Comments on: Cavemen liked big butts and archaeologists cannot lie

By: honora

honora — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:39:54 +0000

Having the unquestioned moral authority to comment, I

believe the fact that the carvings were missing heads is strongly indicative of the fact that this was a religious (yes cavemen were religious) act seeking the god’s assistance in shutting them up!!!!!

Oh am I gonna get hate mail over that one.

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on March 12, 2007 at 11:15 AM

And all for nought!!!

Cue Henry Higgins “Let a Woman in Your Life”

By: Labamigo

Labamigo — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:34:49 +0000

Maybe Rosie O’Donnell could’ve attracted a man back then.

By: Dread Pirate Roberts VI

Dread Pirate Roberts VI — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:15:25 +0000

Having the unquestioned moral authority to comment, I believe the fact that the carvings were missing heads is strongly indicative of the fact that this was a religious (yes cavemen were religious) act seeking the god’s assistance in shutting them up!!!!!

Oh am I gonna get hate mail over that one.

By: Valiant

Valiant — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:58:05 +0000

Hey! They finally buried James Brown. It was in you exit tangent link.

By: Blacklake

Blacklake — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:43:14 +0000

They depict the profile of women minus their heads – strongly suggesting that cavemen were more interested in the shape of the body than the way a female looked.

Or maybe they did care, but all the cavewomen were ugly.

By: honora

honora — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:26:45 +0000

So when are we going to hear the caveman remix of “Baby Got Back”?

thirteen28 on March 12, 2007 at 9:46 AM

I was going to suggest you’re too hip for the room, but perhaps it’s just that you’re too hip for me!

By: thirteen28

thirteen28 — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:46:11 +0000

So when are we going to hear the caveman remix of “Baby Got Back”?

By: honora

honora — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:20:02 +0000

Coming next: the interpretive dance featuring a song by Tool and a fishbowl full of pasta.

It’s all symbolic ‘n stuff.

Where’s my grant?

TABoLK on March 11, 2007 at 10:59 PM

American Idol perhaps?

By: honora

honora — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:18:37 +0000

What’s with these women with no hips? They want boobs the size of Kansas but no hips. It’s not a sound architectural decision.

Coronagold on March 12, 2007 at 9:08 AM

Large breasts are an adolescent boy’s prime fantasy. So what does this say about our culture? And you’re right, slender hips and huge knockers completely shifts the center of gravity, and that can’t be good….

By: Coronagold

Coronagold — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:08:20 +0000

What’s with these women with no hips? They want boobs the size of Kansas but no hips. It’s not a sound architectural decision.

By: Tony737

Tony737 — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:05:54 +0000

mmmmm biggggg buttssssss

From “Scrubs” …

J.D.: “I need some advice, I um, have a date with a black woman and uh, I was just wondering …”

Turk: “Look,the only difference between a white woman and a black woman is that when a black woman says ‘Does this make my butt look big?’ you say ‘HELL YES!’”

By: dinasour

dinasour — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:53:36 +0000

It may actually be worse than that.

One of the reasons used to explain why human females have such enlarged breasts, is that when proto-humans started walking upright, the butt was less prominant, so the curvy parts moved upward.

By: right2bright

right2bright — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:56:42 +0000

I think all of you are missing the really important news. In 2080 we are going to have another “world hunger”. This would be about a dozen in the past couple of decades of a major starvation of the human poopulation (I misspelled it, but it looks right for this rant). When are we going to learn, we just can’t continue starving the world every couple of years.
Please, show some compassion.

By: csdeven

csdeven — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:34:23 +0000

A respectable big ass is one that you can put your drink on while the gal is standing up. Like a shelf. An ass that could break walnuts for you too.

Rosie’s ass is nothing but a huge depository for gravy. She can’t get inoculations because her ass would pop like a zit with gravy spewing all over the place.

By: EricPWJohnson

EricPWJohnson — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:30:59 +0000

The problem with Rosies butt is that it rests on her shoulders

By: JackM

JackM — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:15:59 +0000

Maybe the dude was just painting a pic of a fat chick.

By: laelaps

laelaps — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:29:04 +0000

Forget Rosie, and think J.Lo. Now that's a respectable butt. Contrary to some anti-evolutionists here ("There were no cavemen"), I'd include a depiction of her head on my stone wall. It's so pretty!

By: CyberCipher

CyberCipher — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:01:17 +0000

Try to imagine what would happen to the caveman that drew his mate or love interest on a cave wall, complete with a head and face that was clearly recognizable by others, accompanied by a larger than life derriere. NOW is it clear why the drawings appeared without heads? Sheesh! We have to explain everything to these nimnuls — and they call themselves “scientists.”

By: CyberCipher

CyberCipher — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:50:33 +0000

So like next, you’re going to tell me that this is why Rosie was cast in the role of Betty Rubble, right?

By: Mark V.

Mark V. — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:41:59 +0000

A show for Rosie herself. Can’t believe they haven’t thought of that before.

By: R D

R D — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:10:06 +0000

They depict the profile of women minus their heads – strongly suggesting that cavemen were more interested in the shape of the body than the way a female looked.

And just how is that different from “modern” man? Oops…un PC?

By: R D

R D — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:05:19 +0000

Allah really has a thing for Rosie. Get help dude! As for most other Big Butted women, at least you can tell their ass from their mouth.

By: Theworldisnotenough

Theworldisnotenough — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:46:43 +0000

Exit question tangent: I’ve got nowhere else to put this, so here you go. Despair.

But that’s free material Allah? The world would be weird without moonbat liberals. Then what would conservatives be?

By: jic

jic — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:14:33 +0000

Not only (as yo has already pointed out) are these statues old news, but it’s downright stupid to assume that the represent an ideal of the female form. The evidence found so far suggests that these statues were ritual fertility symbols, not caveman porn.

By: TABoLK

TABoLK — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:01:35 +0000

Hmphf.
My poetry featured the goofy spacing that proper polemic art should have. But the petit-bourgeoise tastes of the comment system has stripped my prentious art of its impact.

For this I blame Bush.