039;m no fan of Rosie&#039;s politics, but whenever Trump gets into these little pissyfights it just winds up making Rosie O&#039;Donnell look like gold.                  ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rosie vs. Trump: The war continues&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This time with Donald Trump showing his class by taking pot shots at mental illness.Look, I&#8217;m no fan of Rosie&#8217;s politics, but whenever Trump gets into these little pissyfights it just winds up making Rosie O&#8217;Donnell look like gold.                  &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernDem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306877</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306877</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;right2bright on March 16, 2007 at 11:52 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I will not abandon my principles just because some loons took over the Democratic party. At least I&#039;ve got Zell and Joe!
Suffice it to say I see where you&#039;re coming from, and I will be here to let you know we aren&#039;t all idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>right2bright on March 16, 2007 at 11:52 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I will not abandon my principles just because some loons took over the Democratic party. At least I&#8217;ve got Zell and Joe!<br />
Suffice it to say I see where you&#8217;re coming from, and I will be here to let you know we aren&#8217;t all idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonelyMassRepublican</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306177</link>
		<dc:creator>LonelyMassRepublican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306177</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree and disagree; the real question is, why does ABC continue to give her a platform? 

saint kansas on March 16, 2007 at 9:25 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ABC gives her a platform because we pay attention and react.  If the reaction was a big yawn, ABC would soon give her the &quot;Buh-Bye!  There&#039;s the door.&quot;

We like Ann Coulter because she gets under the skin of Liberals.  Libs love Rosie because she gets under the skin of those in the right.

With the leftie dominance of the media, we will never win a battle with the likes of Rosie because the MSM is on her side every time!  We end up just looking like defensive bigots to them.  (as in &quot;Leave the fat lesbian alone you bigots!&quot; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I agree and disagree; the real question is, why does ABC continue to give her a platform? </p>
<p>saint kansas on March 16, 2007 at 9:25 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>ABC gives her a platform because we pay attention and react.  If the reaction was a big yawn, ABC would soon give her the &#8220;Buh-Bye!  There&#8217;s the door.&#8221;</p>
<p>We like Ann Coulter because she gets under the skin of Liberals.  Libs love Rosie because she gets under the skin of those in the right.</p>
<p>With the leftie dominance of the media, we will never win a battle with the likes of Rosie because the MSM is on her side every time!  We end up just looking like defensive bigots to them.  (as in &#8220;Leave the fat lesbian alone you bigots!&#8221; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306059</guid>
		<description>theorists....  1 cup of coffee... can&#039;;t typwe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theorists&#8230;.  1 cup of coffee&#8230; can&#8217;;t typwe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306057</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306057</guid>
		<description>Why do I think of this MIB quote every time I hear about 9/11 conspiracy theories...

&lt;strong&gt;A person is smart, people are dumb panicky dangerous animals.&lt;/strong&gt;  

The more throerists there are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I think of this MIB quote every time I hear about 9/11 conspiracy theories&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>A person is smart, people are dumb panicky dangerous animals.</strong>  </p>
<p>The more throerists there are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazztek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazztek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306047</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...We oughta out Truthers, expose the vermin for who they are.
Bad Candy on March 15, 2007 at 10:12 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But... Rosie&#039;s already &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;out...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

OH!  Wait! I get it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;We oughta out Truthers, expose the vermin for who they are.<br />
Bad Candy on March 15, 2007 at 10:12 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>But&#8230; Rosie&#8217;s already <strong><em>out&#8230;</em></strong></p>
<p>OH!  Wait! I get it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-306013</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-306013</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;SouthernDem on March 16, 2007 at 9:19 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sorry if that offends you, but that is the &quot;modern&quot; democratic party. Look what moveon.org is up to, read the other thread about the prof. and his 10 points.  These are not isolated instances.  This is the modern Democratic party.  When Moveon.org say they own you (the generic you), they prove it by intimidating your people to pull out of a debate.  Rosie is revered by the Hollywood left, and if you don&#039;t think they influence, look at where the first high profile fund raisers were held.  And the room is full of Rosies, Arkin&#039;s, Baldwin&#039;s, Penn&#039;s, etc., etc.  They believe this and the Democratic leaders do not distance themeselves.  You saying you don&#039;t believe, means very little, you support the leaders that support these wackos.  You can&#039;t have a &quot;get out of the party&quot; card for saying Rosie is a whack job.  She, and the movers that are pushing your party, accept and embrace her.
You and many others are caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.  You are afraid to walk away from a party that you once knew and embraced, yet you can&#039;t be associated with the Democrats and be taken seriously.
As one of your illustrious leaders used to say &quot;I feel your pain&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>SouthernDem on March 16, 2007 at 9:19 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry if that offends you, but that is the &#8220;modern&#8221; democratic party. Look what moveon.org is up to, read the other thread about the prof. and his 10 points.  These are not isolated instances.  This is the modern Democratic party.  When Moveon.org say they own you (the generic you), they prove it by intimidating your people to pull out of a debate.  Rosie is revered by the Hollywood left, and if you don&#8217;t think they influence, look at where the first high profile fund raisers were held.  And the room is full of Rosies, Arkin&#8217;s, Baldwin&#8217;s, Penn&#8217;s, etc., etc.  They believe this and the Democratic leaders do not distance themeselves.  You saying you don&#8217;t believe, means very little, you support the leaders that support these wackos.  You can&#8217;t have a &#8220;get out of the party&#8221; card for saying Rosie is a whack job.  She, and the movers that are pushing your party, accept and embrace her.<br />
You and many others are caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.  You are afraid to walk away from a party that you once knew and embraced, yet you can&#8217;t be associated with the Democrats and be taken seriously.<br />
As one of your illustrious leaders used to say &#8220;I feel your pain&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viewtifulgare</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305895</link>
		<dc:creator>Viewtifulgare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305895</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t know what to say...after hearing that argument, who could possibly still be in doubt that Bush blew up the towers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t know what to say&#8230;after hearing that argument, who could possibly still be in doubt that Bush blew up the towers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxforce91</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305889</link>
		<dc:creator>foxforce91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305889</guid>
		<description>I appreciate Rosie because she&#039;s just saying what everyone on the left believes - correction: wants to believe. Because if they actually believed that their government did this then they would be too afraid to speak out in public about it and - if they had a modicum of intelligence - they would pack their bags and head for Canada or somewhere they could get asylum. Wouldn&#039;t it be supremely stupid, (if this were even a viable theory,) to stay in a country where the government was out to KILL you? It&#039;s like I tell my goofball friends who &quot;love&quot; Noam Chomsky; if he hates capitalism and he hates the US - why is he here selling books? Does that make any sense to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate Rosie because she&#8217;s just saying what everyone on the left believes &#8211; correction: wants to believe. Because if they actually believed that their government did this then they would be too afraid to speak out in public about it and &#8211; if they had a modicum of intelligence &#8211; they would pack their bags and head for Canada or somewhere they could get asylum. Wouldn&#8217;t it be supremely stupid, (if this were even a viable theory,) to stay in a country where the government was out to KILL you? It&#8217;s like I tell my goofball friends who &#8220;love&#8221; Noam Chomsky; if he hates capitalism and he hates the US &#8211; why is he here selling books? Does that make any sense to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertCSampson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305803</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertCSampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305803</guid>
		<description>Only 1 question is necessary in debunking these Bush bombed the WTC retards.  &quot;What were the planes for?&quot;  No Really, What were the planes for then?  Bush could have blown up the WTC without any planes.  I mean why bother making it so elaborate when you could have just planted some explosives and blamed whomever anyhow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 1 question is necessary in debunking these Bush bombed the WTC retards.  &#8220;What were the planes for?&#8221;  No Really, What were the planes for then?  Bush could have blown up the WTC without any planes.  I mean why bother making it so elaborate when you could have just planted some explosives and blamed whomever anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: budorob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305739</link>
		<dc:creator>budorob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305739</guid>
		<description>It is telling that yesterday she defends a terrorist, and today shines the light on the 9/11 conspiracy. 

Simple test...25% of the population is retarded. There are 4 panelists on The View and Rosie is retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is telling that yesterday she defends a terrorist, and today shines the light on the 9/11 conspiracy. </p>
<p>Simple test&#8230;25% of the population is retarded. There are 4 panelists on The View and Rosie is retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Candy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305617</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305617</guid>
		<description>E.M. We can only hope that&#039;s true, she&#039;ll never make it on her own unless she gets a job at MSNBC and goes even further than Keith Olbermann.  Daytime talk would eat her alive, she&#039;d never get the solid ratings needed, she&#039;d get spikes for her crazed ranting until it got old and no one watched anymore.


Gregor, got a problem?  You seem to be at odds with the HA staff quite a bit...

Anyway, my guess is use of slurs is what set off the mods.  I could be wrong and if I violated policy, my apologies, I signed up during the first open signup, and haven&#039;t bothered to examine the ruleboard since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E.M. We can only hope that&#8217;s true, she&#8217;ll never make it on her own unless she gets a job at MSNBC and goes even further than Keith Olbermann.  Daytime talk would eat her alive, she&#8217;d never get the solid ratings needed, she&#8217;d get spikes for her crazed ranting until it got old and no one watched anymore.</p>
<p>Gregor, got a problem?  You seem to be at odds with the HA staff quite a bit&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, my guess is use of slurs is what set off the mods.  I could be wrong and if I violated policy, my apologies, I signed up during the first open signup, and haven&#8217;t bothered to examine the ruleboard since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Princess</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305611</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Princess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305611</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Big Picture, Rosie...&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;re not sure how George W. Bush gets away with all of these complex conspiracies--being a mildly retarded chip and all--but if he and his devious, fascist administration really did engage in a massive and complex conspiracy to down WTC......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Big Picture, Rosie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;re not sure how George W. Bush gets away with all of these complex conspiracies&#8211;being a mildly retarded chip and all&#8211;but if he and his devious, fascist administration really did engage in a massive and complex conspiracy to down WTC&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naliaka</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305605</link>
		<dc:creator>naliaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305605</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Enough already with the all Rosie, all the time blog. 
honora on March 16, 2007 at 9:39 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
In complete, 100%  agreement.  How about that? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Enough already with the all Rosie, all the time blog.<br />
honora on March 16, 2007 at 9:39 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>In complete, 100%  agreement.  How about that? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honora</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/comment-page-1/#comment-305584</link>
		<dc:creator>honora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/15/rosie-odonnell-911-truther/#comment-305584</guid>
		<description>Enough already with the all Rosie, all the time blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough already with the all Rosie, all the time blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
